for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

you have just lost the best posteron this thread
he has his faults but hiswork rate on seo cant be matched
by anybody his info and posts will be very badly misted

123456 -
Can't agree more

Bos , i'm not that loyal to most of my shares, and i would only be in short term unless there is big news of a deal ,but i do watch carefully and i do think it may have a long term future ,although all that rubbish of 20 being posted on here was a joke..

Night all ,,night jimboy

12345/PSleon

You're not Mr and Mrs Masterson by any chance are you?

edited by moneyam for containing personal abuse. Poster removed

Without PM1 this board is dead. Great loss.

But PM1 ALWAYS bounces back.

Bos , i'm not that loyal to most of my shares, and i would only be in short term unless there is big news of a deal ,but i do watch carefully and i do think it may have a long term future ,although all that rubbish of 20 being posted on here was a joke

My be a joke of being 20 per share we need dreamers. I will bethe one making a idiot out of you if it happens

Bullshare - Love him or hate him Paul is an asset to this board - yes I know some will disagree - but everybody on here knows exactly where he is coming from. He does much more research into any share than most of us put together. Yes he ramps - but we all know that. Yes he exaggerates - but we all know that. Yes he is in love with himself and he gets up all of our noses some times - but we all know that as well - but who is it that is always the first with the news - who is always the first to recognise the potential - it is of course Paul.

I think you have over reacted - and yes - maybe you should give him a yellow card - but even Rooney and Beckham get second chances.

I feel exactly the same about QC - he brings a balanced and constructive view.

I would respectfully ask that you reconsider

Baza

amazing.
Pm! gets banned and the shorts cry 'FREEDOM' and how he was a disgrace etc etc.

personally,i believe he added spice and interest to what is otherwise a seriously boring topic, on a boring site (lets faCE IT DEALING IN SHARES AIN'T EXACTLY SPLITTING THE ATOM OR HAVING SEX--- if it is,you definitely need to get out more).
The motto has always been DYOR,
so I for one will miss his uber 'positive' input.. how long before the shorters come out from the woodwork and start knocking and the lemmings go for the fall. Off to bed.

Bullshare I agree with post 11466 if PM is not reinstated, albeit with a warning, then Moneyam will lose an excellent researcher and other posters, will leave in droves.

bhunt 1910
well stated and right in everyway
regaurds

oblomov
so your wrong again but i know you well from fyb AND your faults
regaurds

I think the key part of Bullshare's post was

"As a result of complaints of breach of copyright"

What do you expect him to do in the face of breaches of copyright that have been brought to the attention of MoneyAm?

Note the plural - complaints.

MoneyAm have to be seen to be taking action over the problem.

but he did not post the t&G note on this bb did he? So why ban him off this site, i could understand it if he did. It looks like they have been waiting for an excuse to ban him and they just found one!

my first time posting on any thread and i vote to bring them both back (qc & pm1).

Breach of copyright:
The moderators of this and any other board had no option but to
suspend his postings due to breach of copyright.However I think that if this
is a one-off error of judgement and it will not happen again I'm sure that if the
original poster assures the writer that it will not happen again I'm sure that this situation will be amicably resolved.

magicmick,
I second that motion, Bullish or Bearish the more opinions the better,
whether you agree with them or not, it's your decision and your hard earned cash.
No one sould be barred from speaking their own mind !!!

alan - my post clearly states - IMO - and IMO - there will not even be 200 for Asda - if you read - past RNSs - they state several hundred in the first year - do you call them liars - now its just possibly 200 ? - brokers - tipsters - posters - all state IMO - they are not liable if things do not happen - like RHPS - who advise to buy many stocks - and often advise you later to sell at a loss - as it went wrong - and note they only advise - they never tell you to buy - or sell - its in the small print - the same as saying - IMO - In My Opinion - if ever there is over 200 for Asda - please remind me - and if there never is - I will remind you -


hewittalan6 12 Oct 2005 07:57 - 11199 of 11475
ii,
Just to query one word of your statement. Where did you get the word maximum from. Nobody in this, or any other RNS has said 200 maximum. Either explain your unjustified scare mongering or withdraw that comment as a blatant lie.
Alan

dawall - to post your opinon - your research - and comments is fine - but PM1 goes OTT with personal abuse - he has at me - but I do not respond - and tell him to stop the personal rubbish - he is unstable - and is now banned from AFN - FYB - Moneyam - why is he banned from all of them - ? All the droves who left AFN to go to FYB - are all back at AFN now - this is one stock - a stock called SE0 - there are billions of people in the world who do not know of SE0 - and likely just a few tens of thousands who do know of SE0 - it is not the world - and the world is not SE0 - he was not an excellent researcher - he was only a poster - for those too lazy to hit the google button themselves - that is all -


dawall - 13 Oct 2005 23:40 - 11468 of 11476
Bullshare I agree with post 11466 if PM is not reinstated, albeit with a warning, then Moneyam will lose an excellent researcher and other posters, will leave in droves.