for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Andysmith - nothing personal -how could it be on a bb? LOL. In fact, thought your posts a while ago re the idea that you pays yer money and takes yer choice (ie fundamentals dodgy yes but blue sky potential ) seemed a sensible judgement. And I know that II et al were bashing but anyone who vaguely questioned the fundamentals (which was my position) was jumped on with aggressive retorts about investors stick it out, odds of success, etc etc. Selling at the top to protect yourself was wise (and nicely done if you were in so early). But essentially, when the optimists were so bullish the fundamentals didn't support it. And now perhaps the derampers are overstating it. Herd mentality. And as an observer who never owned this particular share (I am a fascinated observer on this bb of group psychology and political manoeuvering) what is worse than Pms infantile googling is apparent sensible posters who offered seemingly carefully argued reasons for positivity when the sp was in the 20s only to inform sometime later that they have no holding and then patronise holders.

Bosley, Frenchie seem sensible to me. I only trust 2 other posters on mam. And they aint anywhere near this share.

Do any us really give a jot about SEO ? Be honest with at least yourselves . l dont . l care about SEO as much as i care whether it rains while im asleep in bed .... i All i care about is the monies i can extract from trading it. Sentimentalism is one thing: but watching profit rapidly vanishing down the lavatory is absurd . Be honest Bos : lf you could perhaps change / modify any fiscal decisions you have made with SEO l suspect that top of your agenda would have been to take 27-30p only to return another day . a'bientot .....Right im off out ......Amusez-vous bien Bonne nuit @+ J

Do any us really give a jot about SEO ? Be honest with at least yourselves . l dont . l care about SEO as much as i care whether it rains while im asleep in bed .... i All i care about is the monies i can extract from trading it. Sentimentalism is one thing: but watching profit rapidly vanishing down the lavatory is absurd . Be honest Bos : lf you could perhaps change / modify any fiscal decisions you have made with SEO l suspect that top of your agenda would have been to take 27-30p only to return another day . a'bientot .....Right im off out ......Amusez-vous bien Bonne nuit @+ J

brandname, look at the chart and imagine calling all the peaks and troughs correctly , going long and short. that's all he tries to do.
greekman, i would agree if this was the first time pm1 has hinted at inside information.
tfc, it certainly isn't improving. care about seo??... no . believe that it has potential?... yes. and yes, i do wish i had sold at 30p.
zscrooge, thanks ...but you're only saying that 'cos i might be living down the road from you!!

LOL! Wine kicking in, must get to bed.

PM, this is not a go at you but merely to answer greekman.

Mock all you like about RNS's, or even imply I might have been guessing, but these words are from an E-Mail to me 4 weeks ago ....

"I hope that in the next few weeks we will be able to enlighten the market on just how good Biotec is, and how many gems exist in it."

THIS is why PM has been questioned tonight.....

Paul, I am not attacking you personally - just seeking the answer to a perfectly reasonable question put in a reasonable manner.

You say:-

'Oblomov Hi,

Your again going to annoy everyone here as you did on FYB'

Many of the posters here over the past few hours are the same posters who post and read FYB. I dont believe I annoyed them on FYB and trust I am not annoying them here. If I am mistaken, would they please speak up and I'll stop posting .

I think the only person I've annoyed is you, because you cant bear to be questioned.

When the price is rising you are a hero PM1

When the price is sliding you are to blame.

You have not changed your stance or style throughout and I ask that you do not. I value your research and analysis. I judge not your personality, age, sex, morals or character etc.

Any investment decisions and consequences are my own. I made them and I'm very very happy.

Thank you for providing such regular wide ranging information. DO NOT STOP just because of a few bashers, baiters and dissapointed investors/traders.

oblomov, last chance went begging, and you came back with another insinuation, your squelched, goodbye.

---------------------------------------------------------------

paulmasterson1 - 07 Oct 2005 20:48 - 10828 of 10873

Oblomov Hi,

Your again going to annoy everyone here as you did on FYB, with your adolescent continuation of another saga, I have told you I am not answering your questions, and as I said before, if you continue with your insinuations such as 'avoided' 'sinister' 'smoke screen' etc, I will have no choice but to squelch you.

