Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


someuwin - 12 Oct 2005 07:27 - 11187 of 27111

Excellent news - also good to see ASDA confirming the 200 Greenseal rollout continues to plan.

p.s Not worried by short term fluctuations in the SP!


iturama - 12 Oct 2005 07:27 - 11188 of 27111

You can hardly be more positive than that but no doubt the usual sad suspects will be out in force trying to justify their stances. Peculiar how people that profess not to hold the stock spend so much time smugly decrying those that do.

paulmasterson1 - 12 Oct 2005 07:36 - 11189 of 27111


Hi All,

Let's get ready to rummmmmmmble !

There we have it, I guess the next thing will be US FDA status, that could be holding up the US deal, because if Stanelco needed UK clearance they will defo need US FDA clearance IMVHO.

Maybe once Starpol gets the US FDA clearance we will see Wal-Mart go for that and Greenseal together, I guess they could be waiting for proof that Stanelco's Starpol 2000 is going to be allowed on their products.

Cheers,
PM

insiderinside - 12 Oct 2005 07:36 - 11190 of 27111


NOTHING SOLD - ANOTHER RNS AND NO ORDER - REVENUE - LOL - JAM - JAM - JAM

panic - panic - tell everyone what they know already -

the bad news Asda confirm just only 200 maximum - that will only support the price to 6p - after they are all done - as 200 is not a confirmed figure - just a planned total - they have no new orders -

i thought this Starpol stuff was already approved - all the competitors materials are - so today we find out that it is not FDA approved for all food types even - sorry state it is -

if an institution knew that 200 is all they get - after ramping several hundred and even thousand - then you can see why they sell out now

this confirms loss levels - prelims next year - will be a big loss - red - red - red - at least SE0 can save on buying - black ink -

spin spin spin - see the oil level price quote - how about saying Starpol is dependent on the price of ingredients - and at the will of farmers - who are likely to keep raising their prices - if government subsidies are not increased - lol - oil to go down long term - farm produce to go up long term - iiiiidiots.

no dates in the RNS - its past tense - its happened already - its a panic RNS - what could we tell all those dumb PIs so they can ramp and ramp - like p'ing on a fire - to try to stop it burning your house - LOL

insiderinside - 12 Oct 2005 07:38 - 11191 of 27111

no dates - means no dates - start of exclusive period - end of it - why no dates - its happened already - panic RNS - panic RNS



insiderinside - 12 Oct 2005 07:36 - 11190 of 11190

NOTHING SOLD - ANOTHER RNS AND NO ORDER - REVENUE - LOL - JAM - JAM - JAM

panic - panic - tell everyone what they know already -

the bad news Asda confirm just only 200 maximum - that will only support the price to 6p - after they are all done - as 200 is not a confirmed figure - just a planned total - they have no new orders -

i thought this Starpol stuff was already approved - all the competitors materials are - so today we find out that it is not FDA approved for all food types even - sorry state it is -

if an institution knew that 200 is all they get - after ramping several hundred and even thousand - then you can see why they sell out now

this confirms loss levels - prelims next year - will be a big loss - red - red - red - at least SE0 can save on buying - black ink -

spin spin spin - see the oil level price quote - how about saying Starpol is dependent on the price of ingredients - and at the will of farmers - who are likely to keep raising their prices - if government subsidies are not increased - lol - oil to go down long term - farm produce to go up long term - iiiiidiots.

no dates in the RNS - its past tense - its happened already - its a panic RNS - what could we tell all those dumb PIs so they can ramp and ramp - like p'ing on a fire - to try to stop it burning your house - LOL

All IMO - DYOR !

insiderinside - 12 Oct 2005 07:40 - 11192 of 27111

Among the small caps Stanelco, the packaging technology specialist, fell 1.75p to 12.25p in heavy volume amid rumours that several analysts had moved to lower their forecasts.

DYOR !

ssanebs - 12 Oct 2005 07:42 - 11193 of 27111

evo and kbc had not changed their figures yesterday

tweenie - 12 Oct 2005 07:47 - 11194 of 27111

inside inside
HOW exactly is it old news re starpol....
From reading the last few pages the general concensus from the knockers seems to be .." so wheres/when are the 200 machines going to appear."
WELL HERE IT IS IN BLACK AND WHITE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH -within the alloted timescale.
I don't read anywhere promises of a golden egg, just plain and simple facts.
Where are the facts that this is all smoke and mirrors.....

And at the end of the day ...it's your hard earned cash-- only you can decide what to do with it--- I bet you top up though ...LOL!!!!!!

Anyway, given the exclusivety period is only 30days for starpol with asda, does this suggest 'other deals' in the near future , or am I readig too much into it?
Any suggestions welcome.

KingKonggb - 12 Oct 2005 07:47 - 11195 of 27111

Looks like the Guardian have either got their investigative facts wrong or someone is feeding them misinformation to engineer a trading position!!!

IMHO

Kong

jammyjimmy - 12 Oct 2005 07:48 - 11196 of 27111

insiderinside, darling boy?.....looks and sounds like you are decending into panic hyper-bashing mode before the sp rises? Do us all a really...really big favour and "Do One".

iturama - 12 Oct 2005 07:53 - 11197 of 27111

Worth saying again.
You can hardly be more positive than that but no doubt the usual sad suspects will be out in force trying to justify their stances. Peculiar how people that profess not to hold the stock spend so much time smugly decrying those that do.

You might also consider the motives of these elements - be sure it not out of good will.

tweenie - 12 Oct 2005 07:57 - 11198 of 27111

removed

hewittalan6 - 12 Oct 2005 07:57 - 11199 of 27111

ii,
Just to query one word of your statement. Where did you get the word maximum from. Nobody in this, or any other RNS has said 200 maximum. Either explain your unjustified scare mongering or withdraw that comment as a blatant lie.
Alan

stockdog - 12 Oct 2005 07:57 - 11200 of 27111

Run, rabbit, run! Let's hope the SP responds to save me from having to make any hard decisions yet again!

sd

oblomov - 12 Oct 2005 07:58 - 11201 of 27111


Someuwin said 'p.s Not worried by short term fluctuations in the SP! '

You call 30p to 12p a 'fluctuation'? I'd hate to see it drop then.lol

Biscuit - 12 Oct 2005 08:00 - 11202 of 27111

Wasn't it the chap in the Guardian who was writing negative the last time Simmon C was shorting SEO? Would be interesting to see if Simon C is shorting at this time again??

stockdog - 12 Oct 2005 08:00 - 11203 of 27111

It was very nearly fluc to us Eulopeans too!

ssanebs - 12 Oct 2005 08:08 - 11204 of 27111

simon c has been short

DAWALLWORK - 12 Oct 2005 08:18 - 11205 of 27111

insiderinside give it a rest now. Have you any idea how ridiculous and childish you sound

hewittalan6 - 12 Oct 2005 08:19 - 11206 of 27111

Come on ii. For a man of your enormous intellect it is not difficult. You said (twice) in your post "200 maximum".
Either you are privy to information that is not released to the public or you are a sharlaton who inserts the odd untruth into your posts in order to justify your position. I ask again that you either justify this comment or withdraw it and apologise to the board for misleading them, deliberately or otherwise. I have no problem with anyone expressing any opinion on here, providing that opinion is justified. I have no issue with genuine mistakes. I have a real issue with damn lies.
Alan
Register now or login to post to this thread.