for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

good...price holding up but there are so many views I think the only thing is to sit it out for the moment.

Can't post link but you need to look under BPRG thread and look for Greek name, hope this helps. Regards AdieH.

AdieH

Still didn't find it.

You can post the link if you copy it from the address line at the top of your browser & past it here.

Will try.

http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail/?type=discussion&code=cotn%3ABPRG.L&threshold=0&it=le&pageno=4 try this, hope it works.

morning all. just finished reading the iii thread on bprg.truth be told , the guys over there know just as much for certain as we do here, i.e. f**k all!!!it seems quite a few people on iii are lawyers ( why is it we seem to think they know more than us?) but all they seem to be saying to me is .... if , if , if ....
the judge heard all the available evidence. he has made his ruling. bprg got the main patent. seo got two others. why would a judge do that if he knew seo couldnt do anything with the other two patents without bprg approval? he might as well have given all in favour of bprg.
as i keep saying , no one really knows or fully understands the ruling.both sides are claiming victory. im confused. im not the only one judging by all the posts i have read. someone needs to give us all clarity . come on tim.

p.s. there are some on the iii bprg thread who view seo as the devil incarnate and bprg as the righteous crusaders of good in an evil world. very sad.

I think Tim has gone into hiding...

anybody else read the iii thread?

If you hold SEO you have a different opinion to if you hold BPRG.

It cannot be denied that SEO have been found to be in the wrong! BPRG have been given the master patent, the other two hang off this! We will have to wait and see what the judge decides regarding the compensation and they transfer of patent/contracts etc etc but in my humble opinion it does not look good for SEO.

BPRG is rising and news is due out shortly regarding a new contact (Wyeth), lising on the NASDQ due 20th Oct so news should be out before then, large instituational purchase of bonds (they were snapped up), if you take all this information on board then I think this is some indication.

I hold BPRG, used to hold SEO but sold out to buy BPRG. DYOR.

hello adieh . i know thats the way it seems , but dont you think it makes little sense in judging it this way. if the two other patents hang so much on the first then why didnt bprg win the lot?

by the way i have bought in and out of bprg. same with seo .

Not sure but have been told the document from the case verdict is 67 pages long, haven't read it myself but as you say maybe someone from shares mag or similar might digest and raise the relevent bullet points for us to digest. Am happy to be holding BPRG and may jump in with SEO once further details are relased. Good Luck to all holders on both. : - )

The way I read it-
There will now be a further(hearing) to determine the mechanism of(transfer) of
(ownership) of the main patent to BioProgress,(together) with all other (patents) and
(patent applications)worldwide which are(derived)from the original main patent
filing. In addition, the Court will be asked to assess the damages to be
awarded to BioProgress for Stanelco's misuse of BioProgress' confidential
information.

You read it correct, can't wait for the hearing...

with the damages completely unknown arent you surprised that the price is drifting upwards?I find it impossible to assess how much of a future SEO have until i know if they own the rights to any of the products that support their share price! or have i got it wrong?

willfagg ,i dont claim to be an expert in share dealings but i have seen what i think this is many times . it looks to me like people are buying on rumour( or speculation) and then will sell when there is any news. i AM surprised though that neither side has come out with a definative statement . or do they not fully understand the ruling?

shares mag this week.even mr . freeborn doesnt know. he says bprg SEEM to have won but we have to wait for the full text.seo is still great value thanks to its NEW lid sealing process. looks safe to me.

The full report is out 67 pages of it, maybe we need a lawyer to fully understand it! Still both companies in the blue now, may not be the case once the full compensation package has been agreed?

i agree adie . it really need putting to bed once and for all , then both companies can get on with things.

It upsets me to think I may be missing out and I like SEO a lot, but without a clue as to the cost and effect of damagesI have to stay out. (it would appear by the lack of comment SEO are in the same boat or they would have reassured investors by now?)- still watching though