| Home | Log In | Register | Our Services | My Account | Contact | Help |
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.
Pursuit Dynamics Sign First Deal (PDX)
Gausie
- 03 Feb 2003 08:39
See todays RNS.
Gausie
- 03 Feb 2003 08:39
- 2 of 232
Fabulous news about PDX - can't believe I missed it!
I've been trying to get some more info from the pursuit guys this morning.
So - here's the SP:-
Edmonton is Ontario's main heavy industrial area, about an hour's drive from Toronto. The deal thats been done is for Sonico to buy a small number of units from PDX for testing purposes. PDX engineers will support the deployment and test process, and will bill sonico for time and expenses.
The PDX-3 will be tested in some new 'standing tanks'. The theory is that a single solid state PDX3 unit will replace four traditional components: the pump, the macerator, the agitator and the oxygenator. Each of these traditional components costs more than a single PDX3. Each of these components has a shorter servicing interval than the PDX3. Servicing any of these components requires the standing tank to be shut down.
Should the tests prove succesful, the expectation is that all new water processing plant worldwide will be built with PDX3 technology, and a retrofit program will begin worldwide to replace all existing tanks with the PDX3 version. The cost of retrofitting a PDX3 pump and servicing it for 3 years is expected to be less than the cost of servicing existing technologies for two years.
If these tests prove succesful, in four month's time Pursuit could well be forecasting an initial annual royalty in the region of 25m and growing over 5 years to more than $500m.
The shares currently trade under 40p. Numis have a target of 1.50. Looks like they may have to revise that upwards pretty soon.
Gausie
I've been trying to get some more info from the pursuit guys this morning.
So - here's the SP:-
Edmonton is Ontario's main heavy industrial area, about an hour's drive from Toronto. The deal thats been done is for Sonico to buy a small number of units from PDX for testing purposes. PDX engineers will support the deployment and test process, and will bill sonico for time and expenses.
The PDX-3 will be tested in some new 'standing tanks'. The theory is that a single solid state PDX3 unit will replace four traditional components: the pump, the macerator, the agitator and the oxygenator. Each of these traditional components costs more than a single PDX3. Each of these components has a shorter servicing interval than the PDX3. Servicing any of these components requires the standing tank to be shut down.
Should the tests prove succesful, the expectation is that all new water processing plant worldwide will be built with PDX3 technology, and a retrofit program will begin worldwide to replace all existing tanks with the PDX3 version. The cost of retrofitting a PDX3 pump and servicing it for 3 years is expected to be less than the cost of servicing existing technologies for two years.
If these tests prove succesful, in four month's time Pursuit could well be forecasting an initial annual royalty in the region of 25m and growing over 5 years to more than $500m.
The shares currently trade under 40p. Numis have a target of 1.50. Looks like they may have to revise that upwards pretty soon.
Gausie
Biker
- 03 Feb 2003 09:21
- 3 of 232
Thanks G. I missed it too.
Boyse
- 03 Feb 2003 18:01
- 4 of 232
I bet he has a tattoo PDX
Pommy - 04 Feb 2003 08:15 - 5 of 232
Reminds me of the "Welcome to Jamacia how you enjoyed your stay" tattoo joke!!
So if hes got one i bet its not "Pursuit Dynamics Technology"
So if hes got one i bet its not "Pursuit Dynamics Technology"
Dailos
- 01 Jul 2003 19:29
- 6 of 232
Bought some more of these today.
d.
d.
Martini
- 16 Jul 2003 15:18
- 7 of 232
Where's Gausie when you need him?
Jules
- 16 Jul 2003 15:33
- 8 of 232
Martini
we have steam propulsion:-)
we have steam propulsion:-)
Martini
- 16 Jul 2003 15:48
- 9 of 232
Jules
Another 25p and I can afford lunch with you again :)
M
Another 25p and I can afford lunch with you again :)
M
Jules
- 16 Jul 2003 16:00
- 10 of 232
i'll look forward to it:-))
Martini
- 19 Aug 2003 11:23
- 11 of 232
When is this header going to be updated?
Jules our way to another lunch by the looks of it:)
M
Jules our way to another lunch by the looks of it:)
M
Boyse
- 19 Aug 2003 12:02
- 12 of 232
welcome to the love pump ;-)
Dailos
- 19 Aug 2003 15:19
- 13 of 232
martini
i mailed you a few weeks back asking you to join me, jules and ruth for lunch, no reply?
hope you are well you old git:-)
d.
i mailed you a few weeks back asking you to join me, jules and ruth for lunch, no reply?
hope you are well you old git:-)
d.
MightyMicro
- 19 Aug 2003 15:25
- 14 of 232
Dailos:
If you're short of an old git for lunch, I'm Martini's understudy.
If you're short of an old git for lunch, I'm Martini's understudy.
Dailos
- 19 Aug 2003 15:31
- 15 of 232
MM
sounds good, maybe mid to end sept, i'll be in touch
d.
sounds good, maybe mid to end sept, i'll be in touch
d.
Martini
- 19 Aug 2003 16:01
- 16 of 232
Dailos I replied! Well I thought I had - email me again.
M
Yep still got a copy of my reply it went to
t****2@btconnect.com
M
Yep still got a copy of my reply it went to
t****2@btconnect.com
Dailos
- 19 Aug 2003 19:07
- 17 of 232
Martini
my apologies, you did, i looked for reply in my muppettrader file, didnt even open your mail on t****2 (have many unopened i should read i expect!) sorry once again, if its any consolation, it was a great day, lunch followed by "special treats"):-)
MightyMicro
I meant to say keep it quiet, we dont want any Deddington riff raff there :-)
my apologies, you did, i looked for reply in my muppettrader file, didnt even open your mail on t****2 (have many unopened i should read i expect!) sorry once again, if its any consolation, it was a great day, lunch followed by "special treats"):-)
MightyMicro
I meant to say keep it quiet, we dont want any Deddington riff raff there :-)
Martini
- 19 Aug 2003 19:13
- 18 of 232
Doh! I was looking forward to that.
Martini
- 01 Sep 2003 14:32
- 19 of 232
About time you updated the thread header G :)
M
M
Bullshare
- 01 Sep 2003 16:38
- 20 of 232
Martini; I presume this new deal is with Willy Wonka's Chocolate factory, can't think of another company making chocolate and drinks can you:-)
Martini
- 01 Sep 2003 18:17
- 21 of 232
I knew a girl once who worked in Bournville who drank Run and Coke. Geez Rum and Coke that dates me! I will be getting all nostalgic about brew 11 next !
Paulismyname
- 01 Sep 2003 20:03
- 22 of 232
Have just spoken to Gauise and no doubt he will update the thread - however at this moment in time he is watching Mastermind with a view to passing on a few tips to the producers -:)
Gausie
- 02 Sep 2003 12:04
- 23 of 232
Paul - Was that you on the phone? I didnt realise. You must have phoned me just as I'd dialled 123. Sorry. :-)
Martini - Do you still have Addo's artwork for PDX - a quid by Xmas?
Gausie
Martini - Do you still have Addo's artwork for PDX - a quid by Xmas?
Gausie
Robb - 12 Sep 2003 15:08 - 24 of 232
PDX gone ballistic this afto, wonder if weekend press is coming or leaking news of another trial contract? Not complaining but tempted to take profit and watch for retracement. Still moving fast even as I type.
Martini
- 12 Sep 2003 15:42
- 25 of 232
Robb
Lovely ain't it:)
As you say tempting but so far buy and hold has worked well.
M
Lovely ain't it:)
As you say tempting but so far buy and hold has worked well.
M
Gausie
- 12 Sep 2003 15:45
- 26 of 232
Robb - good luck. Every time I've tried to sell PDX and buy back I've caught a cold.
Robb - 12 Sep 2003 15:50 - 27 of 232
Martini/Gausie
I was tempted when I started typing at 15.00 at 79p bid. By the time I posted it was 83 and now its at 85p. I missed the big boom @end 99/early 2000 but I guess this is what it must have been like - no wonder you old-timers go misty eyed about it :-)
Still holding atm
Regards
Rob
I was tempted when I started typing at 15.00 at 79p bid. By the time I posted it was 83 and now its at 85p. I missed the big boom @end 99/early 2000 but I guess this is what it must have been like - no wonder you old-timers go misty eyed about it :-)
Still holding atm
Regards
Rob
Robb - 12 Sep 2003 16:07 - 28 of 232
Jumped at 84. My first ever double bagger. Thanks to you Gausie for bringing it to my attention in the first place. May regret it but will keep watch closely next week and keep it on the radar in the future.
Regards
Rob
Regards
Rob
Martini
- 12 Sep 2003 16:26
- 29 of 232
Nice timing Robb very close to the intra day high.
Bones
- 12 Sep 2003 18:11
- 30 of 232
Well done Robb. It's a nice feeling eh! I've just doubled with Just Car Clinics (JCR) (reports Monday - hope it don't disappoint). A rarity these days which makes it all the sweeter. We all have some way to go to beat Pinsticker's 6-bagger on LMC :)
Gausie
- 13 Sep 2003 09:57
- 31 of 232
Nice one Robb - you have a target to get back in?
I've only managed to get out then back in cheaper once - let some go at 72p then bought same value back at 65p. The three other times I tried I ended up reducing my holding.
I've only managed to get out then back in cheaper once - let some go at 72p then bought same value back at 65p. The three other times I tried I ended up reducing my holding.
Jules
- 13 Sep 2003 10:21
- 32 of 232
gausie:-(
nice little mention in financial times saying that there is talk of large institutional interest and more agrrements possibly in the pipeline
nice little mention in financial times saying that there is talk of large institutional interest and more agrrements possibly in the pipeline
Gausie
- 15 Sep 2003 08:17
- 33 of 232
a quid by lunchtime?
:o)
:o)
Robb - 15 Sep 2003 08:51 - 34 of 232
Gausie, what were you just saying about not trying to time the shakeouts? I know a profit is a profit but I award myself a big doh!
There's obviously some serious momentum behind them now. The only problem with pdx as I see it is that you have to shorten the timescale on the "Quid by ......" t-shirts so bloody often :-)
There's obviously some serious momentum behind them now. The only problem with pdx as I see it is that you have to shorten the timescale on the "Quid by ......" t-shirts so bloody often :-)
Gausie
- 15 Sep 2003 09:15
- 35 of 232
Robb - u may have got it right. I was saying that I always screw it up.
Boyse
- 01 Oct 2003 07:53
- 36 of 232
Pursuit Dynamics plc announces that trials carried out on its innovative PDX
Technology by Sonico Ltd ("Sonico") have been successful. Following the
satisfactory completion of the trials programme, and having reached the end of
the exclusivity period, Sonico requested the exclusive licence to utilise the
technology for a number of applications within the wastewater industry. However,
Pursuit has received further expressions of interest relating to the use of the
PDX Technology in the wastewater industry from other major companies within this
sector. Consequently, the Board of Pursuit has rejected the request for an
exclusive licence but remains in discussions with Sonico regarding the possible
granting of non-exclusive licences for specific applications in the wastewater
industry.
