gordon geko
- 15 Nov 2004 12:12
09/11/2004
Intention to float on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) and appointment of new directors
Falkland Gold and Minerals Limited ("FGML"), an exploration company, announces that it intends to implement a placing and offer for subscription to raise up to 8m and to apply for the admission of its shares to trading on AIM.
FGML was incorporated in February 2004 and has begun an exploration programme for gold and other minerals in the Falkland Islands.
FGML holds the only licence to explore for gold and minerals, giving it exclusive exploration rights to substantially all of the onshore land mass of the Falkland Islands, covering approximately 12,000 km2.
The licence, currently valid to January 2007, will be extended by the Falkland Islands Government to July 2009 on admission to AIM.
The money raised will be used to undertake further stages of its exploration programme.
If its anything like FOGL it will be very oversubscribed
profitmaker
- 15 Nov 2004 14:20
- 2 of 46
Count me in. I'm not going to turn my nose up at 20-30% within a week. Missed out on FOGL,certainly not going to miss this time.
red nutter
- 15 Nov 2004 17:15
- 3 of 46
Any one know how you can subscribe for this share?
gordon geko
- 15 Nov 2004 17:22
- 4 of 46
have registered at www.fgml.co.uk await the prospectus
aldwickk
- 16 Nov 2004 22:48
- 5 of 46
>
please click banner to support our sponsor.
Juniors in denial
Eric Hommelberg
November 16, 2004
Note: This piece replaces the last week announced chapter VIII of the Gold drivers 2005 report "Gold & Investment opportunities in Gold Mining/Exploration companies". This piece has a strong focus on present situation. However 80% of presented material here will find its way into chapter VIII of the report. A preview of the report can be found here. Readers interested in the entire report can drop a mail. I'll send the entire report in pdf format around mid December. END.
Strange world today! While gold is making a 16-year high, many junior mining companies are struggling to bounce off their year-low these days. How come you may wonder, weren't they supposed to rise faster as their senior brothers on rising Gold prices? Weren't they supposed to be "an once in your lifetime opportunity?" How to explain the lack of excitement these days regarding juniors? Will they recover? How is this going to end? So what to do now? Sell, Hold or Buy? The main problem here is that many investors are counting on a severe correction in the price of Gold and therefore started selling their Gold shares. However, the liquidity in junior gold mining shares is so small that they simply can't absorb the generated selling pressure. What happens next is a rapid decline in the junior shares (lack of bids) thereby confusing many shareholders. When the selling pressure continues confusion turns into fear and further down the road into panic. The result can be a dramatic waterfall sell-off. I wrote this piece in order to show investors that it won't be such a clever deal imo to sell your junior mining shares right now. It's my strong believe that looking back in a few years time at this period (Q4-04) when Gold was at the verge of breaking its 16-year high of $430 and on its way to $500 that people will wonder how they could be so stupid to sell junior shares at these historic lows. So the main question here is:
Are the Juniors on a launch pad now and should I invest accordingly?
Well, let us examine the question first of why to invest in junior mining companies at all.
Why to invest in Junior Mining companies
Since the start of the current bull market in Gold in 2001 the Gold share index HUI appreciated by more than 600%. Still lot of denial does exist among fund managers regarding the strength of this current bull. It seems that the first phase of this bull market in Gold (which was characterized by denial) is in its latest stage and phase two (which will be characterized by acceptance) will be launched by slashing Gold's 16-year high of $430. Expect some serious inflow of investment capital during this second phase of the bull market in Gold and watch out what will happen with the high quality junior mining firms. They can go ballistic but it requires a stomach of steel in order to keep them during severe corrections. They tend to rise faster as their senior brothers but also the opposite is true, they fall much harder during corrections. Is an investment in a junior mining firm extremely risky as some people want you to believe? Well, Ian Gordon (vice president of Canacord Capital and editor of the long Wave Analyst) gave some presentations in Europe lately in order to promote the investment opportunities in junior mining firms.
