Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

mjr1234 - 26 Jun 2005 01:14 - 1023 of 1909

True.

The only one panicking is the bitter ex shareholder N**** S**** (aka sad bast*rd) who keeps concocting ever more intricate self-satisfying theories to prove to himself that he was right to sell out of NML at a loss.

Wendy D - 26 Jun 2005 09:53 - 1024 of 1909

Thankyou, Takahe, but frankly, I am past caring.

Anom has shot himself in the foot too many times for there to be any benefit whatsoever in me continuing with any of his nit-picking, detail-obsessive arguments.

My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known. My previous put downs of Anom's earlier ramping and vastly inflated figures are well documented. I maintain a "wait and see" attitude to the stock, and have never ramped it here or anywhere. Nor have I ever attempted to pull wool over the eyes of new shareholders - I have even been downbeat in reply to some of them, to mitigate some of the more fanciful comments made. I have no need to take refuge in claims of being "lied to" to excuse my mistakes. I have no need to blame anyone else for things I did of my own free will.

There is no further point in me even acknowledging the man's existence.

takahe - 26 Jun 2005 21:21 - 1025 of 1909

Wendy D...I hope we don't have to 'wait and see' for too much longer.

Anomalous1 - 27 Jun 2005 00:55 - 1026 of 1909

Wendy D - 26 Jun'05 - 09:53 - 1023 of 1024
My opinions about the management are well known, my opinions about the project are well known and my opinions about this non-disclosure nonsense are also well known.

The fact that you dropped the management in it is well known - and I do hope they ask you to contribute to any fine.

The fact that the non-disclosure matter has the AIM regulation team investigating NML is well known - and Wendy caused their involvement throught denying that anything was wrong.

The fact that you admit that there is a major seller is also well known - contrary to the views of some of your fellow shareholders.

But most of all, your 'shameless' ramping of Minmet is also well known to the previous Minmet shareholders, who still hold a grudge against you for ramping the share.

One wonders if you're being backed to ramp this share too, because there are some serious questions about the project that have never been answered and for a so-called 'expert' to ignore these obvious questions leads some to believe that you are deliberately ignoring the obvious and simple answers.

I wonder if the NML shareholders will feel the same way as the MNT shareholders feel about you in a years time?

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 12:35 - 1027 of 1909

Will be very interesting to see if the seller has dunped at 3.25p today.If they have I would immediately abandon all hope as this will never get anywhere with the seller having an unlimited amount of stock to sell.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 12:47 - 1028 of 1909

An unlimited amount of stock?

Are you sure about that?

Where's he getting his unlimited amount of stock, is he mining it out of the ground?

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 12:52 - 1029 of 1909

Theyve been selling for the last 18 months with no sign of them running out any time soon.What is more crucial is the ever decreasing price they are prepared to accept for their shares that is of vital importance imo.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:12 - 1030 of 1909

Maybe that suggests they are running out of shares to sell - they might not be that bothered about getting a good price for the last few?

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:12 - 1031 of 1909

And there's the trade - a massive 50K!

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 13:40 - 1032 of 1909

No evidence there of the seller only the mms dont want the stock.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:46 - 1033 of 1909

Glad you accept there's no evidence of a "seller" now.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 13:47 - 1034 of 1909

There's a lot of poisonous snakes around today..

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 14:03 - 1035 of 1909

Just mind you dont get bitten then by the deadly Asp!

ASMITH2 - 27 Jun 2005 14:58 - 1036 of 1909

I hope that Anomalous does continue to post I consider it outrageous to the extreme when posters attempt to bash Anomalous for providing proven evidence of the selling when you have the likes of someone called EB on a competitor claiming a major transaction will be completed in a matter of days and he expects the sp to at least treble...I would call that outrageous blatant RAMPING.!

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 15:02 - 1037 of 1909

There is evidence of -selling- alright. The fact that the share price has fallen over the past year tells you that there have been more sells than buys.
What there IS NOT is evidence of a specific -big seller-.

There is certainly NOT any evidence that there is a -big seller- out there that is still selling his shares at these levels.

Dynamite - 27 Jun 2005 15:46 - 1038 of 1909

mjr...all that is happening at the mo. is that a few people are getting frightened out because they have had to wait longer than they anticipated. Also some people may think that they can make a quick profit elsewhere and coem back in..they might or might not be too late.
Patience
Di

Wendy D - 27 Jun 2005 18:19 - 1039 of 1909

mjr1234/Di -

I have to disagree with you both on this.

The pattern over the last 12 months or so has been selling into strength. A large number of shares - I really have no idea how many - have been drip fed into the market every time the share price pops up a bit.

However, it depends what you call "large selling". The table I saw the other day included sells of as little as 16k in such "large selling", which is patently silly. At an average price of - say - 5p bid over the last 12 months (I haven't checked, but it's close enough as a ballpark figure) only sells of 500k or more are in any way indicative of a large holder rather than an ordinary PI. Indeed, I know of several PIs with holdings close to and some way above the million mark, so even that guideline can't be taken as "fact".

There is no indication of who any large seller might be, from the large number of possible candidates. It is irresponsible, particularly in the absence of UKREG announcements, to allege that notifiable shareholders are selling and are deliberately not following the process required by the rules.

mjr1234 - 27 Jun 2005 18:28 - 1040 of 1909

Exactly Wendy,

As I said, there is evidence of selling, but selling into strength is found on all stocks and is perfectly normal. It is when people start reading things into it, assuming its a large holder drip-feeding rather than individual holders selling, assuming its someone "in the know", assuming its a notifiable holder selling, assuming this assumed "large seller" has more to sell, assuming this "large seller" has been the same seller over the past year and assuming that same "large seller" is still here today.

Its all just a load of assumptions. Not facts. The only facts are that there have been more sells than buys over time, hence the share price movement. Obviously if you are going to sell, most sensible people will sell into strength in to get the best price, so its no suprise to find that there are more sells done into strength than not into strength.

GayBriefs - 28 Jun 2005 08:53 - 1041 of 1909

If I had participated in the recent 4p placing I would start to be getting cold feet as this appears to be hanging by a thread on the edge of a cliff..big question is ...Is it about to fall off!

stockdog - 28 Jun 2005 09:06 - 1042 of 1909

No chance of you participating in the recent placing - it was not available to "participate" in. So your cold feet and the cliff will both remain equally hypothetical - as such, there is nothing real for any appendages to fall off. Tell us something we don't know about the current operation in Angola if you wajnt to be helpful.
Register now or login to post to this thread.