In addition to the confectionery industry agreement that is currently in place,
Pursuit is in active discussions with companies involved in the following
industries: food, oil, dairy, nuclear decommissioning, brewing, chemicals,
paint, pet food and defence.
Pursuit's CEO John Heathcote said: "The Sonico performance evaluation programme
has proved the commercial potential of our technology in several wastewater
applications. The current high level of interest evident from major
participants, both in the wastewater and other industries, allows us to be
selective in the choice of partners who we feel have the capability to maximise
the market penetration of the PDX Technology in the time-frame we require from
our licensees."
Technology by Sonico Ltd ("Sonico") have been successful. Following the
satisfactory completion of the trials programme, and having reached the end of
the exclusivity period, Sonico requested the exclusive licence to utilise the
technology for a number of applications within the wastewater industry. However,
Pursuit has received further expressions of interest relating to the use of the
PDX Technology in the wastewater industry from other major companies within this
sector. Consequently, the Board of Pursuit has rejected the request for an
exclusive licence but remains in discussions with Sonico regarding the possible
granting of non-exclusive licences for specific applications in the wastewater
industry.
In addition to the confectionery industry agreement that is currently in place,
Pursuit is in active discussions with companies involved in the following
industries: food, oil, dairy, nuclear decommissioning, brewing, chemicals,
paint, pet food and defence.
Pursuit's CEO John Heathcote said: "The Sonico performance evaluation programme
has proved the commercial potential of our technology in several wastewater
applications. The current high level of interest evident from major
participants, both in the wastewater and other industries, allows us to be
selective in the choice of partners who we feel have the capability to maximise
the market penetration of the PDX Technology in the time-frame we require from
our licensees."
Martini
- 01 Oct 2003 09:15
- 37 of 232
Nice one Gausie but not quite qualifying yet for the header:)
M
M
Bullshare
- 01 Oct 2003 10:28
- 38 of 232
Well done to everyone, if only I had not sold at 72p!!
Gausie
- 01 Oct 2003 13:03
- 39 of 232
No stamina Mike
Andy
- 01 Oct 2003 13:07
- 40 of 232
Gausie,
Any thoughts re the RNS?
Personally, although it read well I was a tad disappointed that the first deal isn't signed, although obviously if that enables them to negotiate better deals and increase shareholder value, it's fine, but a revenue earning deal would have silenced the doubters.
Any thoughts re the RNS?
Personally, although it read well I was a tad disappointed that the first deal isn't signed, although obviously if that enables them to negotiate better deals and increase shareholder value, it's fine, but a revenue earning deal would have silenced the doubters.
Gausie
- 01 Oct 2003 13:18
- 41 of 232
Andy it's better than a deal.
It proves that the technology works
It proves that companies want to pay for it
The exclusivity request implies that companies believe it provides competitive advantage.
PDX's refusal implies other customers in the same industries in the wings - so rapid adoption.
It proves PDX won't be pushed into making a deal for the sake of it
It implies success in the other industries undergoing trials.
This, I believe is why the price is holding up on probably the biggest volume day since PDX came to the market.
DCF 8 - 10
2 by xmas.
It proves that the technology works
It proves that companies want to pay for it
The exclusivity request implies that companies believe it provides competitive advantage.
PDX's refusal implies other customers in the same industries in the wings - so rapid adoption.
It proves PDX won't be pushed into making a deal for the sake of it
It implies success in the other industries undergoing trials.
This, I believe is why the price is holding up on probably the biggest volume day since PDX came to the market.
DCF 8 - 10
2 by xmas.
Bullshare
- 01 Oct 2003 13:43
- 42 of 232
Gausie; :-) only 2
Gausie
- 01 Oct 2003 13:45
- 43 of 232
Bullie
That's 2 bid
Probably worth mentioning that IG index now quote PDX - which means traders can now go short if they want to. Wouldnt recommend it without a tight stop loss tho.
Gausie
That's 2 bid
Probably worth mentioning that IG index now quote PDX - which means traders can now go short if they want to. Wouldnt recommend it without a tight stop loss tho.
Gausie
Bullshare
- 01 Oct 2003 14:21
- 44 of 232
gausie; Whats shorting?
MightyMicro
- 01 Oct 2003 14:31
- 45 of 232
Bullie: Let me explain shorting, when you go to buy a car, the dealer sells you something he doesn't actually have at the time . . . . :)
Incidentally, is the PDX steam-powered car with the no moving parts the next enviro-vehicle?
Incidentally, is the PDX steam-powered car with the no moving parts the next enviro-vehicle?
Andy
- 02 Oct 2003 10:29
- 46 of 232
Gausie,
Thanks for your reply, and I agree with the points that you raised.
With regard to IG Index, some of us are already long!
Thanks for your reply, and I agree with the points that you raised.
With regard to IG Index, some of us are already long!
Boyse
- 02 Oct 2003 14:19
- 47 of 232
Mr G Nice of you to Take the time ! Great to see you Thursday .
Boyse
Boyse
Alchemistatwork - 04 Oct 2003 16:18 - 48 of 232
The other side is closed for enhancements this weekend - they outsourced to Jarvis? Trust not. Anyway...yet another RNS promised for this hot stock, sooner rather than later, by the way. The promise was by one held in great esteam over there.
Off on visit to PDX soon too.
Off on visit to PDX soon too.
Gausie
- 04 Oct 2003 16:30
- 49 of 232
Alchemist
I believe the expression is: "About to leave the station. Toot! Toot!"
Something like that, anyway.
I believe the expression is: "About to leave the station. Toot! Toot!"
Something like that, anyway.
Alchemistatwork - 04 Oct 2003 18:51 - 50 of 232
When Torotrak had a similar interview the reaction was very positive.
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/profiles/PursuitDynamics.html
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/profiles/PursuitDynamics.html
Jules
- 06 Oct 2003 13:47
- 51 of 232
Think the train is picking up steam Gausie:-))
Up 10% today:-)
Up 10% today:-)
Gausie
- 06 Oct 2003 16:32
- 52 of 232
Up 10%?
I'm not interested in tiny little moves like that. Tell me when it's up 15% intraday. ;o)
Feedback from the company and from my own contacts in various industries (and now in various countries) getting *extremely* positive.
I'm hearing new whispers from the brewing industry, confirmation of old news about a confectioner and fizzy drinks manufacturer, ongoing updates about oil recovery, and also some brand new research into firefighting - using an entirely new technique for managing flames.
This is sooooo BIG.
I'm not interested in tiny little moves like that. Tell me when it's up 15% intraday. ;o)
Feedback from the company and from my own contacts in various industries (and now in various countries) getting *extremely* positive.
I'm hearing new whispers from the brewing industry, confirmation of old news about a confectioner and fizzy drinks manufacturer, ongoing updates about oil recovery, and also some brand new research into firefighting - using an entirely new technique for managing flames.
This is sooooo BIG.
dclinton
- 06 Oct 2003 16:57
- 53 of 232
Gausie - it closed up 15% on the day :-)
Martini
- 06 Oct 2003 17:00
- 54 of 232
Yawn only 15% :)
dclinton
- 06 Oct 2003 17:06
- 55 of 232
He did say to tell him...
Martini
- 06 Oct 2003 17:11
- 56 of 232
Indeed :)
5 bagger here we come
5 bagger here we come
dclinton
- 06 Oct 2003 17:18
- 57 of 232
I first got in at 45p back in July when Shares Magazine tipped them. I made the mistake of getting out at 73p last week. Quickly got back in at 92p when I realised my mistake. Up 22% since then which helps take the sting out of the gap.
Today's rise pushes these well above the 3 and 6 month trend channels and slightly above the 1 month trend as well.
Today's rise pushes these well above the 3 and 6 month trend channels and slightly above the 1 month trend as well.
dclinton
- 07 Oct 2003 08:24
- 58 of 232
Hardly worth mentioning the 8% rise in the first 10 minutes of this morning...
Robb - 07 Oct 2003 08:44 - 59 of 232
dclinton - purrleeease don't mention it any more - my 84p exit doesn't look so clever now. I go away for a week and this pile of steaming potential goes ballistic! :-( for me but good luck all who are still in. Looks like I have a re-entry problem to think about.
dclinton
- 07 Oct 2003 09:07
- 60 of 232
Sorry Robb :-( Been in that position on a few stocks myself. Was lucky to spot my mistake on this one and re-enter otherwise I'd be kicking myself hard.
Biker
- 07 Oct 2003 10:46
- 61 of 232
Choo choo. :)
Andy
- 07 Oct 2003 11:20
- 62 of 232
robb,
hard luck.
it still looks a good investment though, i see no reason why the price won't continue to increase, given the new uses that are being discovered for the pump, and if they find it works well in the Alberta oil sands, the sky really could be the limit! (IMHO)
I am looking to top up, and increase my spreadbet.
hard luck.
it still looks a good investment though, i see no reason why the price won't continue to increase, given the new uses that are being discovered for the pump, and if they find it works well in the Alberta oil sands, the sky really could be the limit! (IMHO)
I am looking to top up, and increase my spreadbet.
Gausie
- 07 Oct 2003 22:11
- 63 of 232
Robb
I know the feeling - I let 10,0000 go at 26p.
I know the feeling - I let 10,0000 go at 26p.
porky
- 08 Oct 2003 11:20
- 64 of 232
Been some wild gyrations in the price this morning,tried to buy 1000 worth online with comdirect, only to be told it exceeded the amount I could deal online.
Had no trouble yesterday buying double that amount online.
Had no trouble yesterday buying double that amount online.
Martini
- 08 Oct 2003 13:44
- 65 of 232
Did I miss something?
Gausie
- 08 Oct 2003 13:56
- 66 of 232
Your morning Cocoa?
Paulismyname
- 10 Oct 2003 12:48
- 67 of 232
I think (but am not sure) a certain person possibly AJ has created a shorters thread over the road for pdx. (PDX Shorters Syndicate)
Just adding to the infomation flow
Just adding to the infomation flow
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 13:39
- 68 of 232
Paul,
You KNOW it's Ashley!
He is waging a vendetta against certain people, and thinks that he can harm them by trashing PDX.
He is currently using the id's "AVOINT", "PDX Shorters syndicate", and probably "duncescap".
What he fails to appreciate is if he suceeds in damaging PDX, he will have damaged many people's investment, and not just the people he really wants to hurt, who will probably suffer the least.
HE is now saying Hoot and Gausie will be selling before Monday's visit!
You KNOW it's Ashley!
He is waging a vendetta against certain people, and thinks that he can harm them by trashing PDX.
He is currently using the id's "AVOINT", "PDX Shorters syndicate", and probably "duncescap".
What he fails to appreciate is if he suceeds in damaging PDX, he will have damaged many people's investment, and not just the people he really wants to hurt, who will probably suffer the least.
HE is now saying Hoot and Gausie will be selling before Monday's visit!
Gausie
- 10 Oct 2003 15:09
- 69 of 232
Andy
We all know the price will go up immediately after the visit - thats what happens when investors get to see and touch the technology.