His presentation was titled:
"Investing in Junior Gold Mining Shares. What risk? What reward?"
He clearly pointed out that an investment made today in a high quality junior mining firm should not be categorized as being a high risk investment. Why not? Because you'll buy them at historic low levels today thereby reducing the downside risk towards a minimum. (of course he refers to a multi-year time span and not the short term volatility which can be extreme.)
Furthermore Ian Gordon said: "the main investments I make is in bullion and junior mining companies" END.
So what makes the juniors so special then? Well, the reason is twofold. First of all the senior producers will go after them so why won't you as an investor do the same? Second is that Juniors tend to rise very fast on rising Gold prices but as said before also the opposite is true, they'll drop much faster during severe corrections and thus subject to extreme volatility.
Let us focus on these characteristics by answering the following:
Juniors & the price of Gold. What influence?
Juniors & declining gold reserves. Why should they benefit?
Juniors & volatility. How to approach?
Juniors & declining gold reserves. Why should they benefit?
As mentioned above world wide declining gold reserves will benefit the juniors because their senior brothers will go after them. But why are the senior producers hunting for them? Because the Gold industry is facing a decline in Gold production coming years and the senior gold producers will be struggling in order to replace their dwindling gold reserves. So how bad is this situation really? Alex Davidson (Vice President Exploration Barrick Gold) said last year:
"Big mining companies need to spend more on exploration, or else, at current annual production rates, reserves will be depleted in 10 years, he said. It can take six to eight years between making a discovery and starting mine production, and "we're not currently funding exploration at a level required to replace reserves,"
It seems that the awareness of a dwindling Gold supply is growing these days. Dow Jones News Service reported on Nov 10:
"Merrill Lynch Investment Managers have a favorable outlook for gold, underpinned primarily by emerging pressures on supply".
Merill Gold fund manager Evy Hambro said:
"We've got a situation where the mined production of gold is going to be declining for the foreseeable future,". END.
Further more Hambro said that falling mine output over the coming years was one of the reasons to to prolong the rally in U.S. dollar gold prices. Hambro is not a crank, his seven-member team is one of the world's largest managers of gold equity investments, overseeing about US$6.5 billion spread between several mining funds.
The main reason for this situation to exist was a lack of Exploration during the 1997 2002 period. Exploration budgets had been slashed by 67% during this period. Fortunately the Exploration sector attracted more investment capital again since 2003 but the sad truth is that it doesn't matter how much money you'll throw at Exploration, no matter what the Gold price is, it still takes three to five five years from scratch before a big discovery can be made and after that it still takes four to seven years before a mine can be opened in order to mine the new discovery.
Newmont president Pierre Lassonde said (August 2003):
"The 20-year bear market in gold has weeded out marginal gold producers and significantly curbed exploration and production.". "If gold was $1,000 an ounce, it still takes four to seven years to open a mine," END.
Barrick CEO Greg Wilkins said more or less the same, he said (Nov 2004):
"The average lead time for a large discovery to go on-stream with production was around five to seven years but that seven to 10 years was probably more realistic. ". "The industry isn't going to be able to respond immediately to higher gold prices. It is going to take a long time." END.
Trevor Steel, partner at Baker Steel Capital Managers told delegates at a two-day Euromoney gold seminar recently:
"The way I like to think of it is that the gold industry is in overdraft. It's been relying very much on discoveries that were made many, many years ago and it is not replacing the reserves it is mining every year,"
Despite this, Steele said the industry needed to spend more money on exploration to find big enough deposits to replace production.
"It is going to be a major challenge for the majors . . . yes of course they can acquire, but they all want to find the large assets and there just aren't that many of them around."
Paul Burton, editor of World Gold said:
"But the industry needs major new finds to replenish the inventory pipeline. What we need to reinvigorate the industry is some major new finds. Such discoveries are rare."END.
