bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
paulmasterson1
- 13 Oct 2005 13:52
- 11367 of 27111
Interesting .... "Stanelco will participate in a speaking engagement while at
the forum"
qc
- 13 Oct 2005 13:56
- 11368 of 27111
PM,
Jog our memory a little. We notice that there is no mention of Starpol being desolvable in warm water in you post above. Is it desolvable? Thought that may have been a fairly good selling point?
QC and DaZ
paulmasterson1
- 13 Oct 2005 14:02
- 11369 of 27111
QC Hi,
I don't think Starpol 2000 disolves in warm water, as it is part PLA part PVA and possibly other things, maybe boiling water, but I haven't seen a datasheet on it yet.
I know Stanelco make other TPS that can be temperature adjusted to disolve when you want it to, but Starpol 2000 is a bit different.
Cheers,
PM
Mad Pad
- 13 Oct 2005 14:06
- 11370 of 27111
Not me I only bought 43,054 @ about 09.30
qc
- 13 Oct 2005 14:09
- 11371 of 27111
Thanks for that PM.
bhunt1910
- 13 Oct 2005 14:53
- 11372 of 27111
Well I hope that not the only announcement we will get - will be very disappointed if it is
Baza
hewittalan6
- 13 Oct 2005 14:57
- 11374 of 27111
Welcome back, Driver. Wouldn't dream of giving such an esteemed personage crap.
Alan
bhunt1910
- 13 Oct 2005 14:59
- 11375 of 27111
Hey driver - we have missed you you know - welcome back.
U back at work yet ?
Baza
Bema
- 13 Oct 2005 15:13
- 11376 of 27111
Thanks for the report PM1, will take a while to study in detail but seems very positive.
shamona
- 13 Oct 2005 15:16
- 11377 of 27111
masterson
i'll have the report please belabed12@hotmail.com
paulmasterson1
- 13 Oct 2005 15:22
- 11378 of 27111
Hi All,
I like the bit in the report about Wal-Mart currently using polypropylene, and thus needing to convert the plastic type as well if they want to use Greenseal, because Greenseal does not work on polypropylene, so IMHO the FDA approval of Starpol 2000 for meat, fish, etc (MAP packaging) is whats holding them back right now.
Once the FDA gives approval, and there is no reason to think they won't, as the EU already has, then I see no reason why we won't get a deal with Wal-Mart, for Greenseal+Starpol.
Cheers,
PM
paulmasterson1
- 13 Oct 2005 15:32
- 11379 of 27111
Also in the report is that Wal-Mart will need such a huge amount of packaging, that Stanelco would licence the Starpol 2000 IP to another manufacturer, and just receive royalties, which makes me instantly think of Natureworks ....
Rasenberg
- 13 Oct 2005 15:42
- 11380 of 27111
Can I have a copy please Paul.
leon_rasenberg@hotmail.com
Biscuit
- 13 Oct 2005 15:47
- 11381 of 27111
Think it will rise again tomorrow?
Bugz
- 13 Oct 2005 15:51
- 11382 of 27111
Likewise PM!!! Ur gonna be well bored of e-mailing it to every tom, dick and harry!
Cheers ;)
bhunt1910
- 13 Oct 2005 16:39
- 11384 of 27111
Looks like a bit of profit taking towards the end - still a good day compared to the rest of the market.
Baza
EWRobson
- 13 Oct 2005 16:50
- 11385 of 27111
PM I'll join the T&G brigade if youn would be so kind (ericrobson99@hotmail.com) Will try to appraise at the weekend though off for a hol within a hol in luxury near Krabbe.
Apart from the trading arrangement with SP metal have seen nothing on Starpol volumes or revenue and therefore contribution. I accept the argument that it is good for Greenseal sales, see PM's comment re wal-Mart, but that is factored into current sp, I reckon. A decent stand-alone figure for Starpol would help; we need an idea re the number of 0's! Two or three weeks around the present elvel would be no pad thing, at the least establishing a support level. Volumes good with buys outnumbering sells, but if buying dries up, the drip drip selling could take over again driving the sp lower. Quite an important period coming up methinks.
Eric
hewittalan6
- 13 Oct 2005 17:13
- 11386 of 27111
Anyone else notice a 1.3million buy go through after the bell, at a premium to the offer. Speaking as a dumb blonde, does this have any significance, or is it just a late reported trade at an earlier, higher sp?
Alan