Just like ADVFN's price used to go up after a doddy and smelly do.
The guy's nuts.
We all know the price will go up immediately after the visit - thats what happens when investors get to see and touch the technology.
Just like ADVFN's price used to go up after a doddy and smelly do.
The guy's nuts.
Paulismyname
- 10 Oct 2003 15:15
- 70 of 232
Gausie, I woud read the thread if I were you, as I comented earlier "if" it is a certain person it is clearly one of his bad days...
Bullshare
- 10 Oct 2003 15:31
- 71 of 232
Personally I think it's Martini just winding a few people up :-). I have seen his style before. Does this trick to get everyone talking about a stock.:-)
MightyMicro
- 10 Oct 2003 15:34
- 72 of 232
Bullie: not conspiratorial enough. It's Gausie de-ramping so he can buy in cheap. S'obvious. (See MMD and other threads ad nauseam.)
Martini
- 10 Oct 2003 15:50
- 73 of 232
Bullshare
You and your big mouth! - I am short at present but for guads sake don't tell anyone or I will get macerated through a pump on Monday :)
You and your big mouth! - I am short at present but for guads sake don't tell anyone or I will get macerated through a pump on Monday :)
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 15:52
- 74 of 232
Paul.
what is wrong with your eyesight????
It's not "if", it "IS" him!!!
Go and look at the latest postings by "Sp spamster", in particular the one that links through to the GOS thread on Sardinesplaice!!!!!
You seem to have quickly forgotten the abuse he gave you there!
what is wrong with your eyesight????
It's not "if", it "IS" him!!!
Go and look at the latest postings by "Sp spamster", in particular the one that links through to the GOS thread on Sardinesplaice!!!!!
You seem to have quickly forgotten the abuse he gave you there!
ssanebs - 10 Oct 2003 15:52 - 75 of 232
I HAVE SPOKEN TODAY TO TIM FREEBORN AND HE SAYS THE CADBURY DEAL IS IMMINENT SO THE PRICE WILL PROBABLY CONTINUE UPWARDS AHEAD OF THIS
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 15:55
- 76 of 232
ssanebs,
Yes i believe it's immiment too.
Paul,
You have mail!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please read it and tell me who might have made the post that I have pasted into it!
Best guess will do.
Yes i believe it's immiment too.
Paul,
You have mail!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please read it and tell me who might have made the post that I have pasted into it!
Best guess will do.
skinny
- 10 Oct 2003 16:22
- 77 of 232
What a dog of a share - down 5% today :-)
Paulismyname
- 10 Oct 2003 16:33
- 78 of 232
No mail here Andy
Seymour Clearly
- 10 Oct 2003 16:36
- 79 of 232
Well I bought a few of this dog. Buy the dips I read!
Jules
- 10 Oct 2003 16:38
- 80 of 232
I wish all dogs were like this one:-)
Bullshare
- 10 Oct 2003 16:38
- 81 of 232
martini; Sorry. Macerated is a big word for you
Gausie
- 10 Oct 2003 16:43
- 82 of 232
isnt it a dance?
skinny
- 10 Oct 2003 16:46
- 83 of 232
I thought it was something that those small bore toilets did with sh*t!
Seymour Clearly
- 10 Oct 2003 17:26
- 84 of 232
Just realised too late that I've been on a rampers BB
cue fx
*Sigh*
cue fx
*Sigh*
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 17:34
- 85 of 232
Paul,
Ok then as your email appears to be down, here is the post!!!
Any ideas who may have posted this??
-----------------------------------------------------------
SP Spammer - 10 Oct'03 - 15:44 - 4962 of 4965
gausie you friggin arse, you said pdx was going to go up, now i see it crashing, if i had not listened to you and had put the money into goshawk gos after reading this thread http://www.sardinesplaice.com/sbb/thread.php?ThreadID=936 i would be making bundles, instead now i am fecked
Ok then as your email appears to be down, here is the post!!!
Any ideas who may have posted this??
-----------------------------------------------------------
SP Spammer - 10 Oct'03 - 15:44 - 4962 of 4965
gausie you friggin arse, you said pdx was going to go up, now i see it crashing, if i had not listened to you and had put the money into goshawk gos after reading this thread http://www.sardinesplaice.com/sbb/thread.php?ThreadID=936 i would be making bundles, instead now i am fecked
Martini
- 10 Oct 2003 17:49
- 86 of 232
Look my hero Ash says its a sell and that's good enough for me.
I have him on a pedestal as one of the great traders of all time if not even longer than that.
M
PS
It also helps when watching his lips move.
I have him on a pedestal as one of the great traders of all time if not even longer than that.
M
PS
It also helps when watching his lips move.
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 18:50
- 87 of 232
Paulismyname,
You've gone quiet!
If you still need convincing i'll post you a couple of real beauts that he posted last night under his HKP id!
You've gone quiet!
If you still need convincing i'll post you a couple of real beauts that he posted last night under his HKP id!
Paulismyname
- 10 Oct 2003 20:04
- 88 of 232
Sorry Andy genuinely, had a report to type for a client and have just finished tea!!
Yes I got your email and agree it is somewhat crude. AJ ( if it is him) has a problem insomuch as he sometimes acts (in my own opinion) in a totally irrational way. He is best avoided in these moods and rising to the bait only makes the situation worse.
However....when he posts comments in a more responsible mood, in all fairness he is worth a read especially in relation to Lloyds of London and mining stocks.
Seriously I would apply your own commercial judgement to PDX, Gausie has provided some information and over the road Greystone has also commented if that helps you.
Paul
PS Martini - I will copy and paste your compliment to AJ over the road at The Plaice....-:)
Yes I got your email and agree it is somewhat crude. AJ ( if it is him) has a problem insomuch as he sometimes acts (in my own opinion) in a totally irrational way. He is best avoided in these moods and rising to the bait only makes the situation worse.
However....when he posts comments in a more responsible mood, in all fairness he is worth a read especially in relation to Lloyds of London and mining stocks.
Seriously I would apply your own commercial judgement to PDX, Gausie has provided some information and over the road Greystone has also commented if that helps you.
Paul
PS Martini - I will copy and paste your compliment to AJ over the road at The Plaice....-:)
Gausie
- 10 Oct 2003 20:13
- 89 of 232
Paul
Get off the fence - you risk splinters up your arse.
Ash? or Sanity?
Get off the fence - you risk splinters up your arse.
Ash? or Sanity?
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 20:57
- 90 of 232
Paul,
You are in denial!
There are enough clues in his posts over at the plaice, but you don't want to see them!
HE says he hasn't been on the BB's much today, "been out doing other things"
If you believe that, well i won't bother saying it....
Just think why he posted that!
PS Denial isn't a river in Egypt!
You are in denial!
There are enough clues in his posts over at the plaice, but you don't want to see them!
HE says he hasn't been on the BB's much today, "been out doing other things"
If you believe that, well i won't bother saying it....
Just think why he posted that!
PS Denial isn't a river in Egypt!
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 20:58
- 91 of 232
Paul,
This wasn't posted be me!
-----------------------------------
Kayak - 10 Oct'03 - 01:22 - 487 of 505
Ashley is certainly on the wrong side of humanity (ADVFN):
hkp - 10 Oct'03 - 00:12 - 264 of 267
Andy/Ron, if a Jew tells you to buy he is selling, get real!
hkp - 10 Oct'03 - 00:14 - 265 of 267
ZZaxx nice try, ever done business with Jews before?
This wasn't posted be me!
-----------------------------------
Kayak - 10 Oct'03 - 01:22 - 487 of 505
Ashley is certainly on the wrong side of humanity (ADVFN):
hkp - 10 Oct'03 - 00:12 - 264 of 267
Andy/Ron, if a Jew tells you to buy he is selling, get real!
hkp - 10 Oct'03 - 00:14 - 265 of 267
ZZaxx nice try, ever done business with Jews before?
Gausie
- 10 Oct 2003 21:03
- 92 of 232
And when Martini joined the thread thereby, in ash's opinion, forming a synagogue it made me wonder....
If Martini's recently converted, was Ash the bit they chopped off?
If Martini's recently converted, was Ash the bit they chopped off?
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 21:13
- 93 of 232
Gausie,
ROFLMAO!!!
ROFLMAO!!!
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 21:14
- 94 of 232
Paul,
You have mail!
You have mail!
MightyMicro
- 10 Oct 2003 21:46
- 95 of 232
Anyone want a glass of claret (kosher of course)?
Andy
- 10 Oct 2003 21:48
- 96 of 232
Interesting post from Lesk(Aimraider) n ADVFN!
Are some people sharing id's?
Or is he trying to cover for AJ?
Last night's posts were from AJ, I'm sure of that.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AIMRaider - 10 Oct'03 - 21:07 - 12 of 13
niggle - I don't mind posting as lesk, but then I couldn't get into the PBB - I transferred all my level2 stuff to AIMRaider - besides I like being anonymous.... :@)))))))))
ps I was posting as hkp, but someboy logged me off and I can't get back in under that one anymore :@DDDDDD
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are some people sharing id's?
Or is he trying to cover for AJ?
Last night's posts were from AJ, I'm sure of that.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AIMRaider - 10 Oct'03 - 21:07 - 12 of 13
niggle - I don't mind posting as lesk, but then I couldn't get into the PBB - I transferred all my level2 stuff to AIMRaider - besides I like being anonymous.... :@)))))))))
ps I was posting as hkp, but someboy logged me off and I can't get back in under that one anymore :@DDDDDD
-----------------------------------------------------------------
skinny
- 10 Oct 2003 22:28
- 97 of 232
Oh Gaud!
Andy
- 11 Oct 2003 00:46
- 98 of 232
They are already here, IMHO.
Check out "moneyman" and "caravaggio"
They seem to post on the same threads here as other places, and other plaices!
Check out "moneyman" and "caravaggio"
They seem to post on the same threads here as other places, and other plaices!
Paulismyname
- 11 Oct 2003 12:51
- 99 of 232
Andy I was being deliberatly tactful because of the history of AJ here and Bullshares decision regarding his membership earlier this year. Moneyam want a BB that is free from some of the problems that plague other sites.
Andy
- 11 Oct 2003 13:35
- 100 of 232
Paul,
Ok !
I see "caravaggio" seems to have vanished!
Ok !
I see "caravaggio" seems to have vanished!
skinny
- 11 Oct 2003 14:00
- 101 of 232
Andy
- 11 Oct 2003 14:01
- 102 of 232
He's woken up!
He last spammed ADVFN at 04:20, where he used a new id to promote SP,so a quiet morning, but now he's attacking PDX again as DP1
First barrage was interesteing, but he only cut and pasted half the sentence!
it does show he's starting to try harder though.
He last spammed ADVFN at 04:20, where he used a new id to promote SP,so a quiet morning, but now he's attacking PDX again as DP1
First barrage was interesteing, but he only cut and pasted half the sentence!
it does show he's starting to try harder though.
Andy
- 11 Oct 2003 14:08
- 103 of 232
moneyamn = Ashley on AM!
