bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
jammyjimmy
- 12 Oct 2005 07:48
- 11196 of 27111
insiderinside, darling boy?.....looks and sounds like you are decending into panic hyper-bashing mode before the sp rises? Do us all a really...really big favour and "Do One".
iturama
- 12 Oct 2005 07:53
- 11197 of 27111
Worth saying again.
You can hardly be more positive than that but no doubt the usual sad suspects will be out in force trying to justify their stances. Peculiar how people that profess not to hold the stock spend so much time smugly decrying those that do.
You might also consider the motives of these elements - be sure it not out of good will.
tweenie
- 12 Oct 2005 07:57
- 11198 of 27111
removed
hewittalan6
- 12 Oct 2005 07:57
- 11199 of 27111
ii,
Just to query one word of your statement. Where did you get the word maximum from. Nobody in this, or any other RNS has said 200 maximum. Either explain your unjustified scare mongering or withdraw that comment as a blatant lie.
Alan
stockdog
- 12 Oct 2005 07:57
- 11200 of 27111
Run, rabbit, run! Let's hope the SP responds to save me from having to make any hard decisions yet again!
sd
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 07:58
- 11201 of 27111
Someuwin said 'p.s Not worried by short term fluctuations in the SP! '
You call 30p to 12p a 'fluctuation'? I'd hate to see it drop then.lol
Biscuit
- 12 Oct 2005 08:00
- 11202 of 27111
Wasn't it the chap in the Guardian who was writing negative the last time Simmon C was shorting SEO? Would be interesting to see if Simon C is shorting at this time again??
stockdog
- 12 Oct 2005 08:00
- 11203 of 27111
It was very nearly fluc to us Eulopeans too!
ssanebs
- 12 Oct 2005 08:08
- 11204 of 27111
simon c has been short
DAWALLWORK
- 12 Oct 2005 08:18
- 11205 of 27111
insiderinside give it a rest now. Have you any idea how ridiculous and childish you sound
hewittalan6
- 12 Oct 2005 08:19
- 11206 of 27111
Come on ii. For a man of your enormous intellect it is not difficult. You said (twice) in your post "200 maximum".
Either you are privy to information that is not released to the public or you are a sharlaton who inserts the odd untruth into your posts in order to justify your position. I ask again that you either justify this comment or withdraw it and apologise to the board for misleading them, deliberately or otherwise. I have no problem with anyone expressing any opinion on here, providing that opinion is justified. I have no issue with genuine mistakes. I have a real issue with damn lies.
Alan
shamona
- 12 Oct 2005 08:19
- 11207 of 27111
Nice of Stanelco to bail out my trade, thanks very much.
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 08:23
- 11208 of 27111
I'm not so sure this RNS is great news.
Hadn't we assumed that Starpol 2000 had been approved for use with food? We never questioned that it hadn't, anyway, so nothing new there.
More trials with ASDA, albeit it for a month only. But 'more trials' is not good news - we thought the trials were a thing of the past.
As for being on target for the 200 conversions - they said that in the last RNS on 3rd October (The adoption of Stanelco's GREENSEAL Technology under the ASDA contract continues to progress in line with expectations) so nothing new there.
I dont think this is very great news, I'm afraid, and not likely to lift the SP for long.
Bema
- 12 Oct 2005 08:23
- 11209 of 27111
A nice timely approval before the packaging conference methinks.
hewittalan6
- 12 Oct 2005 08:26
- 11210 of 27111
Just a thought, guys (before ii jumps down my throat and accuses me of anything)
Someone yesterday (might have been Boz) said he had noticed that a sharp decline one day in the sp was inevitably followed by an upbeat RNS the next. Given that an RNS announcing a government approval can hardly be concocted to support the sp, could there be an issue here with inside knowledge in the market, and the price being artificially reduced for someone to get in cheaper before the RNS?
Or am I becoming paranoid?
Alan
KingKonggb
- 12 Oct 2005 08:27
- 11211 of 27111
It is good news however does anyone think that this only a short term fix for the SP to stop the slide and perhaps we'll settle back to 12-13p?
Kong
stockdog
- 12 Oct 2005 08:29
- 11212 of 27111
oblomov - You should at least give credit for the reassertion of the 200 m/c target sorting out some of the sillier discussions on this thread over the last few days.
The 30day exclusive wiith ASDA is news giving a market and a timescale dimension to Starpol.
We may have been naive to have forgotten to question governmental approval for Starpol, but the news is better than being denied approval and, since it is required, is a major hurdle overcome for a new product - in particular the US FDA is notoriously hard to battle through and they are half way there.
So credit where it is due, although I agree it does not ell us how many tonnes at what profit margin SEO will be flogging to ASDA, or any tangible prosppects in the US market.
If the SP stops falling, that will be something achieved, while we wait for actual sales figures.
sd
Bema
- 12 Oct 2005 08:29
- 11213 of 27111
Don't think it will do much to stop the slide, but it should be good sweetener for long term holders
hewittalan6
- 12 Oct 2005 08:32
- 11214 of 27111
Ob,
I think the new trial is more to do with the "other general packaging applications" mentioned in the RNS, and the approval is news. It has just happened and the previous 200 conversions were for greenseal. Asda are now looking at taking the full house of Greenseal and Starpol. This is surely extra to our expectations, even though SEO probably expected it when increasing their supply contract with NW for Starpol ingrediants.
Alan
paulmasterson1
- 12 Oct 2005 08:42
- 11215 of 27111
Remember I posted a few days ago, that Starpol could be used in Tetrapaks instead of Polythene, with the approval today for food use, it's quite possible that Tetrapak could start using it soon too, that would certainly explain a 'limited' 30 days for ASDA.
Cheers,
PM