Many people including myself have had their right to post on the ADVFN BB removed in recent days for nothing more than rubbishing the outrageous claim of what PDX are about to do. The information if true has to be illegal as it is not in the pubic domain.
ADVFN seems to be supporting the poster who are making these outrageous claims and i can therfore only assume they are also incolved in the pump and dump.
The FSA have been informed!!

Very interesting


I bought PDX lol


I also wrote a reasoned piece on why the AFN market capitalision at 6 times annual turnover did not make a lot of sense and it simply never made it to the bulletin board.

Ghostman,

LOL!

I think you will find that the information IS in the public domain, if you know where to look that is!

Otherwise, go visit the company, like I did.

The PDX unit is revolutionary and innovative, and will be a winner if they are able to commercialise it, IMHO.

sorry we dont all have access to the companies directors, so the information is not in the pub domain.
This is a classic ramp buy the people who have a rep for doing it many times before to many companies that are now broke!!

Ghostman, name names.

You come on here ranting on about "people who have a rep for doing it many times before to many companies that are now broke!!" and your sly insinuation is that I have been involved in such shenanigans. Which is complete bollocks. Are you trying to tar me with the brush you and hoot used years ago?

In the meantime you've spent years ramping Recall and you choose to swim with the likes of Ashley James. In fact, you're 'thick as thieves' with him. How apt.

I bought PDX a while back after taking a look at the company web site: http://www.pursuitdynamics.com/default.asp and was impressed with what I saw.

But as soon as I made a profit I sold.

What I don't understand is why they don't actually manufacture & market the product they say they have developed themselves. My understanding is they have this wonderful system which has a multiple of uses (& huge potential markets), but they are still looking for someone else to manufacture & market it for them - I think this is the problem. If I was a interested manufacturer, I would wait until the company went bust, and buy the system from the liquidator for next to nothing, and not have to pay a royalty.

PDX needs to take it on themselves initially and manufacture & market the products and when the order book gets to large for them to cope with, then look for someone else to handle the expansion and take it on.

Gausie
How wrong you are, I do not know Ashley James, I met him very breifly once years ago and have no contact with him.
I am disgusted at the treatment many people have recieved by ADVFN and as for you know who, he deserves everything he has coming his way ;-)))

Crap company with no prospect. Simple, just a pump (pun)and dump like all those mining stocks and Lloyds Insurance companies. Short the a*se out of it

pommy
pump and dump has to be better than pump and forget to dump?
iam pumping to 5 and then dumping
DS

Make sure you don't wait too long to dump - if you read the auditors report in the interim results they mention that the company at the time had only enough money to keep them going a year. The directors believe that during that time they would obtain contracts OR WOULD (more likely) RAISE MORE FINANCE. I wonder what that'll do to the share price!

They have raised finance, and the companies brokers exercised opions to give the co more money. That dont sound healthy.
Now they have to market the product which aint gonna gome free. never seem a person marketing shit for free.
Some people are gonna get badly hurt on this stock.
The funnies thing is the main ramper told some heavy hittes were coming in on friday morning and hey did arrive and the shares went up. But someone has had a sniffa round and the shares were all bought on margin!!!
Very dangerous when you start believing your own lies and trying to finance it thru margin!!! OUCH!!!!!

SAD TOSSER

The last time I saw a load of hot air going through a pump and into water I was sat in the bath - the curry the night before was amazing. You'll have to be Ffaster off the mark if you want to catch the next upward moving share. This aint it. Sounds like a wonderful shorting opportunity.

Ghostman,

I have removed your last post as it contained words that some people may have found offensive.

Ian

I was only describing ADVFN as a bunch of C--ts, which we all know they are....and the rest?!!!! (BTW sorry for having 2 IDs, it took you ages to remind me of my password to my normal one!!!)


Gausie has now found it necessary to start post peoples names on ADVFN.
Thats ADVFN for you, bunch of c--ts who have banned over 20 posters this last week for pointuingout the truth about PDX.

I am baffled by all this from you on these bulletin boards.

Your ranting is not helping your arguement - indeed it is damaging your case.

If you don't want to invest in this stock surely, the thing to do, is to state your case, coherently and logically, supported by facts and then leave others to their fate.

I would be very grateful if you would tell me, in clearand considered terms just what you think is the problem with investing in PDX and then leave me to decide what to do.

