NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

For those that are still bothering to read Anomalous, he is as usual being economical with the truth.

What I actually said, (amongst many other similar things), on Energyi's "Charts and Fundamentals" thread on ADVFN, was this:

"wdurham - 13 Apr'05 - 11:46 - 4541 of 5408 edit

" What we do know though, is that there has been some missing RNS's. The bank for one and the directors (that converted expenses) for the other."

I'm getting fed up with this. Why are these UKREG statements "missing"?

The full number of shares issued for the convertible drawdown was announced by the company on 20th January.

The full number of shares issued to directors in lieu of accrued fees was announced by the company on 29th December. Those accrued fees were spelled out, by named director, in the Annual Results published in November. They relate mainly to the non-execs. Shares were issued at 10 to the A$ on the outstanding amounts.

The full number of shares issued to the Badenhorsts has been announced by the company, on 4 August and 29 December.

The AIM rules state that the AIM listed company must disclose such information, insofar as they have it, without delay.

They did.

Where is the problem?

-----------------------------------

wdurham - 15 Apr'05 - 19:14 - 4743 of 5408 edit

< <>>

And the equally interminable harping on about missing RNS statements is equally silly. The UKREG announcements were made as required - they merely lacked the fine detail required by the AIM rules. The purpose of the rules is to try to ensure that shareholders are kept informed about major shareholders' buying and selling activities, and directors dealings.

Tell me, as an investor, that you don't know how many shares the lending bank now hold? And you don't know how many shares the Badenhorsts hold? And you are equally unaware of the directors' holdings following the issue of shares distributed to them in lieu of the accrued fees stated in the last Annual Report?

There was indeed inadequate disclosure from the point of view of the AIM rules, but there was definitely material disclosure, and no shareholder who has two braincells to rub together is in any doubt as to who owns what."

-----------------------------------

I did NOT say there was "nothing wrong". My opinion and what I said is clear from the above.

The only person responsible for reporting NML to AIM and the FSA was the person who actually DID it - Anomalous.

The only person responsible for continuing to nag the AIM team and the FSA over this matter is Anomalous.

If the directors of NML are fined or in any other way punished, the only person responsible will be Anomalous.


And now I shall once again filter him. His ongoing drivel is increasingly irritating.

Wendy - he is also taking your name in vain on ADVFN!

Why is so much rubbish put about, why not wait for an RNS.

Here's a Wendy post to remind everyone what she thinks of the management!

wdurham - 1 Apr'05 - 17:12 - 3473 of 5408
The delay of production activity until June is disappointing. This shambolic management have even managed to beat the Wendy Factor. I already had 2.5 times their timescale factored in, and they can't even meet THAT!

Anomalous1 - 25 Jun'05 - 19:46 - 1018 of 1018 (Filtered Forever)

They moved into Angola in October 2004 and are producing diamonds by April 2005..that can't be bad, compared to some.

Last drilling report was 17/05/2005, what is the ,hysteria' for forget panicking, SP[offer] is 4.0, so what.

True.

The only one panicking is the bitter ex shareholder N**** S**** (aka sad bast*rd) who keeps concocting ever more intricate self-satisfying theories to prove to himself that he was right to sell out of NML at a loss.

Thankyou, Takahe, but frankly, I am past caring.

Anom has shot himself in the foot too many times for there to be any benefit whatsoever in me continuing with any of his nit-picking, detail-obsessive arguments.

My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known. My previous put downs of Anom's earlier ramping and vastly inflated figures are well documented. I maintain a "wait and see" attitude to the stock, and have never ramped it here or anywhere. Nor have I ever attempted to pull wool over the eyes of new shareholders - I have even been downbeat in reply to some of them, to mitigate some of the more fanciful comments made. I have no need to take refuge in claims of being "lied to" to excuse my mistakes. I have no need to blame anyone else for things I did of my own free will.

There is no further point in me even acknowledging the man's existence.

Wendy D...I hope we don't have to 'wait and see' for too much longer.

Wendy D - 26 Jun'05 - 09:53 - 1023 of 1024
My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known.

The fact that you dropped the management in it is well known - and I do hope they ask you to contribute to any fine.

The fact that the non-disclosure matter has the AIM regulation team investigating NML is well known - and Wendy caused their involvement throught denying that anything was wrong.

The fact that you admit that there is a major seller is also well known - contrary to the views of some of your fellow shareholders.

But most of all, your 'shameless' ramping of Minmet is also well known to the previous Minmet shareholders, who still hold a grudge against you for ramping the share.

One wonders if you're being backed to ramp this share too, because there are some serious questions about the project that have never been answered and for a so-called 'expert' to ignore these obvious questions leads some to believe that you are deliberately ignoring the obvious and simple answers.

I wonder if the NML shareholders will feel the same way as the MNT shareholders feel about you in a years time?

Will be very interesting to see if the seller has dunped at 3.25p today.If they have I would immediately abandon all hope as this will never get anywhere with the seller having an unlimited amount of stock to sell.

An unlimited amount of stock?

Are you sure about that?

Where's he getting his unlimited amount of stock, is he mining it out of the ground?

Theyve been selling for the last 18 months with no sign of them running out any time soon.What is more crucial is the ever decreasing price they are prepared to accept for their shares that is of vital importance imo.

Maybe that suggests they are running out of shares to sell - they might not be that bothered about getting a good price for the last few?

And there's the trade - a massive 50K!

No evidence there of the seller only the mms dont want the stock.

Glad you accept there's no evidence of a "seller" now.

There's a lot of poisonous snakes around today..

Just mind you dont get bitten then by the deadly Asp!