rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.

for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ

for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance

Limit order amended!

The Nikkei closed +1.4% @12,560.95, the highest level since early September 2008.

Its fourth straight weekly gain.

No need to ban UK banks from proprietary trading - Banking Standards committee

LONDON | Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:21am GMT

(Reuters) - A U.S.-style ban on Britain's banks trading with their own money is not needed and would be too difficult to enforce, members of an influential committee said on Friday.

Instead, Britain should use the threat of capital add-ons or other tools to bear down on any bank that shows signs of proprietary trading, said the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS).

The PCBS said a U.S. ban on proprietary trading, known as the Volcker rule, has shown it is difficult to define and prohibit such trading, and it would impose an extra burden on UK regulators who already have to enforce a complex separation of banks' retail operations.

It may be a bit late - but where can I do a spread bet on the NIKKEI 225. I can't see it on IGINDEX

Its Japan 225 on IG.

Currently 505 - 513.

Surely that 8 point Nik spread will exceed trade expectancy???

EUR CPI y/y 1.8% consensus 1.8% previous 1.8%

EUR Core CPI y/y 1.3% consensus 1.3% previous 1.3%

GBP CB Leading Index m/m 0.4% previous 0.0%

Just closed a FTSE position for a nice profit, running with 1 open daily play now.1 hr chart below..

15 min also

interesting to see that, though FTSE is now down 28 points, both C+M and HG+HC indices are still chugging north - no doubt in anticipation of stimulus in those areas in the budget

Doubt it's got further to chug stimulus or not...

Again, looks like a correction is due..

confess i was quite heavily into C+M (no, not S+M!) and took profit in 2/3 this morning ..... however, still have longs in both

I was in the NMX3720 from early August until recently, getting stopped @9,500 when I thought a retrace was due. Hey ho!

