for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Paul

I've caught you out so many times I stopped pulling you up about it, I know you read all the posts here.

That ii bans got to hurt, how you going to spend your evenings now?

lol!!

oily

Sorry, i'll refrain forthwith.

oily

were you meaning the posts implying paul is a ramping liar or something else?

i can supply proof of the former if required.

OK, Shamona, let us hear it then! Fair question?

bos
What ever its worth its more dosh in the pot, like I said the royalties on the sales would be a big bonus

Notice to all on this thread - personal insults will not be tolerated - please refrain and concentrate on the topic be that poitive or negative comment,

Ian

mark

As it's off topic i'll refrain from posting my dosier on him.

Price holding up pretty well today considering the markets, may well get a bounce tomorrow off the back of the shares article, think i'll wait to see how the US does tonight before opening a trade though.

Well the US has bounced - up 34 as we spea - just need it to drag the FTSE back abit now.

Paul - was it you that confirmed that WALMART are co presenting with ? Nature Works at the Phili convention on the 19th ??

I am sure someone has confirmed that WALMART were going to present - but they are not yet shown on the agenda that I have just found

baza

I've just bought in, trade not showing yet.

Shares mag article won't have been read by the masses yet so we should get a boost from that tomorrow, also due a technical bounce.

excuse the ignorance of a novice please Shamona but why would you buy in if 1) as you warned its down - post 10682. 2) Its all smoke and mirrors as no-one wants greenseal - post 10690. 3) No-one believes what the company says - post 10693. Is this just a short term punt on the back of SM article or has your stance changed.

excuse the ignorance of a novice please Shamona but why would you buy in if 1) as you warned its down - post 10682. 2) Its all smoke and mirrors as no-one wants greenseal - post 10690. 3) No-one believes what the company says - post 10693. Is this just a short term punt on the back of SM article or has your stance changed.

rasen

Purely short term, I follow over hyped stocks and work the bounces.

i only invest in "true" growth companies with massive potential, especially undervalued one's.

sham

Thx

Well its worked already Sham - just ticked up on the bid - was yours the 500 buy ???

baza

Busy day on the ADVFN board:

From SHARES magasine

'Essam Khashoggi, one of the worlds richest men along with his older brother Adnan, the infamous arms dealer, has done high-tech packaging company Stanelco (SEO) a good turn. Stanelcos purchase of Khashoggis company, Biotec, for 15 million in June could turn out to be a fantastic
bargain.
Khashoggi is estimated to have invested $200 million founding US-quoted company Earth Shell Corporation to develop green biodegradeable
packaging. Sales have commenced but the shares have performed poorly and Essam resigned as chairman in July.

After heavy losses Earth Shell told Biotec to concentrate on only a couple of projects and forget the rest. One of these was a starch-based replacement for the plastic used in cigarette filters. The Biotec filter is
biodegradeable and supposedly safer. More to the point, it should save tobacco companies around 350 million a year on production costs as cellulose has rocketed in price due to the oil surge.
Stanelcos agents are contacting cigarette companies to open an auction to buy the intellectual property rights (IP) once the research on making the starch filter is completed.

There is a good chance that Stanelco will sell the filter IP for more than it paid for Biotec and also collect substantial royalty payments. Biotec is a world leader in starch-based packaging but is barely profitable as sales are
minimal. Packaging made from starch is much cheaper than plastic but cannot be heatsealed. So the combination with Stanelcos radio beam
sealing technology looks like a marriage made in heaven.
by: Timon Day '


Posted after the usual Banal de-rampers:

Still de-ramping pests persist. A bunch of clueless losers!.

What is their raison-d'etre?

Are they trying to help shareholders?

Obviously not!

Read Stanelco's RNSs. The RNSs have to conform to financial regulations.
De-rampers make their own rules: 'Destruction r Us'.

Stanelco's RNSs outline areas of research, development and collaboration which are expected to come 'on stream' during the next twelve months. As they come 'on stream'
Stanelco's share price will rise exponentially.

That is not ramping that is the scenario that exists.

Anyone can check out the company's RNSs for themselves.

z

madmanc - 6 Oct'05 - 12:58 - 52242 of 52244


zeppo

I once read a couple of Stanelco rns, it was the ISRACRAPS and the COURT CASE HAS NO FOUNDATION one's; never believed another word they've came out with since. Both were proven to be shams.

zeppo - 6 Oct'05 - 15:42 - 52243 of 52244 edit


madmanc

It is a fallacy to generalise from the particular.

The two RNSs which you quote, but deliberatly misconstrue, have little relevance to Stanelco's present status or to Stanelco's future prospects. You really are scraping at the bottom of the barrel to find something malicious to post.
As explained in a statement of 24th October 2003, neither Howards White, nor Ben White were present at the meeting which led to the Isracaps deal. (Check Investor Relations, 24th October 2003, on the StanelcoPLC site) The deal (which was made for the good of the company) is dormant until the Appeal Revue next year for the patent dispute with BPRG. Nobody can, as yet, predict the outcome of that revue. Whatever the outcome of the review, Stanelco has moved on. The outcome of the review now only has marginal sigificance to Stanelco's future potential.

Why ignore the many relevant and more recent positive RNSs?

The Stanelco stand created a buzz at the NEC Birmingham last week displaying more packaging innovation on the one stand than the rest of the show.

Stanelco will be well represented at the packaging forum in Philadelphia later this month.

The next Annual Report, due at the end of January 2006, will clarify the tremendous future that this company now has. By then there is expected to be be firm evidence of orders. It is lack of information on orders that is obviously dragging on the share price. To conclude that those orders are not coming through, simply from the current share price, may prove to be a costly mistake.

I believe that now is a good time to top up on this share.

z








madmanc - 6 Oct'05 - 15:47 - 52244 of 52244


true

I've changed my mind, I was forgetten about most of the things you mentioned.

Sorry for generalising, have now bought in after reading your post.


Wow! someone changing their mind on a bulletin board.

That's a first.

stateside

Baza Hi,

Yes, I am one of those that has confirmed that Wal-Mart will be co-presenting with Natureworks at the Sustainable Packaging Forum on 17-19 October.

Proof is here ....
http://www.packworld.com/articles/Departments/19825.html


First posted August 25, 2005 as a Web exclusive

Wal-Mart vp to speak at Sustainable Packaging Forum

WEB EXCLUSIVE: A Wal-Mart representative will discuss sustainable packaging at Packaging Strategies Sustainable Packaging Forum to take place October 17-19, 2005, in Philadelphia.

Matt Kistler, vp of product development and packaging for Sams Club, and Snehal Desai, global commercial director of NatureWorks, LLC, will deliver an extended presentation titled Driving Sustainable Packaging Through the Supply Chain: Challeneges to Innovation and Market Leadership.

Packaging World is a media partner for the Sustainable Packaging Forum. For sponsorship information, please download the sponsorship form here.
Suppliers:

Packaging Strategies
www.packstrat.com
Phone: 610-436-4220
NatureWorks PLA
www.natureworksllc.com
Phone: 952-984-3306

Thanks Paul - I knew that you would know

Baza

Might just get back to evens by the close

3:2 @ 15: 15.25 and 66k v 108k