for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

qc
dog ends fit in nicely with my biodegradable coffins.

Stockdog, Paul is a 23 year old programmer. (my ProfilePro sofware tells me, it may be wrong).

QC Hi,

Indeed, you could be right, butt(lol !) what would the IP be worth to a cigarette manufacturer as a one off purchase ?

Also Biotec could still manufacture the plastic to make the filters, and the cigarette manufacturer or their supplier would use it to make the filters ...

Cheers,
PM

seo will then take care of all your biodegradable needs from the cradle to the grave. when you're born seo will provide bio-d nappies, as you get older seo will provide bio-d big mac cartons, as the stresses of life kick in and you turn to ciggies seo will provide bio-d fillters, and when you die........bio-d coffins!!!! fantastic!!!! we're rich i tell ya'.....rich!!! hallelujah!!

bos
You got it in one.

someone should email howie and tell him.

just realised....oi , tonyrelaxes, you twat!! i wanted 10k.

PM, bosley LOL!!!!

I hope your right PM :-)

morning all. very quiet today.

Morning bos. If you think this is quiet you should be in on PCM where 1.20 worth of shares was bought earlier and 1.10 worth has just been sold. What a cut-throat, crazy, big business world that is in.
Alan

wow!! big money changing hands!!!

Now, now bos. You may think that is small fry, but it is large proportion of the value of a company I am invested in. I am seriosely thinking of making a bid for the entire issued share capital and taking it private, if anyone can change this 20 note for me!!
IMHO though, I fancy PCM as a multi bagger for the not too distant, but that is for another thread.
Alan

alan, driver says so too. unfortunately i have a major problem with pcm from the good old tech boom days. i bought at 16p. still holding, waiting.........

Al, stop ramping PCM, have you had a look at ERT (Postman Pat) to you.

The agreement with Elwood Packaging Inc is initially for 18 months but is dependent upon Elwood achieving and maintaining certain levels of sales, Stanelco said.
Perhaps the same type of deal should have been done with ASDA.

Could it be that the ASDA deal is going slower re conversions etc than expected hence SEO may have learned a lesson. Still a great beleiver re the ASDA deal but looking at the early part of 2006. Similar comment may have been previously posted but just returned from hols so catching up.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Greekman

I read it that Elwood have 18 months exclusivity CERTAIN. It is periods after that that is dependant on having achieved sales.

ASDA had only 12 months - END of exclusivity.

This then permits Grenseal to be sold elsewhere, complementing/increasing the numbers of users paying Fees as well as allowing existing machines to be used for other retailers products. I do not see more than one manufacturer or distributor being needed for Frogpack in a given territory.

Tonyrelaxes

I read it different to you although it would be nice to get a bit more info,IE a bit more meat on the bone so to speak. The extract below is from the initial announcement, it appears to me that the exclusive period only depends on the level of sales and not the period following. I agree re your comments re ASDA and the comment re only one distributor in any given territory.

Quote.
The duration of the exclusive period, initially 18 months, is dependent upon
Elwood achieving and maintaining certain levels of sales.

I read it the way Tonyrelaxes - 18 months to start definite and any extension thereafter dependent on successful sales levels being achieved. No way would Elwood expose themselves to having the rug pulled any time SEO fancied withut a minimum period.

The lesson learned from ASDA may be that 12 months is not long enough to "turn" the market.

sd

"The duration of the exclusive period, initially 18 months, is dependent upon
Elwood achieving and maintaining certain levels of sales."

"is dependent upon" refers back to the "exclusive period", therefore greekman is correct.

"maintaining certain levels" applies to the 18 months and not some unspecified future.

Still think i am right. Can't see how any minimum sales level would require to be implimented or mentioned re any period after the initial 18 months. We may have to agree to differ untill clarification is forthcoming.