14517 Short Dow position taken

Is Fed's QE Working? An Economic Debate

By Greg Robb WASHINGTON--The financial crisis of 2008 sent the economy into a tail-spin from which it has yet to fully recover. In response, the Federal Reserve under Chairman Ben Bernanke has moved aggressively to try to get the economy back on track, pushing short-term interest rates to zero and buying $3 trillion in assets. Fed watchers have been split ever since about the wisdom of the Fed's action. Some believe the Fed is stoking inflation and creating problems for itself down the road. Others believe the central bank is right to take extraordinary measures. In December, the Fed doubled down, saying it would buy $85 billion-a-month in Treasurys and mortgage-related assets until the labor market returned to health. The new round of asset purchases has renewed the debate about the benefits, risks and costs of the Fed's aggressive approach to boosting the economy. This is the backdrop for the Fed's two-day meeting next week, at which members of the Federal Open Market Committee are expected to discuss the latest round of asset purchases, known as QE 3. Two top Wall Street economists offer a better picture of how Fed watchers view the central bank's current policy. James Glassman, a senior economist at J.P. Morgan Chase, generally backs the Fed's asset purchases. Josh Shapiro, chief U.S. economist with MFR Inc., is uncomfortable with quantitative easing. Q: What will the Fed do next week? What are your assessments of the benefits and the costs and risks of QE? Mr. Glassman: I think they will decide to keep doing what they are doing and that is what Ben Bernanke and [Federal Reserve Vice Chair] Janet Yellen have been saying. To me, the benefits are very difficult to identify because the problem is we don't know what would have happened if the Fed were not doing this. I look at...the real rate of interest the market expects five years from now and those real rates are zero--[this is] the footprint of the Fed's large-scale asset purchases. Investors are exiting cash and risk-free assets and moving assets into other pockets. And I think this is why the auto market is coming back, why the real-estate sector is recovering. I think the costs are more about public relations. [Some on the] Fed say the exit strategy is more complicated. [I think] the exit strategy is not complicated. It is not a challenge to unwind what they are doing. Fed policy is about managing the economy. The Fed is not trying to make money, it is not an investment company trying to make money on a portfolio. So to me, all this discussion about mark-to-market losses and interest returned to the Treasury is not monetary policy. We didn't create the Fed 100 years ago to worry about those kinds of things. Mr. Shapiro: I agree that it is hard to know exactly what the impact is, both on the upside and the downside, because we don't know how things would have been without what the Fed has been doing. I don't believe the level of interest rates--which even before QE was very low--was the main impediment for the economy. What the Fed is doing now is manipulating the fixed-income market which, in turn, is having an effect on risk assets as Jim has very correctly pointed out. I think that anytime you manipulate markets to the extent that is being done now, you run the real risk of all sorts of things occurring that are unintended consequences. The Fed has never proven to be very good at forecasting the future, never proven to be very good at identifying bubbles of any sort, and I think what they are doing now is playing with fire. Q: So the sooner they stop the better? Mr. Shapiro: Well, it can't be abrupt at this stage because markets are very much dependent on this flow right now. So I think it is going to need to be a very gradual weaning process, but my feeling is the sooner, the better. But I agree with Jim that they are not going to do anything very quickly now. Mr. Glassman: Josh is exactly right that what the Fed is doing is distorting market prices. And there are costs to that. But to defend the Fed, there are other distortions that you have to weigh against the distortion that the Fed causes in the market. And to me, the main distortion that is driving the Fed now is: An under-employed economy can lead to very bad outcomes. You make everybody super-cautious, businesses don't invest, we don't build capital, it has an impact on our long-run growth potential. I guess I am a little more sanguine. Most people understand that eventually, when rates normalize, rates are going to have to rise from 2% to 4% or so. I agree it is not good for the Fed to be distorting markets but the truth is, this is really just an extension of what they normally are doing. Mr. Shapiro: The fundamental question is, were the 20 years that led up to the great crash a distortion? The super-credit-cycle where the world got itself into incredible problems with debt and that drove economic activity and everything else. Is that where you want to head back to? Is this the correct recipe for fixing these excesses, more of the same that created it in the first place? By not letting markets do their job, you really are short-circuiting that whole corrective process. Mr. Glassman: I think that is right. It is clearer now that we were kind of living on steroids. I think the market is sorting this out fairly well. I am skeptical that we'll just do that all over again, just because the Fed is pushing rates down. I don't think the Fed wants to get us back to the old days. It is really more how can they ease the adjustment to this better balance. And my guess is that the lessons that we've all learned from the housing cycle will help to prevent a repeat of that. Q: Jim, do you think the Fed is playing with fire? Mr. Glassman: I don't. Obviously you don't like it when the Fed has to distort market prices. But I think the fire they are worried about is high unemployment. And inflation is running below the Fed's target and I've never seen that before. I really think the experience of the Japanese tells you it is a very difficult thing to get an economy out of a deflation track. Those are the fires they are trying to fight, recognizing that what they do does distort market prices. But there is enough movement in the market, away from the risk-free market So I don't think they are playing with fire. Mr. Shapiro: My feeling is they are playing with fire. They have never proven to have a crystal ball that is better than any other sort of monkey on Wall Street throwing darts at a dart board. The fact that they think they can look at what inflation is a couple year out...and, bear in mind, when we talk about inflation and the Fed's target, the way we report inflation in this country is not a cost-of-living index. There is no way you can walk around and say, well, my cost of living is going up 1% a year. That is crazy. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I think you need to bear in mind it is not a cost-of-living index. And people's cost of living has gone up much faster than reported inflation and in certain respects it is accelerating now. And I think we need to keep that in mind as we talk about, well, inflation is not an issue and the Fed can keep the pedal to the metal and not worry about it. Q: So the fire they are playing with is just higher inflation? Mr. Shapiro: The problem is that everybody is doing the same thing, so you worry about currency debasement, but against what? Against real assets to a certain degree. Because the ECB [European Central Bank] is doing the same thing, the Japanese are doing the same thing, so what currencies are left for you to "crap out" against. We're kind of the least worst at this stage which is why the dollar is well underpinned and politicians can sit around and do nothing and we don't have a crisis on the fiscal side. But at some stage that changes, if the status quo just goes on forever.

Still long on gold with sl at my entry point now and short on FTSE since 6521 with SL at 6500

bhunt. did you see post 11,378.

USD Core CPI m/m 0.2% consensus 0.2% previous 0.3%

USD CPI m/m 0.7% consensus 0.6% previous 0.0%

USD Empire State Manufacturing Index 9.2 consensus 9.8 previous 10.0

Fed Expected to Hold Steady on Stimulus Despite Debate Over Risks

Federal Reserve officials will spend much of a meeting next week debating the potential risks from the central bank's stimulus plan, but Chairman Ben Bernanke has already signaled he believes the costs of inaction are even greater.
The U.S. central bank looks set to keep buying $85 billion a month in mortgage and Treasury bonds in an effort to encourage investment and bolster a weak economic recovery.

USD TIC Long-Term Purchases 25.7B consensus 39.3B previous 64.2B