bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bhunt1910
- 12 Oct 2005 14:51
- 11274 of 27111
well oblo - I am trying to keep this thread objective - and I always give people the benefit of the doubt. I can perhaps understand that Paul is so wrapped up in SEO and its future that he has calculated that the price will drop (as it says in the article) and he has just made a genuine mistake. If you dont know Paul by now - the fact that he has not come back again - means that he knows that he made a mistake - but he is just not the sort of person who is good at apologising. Accept it - I have.
It was good that you spotted the inaccuracy and pointed it out in a constructive way - but no need to labour the point. I think we all know Pauls strengths and weaknesses - and yours.
baza
paulmasterson1
- 12 Oct 2005 15:02
- 11275 of 27111
Apologise for what, Starpol trays ARE cheaper ....
Todays statement also reports that in food rigid trays Stanelco now believes its
biodegradable trays, which use starch-based technology from Biotec, can seriously
undercut the price of polyster trays. This would be a huge breakthrough. Even six
months ago it was only hoping to produce trays costing twice as much as oilbased
plastics. The rise in oil prices has been a big help, but Stanelco at last
seems to be reaping the benefits of moving into volume production.
The company has bigger fish to fry. In the US we believe it is in talks with several
Fortune 500-sized companies about both Greenseal and biodegradables. There
can be no guarantees, but it seems realistic to expect major progress on both
fronts in the next few months. Considering that each tray-lidding machine handles
around 6m trays per year, a biodegradables saving of, say 1c per tray, could
generate handsome royalties. We have included nothing in our forecast for
materials royalties. Our model shows EPS of 2.3p and 4.8p in 2007 and 2008
EVO note 05/07/2005
LOL at that !
Cheers,
PM
Bema
- 12 Oct 2005 15:04
- 11276 of 27111
Very diplomatic baza. ;o)
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 15:07
- 11277 of 27111
Not wishing to go on about this, but he was quoting directly from todays RNS - not difficult to get that right, is it? If he can get that so far wrong how credence can you put on anything he says, especially knowing that if he gets something wrong he's happy for the mistake to stand rather than put it right.
Anyway, nuff said, point made - subject dropped by me now.
KingKonggb
- 12 Oct 2005 15:09
- 11278 of 27111
Slighty steering away from the Oblo and PM1 arguement (and I also have to agree with Oblo's point, although maybe the RNS is at fault with misleading info!!!), what sort of premium will cig manufacturers will have to pay for the patent on Cig filters and will SEO receive royalties on the adoption of Starpol Cig butts?
Kong
123456
- 12 Oct 2005 15:11
- 11279 of 27111
teather going to recommand seo a buy
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 15:13
- 11280 of 27111
I spoke too soon.
Paul, you're now quoting from something dated 5th. July that was an opinion and not even from Stanelco.
Todays date is 12th. October.
The RNS (from Stanelco) you originally misquoted was up to date. You were quoting directly from it and you misquoted.
That is what you should apologise for.
I think you should seek help, I really do. I dont wish to personalise this but its difficult when faced with such odd behaviour.
shamona
- 12 Oct 2005 15:14
- 11281 of 27111
He misquoted directly from an rns, that means a cut, paste then EDIT!!!!!
He then claims he has nothing to apologise for!!!!!
The lads got a brass neck' i'll give him that lol!!!!
shamona
- 12 Oct 2005 15:15
- 11282 of 27111
It's easy to see why he has been banned from numerous other sites now.
Rasenberg
- 12 Oct 2005 15:16
- 11283 of 27111
this is getting boring now Oblo. We have all read your thoughts and appears most agree to your point of view but for the sake of boredom can we drop this now
Rasenberg
- 12 Oct 2005 15:16
- 11284 of 27111
this is getting boring now Oblo. We have all read your thoughts and appears most agree to your point of view but for the sake of boredom can we drop this now
shamona
- 12 Oct 2005 15:16
- 11285 of 27111
No comments on the Phoqus/Cardinal tie up from anyone in relation to what it means for Ingel?
Bema
- 12 Oct 2005 15:17
- 11286 of 27111
You out again sham?
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 15:17
- 11287 of 27111
Kingkong,
'maybe the RNS is at fault with misleading info!!!)'
Perhaps we should disregard all RNS's from now on and just ask Paul as he knows better! Lol
oblomov
- 12 Oct 2005 15:18
- 11288 of 27111
Rosen,
already said I would drop it - perhaps you should have asked Paul to drop it too!
Bema
- 12 Oct 2005 15:18
- 11289 of 27111
Ingel is a sideshow for me Sham, just like frogpack.
antofelli
- 12 Oct 2005 15:22
- 11290 of 27111
Oblo do you work for the FSA?
Rasenberg
- 12 Oct 2005 15:23
- 11291 of 27111
I dont see any comment from PM1 since you said you would drop it to be honest. Dragging out a slanging match just doesnt help anyone. I agree to your points made but lets not bait him
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 12 Oct 2005 15:25
- 11292 of 27111
Can we all drop this now - I suggest that anyone interested in this thread or any thread on this bulletin board, goes to our news page types in SEO and pulls up and reads the news stories for themselves - it may be an old saying but it is always true - Do your own research - you will then be able to form your own opinion on any news released. Then feel free to come back here and talk about the topic in hand i.e. SEO - and not each other.
Surmon over (for now)
Ian
Bugz
- 12 Oct 2005 15:28
- 11293 of 27111
Has any one any idea or projections on the number of greenseal products ASDA are rolling off each week if we take 7 conversions completed to date?
I'm trying to work out the $$ involved in today's RNS.