LEEWINK
- 28 Mar 2004 15:45
NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.
They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.
does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 15:19
- 1092 of 1909
To any new investors:
NML is a massively undervalued DIAMOND PRODUCER.
The company's own projections backed up by the official Geologist's report state that they will produce 10k-20k cts/month giving a profit AT LEAST 2Million per annum.
On a typical p/e of 15, this would put a fair value on the company of 30M, a share price of 25p+.
Current value is just 5M.
A challenge to the derampers and bitter ex-shareholders: CAN YOU FIND ANOTHER DIAMOND PRODUCER THAT IS SO MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED?
(I already know the answer to that one, and it's not yes).
Don't listen to what ANOMALOUS1/Anomalous/ASMITH2/Gaybriefs/VENOMOUSVIPER/legend20832 post across the internet about this share.
They are one or two extremely bitter-and-twisted ex-shareholders who ran out of patience, and now spend all their time and energy knocking this stock day in, day out. They will twist any piece of information to suit their purpose, which is to avoid the situation where they have to sit there and watch the share price rocket from 3.5p-4p-6p-10p-12p-15p-20p-25p-50p, when they sold out at 3p. They will probably commit suicide when this happens, hence their sheer commitment to deramping NML.
Just DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, read the website, Geologist's report and RNS's and discover the facts about this HUGELY UNDERVALUED COMPANY.
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 15:19
- 1093 of 1909
To any new investors:
NML is a massively undervalued DIAMOND PRODUCER.
The company's own projections backed up by the official Geologist's report state that they will produce 10k-20k cts/month giving a profit AT LEAST 2Million per annum.
On a typical p/e of 15, this would put a fair value on the company of 30M, a share price of 25p+.
Current value is just 5M.
A challenge to the derampers and bitter ex-shareholders: CAN YOU FIND ANOTHER DIAMOND PRODUCER THAT IS SO MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED?
(I already know the answer to that one, and it's not yes).
Don't listen to what ANOMALOUS1/Anomalous/ASMITH2/Gaybriefs/VENOMOUSVIPER/legend20832 post across the internet about this share.
They are one or two extremely bitter-and-twisted ex-shareholders who ran out of patience, and now spend all their time and energy knocking this stock day in, day out. They will twist any piece of information to suit their purpose, which is to avoid the situation where they have to sit there and watch the share price rocket from 3.5p-4p-6p-10p-12p-15p-20p-25p-50p, when they sold out at 3p. They will probably commit suicide when this happens, hence their sheer commitment to deramping NML.
Just DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, read the website, Geologist's report and RNS's and discover the facts about this HUGELY UNDERVALUED COMPANY.
Anomalous1
- 01 Jul 2005 15:22
- 1094 of 1909
mjr1234 could be about to be called a spammer. In which case, it is time to inform Moneyam!
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 15:25
- 1095 of 1909
This is the NML thread, scum head. How can posting about NML here be spam?
Why don't you go down the Marlowes and do some busking or something?
Anomalous1
- 01 Jul 2005 15:43
- 1096 of 1909
English Bigblls - 1 Jul'05 - 15:21 - 5660 of 5661
All I said is, I know where you live.
It is against ADVFN rules to post real names and addresses.
But all I said was,
I know you live on a council estate in the most miserable new town in the country.
mjr1234 (also known as English Bigblls) - 01 Jul'05 - 15:25 - 1094 of 1094
This is the NML thread, scum head. How can posting about NML here be spam?
Why don't you go down the Marlows and do some busking or something?
If that's the level of your research, I can completely understand how you were deceived by NML. You don't have a clue where I live!..................
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 15:44
- 1097 of 1909
Yes I do. Unless you've moved house in the last 18 months. Don't blame you if you have because that place is a real shithole.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 01 Jul 2005 15:47
- 1098 of 1909
Please do not venture into personal insults as this will not be accepted.
