Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

SpreadBetters (FINS) - We all knew they were crooks but now.................. (FINS)     

Mr Euro - 05 Aug 2003 20:36

Fins have from today increased spreads by a factor of 3 on certain stocks.

When questioned as to why they have done this they are saying they do not want this business, it is not attractive to them i.e. they lose money and the punters win!

This is an absolute disgrace.

I only trade a couple of stocks this this account (which is quite small) but this just goes to prove that even if you can get past the constant sh*t they throw at you and make a profit they f*** you by hammering the spread.

Direct access will drive these crooks out of business and they only have themselves to blame. I always thought FINS were a bit different but no, true colours. This puts them on a par with the other biggest crook IG.

Avoid.

snappy - 20 Aug 2003 13:54 - 11 of 23

jules,

Those two blokes should have learned to manage their risk a little better!

Red_Stallion - 20 Aug 2003 13:57 - 12 of 23

ouch

i thought it was something with the sb's playing dirty tricks to get a few big ones over on their customers

what you mentioned is really down to the 2 guys risk management

jules99 - 20 Aug 2003 14:04 - 13 of 23

Giving customers huge credit, can be deceiving if not understood...dirty tricks are always included trying to lure you into buying unwanted stock, or when trying to sell out, SB's saying they cant get through or dont have a buyer etc...which can all equate to losses, thankfully I am not in the game...phewwww!!!

jules.

Velocity - 21 Aug 2003 13:31 - 14 of 23

I don't understand why anyone would trade short-term via the sb's - the 'house' advantage is not only enormous, there's also zero transparency so therefore you might as well blow your wad in casino - at least you'll get free food & drink! I've got 5 sb accounts, which I have barely touched since I opened my broker accounts and I can't see that ever changing, with the exception of long term position trades.

jules99 - 21 Aug 2003 13:55 - 15 of 23

Too right velocity...

Advertising should go like this...

PUNTERS BEWARE - Spread Betting can dangerouslly damage your wealth and Health...

good luck.
jules.

zzaxx99 - 21 Aug 2003 17:26 - 16 of 23

Seems to me that the calculation is simple - if you expect that your profit from the deal after the SB spread will be &gt 60% of the profit from a CFD, use the SB, provided your annual profits exceed the CGT limit

For example, if the SB has GSK @ say 1215/1222 against an underlying of 1218/1220, then if the CFD firm let you deal at the cash price, a short on the spreadbet will be more profitable once the SB price goes to (say) 1205/1207 - a drop of 10 points - at that point the SB price is around 1203/1209 - making a (tax free) profit of just under 7 points. The CFD price is 1205/1207, giving a taxed profit of 8 points, or 6.6 points after paying 40% CGT (always assuming you make over the CGT threshold).

Velocity - 28 Aug 2003 13:04 - 17 of 23

I appreciate what you are saying zzaxx99, but that is a holistic approach - the reality is that cfd's track the underlying cash prices and spreads extremely closely, whereas the sb's play tricks opening up the spreads, skewing the prices and actively trading against you. They too track the underlying cash (and when I say 'track' I mean very loosely) but how on earth can a skilled and disciplined short term trader consistently execute his/her trading plan when the probabilities are so stacked against them?
Assume that each trade is a 50:50 bet on the market at cash. Fine, if it's at cash. SB it and the combination punch of the abovementioned points stack the odds so heavily against you that you will lose your money more than 50% of the time because you will get stopped out when 'cash' wouldn't have stopped you out (ie it didn't trade at that price on cash, but the sb skew did!). And obviously that's not limited to stops - how about OCO's, limit orders, MIT, MOC etc etc. Also, spikes (& gaps) are more common & more extreme in the extent of their moves.

Surely successful trading is about control, and imho that is precisely what you are sacrificing if you are short term trading with the sb's.

packie - 11 Sep 2003 10:47 - 18 of 23

deal for free are the boys.good spreads and good service.they do make mistakes
though therefore keep detailed records of trades(i only trade on the phone)

jules99 - 11 Sep 2003 16:06 - 19 of 23

Can name your top CFD brokers...?

zarif - 11 Sep 2003 17:16 - 20 of 23

i am a spreadbetter and was about to open an account with fins, but after your timely comment I am going to avoid them like the plague.We the traders keep them in business we can also bring them down.
can you recommend me some decent spread betting firms
please email me
zarif_virmani@hotmail.com

zzaxx99 - 12 Sep 2003 10:54 - 21 of 23

-- Velocity,

From what I hear, deal4free skew their prices far more than Fins do, so you're not just trying to beat the additional spread on the SB account, you're trying to second-guess the pricing mechanism of the dealer as well. Dunno if other CFD types do this.

Take your point about the variety of automated trades - Fins is particularly bad for this - their online stop mechanism sometimes doesn't let you add stops, for no readily obvious reason. For example, my last threee trades in GSK - 1st one allowed them online, 2nd didn't allow it and I placed them by phone, the 3rd didn't allow, I went without stops and lived to regret it :-(

Velocity - 16 Sep 2003 09:12 - 22 of 23

zzaxx99 - that's my point. Imo it's almost laughable that the SB's get away with it, but it happens all the time, hence the reason I say I only use SB's for position trading, and cfd brokers which are transparent and cheap for everything else.

Magician - 16 Sep 2003 10:17 - 23 of 23

Spreadbet firms are ok as long as u know what u are getting into. Day trading sounds great but after costs/spreads etc is it that profitable ?? Some people obviously think so, but most will lose their capital/shirts over time. SB firms work if u don't trade all day long or only do a couple of trades a day.
Day traders just play into any brokers hands whether it's a sb firm, a CFD broker or an old school stockbroker. If a sb firm doesn't take a commission they've got to make their money either from crossing the spread all day long or taking on punters positions - why else would they be in business ?? Don't trade all day long => don't pay away spreads all day long => more money made over time - No ??
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Register now or login to post to this thread.