Unfortunately despite ****** and ******* claims I havent been ranting.
They just got a bit upset when I pointed out Evil K had sold 100k PDX and had put his money into Corac. Contrary to their bizarre claims i have not posted heaps of things under multiple names and spent most of yesterday (******) found it necessary to start posting my real name on ADVFN) watching football with friends and not anywhere near a computer.
The sad truth is they are using all the method they can to pump up this stock, which is very much a jam tomorow story.
If they know anymore about PDX than me, they are insider trading , and I believe someone has already made a complaint to the FSA about them (no not me before ******* gets all snooty).
We've all seen ******** do this before and hardly a single promise delivered.
I am very uncomfortbale abour ******** relationship with this company and also with Ron Trenter (see first PDX RNS) who was also a director of Oasis Healthcare a company ********* tried to get all his 'mates' into.

Ive had a good load of money out of this ramp and still have a few shares left in for fre.
But I object to being attacked for pointing out something that is public domain information, but might not be in ******** or ******* interests.

I hope they dont make too many Margin buys to convince the sheep there are still big punters buyers. I have no idea where PDX are going and I care very little. As I said Ive had my money and have a free ride on a few more. Its the attacks that piss me off!!.

PS I would also like to add i hardly know Ashley James so if he has an axe to grind with ******** and ******* thats their business and nothing to do with me!!

If it's so easy to make with no moving parts any small engineering company could make this.
They should have prototypes zipping up and down the Thames by now.
Smells a bit fishy to me.

Well, I don't know about the rights and wrongs of all this but I do know that you would get a better hearing if you moderated your language.

You are simply undermining your own case and bring discredit to yourself.

A sound arguement presented in temperate language, however frustrated you are, will tend to do better for you.

About PDX.

It seems like a reasonable , if speculative, investment to me. People mught be wise though not to commit too much to this one business.

******, another ID, you must make up most of the investment BBs between yourself and ******. Do you also go around threatening people when you investments go sour?

You are right jfw.

I've been caught out in the past with a company like this one. I bought because they had a excellent product, and promises of future deals, & expansion. Unfortunetley the companies that were supposed to do the deals with, did nothing and waited until eventually theBankers pulled the plug. Then they got the bits they wanted form the liquidators for next to nothing (I know because I'm still getting dividend payments from the proceeds a couple of years later - but I've lost most of my original investment.)

Yes buy in, but don't stay in too long - get out as soon as you are in profit, and certainly don't risk anymore than you are prepared to lose. This is a share that it is too easy to be "greedy" with the profits.

If this company makes the big time, you can re-invest then. I think some of the comments are because many people realise that it is not a sure thing that this company is going to succeed and being "good friends" they are trying to make others aware of the risks. (Is this too nice a way of saying it!)

Pommy,

I have edited your posts with regard to using posters real names on this Bulletin Board without prior permission.

Please refrain from doing this.

I have no sway over what gets posted on our competitors sites, but our policy is not to allow this.

Regards

Ian

Pommy,

In truth you spammed CORAC all over the PDX thread for a couple of days, and then you joined Ashley James (funny you should mention him btw!) in trashing the PDX thread, using multiple aliases.

If you have a problem with Darrel, maybe you should settle it off the BB's, rather than try to scare investors out of a compnay they are already happily inmvested in? This is a long running personal dispute you have with him if i Recall correctly!

Ashley, as you know, has a vendetta running against Gausie, so is hardly posting coherent balanced opinions regarding PDX, even you must be able to see that.

To have Ashley as an ally does you no credit whatsoever, and a good many people probably post here because his posts caused them to leave ADVFN!

Interstingly, Ashley also mentioned they bought on margin, but you've already pointed out "you hardly know him", haven't you?

Come on mate, give us all a break, and take your dispute up with Hoots directly.

little woman,

Don't even go there, this is all personal, and nothing to do with PPX!

There are two camps here, and the rest of us holders are caught in the middle.

i believe PDX technology will prove to be a winner, but I am also aware it could all end in tears, and am comfortable with the risk.

Your points are indded pertinent to any up and coming tech share, but this isn't about that!

Andy

Blimmey, anyone who is investing knows the risks and should do their own research before they commit funds. Just lets have normal banter on here and make your own minds up. I dont want to watch other peoples disputes on these boards...... I come on here to check out other peoples views on stocks not to watch personal attacks.....

adieh,

Well said, and I agree totally.
Unfortunately other people have different agendas!

FWIW I beieve that PDX, although risky, offers a superb opportunity for a very good return on our investment.

The potential is huge, but the risk is they can't commercialise the potential they already have. I believe they will.