---------------------------------------------
moneyman - 10 Oct'03 - 22:05 - 2 of 5
ckm I will name a few ;-)
GOS,MDY,ISYS and FFA
-----------------------------------------------
Check these thread on ADVFN, AVOINT (AShley J) posted on them all last night!
---------------------------------------------
moneyman - 10 Oct'03 - 22:05 - 2 of 5
ckm I will name a few ;-)
GOS,MDY,ISYS and FFA
-----------------------------------------------
Check these thread on ADVFN, AVOINT (AShley J) posted on them all last night!
Alchemistatwork - 14 Oct 2003 06:32 - 104 of 232
Just to say an ADVFN group went to Royston yesterday and the place, and the people, and the promise do exist.
Andy
- 14 Oct 2003 08:46
- 105 of 232
Alch,
And a very interesting day it was too!
Sadly the price is off this morning, on a spate of small sells, not sure why?
And a very interesting day it was too!
Sadly the price is off this morning, on a spate of small sells, not sure why?
Paulismyname
- 14 Oct 2003 11:46
- 106 of 232
Noticed a poster called Martini was promoting Pdx over on the advfn site...Martini is that really you?
Bullshare
- 14 Oct 2003 12:49
- 107 of 232
paul; I am sure Martini is shorting this one:-)
Martini
- 14 Oct 2003 14:47
- 108 of 232
PIMN
No it's Dil impersonating me.
M
No it's Dil impersonating me.
M
MightyMicro
- 14 Oct 2003 15:12
- 109 of 232
A Welsh Martini: 6 parts Gin, 1 part dry vermouth, over crushed ice and garnished with a leek.
Haystack
- 14 Oct 2003 15:38
- 110 of 232
I used to have a girl who worked for me and she and her sister drank martini sandwiches. Fill a glass half full with gin then rub the cork of a vermouth bottle round the inside of the glass and fill to the top with gin.
Spaceman
- 14 Oct 2003 16:26
- 111 of 232
Haystack she sounds like my sort of girl, bit worried that she is overdoing the vermouth a bit.
Dil
- 14 Oct 2003 19:31
- 112 of 232
Buy TAD , buy TAD , buy TAD
M :)
M :)
jfletendre
- 14 Oct 2003 19:55
- 113 of 232
why?
Martini
- 15 Oct 2003 00:50
- 114 of 232
jfletendre
Take no notice of us we are just having a bit of banter.
Best Regards
M
Take no notice of us we are just having a bit of banter.
Best Regards
M
Alchemistatwork - 15 Oct 2003 07:11 - 115 of 232
Banter you call that banter ? It is seriously damaging to one's head.
Call DE whist you still have some sanity my man! Lols
AND tell me in paraphrase what he says... see below
Please !
Call DE whist you still have some sanity my man! Lols
AND tell me in paraphrase what he says... see below
Please !
Andy
- 15 Oct 2003 09:48
- 116 of 232
Dil, all,
This is why I like PDX!
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx1.pdf
This is why I like PDX!
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx1.pdf
tyketto
- 17 Oct 2003 00:54
- 117 of 232
SCE still chasing PDX.
Up 7.95% today.
mac.
Up 7.95% today.
mac.
Jules
- 23 Oct 2003 09:39
- 118 of 232
Gausie
pdx hiting a few stop losses today:-(
Dominic Simpson - you still holding?:-)
pdx hiting a few stop losses today:-(
Dominic Simpson - you still holding?:-)
Gausie
- 23 Oct 2003 09:52
- 119 of 232
Jules
You and I are in this low enough to buy dips like this and continue to build real positions.
Other traders and investors will recognise 1 to be a very solid floor and a good start to build their own positions.
Topped up :-)
Gausie
You and I are in this low enough to buy dips like this and continue to build real positions.
Other traders and investors will recognise 1 to be a very solid floor and a good start to build their own positions.
Topped up :-)
Gausie
Jules
- 23 Oct 2003 10:03
- 120 of 232
Gausie
have sent u mail.
Really hope I have to send new underwear to those supposed shorters in the near future:-)
have sent u mail.
Really hope I have to send new underwear to those supposed shorters in the near future:-)
Gausie
- 23 Oct 2003 10:10
- 121 of 232
Jules
Tried to reply - u didnt include your own email addy.
Tried to reply - u didnt include your own email addy.
Jules
- 23 Oct 2003 10:12
- 122 of 232
sent:-)
PW Carnell - 23 Oct 2003 11:11 - 123 of 232
Didnt get in as early as you Jules but sitting on some very big real profits-gausie posted on the other side about brokers attitudes- and mine added this morning.Watching the action with wins and numis before going in again-numis wanted abig premium for aT20 this morning.Waste of time posting on the other side now its been trashed by ashley
Jules
- 23 Oct 2003 11:22
- 124 of 232
PW
It's a shame that they have let the rubbish go on over there:-(
It's a shame that they have let the rubbish go on over there:-(
KeithB
- 23 Oct 2003 14:33
- 125 of 232
Jules I was lucky enough to get out at 131 just over a week ago when I got back from my hols and found where it was at. I certainly haven't shorted it though, I wasn't aware that it was large enough for cfds which are the only way I have found to short things.
I will certainly get back in again when it stops falling.
Keith
I will certainly get back in again when it stops falling.
Keith
shahidali
- 24 Oct 2003 14:13
- 126 of 232
hi lads
its the JABA
its looking good
its the JABA
its looking good
Gausie
- 24 Oct 2003 14:36
- 127 of 232
Hi Jaba. It's a little different here.....
Jules
- 24 Oct 2003 14:58
- 128 of 232
KeithB
well traded!!!
Hi jaba nice to see you on the more moderately sane site:-)
well traded!!!
Hi jaba nice to see you on the more moderately sane site:-)
Andy
- 24 Oct 2003 15:28
- 129 of 232
Jaba,
welcome!
Where's Ashley?
welcome!
Where's Ashley?
little woman
- 25 Oct 2003 20:07
- 130 of 232
Has anyone read the auditors report in the interim results? They mention that the company at the time had only enough money to keep them going a year. The directors believe that during that time they would obtain contracts OR WOULD (more likely) RAISE MORE FINANCE. I wonder what that'll do to the share price!
mikeran
- 25 Oct 2003 22:30
- 131 of 232
The company raised some extra cash recently, and it has been no secret that they have sufficient cash throughout 2004, but the main development phase has been completed, they have already turned down Sonico for an exclusive licence, and have further manufaturers trials due for completion in November. Those that have recently visited the company have been impressed with the viability and functionality of the Pump and the extent of its possible applications. I would expect some significant news anytime between now and the date of their interim results in December, probably much earlier. Any company being that honest about its future financial position , has to be confident of their product, which they appear to be. Again this is supported by those investors who recently visited their Company Base, spoke to management and watched the demonstration.
Dil
- 25 Oct 2003 23:02
- 132 of 232
Seen the header ???
These ever sign a second deal and we will never hear the end of it.
Regards
Dominic Simpson
These ever sign a second deal and we will never hear the end of it.
Regards
Dominic Simpson
Martini
- 26 Oct 2003 00:43
- 133 of 232
PDX have a lot to answer for :)
The Sunday Times - Business
October 26, 2003
Thousands of Cadbury jobs to go
John Waples
THE British-based soft-drink and confectionery giant Cadbury Schweppes is tomorrow expected to announce a shake-up of its international operations, with several thousand job losses possible.
Regards
Dil
The Sunday Times - Business
October 26, 2003
Thousands of Cadbury jobs to go
John Waples
THE British-based soft-drink and confectionery giant Cadbury Schweppes is tomorrow expected to announce a shake-up of its international operations, with several thousand job losses possible.
Regards
Dil
Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:03 - 134 of 232
Gausie has now found it necessary to start post peoples names on ADVFN.
Thats ADVFN for you, bunch of c--ts who have banned over 20 posters this last week for pointuingout the truth about PDX.
Thats ADVFN for you, bunch of c--ts who have banned over 20 posters this last week for pointuingout the truth about PDX.
Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:34 - 135 of 232
Copied from the traders thread to clarify a couple of points....
Unfortunately despite ****** and ******* claims I havent been ranting.
They just got a bit upset when I pointed out Evil K had sold 100k PDX and had put his money into Corac. Contrary to their bizarre claims i have not posted heaps of things under multiple names and spent most of yesterday (******) found it necessary to start posting my real name on ADVFN) watching football with friends and not anywhere near a computer.
The sad truth is they are using all the method they can to pump up this stock, which is very much a jam tomorow story.
If they know anymore about PDX than me, they are insider trading , and I believe someone has already made a complaint to the FSA about them (no not me before ******* gets all snooty).
We've all seen ******** do this before and hardly a single promise delivered.
I am very uncomfortbale abour ******** relationship with this company and also with Ron Trenter (see first PDX RNS) who was also a director of Oasis Healthcare a company ********* tried to get all his 'mates' into.
Ive had a good load of money out of this ramp and still have a few shares left in for fre.
But I object to being attacked for pointing out something that is public domain information, but might not be in ******** or ******* interests.
I hope they dont make too many Margin buys to convince the sheep there are still big punters buyers. I have no idea where PDX are going and I care very little. As I said Ive had my money and have a free ride on a few more. Its the attacks that piss me off!!.
PS I would also like to add i hardly know Ashley James so if he has an axe to grind with ******** and ******* thats their business and nothing to do with me!!
Unfortunately despite ****** and ******* claims I havent been ranting.
They just got a bit upset when I pointed out Evil K had sold 100k PDX and had put his money into Corac. Contrary to their bizarre claims i have not posted heaps of things under multiple names and spent most of yesterday (******) found it necessary to start posting my real name on ADVFN) watching football with friends and not anywhere near a computer.
The sad truth is they are using all the method they can to pump up this stock, which is very much a jam tomorow story.
If they know anymore about PDX than me, they are insider trading , and I believe someone has already made a complaint to the FSA about them (no not me before ******* gets all snooty).
We've all seen ******** do this before and hardly a single promise delivered.
I am very uncomfortbale abour ******** relationship with this company and also with Ron Trenter (see first PDX RNS) who was also a director of Oasis Healthcare a company ********* tried to get all his 'mates' into.
Ive had a good load of money out of this ramp and still have a few shares left in for fre.
But I object to being attacked for pointing out something that is public domain information, but might not be in ******** or ******* interests.
I hope they dont make too many Margin buys to convince the sheep there are still big punters buyers. I have no idea where PDX are going and I care very little. As I said Ive had my money and have a free ride on a few more. Its the attacks that piss me off!!.
PS I would also like to add i hardly know Ashley James so if he has an axe to grind with ******** and ******* thats their business and nothing to do with me!!
Gianni
- 27 Oct 2003 10:56
- 136 of 232
Gausie/Andy,
Refrained up to now getting involved though I did go long much earlier and also sold out earlier as I just like to go with the flow whichever way that happens to be. However I feel that with a market cap close to 50 million the time has come for some real contracts so as my knowledge in this area is zilch and I don't want to post on the muppet boards can you help me and maybe others with the following:-
- originally this pump was seen as a new marine drive opportunity. This has now to all intents been effectively dropped presumably because the drive needs a steam powered engine which will actually be more expensive to run than a standard diesel/petrol driven propellor. (Mind you I love the future potential - e.g. environment and all that). Do I have this right?
