Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


bosley - 15 Oct 2005 12:15 - 11580 of 27111

alan, i agree that the potential uses for starpol are mind boggling when you think about it, but seo have to show that greenseal is living up to the hype. so far it isn't.
eric, how can anyone putting out distorted versions of the truth be acceptable?

Brandname - 15 Oct 2005 13:15 - 11581 of 27111

You could post this bit ....

"Yeah, MAM banned me for aledgedly posting copyright material that had earlier been removed by the administrators, I didn't know it had already been removed, how would I ??

I always try to follow the copyright rules, that is to only post a small amout of an articl, and regognise the owner, and give a link back to the origionator."


Thats how I see it, and if they don't .... too bad :))))

Cheers again,
Paul

jcrawford - 15 Oct 2005 13:25 - 11582 of 27111

Has there been any response on here from the moderator that felt it necessary to ban PM? Its pretty poor that despite continual questioning from members that no effort has been made on their part to answer the questions.

markusantonius - 15 Oct 2005 14:20 - 11583 of 27111

More to the point, in the interests of "fair play" (acknowledging that over-ramping is equally as destructive as over-DE-ramping) maybe a brief resume of what we can/cannot say here? I-I's blatant de-ramping is equally irritating although as soon as it became obvious to me then I merely started to skip over his/her posts!

If PM1 broke strict rules and guidelines [which regrettably I think he did here] then the Moderator had no choice. It's just a shame because Paul obviously cares for Stanelco and has put his money [one presumes?] where his mouth is! Ah well, maybe we can all learn from this, eh?

Just a thought - What if the Moderator was to invite PM1 back but with pre-conditions re: blatant OTT ramping and plagarism... but at the same time, also imposed similar tightening of the reins to I-I? I think this would be beneficial to all readers and posters as the thread is in danger of rapidly degenerating into a battlefield. Maybe Queen1 was right, after all?

So howzabout that, Queenie - a backhanded compliment from a self-confessed "MCP"! ?

Paperbackwriter - 15 Oct 2005 14:31 - 11584 of 27111

BRING BACK PAUL.
It's hugely unfair that he has been banned.
He's the one who works hardest at bringing us up to date with information.
It's II who ashould be removed, not PM.

antofelli - 15 Oct 2005 14:36 - 11585 of 27111

Totally agree

Tonyrelaxes - 15 Oct 2005 14:46 - 11586 of 27111

MONEY AM

Please note the previous 3 posts with which I fully agree.

Whilst accepting you have rules and you would not wish to set a precedent of reversing a decision, I do think your banning of PM1 and QC (particularly) was harsh in the extreme. Yet you allow proven fact distorters like ii to spout away attempting to deceive investors with what clearly appear to be lies by using misleading misquotes.

The T&G report is in the public domain (see SEOs own site) so I fail to see there was a breach of copyright, especially as the source/writer was acknowledged.

ghengis101 - 15 Oct 2005 14:59 - 11587 of 27111

Seconded antofelli, you may or may not agree with Pm's posts but he is a very
useful source of information! I am sure this problem with copyright and plagarism can be amicably resolved with a few e-mails and assurances that it will not happen again , as it would be a shame if Pm was banned for good .

jcrawford - 15 Oct 2005 15:38 - 11588 of 27111

Almost 72 hours since the ban and no effort from MoneyAM. I hear from one of the people involved that they still receive E-mails from MAM about other products despite having been banned under that username. Prepared to sell Level 2 but not let them post on here, a bit of a nose rubber?

Sharesure - 15 Oct 2005 16:00 - 11589 of 27111

Agree with the support for having PM1 reinstated. alot of what he posts is informative and as others have said he causes less harm with his enthusiasm (which is easily recognised) than the shorters/derampers who have told lies to attempt to rig the market in their favour. Well MAM what about reinstatement with a warning/clarification over what is permissible to post?

Brandname - 15 Oct 2005 16:46 - 11590 of 27111

From PM to me:

Thanks for those :)

Can yo post my thanks on the BB to those who have shown their support, and for those who haven't but are keeping quiet :)

Cheers,
Paul

Off to the pub now, got a pub crawl/quiz for the rest of the day, so I will be in bed most of tomorrow recovering :))))

zscrooge - 15 Oct 2005 17:52 - 11591 of 27111

Has PM been reincarnated as Brandname?

chippy2 - 15 Oct 2005 18:10 - 11592 of 27111


MONEY AM

I dont think PM1 posted the note here anyway, so if he emailed a few people a copy, this is surely external from this board.


Please refer to pauls post below.



paulmasterson1 - 13 Oct 2005 12:42 - 11357 of 11591

KK Hi,

I need permission from T&G to put it there, that won't be easy to get methinks.

Maybe it will appear on the official Stanelco website, like KBC, EVO and Hardman notes have.

It's very detailed, and is 22 pages long, something to read over the weekend !

Cheers,
PM


Cheers,
PM

driver - 15 Oct 2005 18:13 - 11593 of 27111

zscrooge
I wouldn't mind if he looks like this.

shamona - 15 Oct 2005 18:40 - 11594 of 27111

What a load of whinging children, masterson was a lying liability and the threads on the other sites he has been banned from are all much better without his one sided googled contributions.

Take your love in off thread please as it has no place on a Stanelco discussion thread.

Brandname(masterson), reported first thing Monday morning, you broke the rules many times and imo need to seek medical help for your compulsion problems when it comes to anything share related. I suspect you have a form of OCD which if not treated will only get worse.

Tonyrelaxes - 15 Oct 2005 18:54 - 11595 of 27111

I wonder how many posts of support Shamona or ii would get if they were banned -fairly or unfairly.....

Brandname - 15 Oct 2005 19:17 - 11596 of 27111

Sham

Feel free to report me but I am not PM, MAM can check this out themselves. Nice try Sham (bles) but you are definatly barking up the wrong tree. Yes have PMs E-Mail address and yes the posts are genuine PM E-Mails.

Post 11590 was after I sent him a copy of posts 11582 to 11585. PM1 is temporarily posting on another board, if PM1 wants you to know where he is I am sure he will E-Mail you accordingly.

Sham, I a regular contributor on iii, come on over and we will be happy to give you a bashers bashing on there as well.

BN

BKK2 - 15 Oct 2005 19:23 - 11597 of 27111

I for one would LOVE to see shamona gone banned and ever and never to return,it won't happen even with the abusive remarks he has made against P.M,he claims he has all our interests at heart,Ye Right.would definatly like to see paul back with all his research.

Peter

BKK2 - 15 Oct 2005 19:23 - 11598 of 27111

.

shamona - 15 Oct 2005 19:49 - 11599 of 27111

I wouldn't be surprised if half of you are masterson, I can't possibly imagine this amount of adults could hero worship a bulletin board poster in reality.

Tony

I don't post for adulation, i'm only here to gauge sentiment on Stanelco and to pick up some snippets of news, if you're here to hear someone predicting 20 per share and posting crap about high oil prices then fair play to you; unfortuantly for you you'll have to go elsewhere now though.

Give me unbiased posters like bosley and driver any day, keep up the good work chaps; now at least I won't have to waste time skimming posts to find your good stuff.

Remember, it's an investment not a football team!
Register now or login to post to this thread.