Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

RTD - Why? (RTD)     

Nitefly - 15 Sep 2003 10:55

Why are we again at 10.5p bid?

It doesn't add up...

Good Results + Strong buying pre results + Christmas online buying soon = Price drop

Then again some companies that have debt for equity hanging in the balance, poor results and bankruptcy around the corner and they go up!

Why sell now at a loss?

Wont that be a kick in the teeth when we see 13.5p 14p again!

Best of luck all.

Fred1new - 13 May 2004 13:34 - 1157 of 2406

I think I have posted this soemwhere else. But what exactly is a T Trade. Who is protected. Can any one do this.

The Other Kevin - 13 May 2004 15:19 - 1158 of 2406

T trades are trades with extended settlements over and above the normal T+3, giving the trader an opportunity to close a position without parting with any money. The broker will charge a premium for this service.


Fred1new - 13 May 2004 16:39 - 1159 of 2406

Thank you.

robstuff - 14 May 2004 09:59 - 1160 of 2406

T trades I think are protected transactions which could be Institutional trading, not sure about the T+3 as i bought some on T+10 and it was shown as an ordinary buy. These now look stupendously cheap compared with other tech stocks - at p/e 12 and 1.5x sales. I do think this is excellent opportunity and have bought more as they should do well on interims very soon.

IanT(MoneyAM) - 14 May 2004 10:04 - 1161 of 2406

rob,

there is a slight difference here when a T is posted next to a trade as it goes througf that is the trade type and in this case a protected transaction.

When you refer to T+ trades, this is not an abbreviated trade type this is the time before settlement.

For example if you bought some shares on T + 10 (trade + 10) this means that you would not have to pay for those shares for 10 days after the transaction.

Regards

Ian

Douggie - 14 May 2004 10:08 - 1162 of 2406

mornin all re. today I'm sayin nowt :o}}}}}

Douggie - 17 May 2004 08:57 - 1163 of 2406

..............:o(((((((((((((((

stargazing - 17 May 2004 15:14 - 1164 of 2406

Tokyo - 17 May 2004 16:31 - 1165 of 2406

well pulled back a bit

overgrowth - 18 May 2004 23:43 - 1166 of 2406

RTD held well today in the face of shorters who are still trying to eke out the last bit of downward leeway. When you start to see the "3p soon" messages appearing, you know that there's a bounce coming very soon.

apple - 19 May 2004 10:38 - 1167 of 2406

It may be time to get back in again.

Douggie - 19 May 2004 12:53 - 1168 of 2406

overgrowth.."3p soon" ? can/will you explain please.

Fundamentalist - 19 May 2004 13:04 - 1169 of 2406

I assume he is referring to a poster on ADVFN called M&C who has just forecast 3p. He has been proved very wrong on both RTD and NSB over the past eighteen months and his comments are being interpreted as a buy signal!!!!!

Douggie - 19 May 2004 13:43 - 1170 of 2406

thanks Fund't. .... still had price reduction when trades at buy/sell= 5/3 ???

Fred1new - 19 May 2004 14:29 - 1171 of 2406

has anybody notice the similarity in the graphs for RTD, TFC and BPRG. ARE THE SAME PEOPLE PLAYIN THIS SHARE.

Fundamentalist - 19 May 2004 15:42 - 1172 of 2406

Fred

Add NSB to your list.

From reading various bulletin boards there are a lot of people either holding all or most of these and/or short term trading them.

IMHO I believe they are all shares which had very healthy rises early in the year and have subsequently been targetted by the shorters. May be wrong but there certainly appears a trend!!!!

apple - 19 May 2004 15:47 - 1173 of 2406

Fundamentalist

I think you are right but we must be near their target levels now so when they have finished then we should see these shares get some legs & recover substantially.

Fundamentalist - 19 May 2004 17:08 - 1174 of 2406

Apple

Lets hope so. 16p appears to be quite a strong area of support and volumes have now decreased substantially. I am expecting these to star rising again as we get nearer to the interims.

overgrowth - 19 May 2004 23:41 - 1175 of 2406

Douggie, Sorry for the delayed response - been out all day, though unfortunately not in the sun :-(

Fundamentalist was able to read my mind anyway.

All we need now is someone to read Carl Clump's mind to see what juicy contracts are due to be signed!

Douggie - 20 May 2004 00:34 - 1176 of 2406

:o))....thanks overgrowth, Fundamentalist, fingers xxxxd for speedy return to mid 20s. mm's seem kindly disposed to RTD, most days open blue, pity it can't be held.it's said anticipation better than !!! well I'v had enough
Register now or login to post to this thread.