Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PIXOLOGY (PIX)     

leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 18:21

WHAT ABOUT THIS ONE FOR A RECOVERY BET FOR 2006
Plenty of CASH in the bank.
IN PROFIT 2006/07
DYOR

leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 18:22 - 2 of 34

BOUGHT 5K worth TODAY @47
All the late trades today are BUY'S

leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 18:24 - 3 of 34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=PIX&Si

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 18:44 - 4 of 34

Why would it recover above 1???

leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 18:49 - 5 of 34

explosive
Why be greedy you can BUY NOW @47
SELL @ 94 if you want you will have still have doubled your money!
Me i will hold for a couple of years as i think a takeover will come.

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 19:03 - 6 of 34

Why though, what even makes you think the sp will recover to 55p??

hewittalan6 - 03 Jan 2006 19:21 - 7 of 34

Same question as explosive.
I see nothing to make me think of recovery.
No volume and a long term downtrend.
What do you know that we don't?
Not knocking you at all, cos I'm always on the lookout for ones I have missed, but I can't find any single reason for optimism.
alan



leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 19:29 - 8 of 34

I have been watching this since pre float.
I can only say look through all the company info.
No reason for the Huge fall.
Hard to guess bottom.
But this looks a good entry point to me.

explosive - 03 Jan 2006 19:44 - 9 of 34

Leedslad, wasn't this share tipped by RHPS then later sold? Can't remember the dates etc. Anyway without wishing to appear rude I see no reason to buy at the moment. I would however much appreciate a brief explanation of why you started the thread and your future forecasts for the sp. Like Alan said above I could well have missed what you've seen, read and understood.

leedslad - 03 Jan 2006 22:16 - 10 of 34

explosive
I have made plenty Buying when all are selling.
This has gone down on very little volumn.
No institution selling and no directors selling
Only 20mil shares in issue and tightly held.
Read all company RNS for last year.
Started thread as it looks like the herd have not even considerd this one.
Time will tell if i am right.
But i am prepared to take the gamble.
DYOR.

leedslad - 04 Jan 2006 09:28 - 11 of 34

Is this the turn?

explosive - 04 Jan 2006 18:47 - 12 of 34

Here we go abit about the company.

Pixology plc has developed a global reputation as a digital photography software specialist and is rapidly establishing a position as the premier private label digital printing solutions provider on both sides of the Atlantic.

Since entering the digital imaging market in 1995, the company has developed technology that enables consumers to easily print, organize, and share their digital pictures. These pictures can be printed at home via the Internet or in-store using kiosks. A new service was launched in August 04 which enables consumers to order prints directly from their mobile phone handsets, without the need to send them to a website or preview them first on a kiosk.



Pixology has provided technology products to a number of leading digital photography brands such as Canon, Hewlett Packard, Kodak, Konica and Nikon.

The company is a participating member of the International Imaging Industry Association (I3A) - the leading global imaging industry association - whose influential members include Agfa, Eastman Kodak, Fuji Photo and Hewlett Packard. Pixology sits alongside these companies on I3As CPXe networking standards committee.

Pixology floated on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange in December 2003 and is headquartered in the UK with sales and support offices in New Jersey, USA and Tokyo, Japan.

Now after looking at the '05 Interims and the basic and diluted loss per share of 3.12p. I think his company has further to fall, market cap of now 9.3m @ 46.5 sp. Competition is very high in this market sector, there are many companies offering in store prints in the high street and online. I can't see why Pixology would dominate or be able to gain a larger section of market share to its competitors.

Leedslad - Glad to hear that you have made plenty Buying when others are selling. Your financial analysis of the stock market isn't at question. I am curious to hear why you believe this could be a winner though? I understand that Pixology are hoping to more into profit this year which is good news. I will add to my watch list for now and may buy should the sp fall to around 30p which is all I think their worth.

explosive - 07 Jan 2006 19:28 - 13 of 34

The 2004 September sp ramp was caused by RHPS tipping the share. This was later sold in Jan '05 hench the deramp of the sp ever since. Jan'06 though TB has advised if RHPS subscribers haven't sold to hold "Contract wins with Boots and Tesco progress - but slow"...

blinger - 07 Jan 2006 20:06 - 14 of 34

In English, if you `de` something, you get rid of it e.g. de-humidify, getting rid of humidity, de-fenestrate- throw out of the window etc. etc.
So to "de-ramp" is to get rid of rampers, throw them out of the window, de-stroy them etc.
I am therefore proud to be a member of the de-ramping brigade.

Technotamed - 07 Jan 2006 20:16 - 15 of 34

I would never under-estimate how far a share will fall, wait till it has at least gained at least 10% before jumping on. When the price has reached what the company is worth it will level off before rising, will add to my watch list.