Please stick to discussion on the topic at hand which is NML.
Ian
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 15:49
- 1099 of 1909
Cheers Ian, lets hope he listens this time.
Anomalous1
- 01 Jul 2005 15:57
- 1100 of 1909
Thank you Ian............about time we got back on topic, rather than listening to the constant personal insults.
The board is for discussion of NML and whether it is a suitable investment, or not. I just happen to think that it is not. The fact that the other posters chose to use personal insults to counter my posts, speaks volumes about the strength of their argument. They feel threatened by posts that discuss facts about the project. Especially when these facts came from information published by the company and is shown on their website.
It's such a pity that instead of going out to find independent corroberating data, they chose instead to try rubbishing other people's posts on a BB. I think this clearly demonstrates the lack of confidence they exhibit in the share and it's prospects. They think that a BB poster can alter the share price, merely by posting points of view on a Bulletin Board.
How sad that they fail to grasp and understand the mechanisms of the market. The 'Mystery' seller(s) offloads some stock, the price crashes down and they have to blame the poster on a bulletin board for their woes.
Is that the best you can do?
How about finding out who the Mystery seller(s) is for a change, mjr1234?!
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 16:01
- 1101 of 1909
There is no mystery seller, Anomalous.
Today for instance, most of the sells have been declared by posters on advfn!
Where's the MYSTERY?
Anomalous1
- 01 Jul 2005 16:15
- 1103 of 1909
Wendy D accepts there is a Mystery Seller(s),
Ianwc accepts there is a Mystery Seller(s),
Mclellan accepts there is a Mystery Seller(s),
Crockandure8 accepts there is a Mystery Seller(s),
and quite a few others.
So who are you deceiving (but yourself) when you claim that there is no 'Mystery' seller?
Are you attempting to mislead the new investors about the real reason for the share price being depressed?
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 16:16
- 1104 of 1909
Nope. There have certainly been sellers, but no Mystery Seller(s).
The real reason the share price is depressed, is that there has been net selling over time, no doubt about that.
The difference is, you are trying to create some kind of sinister monster looming over the stock, armed with an infinite number of shares to sell and an evil grin.
Sensible investors such as those you mentioned and myself suggest that the sellers are actually the placees selling a proportion of their holdings to realise funds early and reduce risk (a standard practice). Hence there is nothing mysterious or sinister about it.
stockdog
- 01 Jul 2005 16:25
- 1105 of 1909
Thanks, Di - interesting. Is Ianwc generally reliable in his info/views would you think?
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 17:24
- 1107 of 1909
There's what caused the drop from 3p bid - a mere 100k!
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 17:53
- 1108 of 1909
I see today's news as fairly positive overall, and it seems initially, the MM's marked it up, so they must have seen it as positive.
Unfortunately as we know, this stock moves quickly both ways on a few trades, so the few people who sold decided the direction of movement.
The announcement is negative in that the expected alluvial projection which would have buoyed the price incredibly, will now be delayed, probably for a few months. But we suspected this anyway due to the late minestart.
It is positive in that the company are clearly acting with a purpose here, and are showing great confidence in what they are doing. It also suggests a JV announcement may well be coming sooner rather than later.
Either way, there should be more news flow over the next few weeks and months now, as the extra equipment is deployed, the alluvials get back on track, the parallel alluvial exploration results come in, more details of these "nice stones" hinted at come in, kimberlited identifies, joint venture agreement, etc etc.
mbugger
- 01 Jul 2005 20:17
- 1109 of 1909
Looks like they have changed tack from alluvial to kimberlite straightaway ,as if a j. v. pending, so havnot really started yet,no real figures yet, never mind ,if sp falls further next week ,topup on wed. say.
mjr1234
- 01 Jul 2005 21:50
- 1110 of 1909
Good attitude mate.
Andy
- 02 Jul 2005 15:33
- 1111 of 1909
So do peope here see this as a positive move by NML?