Let's repeat the last sentence here:
"What we need to reinvigorate the industry is some major new finds. Such discoveries are rare."
Indeed, such discoveries are rare. According to Alex Davidson (Vice President Exploration Barrick) only a very few major deposits (5+ million ounce) have been discovered since 1999.
It should be obvious by now that the Gold industry is desperate for new major discoveries. But where to find them? Remember that 75% of all discoveries are made by junior mining companies so it ain't difficult to understand where the big producers are heading to. The trend is obvious:
Barrick opened an office earlier this year in Vancouver in order to monitor Junior companies.
"Barrick Gold's New Office Tracks Junior Exploration Cos."
"Barrick Gold Corp. (NYSE:ABX) has opened a Vancouver office to monitor junior exploration projects, executive vice-president Alex Davidson said at an exploration conference. Davidson said two or three employees in the office are tracking junior projects, and visiting managers of companies and their exploration sites. The local office also handles Barrick's exploration efforts around Eskay Creek, its 100%-owned gold mine in northern B.C."
And what about Anglogold?
AngloGold CEO Bobby Godsell said:
"It is the end of big picture gold consolidation; there is no compelling logic to combining anymore. The real challenge now is how to replace your ounces for the future." The race to replace ounces is about to begin. It will take the form of takeovers of small producers with long reserve lives and high quality junior mining companies with large in ground reserves that can be mined economically." END.
A few month later these thoughts were echoed by Sam Jonah, the company president:
Where will AngloGold buy next?
Monday August 2, 2004
Sam Jonah, the company president says small gold companies will be the point of entry.
"We will look at juniors that have attractive assets in there portfolios and require our expertise and capital to move these projects forward." END.
And what about Newmont? Are they interested in Juniors? Well, it seems they are! They took an interest in Gabriel Resources Ltd. So what happened to its share price? It shot up by 54%!
Newmont adds muscle to Gabriel gold find, stock up "VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Aug 30 (Reuters) - Shares in Gabriel Resources Ltd. leapt as much as 54 percent on Monday on news that the world's biggest gold producer plans to buy a stake in it -- a major credibility boost for the small Canadian miner that owns Europe's largest gold deposit. "
"At a time when the world's biggest producers are mining out reserves more quickly than they are replacing them, the project is regarded as a big and important future source of gold, and rumors have surfaced frequently that a major may buy it." END.
And what about Goldfields?
Gold Fields: Investing in juniors make sense
28 Sept 2004
Ian Cockerill: "We invest in 10 juniors in the hope that one or two of them come up trumps, and the value you get off the table there will pay for the other eight that do not. But you are spreading your exploration dollars, It increases your chance of success."
"It has been a very successful program," Cockerill declared. He estimated that Gold Fields invested $30 million to $40 million in the junior exploration company process, converted $120 million in value, of which $40 million was harvested." END.
I hope you'll understand by now that the better junior mining companies are being watched like a hawk by their senior brothers so as an investor you should do the same.
Juniors & the price of Gold. What influence?
The primary key driver for Gold Mining equities remains of course the price of Gold. Make no mistake about it, without higher gold prices there won't be any excitement in this sector. So higher gold prices will do the trick, but when to expect excitement really to kick in? That's difficult to answer but my intake is this. First of all you should ask yourself if you're convinced of higher Gold prices down the road. No bull market in Gold means no bull market in Gold mining equities. It's that simple. I think that we're in a bull market in Gold for reasons well documented in my piece "Gold drivers 2005 preview" which can be found here. If you agree to be in a Gold bull market then you should analyze where we exactly are in this bull market and how much further potential we may have got. Any secular bull market can be divided into three stages. The first stage is being characterized by climbing a wall off worry and denial. The second stage will be characterized by acceptance and large inflow of institutional investment capital. The third stage will be characterized by mania. It's my strong believe that we are at the end of stage one of this bull market in Gold and on the verge of entering stage two. When Gold's 16-year high of $430 will be slashed definitely investors will realize that this bull market in Gold is for real and excitement can kick in very fast. But are we going to slash the $430 level now or do we have to face another Gold ambush and watch the shares going down again? Well, we're at a critical juncture here, indeed some analysts warning for a correction now, some analysts even calling in a top of a three year bear-market rally (Prechter) and expect Gold to fall below $300 again while on the other hand some analysts are calling for an accelerated move towards $500. You see, confusion is all over the place in the Gold market these days which makes investors to decide to step aside from the gold market for a while.