AndrewThomson77 - 08 Jan 2006 00:02 - 16 of 34

My chart indicates this as a strong buy at the moment. However, it also indicated a buy in May, July (twice), Sept and Oct last year and none of these were followed by a significant rise in the share price. I've not gone through the figures in detail but from looking at the chart, the rises were only in the region of 6%, assuming you got in at the very bottom and sold at the top of the rise. Then downhill again. I guess a dog is just a dog.

I'll admit that the current buy indicator is stronger than any in the previous year, but I'm not going to touch this one. Good luck anyway!

leedslad - 09 Jan 2006 08:36 - 17 of 34

:-)
Thank you pix

leedslad - 09 Jan 2006 09:49 - 18 of 34

Top of the leader board now.
And a long way to go yet after press comment this weekend i would say
:-)

Kivver - 09 Jan 2006 10:31 - 19 of 34

Fair play to you leedslad, im still learning about this trade, about investors and contributors to these bb's. You have gone about your job quietly certainly not over promoted this stock (havnt a clue what Blinger is saying or refering too) not been put off by the negative comments and stuck to your guns. Nothing but praise for you. A excellent start today, i hope it continues.

leedslad - 09 Jan 2006 11:35 - 20 of 34

Kivver
Thanks. Hope you got a few.

Kivver - 09 Jan 2006 11:49 - 21 of 34

Unfortunatley no, but will being keeping an eye on things.

leedslad - 09 Jan 2006 20:34 - 22 of 34

Seymour Pierce Ups Pixology To Outperform

Monday, January 09, 2006 9:12:01 AM ET
Dow Jones Newswires



1300 GMT [Dow Jones] Seymour Pierce ups Pixology (PIX.LN) to outpeform from hold, as the company indicates its loss for the year is anticipated to be "significantly" lower than Seymour Pierce's GBP1.7M estimate. Thus lifts estimate of pretax loss estimate for '05 to GBP1.5M. Says the company remains "well placed to benefit from development of the nascent digital printing market." Argues the EV/Sales multiple of 0.9x fails to account for "the significant growth expected over the next two years." Shares trade +38% at 56.5p. (PBA)


Contact us in London. +44-20-7842-9464
Markettalk.eu@dowjones.com

explosive - 09 Jan 2006 21:37 - 23 of 34

Leedslad, have you any indication of the worth of the Tesco contract signed in Novemeber? Also is there any profit in software liscences or doesn't this come into the equation?

leedslad - 09 Jan 2006 21:40 - 24 of 34

explosive
Sorry no idea to both questions.

explosive - 09 Jan 2006 22:24 - 25 of 34

OK, I'll try and find out, I would have thought Tesco would take a percentage of money taken in their stores. If there is a software liscense fee payable to PIX you could see aditional revenue.... Last question, do you know how many machines will be placed in Tesco stores and how far the roll out has got?

leedslad - 10 Jan 2006 07:08 - 26 of 34

sorry no

explosive - 17 Jan 2006 22:45 - 27 of 34

16.5% up this week, have no idea why? Anyone?

leedslad - 18 Jan 2006 09:39 - 28 of 34

Easy because they are cheap

back4packer - 29 Mar 2007 08:31 - 29 of 34

Pixology plc

Statement re Share Price Movement

The Board of Pixology notes the movement in the Company's share price over the
last few weeks and confirms that the Company continues to maintain a strong
balance sheet, with over 5 million of cash in the bank. The Board is also very
aware of the uncertainty resulting from the lack of recent news regarding offer
talks, but expects to be in a position to update the market on these talks
within the next few weeks. However, there can be no certainty that an offer will
be made for the Company or as to the terms upon which any offer might be made.
The Company also plans to issue its Preliminary Results for the year ended 31
December 2006 in the second half of April.

back4packer - 29 Mar 2007 08:36 - 30 of 34

MKT Cap of less than 4m - yet 'the Company continues to maintain a strong
balance sheet, with over 5 million of cash in the bank.'

UNDERVALUED.

neil777 - 29 Mar 2007 08:52 - 31 of 34

Very cheap, but a shocking spread!

back4packer - 29 Mar 2007 09:18 - 32 of 34

price still rising, volume increasing and spread reducing now

canada1 - 26 Apr 2007 08:02 - 33 of 34

What a ripoff, worth at least 55p a share.

canada1 - 01 May 2007 08:34 - 34 of 34

By the lack of comment, I take it I'm the only plonka that bought pix at 64p and refused to sell them at 42p, over six months ago?
Register now or login to post to this thread.