maestro
- 20 Sep 2007 18:44
could be the mother of all rockets
Treblewide
- 08 Oct 2007 17:03
- 11 of 28
maestro....so you are saying you bought QXL at the bottom and sold at the top.......dont believe it.......so to prove it be so kind as to post the proof....a screenshot of your account showing you going in and out of the trade with all other details blanked out will suffice...do that and i agree that was a superstar trade...if not then wind yer neck in coz yer a clown
maestro
- 08 Oct 2007 17:10
- 12 of 28
i bought near the bottom 0.14p but i admit i sold too early due to loss of job..sold at 1.5p old price or would have been a millionaire now...the day i sold it doubled again in a few days or would have made 160,000...thats life i guess
unluckyboy
- 08 Oct 2007 17:47
- 13 of 28
What does it all matter,we are all in this game to make a few quid.I cannot see who gives good advise or bad it's upto yourself to make up your own mind if it's a good or bad share.And if someone makes a buck or two well done.
prodman
- 08 Oct 2007 19:19
- 14 of 28
Just a quick question maestro how many were you holding at the time?
maestro
- 08 Oct 2007 22:49
- 15 of 28
4500 old shares...sold all except 591 and sold them at 2000p...fuck it!
blackdown
- 18 Oct 2007 08:19
- 16 of 28
This 'mother of all rockets' seems to be heading in the wrong direction.
maestro
- 18 Oct 2007 21:10
- 17 of 28
maybe they want it to hit 4m market cap and then buy in for a similar qxl recovery play
hlyeo98
- 18 Oct 2007 21:33
- 18 of 28
NXT just has no comparison to QXL. This has been a failure for a long time.
maestro
- 19 Oct 2007 17:29
- 19 of 28
well it has just 3 letters like QXL and middle one X
hangon
- 23 Oct 2007 16:45
- 20 of 28
QXL is a Polish-biased Ebay look-alike and I guess that is profitable ..... but it is a whote lot different from a manufacturer like NXT.
I agree NXT has been a disaster and the only folk to benefit have been the Directors, who would not find employment elsewhere if their performance was similarly disgraceful -
. . . . However, remember that the sp is nothing to do with the Company! . . .
It is a "Fear/Greed"-issue and to that extent a loudspeaker maker in England is never going to be worth 4 ( I checked the sp graph over 10years and it never was 16, mentioned earlier. . .or is the graph wrong?). Grief, Lloyd's Bank is only a pound more and they have a decent Yield!
However, it is possible it's worth 8p - but I'd like to know what the Directors were doing to have got the business so poor. Heads must roll!
Anyone taking up the Rights?
maestro
- 23 Oct 2007 17:23
- 21 of 28
one whiff of a profit though and this will soar past 100p
blackdown
- 23 Oct 2007 17:24
- 22 of 28
You must have had a whiff of something to reach this conclusion.
maestro
- 23 Oct 2007 17:27
- 23 of 28
not really..when nxt speakers become standard in mobiles,computers,cars then you are looking at a monster waiting to happen
blackdown
- 23 Oct 2007 17:29
- 24 of 28
A bit like the morning constitutional then.
Big Al
- 23 Oct 2007 17:44
- 25 of 28
Piss off, maestro. I've been hearing about NXT speakers being "standard" in everything for about 10 years. It ain't happening and ain't likely to.
The only whiff anyone will get is just before they flush NXT away. ;-)))
maestro
- 23 Oct 2007 18:09
- 26 of 28
oh so thats why the most successful motor company Toyota is putting them in many of their new lines..it aint just about sound but weight and space saving too...welcome to the future of NXT
Big Al
- 23 Oct 2007 22:03
- 27 of 28
Yelp, yelp goes the Andrex puppy round the bend. ;-)))
blackdown
- 08 Nov 2007 10:35
- 28 of 28
Any whiff of that profit yet? Don't know about mother of all rockets - maybe great grandmother?