Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....

thanks for your customary marxist polemic fred
as usual i have skipped past as you're just seriously dull

anyway, as you never vote, the question i asked could have been of no possible interest to you

stan - i assume you actually voted first time around, so my question for you remains valid

Exec,

I warmed very, very much (as did wifey) towards Michael Gove, who appeared on this morning's Andrew Marr show.

-==

You must have been b. cold.

Next, you will be saying Theresa would warm the cockles of your heart.

-=-=-=-=-=

Manuel.

How ungrateful of you when somebody has paid attention to you.

Go and ask Nanny Theresa for a cuddle.

The big question for Stan is what comes first ... Brexit or a Burnley win ?

Did Blackburn vote remain ? You could always move there and support them Stan , makes sense.

On the ITV news website (Robert Pexton column): it looks like TM has joined I'm a celeb get me out of here with the palm-tree backround....the way it's going : she might as well.....to me we are going to get more emu than EU....or is it the other way round ?...

Gove is a lying toerag!

Nothing that was listed in your post is true EL, we would still be under €u law, possibly forever.

Alf,

Iv'e already answered your question, now read my post 10444 again slowly and if you still can't understand it then ask someone who has understood it and then maybe you will get it.

The big question for Dil is what comes first ... The "informed referendum" or a Carduff City implosion.

Even Oily doesent believe it...


https://twitter.com/brexitblog_info/status/1069354364110848001

so stan, how will you vote if there is a referendum?
try answering without having first referred to to the commissariat

Mr Garnet you seem more dense then I thought but being the patient type I will persevere..so once again...

Alf,

We can't possibly have merely "a 2nd referendum" as everyone in the Country have had the time in between that referendum to be "informed" of some important elements that were not explained by the outers before the last one and the 1st "informed referendum" that should now happen...how many more times do you need to have this explained to you?

Stan.

You have to make allowances for Manuel, for as he moves into decrepitude he still remains in his childlike attention-seeking phase, like quite a lot of so-called "up and at "em" brigade" throwing their toys out of the pram.

Nanny won't be proud of him.

Quite Fred quite.

Think you put the e's in wrong place Stan.

EL reading that the back stabbing Gove has suckered you to support TM`s position beggers belief.

Better you watch Mogg in House of Commons live.

stan clearly can't make up his own mind how to vote in the event that there is a(nother) referendum, but just dances around the issue as fred's little puppet

it was interesting to hear today from a small group of important and very well educated saudi businessmen that they all thought uk would be well shot of brussels and was strong enough in the longer term to flourish

Manuel,

Still crawling in SA.

Be careful you never know when you will have served your purpose for them.

Some of the objections to the backstop may merely be technicalities. However, even as technicalities, they are important and require consideration.

Membership of the EU does allow member states to be able share security information. Leave and you aren't any longer a member.

eg. So a non-member has a potential lack of access to certain levels of (sensitive) security information.

Well, this might be a factual technical possibility but it can, does and will work both ways, if it has to.

But it does NOT have to work like that if it isn't sensible. Mutual sharing of sensitive security information need not necessarily have to stop - even though the backstop agreement analysis says it could.