I visited PDX at Royston two weeks ago, and was very impressed with the PDX processing device. They are still finding new applications, and there are one or two that offer enormous potential, including a firefighting solution that, if proved, would enable the fire brigade to have smaller and lighter engines and tenders.

I'm happy holding, nad hope to see at least a couple of deals by Xmas.

Andy & AdieH, I agree with you both - but I was trying to show how easy it is to be objective about a share and not personal. (I sometime wonder if some of the posters know how to do this).

We all can do research, and hopefully know the risks - but if people to post on the board objectively, they should be able to post negative things about the company as well as the positive - so others can make up thier own mind.

I'm going to stay out of this one in future......

little woman.

Yes, positives and negatives are indeed welcome and are what a BB should be about, IMHO, discussion and balance!

That's what I come here for, I don't mind if others don't like my stock, and if their points are good, and made in a constructive manner, I may reconsider my stance.

I invest to make money, and If. i'm wrong, it's cheaper to sell and move onto the next stock.

Andy
So many posts so little meat.

you know so little.

Ashley is not an ally. I met him once 3 years ago and have had no contact with him at all. so there!!! na na ner na na.

I didn not spam CORAC all over the PDX thread, i merely mentioned EK had sold some PDX and put his money into Corac, and gave a biref synopsis as to why they were a better bet and the similarities of the tw o companies. It was only after I was attacked by Hoot for doing so that I continued to tell why it was a safer bet than PDX.

You cant see the truth for the mist thats still in your eyes from the Royston visit.

There was no fallout by me after the Recall affair. It was Hoot that made threats against me, other directors and his own offshore accountant and demanded 25,000 pounds back that he had invested. I had far more than him invested, but i do my blaming in the mirror. Hoot doesnt have a mirror coz hes so effing ugly they keep braking, so he has to turn to other people to blame. As Recall went up he took plenty of pleasure in reminding me that it was him who 'discovered' them. It was a very different story later on. As Im sure people will find out if it goes tits up with PDX.
Him, Gausie, and a few mates are keeping PDX up with their margin buys on an illiquid stock. But it cant last for ever. Even if the do some deals the current price will be lucky yo be maintained on sheer fundamentals alone. And eventually it will be another manufacturing stock with a low PE anyway.
Havent you ever noticed hes never arround to give you a trade by trade commentary on down days, with all his promises and winks!!

BUYERS BEWARE!!!!

As for being able to post negative things about a stock. Its pretty bloody obvious its not allowed. If I am a deramper for posting concerns about the valuation of PDX, then Im sure you can work out what that makes the poster of more winks than a man with a squnit in bright sunlight!!!

BTW another poster banned this morning from ADVFN. As far as I know he did nothing than post a few negs about PDX.

Whats that all about???????

Pommy,

With regards to Ashley, you both appear to be employing the same tactics, and delivering a similar message, so perhaps that's why people are drawing the conclusion you are acting in concert?

Sorry but you DID spam CORAC over the PDX thread, I even asked you to at the time to post on the Corac thread, and even went there as I was prepared to listen to your reasons, but not on the PDX thread.

I'm not sure what "mist" is in front of my eyes since the Royston visit, apart from the steam the PDX unit produced that is! I enjoyed the visit, thought the demostration was impressive, and the unit did what they said it could do.

I really don't know about what occurred with Recall, although I did know the company name because I have seen it mentioned before. To be honest, that's in your joint pasts, and I really do think you need to get together to sort it out, rather than spoil the PDX thread on BB's. other holders such as myself had nothing to do with this.

I think the unit offers potential clients an opportunity to save substantial costs, and if they can sign some significant commercial deals, I epxect the royalty payments to be reasonably substantial, as they can offer very significant cost and space savings, as well as enabling continuous rather than batch processing.

As a growth company, valuations are difficult, it's what someone else is prepared to buy the share for surely? Once the growth slows, I agree, fundementals will come into play. To quote the NAV, and keep on repeating it as Ashley does, is ridiculous, and even he knows it!

You are right to advise caution, it IS a high risk share, but there's also the chance of a substantial reward, IMHO. I personally am happy with that, and I'm happy to wait and see how PDX progress.

If no deals are signed before Xmas, I would probably start to become a little concerned.

pommy,

What was the logon id?