Let us focus now on today's situation. It reminds me of December 2002 when Gold was struggling in order to break its long term resistance of $325. The same skepticism was being felt as we're witnessing today. When the $325 resistance was taken out the formation of a teacup with handle was completed and Gold took off. The following chart was published by Mr. Jim Sinclair on December 13 2002.
Mr James Sinclair furthermore wrote:
"This is a momentous occasion and something you may not see again technically in your trading career. Not only is it rare to see this formation, but rarer even to see any formation with such symmetry. The more symmetrical a formation is, the more meaningful it is. The longer it takes to construct a rare formation like this, the more meaningful the formation is."
"I suggest you save the chart given to you this evening on the technical review. In your career, whenever you see this again, in anything, you will know what to do." END.
That was December 2002.
Mr. James Sinclair was right. Gold took off all the way up from $325 to $390 in a short period of time (less than two months). Why do I come with the December 2002 teacup formation? Well, because we are completing just right now another teacup with handle formation and therefore I want to repeat Mr. James Sinclair's statement from December 2002:
In your career, whenever you see this again, in anything, you will know what to do.
Sure, Mr. James Sinclair brought the current teacup formation to his subscribers' attention last month by publishing the following chart:
Published by James Sinclair on www.jsmineset.com
What should be obvious by now is that you'll recognize the importance of the $430 resistance. When it breaks, a rapid launch towards the $500 mark isn't unthinkable. The following chart illustrates the importance of the $430 resistance level from a very long term perspective.
Published by Ian Gordon at www.thelongwaveanalayst.com
So here we do have a completed teacup with handle formation projecting a rapid rise towards the $500 mark which is confirmed by the long term chart of Gold as well. What's needed now is a decisive break of the $430 - $435 resistance.
As I said, a rapid rise towards the $500 mark is not unthinkable. James Turk of goldmoney.com publicly says to expect Gold to hit $500 by year end. No, this is not a misprint, he expects Gold to hit $500 by year end. In his latest piece "The Buck drops here" (Nov 10) he wrote:
"In fact, gold looks like a rocket just starting to launch. Ignition occurred on Friday, October 29th when gold closed at 16-year weekly and monthly highs. Lift-off is now just beginning. As can be seen from the above chart, gold is moving off of its launch pad by breaking above the horizontal, dashed red line. But just as importantly, we can see from this chart that $500 is not a moon-shot away, but rather just a short chip-shot. Let's see how long it takes gold to reach that level. As I noted in my recent interview in Barron's, which has the same title as this alert, I expect gold to be at $500 by the end of this year, or early next year at the latest." END. http://www.goldmoney.com/en/commentary.php
So what happens if Gold breaks its 16-year high of $430 level definitely?
Again, the bull market in Gold will gain much more acceptance and investment capital will find its way into the Gold mining sector. But here is the problem, the entire Gold mining sector is so small that this sector will simply explode when serious investment capital is heading towards the Gold mining sector. We saw that happen last time when serious investment capital was heading towards the Gold mining sector in 1996, the XAU index was on a launch pad to 150 and many junior companies appreciated multiples of 100%. The chart below shows perfectly clear what kind of wonders a rapid rise of the Gold price could do for a junior but it also shows what kind of disaster a declining price of Gold can cause. The chart presented here is from a typical junior Gold Mining/Exploration company.