Cheers,
PM

oblomov
Enough said.

TFC
Why are you bothering to post on here, the amount of shares you said that you were buying at the time was hundreds of thousands, you must of made a packet why would you return to these boards to gloat, some of the posters are still here that got you in to SEO in the first place. I also have a long memory you got out to quick and had to buy back in at 18p, the same goes with eric I do respect his post but the last time I heard from him was he bought 100k shares at 21p SEO has been going down ever since.
How can you believe any one?

GOTYA Hi, Thanks, no worries, back to business, sorry I can't please everyone, and rise to the baiting of oblomov, I went through all this on FYB twice with Oblomov, and I am not prepared to waste my time, and BB space discussing it any further.

====================================================

Greekman also has the sense to see it in the correct light, as always.

====================================================

QC, maybe so, but the message says 'hope to' not 'will', or what those gems are, so yes I did have something to grab at, but what and when is down to me to find out, hence my reading ALL of Biotecs patents over the last few weeks, and my posting everything I could find out on the Cigarette Filters, BEFORE the RNS came out.

====================================================

I suggest everyone puts any of my predictions on RNS's down to 'a very well educated guess' .... that way we won't have lots of BB space wasted discussing ME.

Cheers,
PM

Paul said

'my posting everything I could find out on the Cigarette Filters, BEFORE the RNS came out'

I must have missed that - when did you post anything about cigarette filters before the RNS?

Why do we have so many posters on here that appear so bitter and twisted?
Feeling so sorry for the husbands, wives, children, parents of such 'sad' people.
Keep posting the upto date relevant information . All seo followers are interested in a healthy debate.
If you have 'bad' thoughts about someone go for a walk- much more healthy than typing back stabbing remarks.
We chose to buy shares at a price- we chose to keep them or sell them and if we took notice of someones observations and they changed their thoughts -thats their choice - if their observations were malicious-they have to live with it.

Lets all be polite or zip it. And please GROW UP.
Goodnight and Goodluck.

TFM, What price are you hoping to buy back in at?

Why does every SEO thread destroy itself with pointless bickering?

Oblo re: post 10878

I think you have indeed missed something here - quite a lot in fact.

Paul posted very extensive information relating to cigarette filters markets etc from page 484 (his post 9878 onwards). This was 20 September. He referred to it again on 22 Sept (9834) and of course immediatly the RNS on the subject was issued on 3 October.

Thanks Tony, fair enough - I had missed it as I was away for 10 days and read through the posts a bit quick to catch up on my return!

Well done Paul - credit where its due.

Tony Hi,

I guess you remember Oblomov questioning me in exactly the same manner on FYB, before eventually being told by admin to pack it in.

I think Oblomov has a personal agenda aimed at discrediting me by whatever means, but as I have squelched Oblomov, I will leave it to each individual to decide what information posted by either of us is of value to shareholders.

Also your correct about the Cigarette Filters, I chose to research those and post my information here, as an educated guess for one of the upcoming Biotec updates. EVO mentioned the filters in the last note before then.

In the latest note, EVO repeats what I had told everyone weeks ago "The statement promises an update on other Biotec-related projects in the near future"

Also EVO say "As with the cigarette filter, it now talks in terms of producing starch-based plastics which are substantially cheaper than oil-based equivalents. But it is impossible to put a value on these prospects at this stage." .... so as you saw last night, I have been posting info on Tetrapak, where this would be very relevant, and tomorrow I will be looking more into that, and the foil made from starch, which is another patented product at Biotec. These are my 'educated guess' for a couple of the next few Biotec RNS.

Cheers,
PM

Chaps & Chapesses - this thread is out of control again.

Can we please refrain from personal attacks and baiting and just stick with the business of discussing SEO - Pleeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaassssse..

Baza

Anyone else care for an 'educated guess' ....

Major steps are also being made in both Europe and North America
towards the commercialisation of a number of projects, particularly
those involving Biotec's materials and Stanelco intends to update
the market with these developments shortly


Starpol 2000 ?
Starch based foil ?
Replacement for Tetrapak polythene inside cartons ?
One of the 5 ideas I have sent to HQ ?
Something else ?

Cheers,
PM