Considering NAV isnt riddicuous. It the tangible thing you are buying and its diminishing by he day. The rest is a dream. And if you want to see dreams go back to 1999, the dreams fot hat year are still being unravveled int he courts and sitting in peoples sock draws. Without the pumping on ADVFN PDX shares would still be 30p and the dream would be 1/4 the price. Anyone buying this dream at over a quid is crazy.
If I was a big company looking to do business with them, i would let them go bust and by the technology from the reciver.
If i was a director of the company with only 30% , I would let the co go bust and buy it from the reciever and have 100% of it.

There is something unhealthy about the closeness of certain posters on ADVFn and the company. I can recognise it becuase Ive been there, and there was certainly something very unhealthy about the Recall situation although I didnt realise it at the time!!!!

dunno the ID, cant get on to to see, just got a msg from someone I know who went on there , he said he didnt even post anything today, just added the thread as a favourite and put PDX into a monitor!!! i think it may have been the same bloke who started the pommy is Dead thread!!!

Gianni
Someone has set up a site that covers a number of the FAQs on PDX,
May answer some of your questions but remember it is promoting the Bull case for PDX so should be read in that light.
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx/index.html

Pommy
You have every right to post a negative view of PDX and people should be aware that this is blue sky stuff and not for widows and orphans. I have tried to keep out of the personal stuff and would respectfully suggest you do so here it will only end up going the same way as ADVFN as I doubt MAM will let you keep the feud going here for that long.
Regards
M

Pommy,

When Microsoft first started out, surely their NAV was also low, but they had a product they were able to licence worldwide, and that NAV grew?

I am NOT comparing PDX to MSFT, just making a point that, as the unit has just come into production, and they are currently negotiating deals, and therefore the NAV will be low. I accept this is part of the risk of owning PDX, but believe the market is there to support it once commercial deals are signed.

I also accept I could be totally wrong.

As they have stated they have funds until Dec 2004, and I expect deals before then, I don't think going bust is an option. If no deals by say, June, that view would be different.

J.Heathcote can probably make a healthy nest egg without going down the route you suggest.

Remember: the share started moving after Durlacher distributed about 9 million to their clients at 29p, back in June. Only about 2 million of those were new. Durlacher were subsequently (25th Sept) appointed the company broker replacing Numis. Numis has been exercising 50p options which it was granted.

I was on the visit too and had the pleasure of meeting Andy, various other investors including one or two with industry knowledge who came across as totally genuine, and Hoot and Gausie (who I also owe a lift to).

Some key statements made by CEO Johnny Heathcote in his presentation

* He holds 32% of the shares
* The cash burn is 80-90k/month
* Operations are funded to end 2004
* He expects 2 or 3 revenue producing deals by the end of this year

Two broker representatives were present. The foregoing statements IMHO confirm the position laid out in company results and RNS's, including the expectation of deals in the "not too distant future" referred to in the interims.

Regarding the commercial strategy: this company is targeting a huge, diverse and highly specialised and differentiated marketplace just in the food industries, let alone wastewater, oil and gas, marine propulsion, nuclear, paper recycling, brewing and others. Most of these have the potential to apply not one, but several variants of PDX. The actual manufacture is easy (I can well believe having held one in my hands). It's just a tube with some flanges, inlets, manifolds and whatever.

What PDX owns and has to capitalise on is the knowledge of how to configure it e.g. steam pressure, air entraining, nozzle geometry. This is knowledge they have systematically developed by research at Cranwell and subsequently, and is enshrined in the grey matter of a very small number of people plus modelling software. (And is fully IP protected).

Can't advise potential buyers. If it was me and I liked the story I would take a small pos. and look to add as long as it was on track. As I actually bought my holding at 34.5p, I had the luxury of topslicing a bit and keeping the rest as an indefinite hold.

Anyway the first real deal is crucial. Johnny has set up expectations that way. I would be a bit lenient on timing, myself.

Martini - thanks for linking to my FAQ site.

Happy to put a coherent bear case up there too, as soon as I see it. I've tried to include caveats, warnings about it being a purely speculative stock, the phrase "jam tomorrow" crops up, and I've tried to make it balanced.

Above all, I've tried to keep the content calm & rational - if you think that there's something there that's not justified, just let me know.

And - what's this thread over on the traders' board about "first deal done"?