That was 1996 but unfortunately the rapid rise in the price of Gold back then is written down in history books as a bear market really. Now fast forward to present situation. The current bull market in Gold started in 2001 and yes, the year of 2003 showed some renewed interest for the gold mining equities as well but still many investors are anxious to get in. That will change when Gold is marching towards the $500 mark.
Highlights
Gold is on the verge of breaking its 16-year high and heading for $500
Juniors tend to rise very fast in a rising Gold environment
Juniors could benefit tremendously from major discoveries as they are being closely watched by the senior producers
Juniors can be extreme volatile as we've witnessed during Q4 2004
To junior investors I would say:
Get used to the high volatility surrounding the junior sector. Just hold your shares and let them do their Exploration. That's why you should have bought them in the first place, not for short term speculation. Give them the time needed to complete their Exploration programs. Yes, your shares will be subject to sudden panic sell offs in the future again, that's all in the game but they'll recover just as they recovered from previous panic sell offs. Why? Because we're in a bull market in gold. The big move in junior mining stocks is still ahead of us.
Eric Hommelberg
ehommelberg@planet.nl
November 14, 2004
________________
321gold Inc Miami USA
gordon geko
- 17 Nov 2004 14:13
- 6 of 46
GREAT ARTICLE whats your opinion of Falklands ??
does anyone now the timescale ?
gordon geko
- 17 Nov 2004 14:21
- 7 of 46
Falkland Gold and Minerals Limited (FGML)-1st week December - expected 40p
Falklands Gold and Minerals owns the exclusive mineral prospecting rights to the whole of the Falklands, an area in which the presence of gold, diamond indicator minerals and titanium gravels have already been found.
The Geology of the Falkland Islands is very similar to that of the south-eastern cape of South Africa. Why is this? There is a lot of convincing evidence that the Falkland Islands moved from an original position off the southeast African coast 190 million years ago, during the break up of Gondwanaland to its current position 480 kilometres from South America as a result of tectonic evolution. This is very important, given that South Africa is still responsible for around 40% of the worlds gold reserves.
Gold grains have been recovered from stream sediments and geochemical analysis performed has confirmed that gold is present on the islands. Following these findings Airborne magnetic surveys were carried out. The data was interpreted and modelled and numerous target anomalies identified, with 23 drill targets established.
Each of these targets could potentially prove the existence of economically viable gold deposits. With a market capitalisation of around 20 million, this implies a cost per opportunity of around 850,000, which in our opinion represents excellent value.
Given gold grains have already been discovered on the island; The geology is similar to the largest gold producing country in the world and there are 23 targets that have been identified as having the potential to contain mineable gold, we believe there is huge potential upside for FGML - BUY
gra1969
- 17 Nov 2004 16:02
- 8 of 46
Awaiting prospectus etc on this one! should have some huge rewards as the gold spot is said to be entering a bull with returns of immense proportions!
gordon geko
- 22 Nov 2004 13:16
- 9 of 46
anyone know when the prospectus out ? as the floats supposed to be early dec ?
gordon geko
- 22 Nov 2004 13:21
- 10 of 46
telephoned wh ireland prspectus out this thrusday and float date 9/12
gra1969
- 22 Nov 2004 15:49
- 11 of 46
Thanks GG, notleaving much time are they, still, i guess this will be over suscribed like FOGL
gordon geko
- 26 Nov 2004 13:09
- 12 of 46
prospectus arrived today
S A W
- 26 Nov 2004 15:49
- 13 of 46
S A W
- 26 Nov 2004 15:59
- 14 of 46
S A W
- 26 Nov 2004 16:01
- 15 of 46
S A W
- 26 Nov 2004 16:04
- 16 of 46
profitmaker
- 08 Dec 2004 15:25
- 17 of 46
Allocations annnounced. there were 1563 applications for 14 m share. there were only 5 m on offer. Nearly 3 times oversubscribed. Everyone gets minimum of 2500 shares plus 11% of excess application. Bit like the good old days of Govt privitisations.