- the main thrusts for this pump are now in a whole range of applications where this pump will replace the standard ones e.g. waste water and food manufacture (e.g. masceration). I can see how this unit can utilise excess/waste steam from manufacturing plants to run this new pump but....
- What if the steam generator packs up - what is the back-up system? If that breaks down not easy to switch I would guess. Can someone clarify. In most production lines the pumps may fail and therefore the line stops/switches and if the electricity fails a generator can kick in if critical. But what if the actual steam generation fails - e.g. pressure valves? If the back-up is the old type pumps then the benefit is limited.
- most standard applications I've heard mentioned (e.g. waste water pumping stations) will require steam generators installed and presumably a back-up should the electricity fail. Is this correct? If so how do the costs of installation compare to maintaining the existing system - iow the new pump may be brilliant if installed in new plants from scratch as part of the plant design but may not be cost effective if tried in the existing manufacturing/treatment process.
So answers would be appreciated as from my very limited understanding this pump would seem to have tremendous potential but in a much longer time scale than is currently envisaged as royalty income on new plant will take much longer to materialise than a new "mousetrap" which would be an instant success.
TIA
Refrained up to now getting involved though I did go long much earlier and also sold out earlier as I just like to go with the flow whichever way that happens to be. However I feel that with a market cap close to 50 million the time has come for some real contracts so as my knowledge in this area is zilch and I don't want to post on the muppet boards can you help me and maybe others with the following:-
- originally this pump was seen as a new marine drive opportunity. This has now to all intents been effectively dropped presumably because the drive needs a steam powered engine which will actually be more expensive to run than a standard diesel/petrol driven propellor. (Mind you I love the future potential - e.g. environment and all that). Do I have this right?
- the main thrusts for this pump are now in a whole range of applications where this pump will replace the standard ones e.g. waste water and food manufacture (e.g. masceration). I can see how this unit can utilise excess/waste steam from manufacturing plants to run this new pump but....
- What if the steam generator packs up - what is the back-up system? If that breaks down not easy to switch I would guess. Can someone clarify. In most production lines the pumps may fail and therefore the line stops/switches and if the electricity fails a generator can kick in if critical. But what if the actual steam generation fails - e.g. pressure valves? If the back-up is the old type pumps then the benefit is limited.
- most standard applications I've heard mentioned (e.g. waste water pumping stations) will require steam generators installed and presumably a back-up should the electricity fail. Is this correct? If so how do the costs of installation compare to maintaining the existing system - iow the new pump may be brilliant if installed in new plants from scratch as part of the plant design but may not be cost effective if tried in the existing manufacturing/treatment process.
So answers would be appreciated as from my very limited understanding this pump would seem to have tremendous potential but in a much longer time scale than is currently envisaged as royalty income on new plant will take much longer to materialise than a new "mousetrap" which would be an instant success.
TIA
Martini
- 27 Oct 2003 11:18
- 137 of 232
Gianni
Someone has set up a site that covers a number of the FAQs on PDX,
May answer some of your questions but remember it is promoting the Bull case for PDX so should be read in that light.
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx/index.html
Regards
M
Someone has set up a site that covers a number of the FAQs on PDX,
May answer some of your questions but remember it is promoting the Bull case for PDX so should be read in that light.
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx/index.html
Regards
M
Gianni
- 27 Oct 2003 11:51
- 138 of 232
Martini - thanks just read thru it and though my specifics weren't answered fully there I thought the site was very fair though the financials were slightly bullish =:0
I actually noticed there were a couple of sensible negatives posted by some experts in waste water and steam generation so consider the site to be a good one for PDX investors/potential investors to look at. I think of particular interest was PDX's own technical officer who states:-
"Commercially available methods employed for the generation of steam have not significantly changed in over 50 years. Conventionally, steam is used to produce rotational power via either turbines or reciprocating engines, which utilise the expansion energy available as steam pressure reduces. They also require high quality steam to avoid damage to turbines or piston seals from condensation or solid particle entrained in the flow.
The PDX system utilises both the expansion energy available and the 'implosion' energy as the steam condenses to a fraction of its volume in the fluid being pumped. The steam is introduced into the fluid flow through a jet arrangement that is tolerant to variable steam quality and any fine detritus carried with the steam (such as un-dissolved solids, rust particles etc.)
Conventional steam generators follow two routes: A boiler system; or an OTSG (Once Through Steam Generator).
1. The boiler principle: a heated tank of water with steam drawn off the top. These are slow to raise steam as a large quantity of water has to be heated, and salts and minerals contained in the water drop out or adhere to the sides or heating source deteriorating performance.
2. OTSG use a continuous single coil that water flows through, picking up heat and turning into steam. These are smaller, significantly faster at producing steam, but still need good water preparation to prevent corrosion or undissolved solids from being passed that would damage conventional equipment.
By incorporating modern materials and eliminating the need for water preparation in a development of the OTSG principle, a fast acting, very compact, Outboard-equivalent configuration for small vessel applications can be produced."
Unfortunately this raised another query for me - Doesn't the above mean that for the pump to be successful it needs to also form part of the steam generation process itself i.e. the pump is part of the entire system and not independent of it?
I actually noticed there were a couple of sensible negatives posted by some experts in waste water and steam generation so consider the site to be a good one for PDX investors/potential investors to look at. I think of particular interest was PDX's own technical officer who states:-
"Commercially available methods employed for the generation of steam have not significantly changed in over 50 years. Conventionally, steam is used to produce rotational power via either turbines or reciprocating engines, which utilise the expansion energy available as steam pressure reduces. They also require high quality steam to avoid damage to turbines or piston seals from condensation or solid particle entrained in the flow.
The PDX system utilises both the expansion energy available and the 'implosion' energy as the steam condenses to a fraction of its volume in the fluid being pumped. The steam is introduced into the fluid flow through a jet arrangement that is tolerant to variable steam quality and any fine detritus carried with the steam (such as un-dissolved solids, rust particles etc.)
Conventional steam generators follow two routes: A boiler system; or an OTSG (Once Through Steam Generator).
1. The boiler principle: a heated tank of water with steam drawn off the top. These are slow to raise steam as a large quantity of water has to be heated, and salts and minerals contained in the water drop out or adhere to the sides or heating source deteriorating performance.
2. OTSG use a continuous single coil that water flows through, picking up heat and turning into steam. These are smaller, significantly faster at producing steam, but still need good water preparation to prevent corrosion or undissolved solids from being passed that would damage conventional equipment.
By incorporating modern materials and eliminating the need for water preparation in a development of the OTSG principle, a fast acting, very compact, Outboard-equivalent configuration for small vessel applications can be produced."
Unfortunately this raised another query for me - Doesn't the above mean that for the pump to be successful it needs to also form part of the steam generation process itself i.e. the pump is part of the entire system and not independent of it?
mikeran
- 27 Oct 2003 12:45
- 139 of 232
Gianni - not sure if you picked this up on your browse through any PDX material, but the steam pressure required is very low about 2bar, I am not a tech expertise but some domestic Cappucino makers generate about 16 bar + just to froth the milk.
mikeran
- 28 Oct 2003 20:59
- 140 of 232
Gentlemen and of Course Lady investors, -- What a lot of steam on all these PDX threads, but to what avail ? whatever view you have and whichever position you hold Long or short, the overall winner has been the MM. He will run you ragged at will -- Long or short in the absence of any news and at will. I would hope that on so little volume and the relatively small number of trades, this would not be possible. But it is at the moment, maybe the increase in SETS trading in NOV. May make transctions more transparent for those equities.
Please dont lets debate that as well.
BUT why not whichever side you are on stop posting until this weekend on all the PDX threads on Moneyam and the other side. Let the markets and the mm's take their course--- otherwise whether LOng or Short you are playing to their Gallery. They love it and will walk all of you up and down at will.
You at the moment are the total losers.
Please dont lets debate that as well.
BUT why not whichever side you are on stop posting until this weekend on all the PDX threads on Moneyam and the other side. Let the markets and the mm's take their course--- otherwise whether LOng or Short you are playing to their Gallery. They love it and will walk all of you up and down at will.
You at the moment are the total losers.
shahidali
- 01 Nov 2003 10:43
- 141 of 232
looks like a good week coming up for pdx
Seymour Clearly
- 01 Nov 2003 23:21
- 142 of 232
Why?
(I am long)
(I am long)
Andy
- 01 Nov 2003 23:52
- 143 of 232
Shahidali,
Likewise, i'm long too!
Likewise, i'm long too!
Paulismyname
- 02 Nov 2003 20:28
- 144 of 232
Joking aside I was minded to look at this one because of the banter over at the Plaice with AJ (and Gausies Pilchard thread)
This IS a serious comment and no wind up but if if you look at this share from a TA view it is beginning to look a bit windy. If I had been fortunate enough to be long from 20/30p or so when it was first seriously promoted I would be selling now on the view it is never wrong to take a 4 bagger profit.
Just a view dyor etc
This IS a serious comment and no wind up but if if you look at this share from a TA view it is beginning to look a bit windy. If I had been fortunate enough to be long from 20/30p or so when it was first seriously promoted I would be selling now on the view it is never wrong to take a 4 bagger profit.
Just a view dyor etc
Gausie
- 02 Nov 2003 21:01
- 145 of 232
so short it Paul
Paulismyname
- 03 Nov 2003 12:04
- 146 of 232
Think there is a difference between identifying a potential short and taking profits on a long Gausie. I would not short this stock as there is a risk (on the short side) of positive developements, yet if I was long from an entry at low levels I would now be looking to lock in profits on at least some of my holdings.
PS I do not wind people up on stock or trend threads (smile) unlike some we both know
PS I do not wind people up on stock or trend threads (smile) unlike some we both know
Andy
- 03 Nov 2003 13:34
- 147 of 232
Paul,
Why would you "take profits" if you believe the price will go higher?
You do seem to be on a mission with your mentor to wind people up, and if you want to learn more about PDX, and the processing unit's capabilities, I suggest you ask him! (Not that he knows, but you seem to think he's the only one that understands PDX!)
I agree with gausie, go short it Paul, you know it's going down, because Ash said so! (smile)
Why would you "take profits" if you believe the price will go higher?
You do seem to be on a mission with your mentor to wind people up, and if you want to learn more about PDX, and the processing unit's capabilities, I suggest you ask him! (Not that he knows, but you seem to think he's the only one that understands PDX!)
I agree with gausie, go short it Paul, you know it's going down, because Ash said so! (smile)
Paulismyname
- 03 Nov 2003 14:30
- 148 of 232
Andy - Ashley is not my mentor, indeed he can be an unusual indeed difficult chap as his posting last evening on Sardines demonstates (Sardine moving to fee paying).
I merely comment that having taken a brief interest in pdx I would be taking or locking in some profits now had I been fortune enough to have got in @ 20p ish.