Le Petit Fou

Please remember this didnt all start because I was posting negatively about PDX, but that i was pointing out that EK (who Hoot reminded us so many times (37 times a day on avergae) was long on PDX) had sold some to invest in CRA.
CRA, a company i have nothing to do with other than owning a few shares, who have a similar profile, tonnes more money in the bank, and are alredy working with Weir(pumps) and Shell Oil company. The havent been pumped on the BBs, mainly because there isnt someone going looking for tenous links. They have people planting articles and tips in papers and mags(which is oh so easy to do if you know how). They dont have broker with a line of stock to get rid of, writing outrageous valuation documents. They dont have next door neighbours of directors reporting minute by minute on each and every trade.
They have some IP that has comeout of one of the top enginerring Unis in the country, it has interested a couple of very large companies in their field, and more than enough cash to bring it to market.
If soeone had posted.
"its interesting to see EK diversify into another similar IP based comapny with a load of cash behind it, i think we should look at that as well, aas theres proably something in it expecially with the cash pile that PDX dont have" instead of immediately slagging me off as a shorter or a deramper we wouldnt be here!!

pommy,

Ashley's comments about EK "dumping PDX" didn't help, and that started the battle, IMHO.

As you rightly say, EK did indeed sell 100,000 (if I remember correctly) of a 250,000 holding, so hardly a "dump", more a trade, IMHO.

Sadly nobody, incuding yourself on the day, did post something like that, and in hindsight it would have been better.

it was actually 100k of 600k, and if you look back I did say that!!

Bottom line is Hoot cant afford for this to fail and anyone who so much as mentions anything that might make on eof his sheep to think again is fair game for attack, in particular me who he blames for him losing money in Recall when the blame lies with his own greediness!!

pommy,

thanks for the correct figures, and 100,000 from 600,000 is definately a trade and not a dump, IMHO.

I really don't know about the recall situation, you and Hoot need to discuss that in private I think, and try and resolve your differences.

Despite Ashley's "shorting" today, the price has held up, so maybe it will climb back towards it's highs?

i'm not sure I buy the margin story, it originates from Ashley.

FWIW, all my PDX are bought and paid for. A lot of them are through the Halifax which is where I keep about a third of my long term investments. I've never bought any PDX on margin. It makes me laugh every time Pommy & Ash go on about high gearing, margin trading etc. I believe Hoot is in a similar position.

Pommy, if you're reading this, you can click on my name on the PBB here and send me a private message. I can't find your contact details, but think a chat might make sense. Particularly after a one all draw this weekend ;0)

Gausie

OK Folks. I am going to set up a new thread just for people who want to argue all day.

You are just getting boring now.

Your new room is ready for you.

Would you be kind enough to take yourself off there.

"take yourself off there"

what the hell are you requesting people do?

This place is just getting cluttered up with endless childish arguements

Yeah I agree can we just have some constructive comments on this board as we
dont want to be party to your childish disagreements. Someone sort this place out pls......

Go on Children - run along to your play pen.

And its just that british attitude towards children that makes adults like you lot!!!! tut tut!!!!

Gentlemen and of Course Lady investors, -- What a lot of steam on all these PDX threads, but to what avail ? whatever view you have and whichever position you hold Long or short, the overall winner has been the MM. He will run you ragged at will -- Long or short in the absence of any news and at will. I would hope that on so little volume and the relatively small number of trades, this would not be possible. But it is at the moment, maybe the increase in SETS trading in NOV. May make transctions more transparent for those equities.

Please dont lets debate that as well.

BUT why not whichever side you are on stop posting until this weekend on all the PDX threads on Moneyam and the other side. Let the markets and the mm's take their course--- otherwise whether LOng or Short you are playing to their Gallery. They love it and will walk all of you up and down at will.
You at the moment are the total losers.

Blimey . the thought police are out in force at the other place !!!

The following post was automaticallly zapped ????


What`s happened to Pommy ?


How can we be expected to engage in meaningless , provocative and abusive footy posts when our numbers are being culled in this way .

One can understand that it might be considered justified to ban supporters of arse for that very reason alone and it is hard to argue with the view that Pommy is a particularly provocative and abusive arse , but can we not show tolerance ??

Someone has to support the arse or else we would have no one to laugh at ;-))

long time since the manshites scored 10 goals in a match :-))

provocative and abusive

Ummm, i quite like that.


Pommy the new fragrance from Terrace Cosmetics - provocative and abusive !!

I think Im onto a winner there, whats the ascii code for that trademark symbol?

Pommy, I don't know why you were banned. I didn't consider what you poted on the PDX thread enough to ban you.

Anyway, I've been trying to find you. I wanted to chat (not about PDX).

About horse racing, the RACE thread is dead without you. If you want to get in touch.........Mr_Homer_J_Simpson@hotmail.com

Cheers,
HJS.

Will be back in Holland tomorrow and will email, been at the most incredible football match , no not the Arsenal game but this one...


