required field
- 03 Feb 2016 10:00
Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 16:58
- 11282 of 12628
I agree with you, Cyners, a second referendum risks dividing the Great British public further, and the collateral damage could be irrepairable.
It would be so much easier all round if Parliament were to use the powers vested upon them under the Grieve amendment to order Maggie Dismay to just revoke Article 50 completely. After all, and as she told Dilbert in person yesterday, only the Government can revoke Article 50.
:o)
cynic
- 07 Jan 2019 17:01
- 11283 of 12628
does that not then void the referendum, or am i being even more stupid than usual?
that said, i am now totally bored with the incessant gibbering on brexit by all media
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 17:03
- 11284 of 12628
Oh, you're undoubtedly being even more stupid than usual! You really had to ask that question???
cynic
- 07 Jan 2019 17:06
- 11285 of 12628
if i knew the answer, i wouldn't have asked, and yes i am far too lazy to research it myself when clearly you know the answer :-)
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 17:09
- 11286 of 12628
Haven't got a Scooby, but I wasn't ever gonna pass up an opportunity to call you stupid.
Ask Fred or Stan.
:o)
cynic
- 07 Jan 2019 17:17
- 11287 of 12628
chuckle chuckle chuckle
i've no problem with being called stupid, but much amused that you haven't a clue either
Fred1new
- 07 Jan 2019 17:22
- 11288 of 12628
Manuel,
You are repeating the same points as previously posted.
Are you dribbling as well?
-=-=
CNG,
Disagree with your first point, I doubt that society, after a few months, would be fractured anymore than it is now.
Many of Brexiters appear to be similar to football hooligans mobs in the 70s and 80s. A little patience will deal with the remnants of them.
As you posted I, also, would prefer Parliament to reject T. May's "Brexit proposals or deals". But, also for her or parliament to then call for a G/E.
Proposals for "repeal" of the present referendum could be included in the future manifestos of all parties and "individual" MPs and their proposals for a future "Brexit" or rejection of Brexit referendum.
I think the present government is in chaos and has doubtful authority to govern Britain or negotiate for Britain in the EU.
Stan
- 07 Jan 2019 17:57
- 11289 of 12628
How many more times do the outsiders need telling, they really are hard work.
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 18:43
- 11290 of 12628
Cyners,
My tartiflette risked burning earlier, so it was easier to be flippant. Soz, but it was fun.
My best guess, however is this.... The original referendum question was 'Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?'. Whilst there was an implication, there wasn't actually any form of instruction or obligation within the question for the Government to act upon the result, which is why Gina Miller found it necessary to take the Government to court (for clarity) which ordered that Parliament give consent first before invoking Article 50.
The original referendum was therefore, at best, nothing more than 'advisory'.
Given that Parliament weren't obliged, but nonetheless, opted to enact the referendum result suggests to me that they have every right to withdraw Article 50 without further obligation to refer to the people.
Donc, the orginal referendum wouldn't be void per se, but it would still be meaningless.
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 18:49
- 11291 of 12628
Fred,
A little patience will deal with the remnants of them.
I would've thought that many of them are dead already. It's all that red meat, doncha know.
:o)
Dil
- 07 Jan 2019 19:09
- 11292 of 12628
Hils it was Andrew Marr who said to TM that only the government could extend article 50 and she agreed. That's him and all his researchers talking crap too then.
Noise levels on here are going up and up but if you listen carefully you can still hear it ...
tic toc , tic toc , tic toc ...
Dil
- 07 Jan 2019 19:26
- 11293 of 12628
Channel 4 9pm Brexit : The Uncivil War
Cerise Noire Girl
- 07 Jan 2019 19:50
- 11294 of 12628
Dilbert,
I'm not sure if you're missing the point, or if you're running scared that Brexit was never anything more than a pipe dream.
Regardless, and for the sake of clarity, yes it's only the Government who can revoke Article 50. Under the Grieve amendment, however, in the event that the Government is defeated in their attempt to pass the Withdrawal Act (sorry, Agreement as pointed out by Hawkeye below!) next week, the Government then have 21 days to offer up n alternative Plan B. In the event that an attempt to pass Plan B is also defeated, then it is within the power of Parliament to instruct the Government upon what to do next.
Obviously, anything Parliament suggests would also need to be voted upon, and there are a whole load of other ifs and buts. But, essentially, Andrew Marr and/or Theresa May are right insofar as it's only the Government who can revoke Article 50, but she conveniently neglected to say that she may have to take instructions from a higher power (and no, that's not Moggy or BoJo!).
And as another point of order, there is no automatic right to extend Article 50. To do so would require the approval of the other EU 27.
Dil
- 07 Jan 2019 20:42
- 11295 of 12628
Good to see you admit you were wrong and Mrs May was right :-)
Dil
- 07 Jan 2019 20:51
- 11296 of 12628
EU have said they will not extend Article 50 just to give the UK more time to sort things out and that there has to be some new proposal to delay it.
Like it or not there is no majority for anything in Parliament regarding Brexit.
I'd prefer a managed clean break with May resigning and someone on the leave side taking over and negotiating ad hoc deals once we are out.
What I currently think will happen is as time runs out that Corby not wanting to be blamed for a no deal Brexit makes a long winded speech on how he could have done it better and then gets Labour to abstain on May's deal and it finally gets voted through sometime in March.
iturama
- 07 Jan 2019 22:11
- 11297 of 12628
Hilary, is that the same EU Withdrawal Act that passed both houses in 2018 and received Royal Assent in June 2018 and is now an Act of Parliament?
Martini
- 07 Jan 2019 23:05
- 11298 of 12628
The story continues to evolve. I enjoyed that.
What will we do if the dust ever settles?
Stan
- 08 Jan 2019 07:25
- 11299 of 12628
Try and put the pieces back as soon as, then get this useless good for nothing Government out and start to take a real interest in Europe (if that's possible) and stop wingeing on the sides all the time...that would be a good start.
Fred1new
- 08 Jan 2019 08:32
- 11300 of 12628
Travel with hope, not dis'may.
cynic
- 08 Jan 2019 08:32
- 11301 of 12628
hilary - you'll get very porky very quickly if you eat too much of that and then feel embarrassed to display all on the beach in cap d'agde :-)