Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

Balerboy - 03 Apr 2013 20:42 - 10112 of 11003

Agree harry, I have used both avg and avast, avast seems to update quietly in the background whereas avg brings comp to a stop almost whilst updating.

skinny - 05 Apr 2013 07:44 - 10113 of 11003

Does anyone run a 3rd monitor via USB?

Seymour Clearly - 07 Apr 2013 20:37 - 10114 of 11003

Mega, I use Avast free at home, on my mobile phone, and run paid-for avast at work, and am perfectly happy. There doesn't seem to be any difference in performance between the free and paid versions. Avast is very good at spotting the occasional dodgy website and warning you!

Avast for my mobile (GalaxyS2) works well with no noticeable effect.

skinny - 09 Apr 2013 13:58 - 10115 of 11003

Further to post 10113.

Any views on the pros/cons of running a 3rd/4th monitor by either a 2nd graphics card or a USB to VGA/DVI connector such as this or similar?

HARRYCAT - 10 Apr 2013 10:42 - 10116 of 11003

You're not having much luck with this one skinny. None of us have turned our living room into a fully functional trading room yet!

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 10:48 - 10117 of 11003

Harry - I've had 2 monitors for years and as I bought a new 22" with my recent PC purchase, I thought I might as well utilise the 3rd screen.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 11:02 - 10118 of 11003

Skinners,

I've no experience of multi-displays via USB. Instead, I use the older Matrox Quad cards that have been around for a while now. I bought a few of them second hand off eBay some years ago, and keep one spare in case one card goes wrong.

There are certainly faster cards nowadays, but I'm not so sure I'd be able to notice any discernible difference.

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 11:19 - 10119 of 11003

I don't think for what most of us do day to day, we need one of the high performance cards which seem aimed squarely at gamers.

My old PC had a dual head Radeon 9700(128mb), which (Ithink) cost me @£120, 10 years ago.

It ran my 2 screens very ably.

It seems that some mid range cards now come with a 3 output and (I think), as long as 1 is DisplayPort' will run 3 monitors.

I have a 1GB Radeon 7570 with 2 outputs - again it seems more than upto the job of running graphically, typical software - CMC,IG,HL etc.

Both options in post 10115 seem to be about the same cost wise, either using a USB to VGA/DVI/HDMI lead and software or a run of the mill card such as this.

Hils, I know that you have been a Matrox Quad fan for years - which one do you use? as there seem to be some on ebay for a similar price to the Invidia above.

Seymour Clearly - 10 Apr 2013 11:31 - 10120 of 11003

Skinny, I'm just about to install an NVidia 285 quadro twin screen card (with VGA or DVI cables) on my Win7 machine. Think I paid no more than £20 on ebay for it. I'll let you know how it goes.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 11:31 - 10121 of 11003

I think that's the one, skinners.

My Matrox QuickDesks on my current machine says it's a Matrox G200 Multi-Monitor. The spare card I've got says MGI G2 +/QUAD-PL/TVE.

I think the TVE bit is something to do with being able to watch TV, but I've had the card for so long now that I honestly can't remember what it's meant to do.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 11:35 - 10122 of 11003

If you do go for a Matrox quad card, be sure it includes the splitter cables. There are two outputs on the card itself which get split again in the cable.

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 11:41 - 10123 of 11003

Seymour / Hils - thanks for the info - it looks like whichever option I take, it will be less than £35.

Seymour - ls that to be a 2nd card?

On edit - Hils, does the Matrox need/have its own fan?

tyketto - 10 Apr 2013 13:22 - 10124 of 11003

Skinny,
I've got Matrox g550(dual) on two computers .No fan needed.
Be sure to check the type of available expansion slot in the computer
concerned before buying.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 14:03 - 10125 of 11003

No fan, skinners, but the cards do have several little black prickly things that my son informs me are called heat sinks or summat.

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 14:29 - 10126 of 11003

Many thanks for all the input etc.

One last Question about the G200 - do you know what the power consumption is?

I can't seem to find it easily.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 14:32 - 10127 of 11003

No idea, skinners, but I can let you have 50p for the meter if it's a problem. :o)

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 14:41 - 10128 of 11003

Thanks Hils :-)

Just checking I don't get too near the Power supply limit.

hilary - 10 Apr 2013 15:09 - 10129 of 11003

Well, fwiw, I don't think they consume much power at all.

Does this link help? It refers to the G200A using 4 watts.

skinny - 10 Apr 2013 15:14 - 10130 of 11003

That's almost an arm full!

I guessed it would be less than 20w by the spec - lack of fan etc.

My head hurts.

Seymour Clearly - 10 Apr 2013 15:39 - 10131 of 11003

Sorry, been out. Skinny, it's going to be the two main displays, replacing the motherboard graphics. My main aim was for low power demand & whilst I can't remember the consumption, it wasn't much - no fan on this either. The quad output card is the Quadro 4 NVS 400.

Reminds me of the Irishmen in the Audi Quattro joke. I'm sure you know it.
Register now or login to post to this thread.