for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I`d like to make a serius request to MoneyAM to reinstate PM1 on this board as soon as possible. Thanks

Boss, do you mean the argument for SEO is now being presented in the way which you agree with?

I just can't make out the colours of the different teams.

a very good read, doesn't really tell us anything new apart from a few bits and pieces. i can't really add anything to andy's assessment, good post.

fred, what teams would they be?

This thread is bloody silly - I've been away from my computer since 4.30 pm last friday and I turn on now to find 774 unread posts!!!

I've only read those on page 579 - can someone give me a precis of what has happened to cause this rampant posting or pandemic or has nothing really happened?

I saw reference above to PM1 being banned - is that something to do with it - if its not possible to make it short and sweet please just say so as in any case the sp is where I left it.

Thanks.

lies lies lies - disgusting lies - the UBS Warburg target is not for SEO Stanelco - its a different SEO - how can people lie like this ? rampers - IMO


Tonyrelaxes - 14 Oct 2005 21:00 - 11560 of 11573
Pity QC is no longer here. We are all the poorer - especially as to what he has just turned up.

He has found UBS-Warburg's target price from SEO. It would even make Paul (I miss him already) go ballistic....!

MikeW45 - a decent post - the packaging show - has been ramped on BBs for weeks and weeks - as where SE0 announce the big deal with Walmart - so time in this week - a technical bounce - a RNS of failure to get full FDA but spun to say its good they got fruit and veg - a brokers note - the packaging show thats been ramped and ramped - RPHS desperate update note to try to stop selling - ramp - ramp - ramp - spin - spin - spin - and next week - when nothing happens - no orders - no sales - no revenue - just more bull - more talk - more hype - it will - crash down - the shorters now this - they will have changed - from short to long - to pump the spike up this week - the higher the spike early-mid next week - the more to be made - when its shorted back - and from a higher spike - comes a lower low - the bubble bursts - as you say - who will be the prick - to burst the bubble ;)

All IMO - DYOR !

MikeW45 - 14 Oct'05 - 20:56 - 52903 of 52910

Mr AJ
39.5p in 3 months time.Hope you are right.
But I think not.
What is swing trading by the way?
More likely to see a drop in SP next week as no news is announced(is this what you mean by swing trading - ie up 25% last few days down x% next week).
The rises of the last few days have been in anticipation of good RNS's next week.
Good to see a White Marubozu - who reads this rubbish?
Hoping to add to my holding later next week when the current bubble bursts

snip - are you now long to give a good spike - EMA - lol - before going short to make good profit - the first fall was 25SMA through 200SMA - look at the chart - the next major fall is 50SMA through 200SMA - you know its coming - and next week - well spiked up by the shorters gone long - big gain to be had - next week - the big fall - EMA hides it - SMA shows it - faststoch peaked - williams peaked - 50 through 200 - its well primed for it - well played

All IMO - DYOR

ii,
Don't you dare go on about disgusting lies, when everyone on this board knows without doubt that your lies are your stock in trade. You have never even had the courage to respond to my reasonable request that you explain your "maximum" lie. You now compound this by stating that Starpol has failed to get full FDA approval. You know this to be a blatant untruth. You know that the truth is approval has been granted on certain foodstuffs, while testing continues on others, but this does not suit your position. When you have the decency to admit to your own lies, you can take the moral high ground on others lies. In short, shut up or put up. QC may well have made an error, and were he here to defend himself, would likely admit that. You deliberately twist RNS reports by adding in words that do not exist and are too spineless to answer straight questions. Go back to your sordid little world until you grow up enough to stop telling lies.
Alan

