for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

sham
May be a merge then, I wouldn't want to see you get too much out of it.

No, no. You've got hold of the artists impression, post refurbishment and modernisation!!
Alan

A perfect example of mugs rushing in to buy a "cheap" shre, back to sub 14p very soon

roflol
OBLOMOV WAS THE ONE WHO USED TO BCK pm UP TO THE HILT WHEN HIS RAMPS SUITED HIM

I believe Stanelco did in fact look at buying-out Bioprogress but were advised not to touch it with a barge-pole. I'm paraphrasing, but that was the gist.

D

Alan - I thought a true dead-cross was when both 50dma and 200dma were descending which clearly is not the case here. The 200dma continues inn nearly a straight upward trend line hardly flickering at the current little local difficulty.

T&G great report on very conservative basis. Howard White not concerned. Tom Bulford (know to cut losses quickly in my experience) still positive and still the whole Masterton Library to revisit to perk you up whenever feeling queasy about holding too many SEO shares.

I am happily back above break even at 14.47p average price and look forward to 144.7 within 5 years.

RIP PM, but who really had the time to read all that stuff. Although I never squelched him unlike the opposition who have no place on a BB.

Anyway, what would we have all talked about today without a couple of bannings to suck on? God forbid we should discuss SEO.

sd

Love it SD. My apologies for misunderstanding the nature of a dead cross. Learning always learning. I too never squelched PM, or indeed anyone, as inside every ramper and basher is a kernel of truth, otherwise it would not be believable. The trick, as always, is to cut away the crap and find that little nugget. PM was right about the potentials, though he blew it all out of proportion, and ii is right that there are more promises than fulfillments. He does take the view that promises are made to be broken, not kept, and so far SEO have kept more than they have broken.
Still my most promising long termer, and still happy to hold, no matter what happens in the mean time.
Alan

The standard dead cross happened in July

the pice target is 18
this is because the graph will attempt to reach back to the 50MA

Thanks for that snip such an intellect.

Research Page is now up to date 14/10/2005
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread

Phew! Thanks snip - that makes me feel much better!

Does that mean the blue and black line will cross the green line again? If so, it looks
like happening in about a week to 10 days time, or do I misread the graph?

OB, When you are translating TA charts to other people you need a pair of dark glasses on so the others don't see you blinking.

It is possible oblomov. I believe that next week will give it a push either way

Trouble is that this stock hasn`t been allowed to settle into a natural pattern. The hype really has not been helpful in allowing this company to grow on solid foundations. ie rises in between good consolidations

I believe that the outside range will be 12 to 18 with several ups and downs between those two limits. This is called consolidation and must happen to build a good base and the longer it takes the better. If the consolidation gets narrower and narrower in range then it becomes like a coiled spring and there could be an explosive action out of the conso range

IMO removing the hype from this thread can only be good for the long term investors

Now I'm really confused. The 50 and 200 day MA on Snips charts are different to those on the charts at the top of the thread. Whats that all about then???
Alan

my objective thread uses EMA ie exponential moving averages as they are more relevant. They are weighted towards recent price activity

My chart in a recent post here uses 20 and 50 day simple MA as this is the standard dead cross

Alan

The chart posted by Snip are with 20 and 50 moving averages (MA) as opposed to 50 and 200 day moving averages.

Hope that explains it. Anyone got any other comments?

The oily one

have a look at this one but don`t worry as it looks as though it is going to settle into a range (unless there is more silly hyping)

Will be reading the T&G report this weekend.

Andy
Nice one andy it will be reassuring when you get back on board.

Pity QC is no longer here. We are all the poorer - especially as to what he has just turned up.

He has found UBS-Warburg's target price from SEO. It would even make Paul (I miss him already) go ballistic....!