for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

morning all
can anyone tell me what iii thread stands for
lets hope for another good day
thanks

123456 - 13 Oct 2005 23:55 - 11468 of 11479
oblomov
so your wrong again but i know you well from fyb AND your faults
regaurds

Er, wrong about what exactly?

Its a little quiet in here today. Have I missed something?

did ii ever answer the 'maximum' question?
I started reading then got bored.
IMO he can F.O.A.D. if he has'nt got the bottle to own /admit a quite possibly legit mistake/oversight.
Peace and good will to all, even shorters.

ii,
You really cant help yourself can you. You INSERTED the word maximum into the RNS to allow for your negative statement. Now you insist that Starpol has failed the FDA tests. Wrong. Learn to read. It states with utmost clarity that it has passed the first tests and subsequent tests are ongoing. According to your pathetic interpretations of what is admissable, you can say that red means yellow, as long as you put IMO somewhere. You treat the truth as some kind of reference point if you can't be bothered to make something up. Sick, twisted rubbish.
Alan

By the way Bullshare,
Can't help thinking there is something wrong with th rules of the board. Yes PM1 was a ramper (or over enthuastic supporter - take your pick), and yes he may have breached copyright, but to ban him for his exuberance and allow someone who deliberately lies (ii) to continue with his mindless drivel and consistent twisting of plain facts for his own ends seems a little ironic. Can I suggest the rules change to show that deliberate misrepresentation of facts should also lead to withdrawl of service. At least we wouldn't have to put up with the biggest liar since Stalin.
Alan

Have to agree with you Alan about ii.

IMO the other side of the same coin as PM1. The board would really be improved if he went as well.

Careful Alan - you might get banned for defamation of character - or for telling the truth (about ii. !!! - I think this has all got out of hand and agree with QC that there appear to be double standards being applied.

Baza

BULLSHARE are you short on SEO?

Hi Ob,
Thanks for the support. I know we have disagreed (a little) over this stock before but I hope we could never shout liar at each other. I really am of the opinion that MAM should insist on the right to seek evidence for any factual statment made by anyone. This would, perhaps, expose those who claim knowledge that doesn't exist, or have a very different agenda to the rest of us. I welcome negative opinion, as it makes me pause, but I fear that to allow lying to go unchecked lowers these boards to the level of garden fence gossip.
Alan

Anyway, back to the share. About 6 million posts ago, I asked about the 1.3 million buy trade after the bell at a premium, and we couldn't decide what the hell it was. Judging by todays opening movements, do we now think it really was a buy at that price?
Alan

Agree again Alan.

It shouldn't be left to the likes of me (and even Shamona) to challenge these posts when the posters are obviously setting out to deceive. It would be far more helpful if MAM stepped in on these occasions in the same way as the Asmin do on FYB.

Anyway, this morning - it looks to me as if the RHPS investors are reinvesting, on the back of Tom Bulfords bulletin last night (of which I'll say nothing other than subscribe if you want to read it! It was an excellent bulletin). Lots of small quantities going through.

Early next week should be very interesting as a test for this share. The conference should bring good news (or I hope it will) at exactly the same time as chartists everywhere point to the formation (probably on Monday) of the dead cross. Wonder which will win, the chartists view that a dead cross will always lead to a fall, or the combination of anticipation about the conference (or RNS) and TB's buy stance?
Alan

You lot should be pleased this morning ,SEO on the up again..

Always thought it would, Jimmy. as soon as I read that EWR was back in from his Thai hideaway, I knew it would rise!!
By the way, Is it only me, or does anyone else picture EWR sat there saying "I've been expecting you, Mr Bond"?
Alan

trade it they say - buy low - sell high - the trend is your friend - make money - do not hold and lose - use the trend they say

soon will be top of the trend channel - so shorts who closed and went long earlier this week - will soon be selling off - and back to short positions again - be careful - sell at the top - buy at the bottom - make profit - they say



All rumour - DYOR !

Although technically wrong yesterday when Paul stated that the cost of Starpol was cheaper than other oil based products (technically wrong because the RNS specifically stated that STARPOL was still more expensive than oil based products)- it appears that his observation was accurate and is supported in the T&G report where they quote that Stanelco has since (the RNS) reduced the cost by re negotiating the supply agreements such that there is now a clear economic benefit to switching to STARPOL. T&G beleive that Starpol is now a compelling alternative.

Baza

ii - remember whatever your view, trend lines can be broken, up or down.

Bullshare,

I fully support you without any reservasions as to applying the rules, as they are there for the benefit of everyone. But could I respectfully request that PM1 is given a suspension and allowed to return. This would appear more on a level of fairness.. A ban could always follow.
Resectfully, Greekman.

Bullshare
Please have the integrity to reply to the many posters how would like you to clarify the position of PM1 & QC. Did you give them warnings or did you not ? If you did then why has nothing showed up on the BB for everyone to see.
This is the first time I`ve posted on this BB like some others because like them or not they were great for this board. I`ve just read some of the outright lies posted by ii and you consistantly do nothing about him/her. Do you only punish enthusiastic posters.
I know this has to do with copyright issue but this has been an issue through out many boards for a long time and there isn`t consistancy in just cutting them dead and not putting a general warning to ALL posters to make sure they stick to the rules. Please reply this time BULLSHARE. It would help clear the matter up. Thanks.