Conclusion: should be a strong start tomorrow. I expect it to hover around 60p level. If people come in ,it will go further. FOGL went to 61p ,drifted down to 50p in the days after listing. Now it is 80p after 6 weeks. Something similar would be great.
Anyone got any views?
JPDM FORTUNEMAKER
- 08 Dec 2004 21:25
- 18 of 46
Yep, I go with your prediction Profitmaker
JPDM FM
Andy
- 09 Dec 2004 00:19
- 19 of 46
profitmaker,
I think your conclusion should be pretty near the mark IMHO.
I would be disappointed if the first day ended below 50p, which would be a 25% mark up.
RAB Capital may see some upward movement too, as they hold a fair slug of FMGL bought at a much lower price!
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 09:13
- 20 of 46
what happened was expecting premium of 20%+ ? it was 3x oversubscribed ?
aldwickk
- 09 Dec 2004 09:34
- 21 of 46
could the mm's be short of stock?
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 10:39
- 22 of 46
4M shares traded 2day yet price gone nowhere it opened at 48p and then went backwards with 90% buys whats going on ?.
Falkland Gold & Minerals Ltd - Company Share Price
Real time: 10:37 AM
Delay time: 10:22 AM
Market Symbol Exchange Currency Shares in Issue
FGML London Stock Exchange GBX 0
Markets Data
Current (p) 43.00 Best Bid (p) 42.00 P/E Ratio
Change (p) 0.00 Best offer (p) 44.00 Div Yield
Change (%) Day high (p) 46.50 Market Cap () 0
Last sale (p) 42.85 Day low (p) 41.00 52 week high (p)
Last close (p) Day Volume 4,274,122 52 week low (p)
Time Mid price (p) Day change (p) Day change (%) Share volume
08:00 46.50 0.00 0.00
08:30 43.50 0.00 0.00 617,626
09:00 41.00 0.00 0.00 269,815
09:30 43.00 0.00 0.00 1,727,834
10:00 43.00 0.00 0.00 1,156,417
10:30 43.00 0.00 0.00 523,060
11:00 43.00
sagem
- 09 Dec 2004 10:45
- 23 of 46
SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON....WHERE ARE ALL THE SELLS COMING FROM. WHO HAD THE SHARES BEFORE WE DID TO SELL.......VERY STRANGE SITUATION
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 13:06
- 24 of 46
5.2m trades today and the price goes nowhere ??
sagem
- 09 Dec 2004 13:10
- 25 of 46
TO GORDON GEKO.....So what do you think has gone wrong........just look at all the sales now...I wonder why.
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 13:37
- 26 of 46
not sure whats going on thought RAB etc had a lock in ??
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 16:55
- 27 of 46
huge volumes and the price goes nowhere cannot understand it ??s
gordon geko
- 09 Dec 2004 17:17
- 28 of 46
Who were the sellers ????????
