DocProc
- 08 Aug 2005 19:39
- 100 of 245
If you were to leave the earth on a ship going near the speed of light, time would go slower for you. Meanwhile, much more time would have passed on earth, and by the time you got back, perhaps everyone you knew when you left would be dead.
Q 1. According to the Theory of Relativity, wouldn't it be impossible to designate which was going fast, the earth or the ship? In that case wouldn't both people on the planet and those on the ship be able to claim they were the ones travelling fast and the other would be stationary?
Q 2. And, in a similar way, couldn't you assume the ship has stayed stationary and it was the earth that sped away at the speed of light and eventually came back to the ship?
Q 3. If you make it sorta kinda 50/50 and each leave the other a the speed of light, wouldn't these things cancel each other out and neither would age?
jimmy b
- 08 Aug 2005 19:42
- 102 of 245
It looks just like me !
namreh3
- 08 Aug 2005 19:55
- 105 of 245
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. oops.
Nam
bosley
- 09 Aug 2005 08:49
- 107 of 245
driver, re post 104. that's a little too close. has someone been whispering in your ear?
hewittalan6
- 09 Aug 2005 15:36
- 112 of 245
But he was dyxlexic. What if, when he wrote E=MC2, what he really meant was MC=E2. Modern physics would be knackered!!! Oh yes. Now thats my idea of a fun time!!!!
hewittalan6
- 09 Aug 2005 15:36
- 113 of 245
But he was dyxlexic. What if, when he wrote E=MC2, what he really meant was MC=E2. Modern physics would be knackered!!! Oh yes. Now thats my idea of a fun time!!!!
hewittalan6
- 09 Aug 2005 15:37
- 114 of 245
OOps. Bloody computers on the fritz again. Must be the wrong equation after all, and thats what causes my computer to go wrong.
jimmy b
- 09 Aug 2005 15:56
- 115 of 245
Nothnig rong wiht biegn dislexxic alen..
driver
- 09 Aug 2005 16:46
- 116 of 245
There may be a lot of life in the universe. Part 2
Is this a momentous fact or not? Is the circumstance that we can look around and find were the brainiest boffins on the planet merely a trivial result of being the first species able to notice? Or is there some reason to think that intelligence is actually a rare and unlikely evolutionary development, and Homo sapiens has lucked out?
This is more than just another good question to bandy about after dinner, between the cigars and the port. It goes right to the heart of our place in the universe. And its also of obvious and critical importance to SETI researchers. After all, were on a fools mission deploying our SETI telescopes if theres no intelligent life out there.
bosley
- 09 Aug 2005 18:54
- 117 of 245
why would there be any intelligent life out there? there's none in here.
superrod
- 09 Aug 2005 22:43
- 118 of 245
Namreh
sorry for late reply....I HAVE A LIFE...LOL.
a vacuum cannot exist because everything has a vapour pressure ( a few atoms escape from ANY matter all the time ) . neutrinos travel at ( or very close to ) the speed of light so weigh nothing or as close to nothing as makes no odds. every day of your life a billion billion billion neutrinos pass through the average body. the chance of just ONE hitting a body particle in your lifetime is about evens.
superrod
- 09 Aug 2005 22:47
- 119 of 245
and if it did you wouldnt even feel it