I merely comment that having taken a brief interest in pdx I would be taking or locking in some profits now had I been fortune enough to have got in @ 20p ish.
Gianni
- 03 Nov 2003 14:36
- 149 of 232
Andy,Gausie et al,
Not trying to wind anyone up but I did ask some questions earlier in this thread but didn't get any real answers. For example the steam pressure production unit and associated safety features required to move sewage or an outboard drive system might be a tad more sophisticated/expensive to run than that required to froth a cup of coffee.
If I invest in a Company that has a new mousetrap then I like to make sure it is a better one and not a "good idea".
Anyone care to try and answer some of my questions and give me a reason to invest. Oh BTW I think AJ is a first class pr*tt and have no axe to grind - genuine interest.
TIA
Not trying to wind anyone up but I did ask some questions earlier in this thread but didn't get any real answers. For example the steam pressure production unit and associated safety features required to move sewage or an outboard drive system might be a tad more sophisticated/expensive to run than that required to froth a cup of coffee.
If I invest in a Company that has a new mousetrap then I like to make sure it is a better one and not a "good idea".
Anyone care to try and answer some of my questions and give me a reason to invest. Oh BTW I think AJ is a first class pr*tt and have no axe to grind - genuine interest.
TIA
Andy
- 03 Nov 2003 15:52
- 150 of 232
Gianni,
That's a good question, and the answer is that the PDX processing unit will work with any type of steam generation unit, and it can work at some distance from the actual steam generator.
At the presentation I attended, they explained, (if I remember correctly), that there are different types (qualities) of steam, and the PDX would work with any of them, and distance from the generator (pressure loss) wasn't a problem.
If that is wrong, I welcome a correction from anyone, that was my understanding.
Steam generation is already widely used in industry, so steam is readily available in many of the locations where the PDX may function.
When you refer to the marine drive, I did see the outboard motor, and there was a steam generation unit aboard the boat. They did say that seawater can be used, and the presence of salt is not a problem. I believe they are currently working on a new design of steam generator for the marine drive, and that this work is going on in the background as the main drive is for food processing, sewage and waste water, and one or two other areas.
Sorry but i'm not a techie, so just a layman's understanding of what was said, and I hope this answers your query.
If not, please ask again, i'm suresomeone here will have an answer, anf=d if not one of us will email PDX.
Andy.
That's a good question, and the answer is that the PDX processing unit will work with any type of steam generation unit, and it can work at some distance from the actual steam generator.
At the presentation I attended, they explained, (if I remember correctly), that there are different types (qualities) of steam, and the PDX would work with any of them, and distance from the generator (pressure loss) wasn't a problem.
If that is wrong, I welcome a correction from anyone, that was my understanding.
Steam generation is already widely used in industry, so steam is readily available in many of the locations where the PDX may function.
When you refer to the marine drive, I did see the outboard motor, and there was a steam generation unit aboard the boat. They did say that seawater can be used, and the presence of salt is not a problem. I believe they are currently working on a new design of steam generator for the marine drive, and that this work is going on in the background as the main drive is for food processing, sewage and waste water, and one or two other areas.
Sorry but i'm not a techie, so just a layman's understanding of what was said, and I hope this answers your query.
If not, please ask again, i'm suresomeone here will have an answer, anf=d if not one of us will email PDX.
Andy.
skinny
- 03 Nov 2003 15:55
- 151 of 232
Andy - yeh - I think I saw this being used on yesterday's scrapheap challenge - looked good :-)
Andy
- 03 Nov 2003 15:57
- 152 of 232
Paul,
ok fine.
ok fine.
Andy
- 03 Nov 2003 15:58
- 153 of 232
skinny,
Pardon?
Pardon?
skinny
- 03 Nov 2003 16:03
- 154 of 232
Andy - an attempt at humour - unless you saw(or know) the program its wasted!
edit - here's a link http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/S/scrapheap/
edit - here's a link http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/S/scrapheap/
Gianni
- 03 Nov 2003 16:20
- 155 of 232
Andy - sorry, but as I understand it the key applications were marine - which is now delayed as the cost of installing/running a steam powered engine is higher than a propellor driven system so requires new steam engine technology. Ok so now they are looking for a quicker return from using existing plants that generate steam. If I remember right by far the largest bulk of excess steam is produced by the power generation industry not by food/drink/water treatment facilities.
As one of the main uses was in sewage works - anyone ever seen steam being produced in a water treatment works - other than from natural reaction of bacteria in waste? If it needs new plant to produce the steam then what is the back-up system if it fails? As I've said before maybe great potential at the design stage for new plants but just cannot see most Companies installing this pump in existing plants especially food/drink plants hence my belief real volume royalties are quite some way away. But I want to be convinced I am wrong - so come on guys convince me - won't post here again as I feel we are just going over the same ground.
Good luck all still holding.
As one of the main uses was in sewage works - anyone ever seen steam being produced in a water treatment works - other than from natural reaction of bacteria in waste? If it needs new plant to produce the steam then what is the back-up system if it fails? As I've said before maybe great potential at the design stage for new plants but just cannot see most Companies installing this pump in existing plants especially food/drink plants hence my belief real volume royalties are quite some way away. But I want to be convinced I am wrong - so come on guys convince me - won't post here again as I feel we are just going over the same ground.
Good luck all still holding.
DocProc
- 03 Nov 2003 19:52
- 156 of 232
Gianni
You make some excellent points and I agree with you.
Sewage works don't have steam. The bigger food companies almost certainly do have steam so not really a problem there. They wil probably have a bit of spare steam making/using capacity too. Some of the drinks companies will have steam (eg, breweries) and some won't.
Waste treatment plants don't usually need steam unless it is part of the treatment process and, if it is, this would be somewhat unusual.
The pump is a brilliant conception but its need for steam is the thing that kills it - sometimes stone dead! A budgetary requirement for new capital plant to make steam will create delays in PDX getting orders and the need for steam plant on a site which hasn't previously needed it will sometimes even prevent them from being gained in the first place.
So for trading or investment purposes, the PDX business is pretty much like any other.
You make some excellent points and I agree with you.
Sewage works don't have steam. The bigger food companies almost certainly do have steam so not really a problem there. They wil probably have a bit of spare steam making/using capacity too. Some of the drinks companies will have steam (eg, breweries) and some won't.
Waste treatment plants don't usually need steam unless it is part of the treatment process and, if it is, this would be somewhat unusual.
The pump is a brilliant conception but its need for steam is the thing that kills it - sometimes stone dead! A budgetary requirement for new capital plant to make steam will create delays in PDX getting orders and the need for steam plant on a site which hasn't previously needed it will sometimes even prevent them from being gained in the first place.
So for trading or investment purposes, the PDX business is pretty much like any other.
Andy
- 03 Nov 2003 21:10
- 157 of 232
Gianni,
You are correct, since PDX have discovered the myriad of new applications possible by using the PDX as a pump/processing unit, they have prioritised towards non marine applications.
I believe that MOST food and drink producers already use steam in some part of their process, and therefore it's already onsite and available.
I also believe that the PDX offers a low maintenance, impossible to block pumping and macerating unit for sewage treatment works, and yes they would need to install a steam generator, and obviously a backup system in case of emergency. Steam generation is pretty standard stuff, so no problems obtaining an economic and efficient unit, IMHO.
Clearly PDX are at an advanced stage of development, and are looking for partners as well as customers, in order to penetrate the wider market.
PDX are looking to structure deals to include an upfront payment, and a 5 or 10 year royalty deal based on cost savings made by using the PDX in a process.
This could clearly produce some substantial and exponential royalty fee income in the future.
These are some of the reasons I invested, so I hope this helps.
You are correct, since PDX have discovered the myriad of new applications possible by using the PDX as a pump/processing unit, they have prioritised towards non marine applications.
I believe that MOST food and drink producers already use steam in some part of their process, and therefore it's already onsite and available.
I also believe that the PDX offers a low maintenance, impossible to block pumping and macerating unit for sewage treatment works, and yes they would need to install a steam generator, and obviously a backup system in case of emergency. Steam generation is pretty standard stuff, so no problems obtaining an economic and efficient unit, IMHO.
Clearly PDX are at an advanced stage of development, and are looking for partners as well as customers, in order to penetrate the wider market.
PDX are looking to structure deals to include an upfront payment, and a 5 or 10 year royalty deal based on cost savings made by using the PDX in a process.
This could clearly produce some substantial and exponential royalty fee income in the future.
These are some of the reasons I invested, so I hope this helps.
Pommy - 04 Nov 2003 08:07 - 158 of 232
Doc Proc, given the love of tea and coffee of the working masses there must be plenty of steam around. And given that most uneducated factory workers are Manshite fans there should also be a large amount of hot air around as well!!!!
DocProc
- 04 Nov 2003 18:06
- 159 of 232
Spoken like a true expert Pommy?
;-)
;-)
Boyse
- 11 Nov 2003 07:20
- 160 of 232
PURSUIT DYNAMICS PLC ("PURSUIT" OR "THE COMPANY")
PURSUIT DYNAMICS SIGNS ADDITIONAL TRIALS & EXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENT WITH
CONFECTIONERY MANUFACTURER
Further to the Company's announcement dated 1 September 2003 and following
completion of initial trials of its innovative PDX Technology in confectionery
and soft drinks applications with a leading confectionery manufacturer, Pursuit
is pleased to announce that it has now entered into an agreement that
incorporates further development trials with the same manufacturer.
The trials are fully funded by the manufacturer and are scheduled to be
completed by the end of 2003. In addition to funding the trials, the
manufacturer will pay Pursuit #15,000 per month to maintain exclusivity for the
trialling of the PDX Technology in confectionery and soft drinks applications
until, at the latest, March 4 2004.
John Heathcote, Chief Executive Officer of Pursuit said: "This is more good news
for Pursuit. We are successfully marketing our PDX Fluids Handling System
across a broad range of processing industries. We are developing strong
relationships with dominant companies in our targeted sectors with a view to
bringing our technology into commercial use in a structured and timely fashion."
* * ENDS * *
PURSUIT DYNAMICS SIGNS ADDITIONAL TRIALS & EXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENT WITH
CONFECTIONERY MANUFACTURER
Further to the Company's announcement dated 1 September 2003 and following
completion of initial trials of its innovative PDX Technology in confectionery
and soft drinks applications with a leading confectionery manufacturer, Pursuit
is pleased to announce that it has now entered into an agreement that
incorporates further development trials with the same manufacturer.
The trials are fully funded by the manufacturer and are scheduled to be
completed by the end of 2003. In addition to funding the trials, the
manufacturer will pay Pursuit #15,000 per month to maintain exclusivity for the
trialling of the PDX Technology in confectionery and soft drinks applications
until, at the latest, March 4 2004.
John Heathcote, Chief Executive Officer of Pursuit said: "This is more good news
for Pursuit. We are successfully marketing our PDX Fluids Handling System
across a broad range of processing industries. We are developing strong
relationships with dominant companies in our targeted sectors with a view to
bringing our technology into commercial use in a structured and timely fashion."
