Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Vatukoula Gold Mines --- Increasing gold production (VGM)     

walden - 03 Feb 2009 09:14

Couldn't see a thread for vgm following the transition from rvd and now producing gold at Vatukoula in Fiji. Looking to ramp up to a rate of 110,000 oz per annum by mid 2009 with current rate of production probably a little over 60,000 oz per annum.

Making good progress towards their targets.

2517GEORGE - 09 Apr 2009 13:25 - 10 of 454

A number of possible offers is the reason for the sp rise.
2517

walden - 09 Apr 2009 16:24 - 11 of 454

Competition between bidders will be good for any takeout price.

halifax - 09 Apr 2009 16:28 - 12 of 454

can't see any bid succeeding under 2p.

Balerboy - 09 Apr 2009 18:07 - 13 of 454

I'd be quite happy with 2p+ thank you, oh happy days

cynic - 09 Apr 2009 18:09 - 14 of 454

whjy would anyone want to buy this tiddly gold mine(r) with hugely expensive extraction costs?

halifax - 09 Apr 2009 18:17 - 15 of 454

If new equipment purchased production could increasse to 100k ozs pa and costs would fall. market cap 10m, 100kozs gold @ say $800peroz = 60m. QED.

cynic - 09 Apr 2009 20:16 - 16 of 454

your money but something like CEY is a much better bet

halifax - 09 Apr 2009 21:59 - 17 of 454

CEY have it all to do, VGM is producing.

cynic - 10 Apr 2009 07:42 - 18 of 454

agree to differ (sharply) on the better investmnent and potential ...... in fact i don't hold CEY and have not done so for several months, but like to keep an eye on them

required field - 10 Apr 2009 10:23 - 19 of 454

Has anybody read through the operational update : they are hardly making any money at all !, this will peak and then drop....good for a quick in and out...just don't keep them !.

halifax - 10 Apr 2009 12:06 - 20 of 454

rf that depends if bids materialise and the price offerred, directors unlikely to accept a deal pitched lower than 2p inmho.

cynic - 10 Apr 2009 13:42 - 21 of 454

but does anyone think the company is worth any more than twopence!?

required field - 10 Apr 2009 15:37 - 22 of 454

How many shares are there ?....hundreds of millions probably.....more than 750 workers.....not much money coming in....market cap of 10 million at a penny.....if this goes up further ...I would take profits if I was in !.

halifax - 13 Apr 2009 19:49 - 23 of 454

rf if you are not in why are you concerned? Are you a de-ramper or just bitter that you are missing the boat?

cynic - 13 Apr 2009 19:54 - 24 of 454

ah yes .... i forgot .... to halifax, anyone who does not care for "his" companies is perjoratively deemed a deramper

halifax - 13 Apr 2009 19:57 - 25 of 454

cynic glad you have owned up at last!

cynic - 13 Apr 2009 20:12 - 26 of 454

que?

required field - 13 Apr 2009 20:39 - 27 of 454

Halifax, I would jump in straight away if I could make a buck or two....not so sure....reading the RNS's does not inspire....but it may rise just with everybody piling in.....and rise to what level ?, if this goes anywhere 2p...I would say take the profits because the company itself looks like a loser !.

required field - 14 Apr 2009 08:15 - 28 of 454

Well, I missed out on this one...should have got in last Thursday....please take some profits guys !.

cynic - 14 Apr 2009 08:48 - 29 of 454

with a true/live market price of 1.50/1.75 you would be very hard pressed indeed to make any money
Register now or login to post to this thread.