Falkland Gold & Minerals Ltd - Company Share Trades
< < More recent tradesEarlier trades > >
Trade time Price (p) Volume Assumed purchase/sale* (p) Bid (p) Ask (p)
16:51 41.5 100000 purchase 39 42
16:25 41 50000 ? 40 42
16:23 40.88 21221 sale 40 42
16:22 40.88 2500 sale 40 42
16:20 40.88 25000 sale 40 42
16:20 40.12 10000 sale 40 42
16:18 41 20000 ? 40 42
16:14 40.88 23779 sale 40 42
16:10 40 6000 sale 40 42
16:08 41.1 300 purchase 40 42
16:06 40.95 2411 sale 40 42
16:04 40.95 7280 sale 40 42
15:54 41 2439 ? 40 42
15:52 41.5 300 purchase 40 42
15:48 41 1219 ? 40 42
15:41 40 13500 sale 40 42
15:39 41.1 2000 purchase 40 42
15:33 40 50000 sale 40 42
15:18 41.1 12500 purchase 40 42
15:17 41 2000 ? 40 42
15:14 41 420 ? 40 42
15:05 41.1 1946 purchase 40 42
15:04 41.1 2360 purchase 40 42
15:01 41.1 1192 purchase 40 42
15:00 39 50000 sale 40 42
14:53 41.2 1000 purchase 40 42
14:51 42 5000 purchase 40 42
14:42 41.3 1174 purchase 40 42
14:42 40 12500 sale 40 42
14:41 41.25 10000 purchase 40 42
14:31 41.5 9566 purchase 40 42
14:25 41.5 11962 purchase 40 42
14:17 40.75 2500 purchase 40 41
14:16 40.75 24356 purchase 40 41
14:16 40.75 2223 purchase 40 41
14:15 40.75 2453 purchase 40 41
14:06 42.75 50000 purchase 40 41
14:02 40.75 2000 purchase 40 41
13:46 40.5 5000 sale 40 42
13:34 40.3 1545 sale 40 42
13:33 41.5 1769 purchase 40 42
13:28 42 200000 purchase 40 42
13:28 42.25 200000 purchase 40 42
13:25 41.7 1271 purchase 40 42
13:24 42.25 17500 purchase 39 42
13:16 42 25000 sale 42 43
13:13 42.2 4000 sale 42 44
13:03 42.75 2339 sale 42 44
13:02 42.8 2284 sale 42 44
13:00 42.9 7000 sale 42 44
profitmaker
- 09 Dec 2004 17:50
- 29 of 46
Bit of a disappointing day. Plenty of action. almost 25% of new shares traded. Can't really understand why this didn't move higher. Well, there's always tomorow.
piston broke
- 09 Dec 2004 22:47
- 30 of 46
never been involved in a new issue before, however would it be reasonable to assume that the MM's jobs is to get people to buy/sell shares.
If so, then if stock was oversubcribed by threefold and if they need to encourage a few sellers and buyers then they achieved their objective in there being about a qtr of a million more sells than buys. After all, as all stock was subcribed to, no one would be able to buy unless there were some sellers first.
They are therefore getting their ex's by encouraging loads of transcactions and are still sitting on those qtr of a million to play with.
gordon geko
- 10 Dec 2004 13:59
- 31 of 46
can we assume that all those cheques to be returned from wh irlenad will be spent next week on the stock or were they all staging it ??
piston broke
- 11 Dec 2004 09:27
- 32 of 46
I guess that if my assumption yesterday is correct, this stock should soon start going north as the MMs now have about two and a half million shares they can play with, so they have achieved their objective
Andy
- 11 Dec 2004 15:30
- 33 of 46
Gordon,
well I would think those that were intending to stag it are probably no longer, so I can't see too many returned cheques ending up here.
On the otherhand, I can see some institutions possibly buying stakes, so maybe with the limited amount of stock available, the price may rise steadily northwards, rather than rocket like some had assumed pre flat?
I wonder whether some of the sellers were Phillip Securities customers, who presumably could trade on the first day?
I'm going to hold a while, hopefully they will rise once all the trading is out of the way. News may well come unexpectedly. Over the road someone thinks some good news may well be released in the not too distant future, and he was right about the FOGL additional licences, so possibly worth earing in mind.
gordon geko
- 13 Dec 2004 12:32
- 34 of 46
lots of big sellers at the moment and price just about holding some positive press in sunday telegraph yesterday
colinspurr
- 14 Dec 2004 10:53
- 35 of 46
May I refer all you guys punting in this stock to read Alistair Blair's article in the IC dated 3 December 2004 under his column "No Free Lunch". If he is right to me this is another directors get rich quick deal and all the punters wait for something to happen. If it does they still have 67% of the company for very little. They have not started drilling yet?
gordon geko
- 21 Dec 2004 16:37
- 36 of 46
expect some news in January but can see slippage below 40p tempted to get out now ?