* * ENDS * *
Gianni
- 11 Nov 2003 11:30
- 161 of 232
>Andy - thanks for your input but the food/drink industry is one I know quite well and applications will be limited, especially in soft drinks where very little heat is used except to flash pasteurize juices and clean returnables. Please remember that most plants use heat rather than steam per se so not as simple to utilise steam to run pumps elsewhere in the plant.
I just think that many of the current holders should be selling rather than buying. My guess is this will drift lower until a real binding contract is signed and even then not unless there are immediate installation possibilities.
I can't help feeling this is being held up by the constant ramping rather than any real technical or financial logic.
I just think that many of the current holders should be selling rather than buying. My guess is this will drift lower until a real binding contract is signed and even then not unless there are immediate installation possibilities.
I can't help feeling this is being held up by the constant ramping rather than any real technical or financial logic.
Andy
- 11 Nov 2003 11:48
- 162 of 232
Gianni,
Thanks for your reply.
ON the company visit we attended thay did say that in the case of the confectioner that is mentioned in the RNS above, steam was onsite and available.
They also stressed that the distance from steam source and pressure was not a problem, neither was the "quality" of the steam.
They stated that there were several processes that the PDX could improve upon handle within the factory, mollasses for example are tricky to pump, but not with the PDX!
I should add that I was disappointed with the content of today's RNS, not because I see any bad news there, because I don't, but because it wasn't the signed deal we were all presumptiously expecting!
I see the RNS as positive (ish), and see nothing contained within it to cause me concern.
I don't agree that this has been ramped at all, most PDX threads were very quiet until two months ago, and the processing unit has huge potential, which, if realised, will propel the price higher, IMHO.
The technology works, it's now up to PDX to sucessfully commercialise it.
As a growth company, potential overrides fundementals surely?
Therefore I see PDX as a buy or hold, but certainly not a sell.
Thanks for your reply.
ON the company visit we attended thay did say that in the case of the confectioner that is mentioned in the RNS above, steam was onsite and available.
They also stressed that the distance from steam source and pressure was not a problem, neither was the "quality" of the steam.
They stated that there were several processes that the PDX could improve upon handle within the factory, mollasses for example are tricky to pump, but not with the PDX!
I should add that I was disappointed with the content of today's RNS, not because I see any bad news there, because I don't, but because it wasn't the signed deal we were all presumptiously expecting!
I see the RNS as positive (ish), and see nothing contained within it to cause me concern.
I don't agree that this has been ramped at all, most PDX threads were very quiet until two months ago, and the processing unit has huge potential, which, if realised, will propel the price higher, IMHO.
The technology works, it's now up to PDX to sucessfully commercialise it.
As a growth company, potential overrides fundementals surely?
Therefore I see PDX as a buy or hold, but certainly not a sell.
Gianni
- 11 Nov 2003 12:08
- 163 of 232
Andy - I always go with the flow - even if it is with a steam generated pump :)
But you got to admit the "pumping" of this share and the aggression/hate on many boards is exceptional. Just don't see the point in getting excited about any share or comments made unless it represents a large chunk of your positions and then that is bad trading practice anyway.
Good luck to all buyers/holders (I have no position at moment).
But you got to admit the "pumping" of this share and the aggression/hate on many boards is exceptional. Just don't see the point in getting excited about any share or comments made unless it represents a large chunk of your positions and then that is bad trading practice anyway.
Good luck to all buyers/holders (I have no position at moment).
Andy
- 11 Nov 2003 12:43
- 164 of 232
Gianni,
the "aggresion/hate" all eminates from Ashley James, who obviously has his own reasons for trashing a share he told me personally many times "I have no interest in".
He clearly has a serious problem, I think his own trading must be poor, because I told him about PDX in February, and regularly since, and he didn't listen.
It appears to me that he can't bear to see people make money, unless it's in one of "his" shares.
After the PDX visit, he rang me and spoke for 30 minutes about PDX, then finished the call by saying he "wasn't interested"!!! Then he started to trash it!
the "aggresion/hate" all eminates from Ashley James, who obviously has his own reasons for trashing a share he told me personally many times "I have no interest in".
He clearly has a serious problem, I think his own trading must be poor, because I told him about PDX in February, and regularly since, and he didn't listen.
It appears to me that he can't bear to see people make money, unless it's in one of "his" shares.
After the PDX visit, he rang me and spoke for 30 minutes about PDX, then finished the call by saying he "wasn't interested"!!! Then he started to trash it!
Snowman
- 11 Nov 2003 14:34
- 165 of 232
`I don't agree that this has been ramped at all`
Like to think a bit more about that Andy ?
The thread on the other sides free bb is an absolute `must read for a laugh` . The amount of utter twaddle being peddled is unbelievable .
Which i might say is a pity , as the PDX is obviously a clever innovation which may or may not have a great future , but has certainly been worth looking at .
There are certain posters who have contributed to the threads who are a bit more realistic than others and have probably made a lot of people some nice profit .
Unfortunately thier voices are drowned in a sea of ramping tosh that you would need to be a complete idiot to listen to . In fact my guess is it is counter-productive and in a lot of cases puts people off any interest .
We have one post there which manages to conclude from the rns that its not known how much the company is investing in taking up the PDX in its installations but its not small change ... whoaa how fantastic !!! A deal and the company is installing PDX !!
Except that the rns doesnt come close to suggesting that the company is about to install PDX into its installations at all .
Fact that they are continuing trials is good news although can be seen , or spun if you like , both ways . And remember Pursuit are going to put as positive a spin as possible on any news they have .
A bit more realism on PDX would not be a bad thing i would suggest ..
Like to think a bit more about that Andy ?
The thread on the other sides free bb is an absolute `must read for a laugh` . The amount of utter twaddle being peddled is unbelievable .
Which i might say is a pity , as the PDX is obviously a clever innovation which may or may not have a great future , but has certainly been worth looking at .
There are certain posters who have contributed to the threads who are a bit more realistic than others and have probably made a lot of people some nice profit .
Unfortunately thier voices are drowned in a sea of ramping tosh that you would need to be a complete idiot to listen to . In fact my guess is it is counter-productive and in a lot of cases puts people off any interest .
We have one post there which manages to conclude from the rns that its not known how much the company is investing in taking up the PDX in its installations but its not small change ... whoaa how fantastic !!! A deal and the company is installing PDX !!
Except that the rns doesnt come close to suggesting that the company is about to install PDX into its installations at all .
Fact that they are continuing trials is good news although can be seen , or spun if you like , both ways . And remember Pursuit are going to put as positive a spin as possible on any news they have .
A bit more realism on PDX would not be a bad thing i would suggest ..
Andy
- 11 Nov 2003 17:34
- 166 of 232
Snowman,
There have been a number of posts on the PDX thread on the other side that have certainly been "enthusiastic", and some people certainly became excited when the price rose so far so quickly, and there were some "2 by Xmas" type posts, i'll agree, (though not from me!) but "ramping" to me suggests dishonesty, and I think you need to take a check there.
Clearly there are various degrees of investor on the BB's, from the rank novice who thinks he knows something, to the experienced investor who does know something. Clearly posts on a thread will reflect these varying degrees of knowledge and experience, and aren't necessarily "ramping".
I have held a position in PDX since February, and in those days when the price was rising slowly, there were hardly many comments on ANY BB! It was only when the price shot up, that PDX came to the attention of the masses, did posting start in earnest.
So how can it have been "ramped" when it took so long to get going?
As far as the "pump" is concerned, it's a clever bit of kit that could be very valuable to PDX, provided they can sucessfully commericalise it. That is my assessment, no more, no less. I invested for POTENTIAL, and I am happy with the high level of risk involved.
I saw the RNS as Positive(ish), because an outright rejection by the customer would be negative, and PDX are still in there, so clearly there is some cause for optimism?
I suggest our definitions of ramping are somewhat different.
There have been a number of posts on the PDX thread on the other side that have certainly been "enthusiastic", and some people certainly became excited when the price rose so far so quickly, and there were some "2 by Xmas" type posts, i'll agree, (though not from me!) but "ramping" to me suggests dishonesty, and I think you need to take a check there.
Clearly there are various degrees of investor on the BB's, from the rank novice who thinks he knows something, to the experienced investor who does know something. Clearly posts on a thread will reflect these varying degrees of knowledge and experience, and aren't necessarily "ramping".
I have held a position in PDX since February, and in those days when the price was rising slowly, there were hardly many comments on ANY BB! It was only when the price shot up, that PDX came to the attention of the masses, did posting start in earnest.
So how can it have been "ramped" when it took so long to get going?
As far as the "pump" is concerned, it's a clever bit of kit that could be very valuable to PDX, provided they can sucessfully commericalise it. That is my assessment, no more, no less. I invested for POTENTIAL, and I am happy with the high level of risk involved.
I saw the RNS as Positive(ish), because an outright rejection by the customer would be negative, and PDX are still in there, so clearly there is some cause for optimism?
I suggest our definitions of ramping are somewhat different.
Snowman
- 11 Nov 2003 17:51
- 167 of 232
Fair post Andy , although i would point out that i have already highlighted one `exaggeration` that has no basis in `known` fact , shall we say .
Frankly , i may be naive but i find it hard to believe that the price of PDX is being , or has been , moved significantly by BB posts anyway . Which is why i find some of the hostility directed to anyone who doesnt post like a cheerleader a bit hard to understand .
But it takes all sorts i guess ;-)
A new high and some significant news and who knows ... 8-(0)
Frankly , i may be naive but i find it hard to believe that the price of PDX is being , or has been , moved significantly by BB posts anyway . Which is why i find some of the hostility directed to anyone who doesnt post like a cheerleader a bit hard to understand .
But it takes all sorts i guess ;-)
A new high and some significant news and who knows ... 8-(0)
Andy
- 11 Nov 2003 18:02
- 168 of 232
Snowman,
Yes I agree not all posts will be accurate, not sure if the one you refer to was deliberately wrong, i just hope it wasn't!
Well I'm sure that MM's and brokers frequent these BB's, so whilst negative posts won't influence the price too much, they may certainly effect sentiment towards a stock, and you may want to ask why people post day in day out, unless they themselves believe they can move a stock.
I don't mind someone having a negative view, it adds balance and causes thought, but Ashley is being deliberately malicious here, due to him having a grudge against one of the main holders. Some of his first posts on PDX were "selective" in their accuracy, and whilst he correctly says the NAV is 3.5P, we holders aren't invested because of the NAV.
He clearly thinks his posts will have a negative effect and put fear into weak/inexperienced holders, otherwise why post these comments at all?
He has accused a group of people on AM of "shorting all his stocks" which probably says a lot about his trading success rate!
Yes I agree not all posts will be accurate, not sure if the one you refer to was deliberately wrong, i just hope it wasn't!
Well I'm sure that MM's and brokers frequent these BB's, so whilst negative posts won't influence the price too much, they may certainly effect sentiment towards a stock, and you may want to ask why people post day in day out, unless they themselves believe they can move a stock.