Hi guys,
At the risk of sounding like our dear departed friend(!), I've been thinking about Starpol. I know that it is available in many forms, but does this include the rigid plastics of the disposable cup type, or aerosol lid type? Can the degradability be adjusted for conditions and timescale?
If the answer to these questions is yes, then Greenseal may become a bit of a sideshow compared to Starpol. The uses become enormous, and if the price is now better than conventional plastics, the case becomes more compelling. Anything you see, from the lid of your deoderant to the cellophane that wraps your packet of fags, to the disposable beakers used at outdoor events, becomes a possibility for Starpol.
I am not trying to ramp. Anyone who reads these boards knows I was cautious about a 50pps party happening in the foreseeable future, and have made many less than positive observations. I am only trying to work out if the analysts are right in focusing on Greenseal as the major cash cow, or have they missed a salient point. If it could work for plastic bags, what else may be in their sights?
Alan

alan: well done re ii. My own view is that we got distorted versions of teh truth from both PM and ii. More acceptable with PM as he tended to get carried away with his own enthuisiasm, whereas ii deliberately sets out to provide a distorted version be selective quotes. My suggestion is that the T@G report should be read before the posting of criticism (and too eulogistic contributions as well). Good post from andysmith. I'll add the impact on my own perspective over the weekend. The big plus is that it gives a much fuller picture, warts and all, than we have had from Peel Hunt and, in particular, from Evolution. The sp forecast of 21p is cautious but none the worse for that. A big plus is the Starpol forecast - this supports a projected 5p on the sp from Starpol so that the current 15p sp is supportable on fundamentals. The downside is limited (apart from any over-shoot) and I am coming to the opinion that the hype is now out of the sp.

Eric

alan, i agree that the potential uses for starpol are mind boggling when you think about it, but seo have to show that greenseal is living up to the hype. so far it isn't.
eric, how can anyone putting out distorted versions of the truth be acceptable?

You could post this bit ....

"Yeah, MAM banned me for aledgedly posting copyright material that had earlier been removed by the administrators, I didn't know it had already been removed, how would I ??

I always try to follow the copyright rules, that is to only post a small amout of an articl, and regognise the owner, and give a link back to the origionator."


Thats how I see it, and if they don't .... too bad :))))

Cheers again,
Paul

Has there been any response on here from the moderator that felt it necessary to ban PM? Its pretty poor that despite continual questioning from members that no effort has been made on their part to answer the questions.

More to the point, in the interests of "fair play" (acknowledging that over-ramping is equally as destructive as over-DE-ramping) maybe a brief resume of what we can/cannot say here? I-I's blatant de-ramping is equally irritating although as soon as it became obvious to me then I merely started to skip over his/her posts!

If PM1 broke strict rules and guidelines [which regrettably I think he did here] then the Moderator had no choice. It's just a shame because Paul obviously cares for Stanelco and has put his money [one presumes?] where his mouth is! Ah well, maybe we can all learn from this, eh?

Just a thought - What if the Moderator was to invite PM1 back but with pre-conditions re: blatant OTT ramping and plagarism... but at the same time, also imposed similar tightening of the reins to I-I? I think this would be beneficial to all readers and posters as the thread is in danger of rapidly degenerating into a battlefield. Maybe Queen1 was right, after all?

So howzabout that, Queenie - a backhanded compliment from a self-confessed "MCP"! ?

BRING BACK PAUL.
It's hugely unfair that he has been banned.
He's the one who works hardest at bringing us up to date with information.
It's II who ashould be removed, not PM.

Totally agree

MONEY AM

Please note the previous 3 posts with which I fully agree.

Whilst accepting you have rules and you would not wish to set a precedent of reversing a decision, I do think your banning of PM1 and QC (particularly) was harsh in the extreme. Yet you allow proven fact distorters like ii to spout away attempting to deceive investors with what clearly appear to be lies by using misleading misquotes.

The T&G report is in the public domain (see SEOs own site) so I fail to see there was a breach of copyright, especially as the source/writer was acknowledged.

Seconded antofelli, you may or may not agree with Pm's posts but he is a very
useful source of information! I am sure this problem with copyright and plagarism can be amicably resolved with a few e-mails and assurances that it will not happen again , as it would be a shame if Pm was banned for good .

Almost 72 hours since the ban and no effort from MoneyAM. I hear from one of the people involved that they still receive E-mails from MAM about other products despite having been banned under that username. Prepared to sell Level 2 but not let them post on here, a bit of a nose rubber?