maestro
- 08 Oct 2008 09:57
$
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 15:05
- 107 of 288
so what's so bloody funny about these markets? - lol!
smiler o
- 13 Oct 2008 15:07
- 108 of 288
Aye .... lifes to short and hard enough as it is , be happy : )
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 15:32
- 109 of 288
We are inches away from anyone who admits to having read Noddy Goes To Toyland or to having collected Robertson's jam golliwog badges as a child. being barred from the bbs
Al you have not read my postyour answer had absolutely no relevance to my point of view. You are just troublemaking
I told IAN to watch out who answersI am sure he has!
Smilerexactly my view on life dealer have you noticed the same names are the ones doing the baitingcynic you have lost your moneyso dont lose your sense of humour!
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 15:59
- 110 of 288
I'd hope anyone reading scotinvestor's racist posts would be absolutely appalled by their content. Your comments to me when they first appeared some weeks ago was that they were in some way justifiable.
We should unequivocably fight all such comments. You have not done so. Indeed, you earlier suggested he should be re-instated. I nortice not one poster has seconded that request that I've seen and it makes me very happy to see there is no appetite to give him a third chance. Note, he had been warned and requested to desist. AM has always been a very tolerant BB, but has thankfully never put up with that kind of diatribe. None of us should accept it.
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 16:18
- 111 of 288
Indeed Al, in full agreement with your views. Actually, I was more appalled at the the poster in question remarks re the Piper-Alpha tragedy and the manner in which he used that disaster in an attempt to wind you up, quite disgusting. I'm afraid Tabasco also excused that behaviour, which tells me everything I need to know about that particular specimen.
I know that Ian takes his responsibilities seriously and will act accordingly if there is a need to do so. I am also sure he is pissing himself laughing Tabasco at your hypocritical behaviour, as I for one have been the butt of your snide, insulting comments for some weeks now. Anyway, carry on, you're swiftly becoming the laughing stock of the BB, an adequate replacement for your bosom buddy, scotinvestor :-))))
Bullshare
- 13 Oct 2008 16:20
- 112 of 288
tabasco; I am very happy to answer your question as to why we ban users who overstep the mark. Its very simple, we have a very good and easy to read code of conduct, people overstep it once, we warn and give them the benefit of the doubt, second time we zap them.
Mike
As part of our commitment to make our Bulletin Boards as informative, user friendly and free from abuse as possible for our users, please read the following Content Standards which apply to any and all material (contributions) which you make to the Website including the Bulletin Boards and which incorporate our General Terms and Conditions .
Your commitment to these Standards ensures a positive experience for all of our users.
The Standards
You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The Standards apply to each part of any Contribution as well as to its whole.
Contributions must:
Be accurate where they state facts
Be genuinely held where they state opinions
Comply with applicable law in any country from which they are posted
Contributions must not:
Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;
Contain any material which is obscene or offensive;
Infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person;
Be likely to deceive any person;
Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence;
Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass or alarm any other person;
Be likely to disrupt our service in any way;
Give the impression that they emanate from us where this is not the case;
Advocate promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse;
Advertise any product or service other than MoneyAM without our prior written consent;
Contain any personal information or details about a fellow poster. Any poster doing so will have the post removed and their access to the bulletin boards revoked;
We caution against giving out any personally identifiable information (such as private email address, telephone number or home address) online. This information can easily be used for illegal or harmful purposes.
Please also be mindful of your fellow subscribers and treat them with the respect and courtesy they deserve.
If we discover that you have been abusing the Bulletin Board we reserve the right to remove your access to our site
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 16:21
- 113 of 288
ok guys .... let's put the handbags away ...... clearly both tabby and de facto scotty lack any support ..... so tabby, now that you have said your piece, to which no one else subscribes, pipe down before you get too aerated
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 16:27
- 114 of 288
Mike
I'm embarrassed at the behaviour of Tabasco, can I be banned please in accordance with your T&Cs??
Yours in harassed anticipation.
pth
Big Al
- 13 Oct 2008 16:29
- 115 of 288
pth - I was also dismayed by the Piper thing, but it's not something people should get banned for and I certainly wouldn't complain about it however deeply it was aimed. Now that, I do consider free speech ........ unfortunately.
It simply shows them up for what they are and unfortuntely fitted perfectly with scotinvestor's rather strange outlook on the world. He seemed altogether very unhappy at anything and everything.
Dil
- 13 Oct 2008 16:32
- 116 of 288
I get harassed and have racist remarks directed at me all the time on the rugby thread ... face bovvered :-)
Bullshare
- 13 Oct 2008 16:33
- 117 of 288
Dil; I've tried to ban myself numerous times for this but for some reason Ian keeps letting me back on :-)
Treblewide
- 13 Oct 2008 16:34
- 118 of 288
dil...if bully banned everyone that abused you he would go bust...plus it would life a lot less entertianing for the rest of us
Dil
- 13 Oct 2008 16:41
- 119 of 288
:-)
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 16:58
- 120 of 288
Dil.quite agree about the racist card rules are made to be used as and when the owner desiresreading the above guidelines I along with 90% of others on here should have been banned along time agoselective viewing! You Welsh git!
Cynic I have said before there are a lot of things that Scotty says after the gang start on him that dont represent my viewI genuinely try and help people that at least try and help themselvesI would say there was a great deal of bullying against Scottybut because of the way he handled ithe was made the total villainhe said some terrible thingsbut so did othersI am quite happy to put this to bed but the other guilty parties please dont be proud of yourselves!
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 17:08
- 121 of 288
tabby .... you know that scotty and i learned to humour one another, but he really was often pretty offensive in what he wrote, and i am afraid, that as a result he has brought the chop on himself
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 17:25
- 122 of 288
How right this is
I know lots of Tory MPs and peers in receipt of the Tory whip who believe Powell was right on immigration, who know he was no racist and who believe the party's greatest sin was not to take him seriously. Are they all to be sent to outer darkness, too? Will it also be a crime to point out that most of the rest of the ideology of Powellism - about money, about Europe, about the viability of the United Kingdom, about the dangers of an internationally unrestrained America - holds water just as much as this speech does?
Why is this man considered so evil that to mention him approvingly is a career-ending step, just as if someone had praised the social policies of Hitler or Pol Pot? Could it be that the jerk of the knee, and the application of no intelligence whatever, is really the driving force behind the way the Conservative Party is now run? How stupid are they?
Read the speech. Make up your own mind about whether something that told the truth then, and that tells the truth now, should 40 years later be the subject of such hysteria
cynic
- 13 Oct 2008 17:26
- 123 of 288
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
ptholden
- 13 Oct 2008 17:30
- 124 of 288
Tabasco = Sanctimonious, golly gumps, I've just popped a rib laughing at you trying to make excuses for yourself.
Too late to back track now pal, your comments in support of the banned racist plonker are well documented :-)))
Incidentally, the loon who started this thread didn't make any friends with his anti-semetic remarks, I wasn't surprised to see you defending this particular racist either :-))
All in jest of course ;-)
tabasco
- 13 Oct 2008 17:37
- 125 of 288
Cynicthat reply is exactly why we find Britain in this messIm afraid your reply is the norm! so be it! I havent got to suffer it too many more years!
Treblewide
- 13 Oct 2008 17:39
- 126 of 288
tabasco are you leaving? i am sure there would be a few on here who would gratefully have a whip around for you to send you on your way