I don't mind someone having a negative view, it adds balance and causes thought, but Ashley is being deliberately malicious here, due to him having a grudge against one of the main holders. Some of his first posts on PDX were "selective" in their accuracy, and whilst he correctly says the NAV is 3.5P, we holders aren't invested because of the NAV.
He clearly thinks his posts will have a negative effect and put fear into weak/inexperienced holders, otherwise why post these comments at all?
He has accused a group of people on AM of "shorting all his stocks" which probably says a lot about his trading success rate!
Spaceman
- 01 Dec 2003 08:39
- 169 of 232
I see that PDX have just posted one of those documents where they list endless numbers and other rubbish, what are they called? Oh I know results. Anyway whatever they are supposed to say doesn't seem to have done a lot for their share price down a fair bit this morning.
dclinton
- 01 Dec 2003 12:25
- 170 of 232
It's bounced back a little which is a positive sign. The results are pretty neutral and it's still going to take some good news from the trials to get these moving upwards.
Gausie
- 01 Dec 2003 12:29
- 171 of 232
I believe that 1 will continue as strong support - we may dip below it from time to time intraday, but buyers in volume come out of the woodwork every time.
'appy days!
'appy days!
DocProc
- 01 Dec 2003 13:09
- 172 of 232
From http://www.sardinesplace.com
Gianni
- 01 Dec 2003 13:20
- 173 of 232
DP - says it all imo ;-)
DocProc
- 01 Dec 2003 13:25
- 174 of 232
Is that PDX pump on a ramp? Surely not! ;-)
PS. I wonder what they are cooking? Fries? :-)
PS. I wonder what they are cooking? Fries? :-)
mg
- 01 Dec 2003 13:40
- 175 of 232
Martini looks as if he's reminiscing about his Marina's exhaust ......... aahhh them were the days - when you could get cod and chips, plus mushy peas - after a night out on Banks' bitter - and still have change from a ten bob note. Looks as if the Marina shift workers are still around - image of high tech BLMC works with Mr. Spock fiddling with the keys for his supersonic Marina XL5 Coupe.
;)))))))
;)))))))
Gausie
- 01 Dec 2003 13:58
- 176 of 232
:o)
Gianni
- 01 Dec 2003 14:15
- 177 of 232
I also like the novel use of the bins as well as the state of the art plastic bucket recycling system for the condensed water - with a back-up bucket in case the first one springs a leak no doubt :)
Dailos
- 01 Dec 2003 14:20
- 178 of 232
DocProc
LOL!
LOL!
Bullshare
- 01 Dec 2003 14:22
- 179 of 232
I notice the guy with the tie to left hand side,he must be the boss, as he is standing well away and fiddling with his worry beads. Not seen this much hot air near Martini for weeks.
Martini
- 01 Dec 2003 14:48
- 180 of 232
Love it :)
DocProc
- 01 Dec 2003 17:23
- 181 of 232
Just got in from a swim, etc. and scrolled back to have a look at "the guy with the tie to left hand side".
Bl**dy good edit Gausie! 11/10 ROFLMAO! :-))))))
Bl**dy good edit Gausie! 11/10 ROFLMAO! :-))))))
Smallchange - 01 Dec 2003 17:51 - 182 of 232
ROFLMAO...
Great picture...
So thats the RNS thats due a contract from macdonals to serve their chips (poached), interesting very interesting.
Great picture...
So thats the RNS thats due a contract from macdonals to serve their chips (poached), interesting very interesting.
Treblewide
- 28 Mar 2008 14:29
- 183 of 232
i feckin hate this lot....common sense still not prevailing so they have eaten 300k into their 7M annual loss with contract extension and they go up 6%....
valued at nearly 200m with turnover of 3M.......surely common sense will prevail one day?
valued at nearly 200m with turnover of 3M.......surely common sense will prevail one day?
Treblewide
- 22 Apr 2008 18:14
- 184 of 232
about time this bag of shit fell...i have put up with a big paper loss on my short on this for a wee while now...lets hope some sense continues to prevail
Dil
- 23 Apr 2008 09:46
- 185 of 232
Looks like its fallen off the cliff Treb.
Dil
- 24 Apr 2008 09:43
- 186 of 232
Cheers Treb , lost a small bit last time but now well in :-)
Treblewide
- 25 Apr 2008 09:08
- 187 of 232
about feckin time dil boy..its a bag a shite
Dil
- 25 Apr 2008 12:33
- 188 of 232
Someone knows something I reckon
Treblewide
- 25 Apr 2008 16:46
- 189 of 232
cash call is imminent...must be.....last report they have i think 3-4M in cash left...were burning 7M per annum any have only announced 1 contract this year.
long way to fall yet i hope
long way to fall yet i hope
Dil
- 26 Apr 2008 00:41
- 190 of 232
Hanging on in there , gotta be some crap news soon.
Dil
- 02 May 2008 09:48
- 191 of 232
Could you stick a chart in the heading if your out there please Gausie.
Done
Regards
Dominic Simpson
Done
Regards
Dominic Simpson
Dil
- 02 May 2008 10:54
- 192 of 232
lol
:-)
:-)
Treblewide
- 02 May 2008 14:33
- 193 of 232
180 is important area
Dil
- 02 May 2008 15:04
- 194 of 232
nah 120p looks the toughie
Treblewide
- 02 May 2008 15:27
- 195 of 232
will do a deal at 80p :-)
Dil
- 11 Sep 2008 08:47
- 196 of 232
Getting hammered today , anyone heard anything ?
Treblewide
- 11 Sep 2008 09:10
- 197 of 232
about time...i have been short this mut for over a year...maybe their big shareholder dumping?
Dil
- 11 Sep 2008 09:21
- 198 of 232
Now its bounced about 15% in 40 minutes.
Treblewide
- 11 Sep 2008 09:26
- 199 of 232
i rarely look at it Dil...it is the only position i have left with a particualr provider......it will all come home to roost one day it is my pension pot this one......i am in no hurry...will close when it is below 10p
Dil
- 11 Sep 2008 09:34
- 200 of 232
lol
Treblewide
- 15 Sep 2008 10:19
- 201 of 232
ha ha...getting leathered today.....16% down.....now get under a quid ya whore
sniffer - 15 Sep 2008 22:50 - 202 of 232
Quality post.
Dil
- 16 Sep 2008 09:09
- 203 of 232
Unlike the company ... broken 120p support , someone knows something.
Bullshare
- 16 Sep 2008 09:22
- 204 of 232
Where's that ramper Gausie when you need him :-)
Dil
- 16 Sep 2008 09:27
- 205 of 232
Probably shorting the ass of it like everyone else :-)
Treblewide
- 16 Sep 2008 09:40
- 206 of 232
yee har
Dil
- 16 Sep 2008 09:47
- 207 of 232
Pure quality Treb :-)
Treblewide
- 16 Sep 2008 09:54
- 208 of 232
80p next level me thinks
ptholden
- 16 Sep 2008 10:01
- 209 of 232
Ran out of cash? Probably difficult in the current climate to get a placing away or a loan.
Treblewide
- 16 Sep 2008 10:22
- 210 of 232
was always gonna happen....cannot remember thier turnover figure but i think their loss has sat at about between 5 and 7 Million since they started
Treblewide
- 16 Sep 2008 12:03
- 211 of 232
below a quid before close today?
Treblewide
- 16 Sep 2008 12:39
- 212 of 232
ho ho ho...91p bid
Treblewide
- 16 Oct 2008 20:17
- 213 of 232
still got a long way to go down from here
Treblewide
- 23 Oct 2008 10:17
- 214 of 232
oof watch out down below here she comes.......
Treblewide
- 20 Nov 2008 11:31
- 215 of 232
keep going ya mut
Treblewide
- 25 Nov 2008 13:07
- 216 of 232
increased my short on these yesterday and got some sell orders on the book
Treblewide
- 25 Nov 2008 16:25
- 217 of 232
and as if by magic :-)
no one else short this piece of shit?
no one else short this piece of shit?
Gausie
- 26 Nov 2008 10:53
- 218 of 232
Treble - you're breaking my heart here.
Treblewide
- 26 Nov 2008 19:45
- 219 of 232
aye right there is no way you are still long......
Treblewide
- 01 Dec 2008 10:39
- 220 of 232
20p by chrimbo
Treblewide
- 03 Dec 2008 15:44
- 221 of 232
closed out some of my short at various levels around the 40p mark today (from above the 2 qyuid mark)...still got about half left which i am looking for 20p on.
some hefty points and will buy me some beers at chrimbo.....
some hefty points and will buy me some beers at chrimbo.....
jeffmack
- 08 Dec 2008 06:50
- 222 of 232
From Shares mag
Pursuit Dynamics (PDX) - SELL - 49.3p - Stop loss 60p
Blue sky technology sounds wonderful but usually it is a good way for investors to lose
money as it always takes much longer to commercialise than expected and sometimes never.
Pursuit Dynamics (PDX) - SELL - 49.3p - Stop loss 60p
Blue sky technology sounds wonderful but usually it is a good way for investors to lose
money as it always takes much longer to commercialise than expected and sometimes never.
Treblewide
- 08 Dec 2008 09:26
- 223 of 232
lol...so they would be stopped out then....cannot see why 60p is any meaningful kind of stop loss...i am tempted to increase short again
Treblewide
- 29 Apr 2009 14:22
- 224 of 232
this wee blast from the past has gone into auction twice today, up a lot and on ok volume for it......watching closely
Gausie
- 23 Apr 2010 14:56
- 225 of 232
Holy Moly!
Was tipping these at 8p. Unfortunately I dumped all mine years ago.
Was tipping these at 8p. Unfortunately I dumped all mine years ago.
skinny
- 23 Apr 2010 16:14
- 226 of 232
Gausie - should I close now? :-)
Gausie
- 23 Apr 2010 16:29
- 227 of 232
Hold on, I'll ask Hoot :-)
Bones
- 05 Nov 2010 17:22
- 228 of 232
Did anyone hold on?
I never held and still don't but that is a chart stright out of late 1999 :)
I never held and still don't but that is a chart stright out of late 1999 :)
Treblewide
- 05 Nov 2010 20:31
- 229 of 232
wow not looked at these for ages.....that is an unbeliavble chart
market cap of 350M with a tunrover of 75k for 6 months.......speachless
market cap of 350M with a tunrover of 75k for 6 months.......speachless
Dailos
- 04 Feb 2011 18:49
- 230 of 232
I see Simon Cawkwell has been reported to the FSA for manipulation of the PDX share price..
Martini
- 04 Feb 2011 18:50
- 231 of 232
Disgraceful :)
darreng10000 - 17 Feb 2011 16:12 - 232 of 232
| About MoneyAM | Ts and Cs | Privacy Policy | Investment Warning | Content Standards | Corporate Solutions | Advertise With Us | Site Map | © 2025 MoneyAM |
Register now for FREE
Share Prices,
Stock Quotes,
Charts, Bulletin Boards, Indices, Watchlists, Portfolio, Market News, Research
or see our Premium Services including Level 2, Terminal and much more.
Follow us on Twitter