Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

mbugger - 25 Jun 2005 18:40 - 1018 of 1909

Why is so much rubbish put about, why not wait for an RNS.

Anomalous1 - 25 Jun 2005 19:46 - 1019 of 1909

Here's a Wendy post to remind everyone what she thinks of the management!

wdurham - 1 Apr'05 - 17:12 - 3473 of 5408
The delay of production activity until June is disappointing. This shambolic management have even managed to beat the Wendy Factor. I already had 2.5 times their timescale factored in, and they can't even meet THAT!

mjr1234 - 25 Jun 2005 20:02 - 1020 of 1909

Anomalous1 - 25 Jun'05 - 19:46 - 1018 of 1018 (Filtered Forever)

takahe - 25 Jun 2005 20:56 - 1021 of 1909

They moved into Angola in October 2004 and are producing diamonds by April 2005..that can't be bad, compared to some.

mbugger - 25 Jun 2005 21:03 - 1022 of 1909

Last drilling report was 17/05/2005, what is the ,hysteria' for forget panicking, SP[offer] is 4.0, so what.

mjr1234 - 26 Jun 2005 01:14 - 1023 of 1909

True.

The only one panicking is the bitter ex shareholder N**** S**** (aka sad bast*rd) who keeps concocting ever more intricate self-satisfying theories to prove to himself that he was right to sell out of NML at a loss.

Wendy D - 26 Jun 2005 09:53 - 1024 of 1909

Thankyou, Takahe, but frankly, I am past caring.

Anom has shot himself in the foot too many times for there to be any benefit whatsoever in me continuing with any of his nit-picking, detail-obsessive arguments.

My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known. My previous put downs of Anom's earlier ramping and vastly inflated figures are well documented. I maintain a "wait and see" attitude to the stock, and have never ramped it here or anywhere. Nor have I ever attempted to pull wool over the eyes of new shareholders - I have even been downbeat in reply to some of them, to mitigate some of the more fanciful comments made. I have no need to take refuge in claims of being "lied to" to excuse my mistakes. I have no need to blame anyone else for things I did of my own free will.

There is no further point in me even acknowledging the man's existence.

takahe - 26 Jun 2005 21:21 - 1025 of 1909

Wendy D...I hope we don't have to 'wait and see' for too much longer.

Anomalous1 - 27 Jun 2005 00:55 - 1026 of 1909

Wendy D - 26 Jun'05 - 09:53 - 1023 of 1024
My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known.

The fact that you dropped the management in it is well known - and I do hope they ask you to contribute to any fine.

The fact that the non-disclosure matter has the AIM regulation team investigating NML is well known - and Wendy caused their involvement throught denying that anything was wrong.

The fact that you admit that there is a major seller is also well known - contrary to the views of some of your fellow shareholders.

But most of all, your 'shameless' ramping of Minmet is also well known to the previous Minmet shareholders, who still hold a grudge against you for ramping the share.

One wonders if you're being backed to ramp this share too, because there are some serious questions about the project that have never been answered and for a so-called 'expert' to ignore these obvious questions leads some to believe that you are deliberately ignoring the obvious and simple answers.

I wonder if the NML shareholders will feel the same way as the MNT shareholders feel about you in a years time?

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 12:35 - 1027 of 1909

Will be very interesting to see if the seller has dunped at 3.25p today.If they have I would immediately abandon all hope as this will never get anywhere with the seller having an unlimited amount of stock to sell.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 12:47 - 1028 of 1909

An unlimited amount of stock?

Are you sure about that?

Where's he getting his unlimited amount of stock, is he mining it out of the ground?

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 12:52 - 1029 of 1909

Theyve been selling for the last 18 months with no sign of them running out any time soon.What is more crucial is the ever decreasing price they are prepared to accept for their shares that is of vital importance imo.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:12 - 1030 of 1909

Maybe that suggests they are running out of shares to sell - they might not be that bothered about getting a good price for the last few?

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:12 - 1031 of 1909

And there's the trade - a massive 50K!

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 13:40 - 1032 of 1909

No evidence there of the seller only the mms dont want the stock.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:46 - 1033 of 1909

Glad you accept there's no evidence of a "seller" now.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:47 - 1034 of 1909

There's a lot of poisonous snakes around today..

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 14:03 - 1035 of 1909

Just mind you dont get bitten then by the deadly Asp!

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 14:58 - 1036 of 1909

I hope that Anomalous does continue to post I consider it outrageous to the extreme when posters attempt to bash Anomalous for providing proven evidence of the selling when you have the likes of someone called EB on a competitor claiming a major transaction will be completed in a matter of days and he expects the sp to at least treble...I would call that outrageous blatant RAMPING.!

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 15:02 - 1037 of 1909

There is evidence of -selling- alright. The fact that the share price has fallen over the past year tells you that there have been more sells than buys.
What there IS NOT is evidence of a specific -big seller-.

There is certainly NOT any evidence that there is a -big seller- out there that is still selling his shares at these levels.
Register now or login to post to this thread.