Monaco 8 Deportivo 3


Incredible!!!!

Pommy,

A couple of weeks ago I took a young lad from London down to watch his first ever football match, and it finished Bournemouth 6 Luton 3, not bad eh?

Monaco game sounds unbelieveable!

Pommy, you missed my winner today......

Are you still able to read threads on ADVFN (either through you old account or any new ones).

If not, no worries. Will catch up with you on E-mail.

Cheers,
HJS.

Oh no you wont Homer. More accounts banned by ADVFN for doubting the HOOT ramp. Mostly down to the likes of you and your "ramping" crew.

Its a disgusting practice that anyone who tries to talk the froth off the top off PDX gets banned and yet HOOT gets away with telling people specifics of the companies accounts a month in advance of their publication.

I wonder is ADVFN inform their advertisers that a load of their so-called users are actually dormant accounts because theyve been banned.

Time foe ADVFN to own up to the nmuber of real users they have, and to purge the multiple accounts of posters like HOOT and discount all the banned ones.

At last count there were only 15 active users of ADVFN. I dont see why advertisers are paying them anything!

Pommy,

You appear very sad, bitter and twisted mate, but instead of ruining the BB's with what amounts to a personal grudge, why don't you address the problem you have with the person concerned face to face?

It would be a whole lot less boring for the rest of us, particularly as we'd never heard of Recall until you mentioned them!

And as for ADVFN "Only" having 15 active users, that wouldn't cover Les kinch's logons. never mind Ashley James', and you yourself seem to have a few, so that number looks to be a little on the conservative side!

so why am i laughing then :-))

i have no personal grudge, but I know a man who does, hence the threats of violence i regularly receive becuase he did his arse on recall. i lost money on recall and took it with good grace, i didnt feel the need to go round making threats and blaming everyone else!!

As i said, count each multiple user singularly and suddenly their user base diminshes rapidly!!! How many posters on PDX do you thin share an IP address with the shepherd?

Pommy,

No idea, but I only have one logon!

i still say that you need to sort out your problems with him directly, because your grudge match is ruining all the threads that you are both associated with, and that's hardly fair on the rest of us!

And as for PDX being "ramped", there are hardly any PX related posts on here, and virtually none on SP and Financebb, so it can hardly be descibed as a "ramp" IMHO.

So a ramp has to be on multipple BBs?

And continual promises of events that would imply the poster has insider knowledge which in itself is illegal does not consitute a ramp?


interesting view!!

Can we please get back to constructive dialogue, we dont really want to view these comments lets just enjoy this company (profits or losses)......

>Pommy - chill mate even if you are a gooner ;-)
>Andy - you know my views and nothing has changed - don't have a position just did the research and this one ain't worth 50 million - might be but long way to go yet. Won't short it but I'd say buyers beware.

Pommy,

the people you refer to hardly post anymore, and there are plenty of nudge nudge wink wink type psts all over ADVFN!

Les kinch has done it on MMD for years, and nobody complained, for example.


Adieh,

I agree.


Gianni,

Each to his own. and yes fundementally PDX are not worth the current 44 million market cap, there is some considerable hope already in the price, and time will tell if it's justified or not.

I think it will be, and therefore hold.

Andy, good point, i'm with you holding and have increased holding I believe in the technology and obviously so do the trialists (whoever they are) so sticking in with fingers crossed for positive news soon.

This share has more bounce than a football in an international. Quite scary. Anybody know why?
Thanks in advance

Bit of a drop today but there's been strong support at 102p recently and we're still just above the trend line which started forming in mid-August. I'm more concerned by the resistance at around 130p which has been tested twice now. We need some strong news to break through that, I think.

Development Update
http://www.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200312110700231226T.html

Any news on the 90 day trial

ADVFN allowing their site to be used for ramping - in fact contrarians get booted off site for expressing opinions about chart down movement.

Do you have an opinion on the chart down movement? PDX seems to be languishing in a range and I suspect it will do so until some real news emerges about contracts.

Basically the price is as a result of tipster promotion so any news will have a dramatic influence one way or the other depending upon the news.

Personally I wouldn't buy it because the risk is too dangerous at this level; though i might reconsider if they actually received a worthwhile order.

It's being ramped by professionals on ADVFN in my opinion because genuine contrarians are kicked off the site.

Moving again, does anyone have any news on this, does someone know something
regarding the cadburys trial!

AdieH

I've posted a reply for you on another thread with a more appropriate title.

Thanks for that.