Andy
- 21 Dec 2004 16:53
- 37 of 46
Gordon,
Well I may reduce, can use the money in more active stocks until news arrives here.
Still holding for now, but considering my options.
gordon geko
- 30 Dec 2004 16:14
- 38 of 46
seems to be slowly heading towards 50p?
Andy
- 31 Dec 2004 00:20
- 39 of 46
Gordon,
Yes FGML seems to have perked up, maybe thay have shaken out all the staggers now?
I still hold, and am pleased I didn't sell, maybe some news will soon arrive, and that's why the price is rising?
Good luck and Happy New year to all holders.
gordon geko
- 11 Jan 2005 13:48
- 40 of 46
can anyone see further falls ??? as below the float level now
stockdog
- 13 Feb 2005 20:28
- 41 of 46
I'm assuming the present low in the underlying gold price may have as much to do with FGML's stagnant SP at 38.5 where it has been since New Year as anything else.
That and no news being no news and the usual theories about MM's luring stock out of bored punters' portfolios into their acquisitive hands. Do I detect the almost universal selling trades, yet the price holding steady, as a sign of MM's stock gathering.
With what seems to me genuinely interesting geological prospects, apart from the rather romantic history of Gondwanaland, and the wide predictions of gold price set to reach anywhere from $1,000 to 5,000 per tr oz by end of decade, there must come a day. I do have faith gold will be found in commercial quantities.
Of course, it is tempting to think of what else more short-term one could do with the money. Is it safe to sell out now for a month or three, and still find the price the same to come back in later? Knowing my timing, the answer is no.
Basically I see this as a protective holding against the US twin deficits coming home to roost as soon as everyone has seen through GW's cynically transparent budget proposals. Also, following the theory that the central banks have leant almost all their gold to ultimately the jewellery trade and can't have it back, the merest hint that they do wnat it back will lead to an inevitable sharp squeeze in the Gold price and thence a knee-jerk rteaction to gold stock SP's, alomst however fa away from production they are.
So I suppose I will just have to put up with lack of action. Anyoine else feel the same? Interested to hear your views.
SD
Andy
- 14 Feb 2005 02:27
- 42 of 46
Stockdog,
Well I've sold out for now, for a number of reasons.
Firstly, the market cap is quite heavy for a company at such an early srage of exploration IMHO, and secondly, I had other stocks that I thought had a better chance of increasing in value in the near term.
This remains on the watchlist, and I hope they prove a commercially viable resource, I may well be back again when funds allow if the news merits it.
Good luck to all remaining holders.
gordon geko
- 14 Sep 2005 13:30
- 43 of 46
got out long time ago at 38.5p had high hopes but never materilised not sure why
they are at this level seems a bit odd to me ????
RAB capital must be sitting on bug loss for this one but big profits on FOGL etc
stockdog
- 14 Sep 2005 20:12
- 44 of 46
I do feel a bit like Shane Warne - nearly the last man in and 270 runs to make.
Should have followed my own analysis from February above, but NOT discounted my luck with timing.
The last few days dive for the floor seems to have come out of nowhere - classic tree-shake before the end of year trading update next month. WTFDIK!
Gonna see if they lift a bit over the next few weeks and then cut my losses come what may - luckily never got too much stock on the IPO.
sd
gordon geko
- 10 Apr 2007 15:12
- 45 of 46
up 61% today on no news and no massive volume ???????
chav
- 13 Apr 2007 15:53
- 46 of 46
Having talked to a couple of the Aussie geolgists that are doing the prospecting for FGML only a month ago,I think this stock is dead in the water. They are saying no chance and FGML have nearly compleated their work plan and are going to review whether it is worth continuing in the Falklands.
Why the share price has seen a big rise rise this week is anyones guess but not I think based on prospective good news reguards gold finds. SELL QUICK before they fold!