for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Totally agree

MONEY AM

Please note the previous 3 posts with which I fully agree.

Whilst accepting you have rules and you would not wish to set a precedent of reversing a decision, I do think your banning of PM1 and QC (particularly) was harsh in the extreme. Yet you allow proven fact distorters like ii to spout away attempting to deceive investors with what clearly appear to be lies by using misleading misquotes.

The T&G report is in the public domain (see SEOs own site) so I fail to see there was a breach of copyright, especially as the source/writer was acknowledged.

Seconded antofelli, you may or may not agree with Pm's posts but he is a very
useful source of information! I am sure this problem with copyright and plagarism can be amicably resolved with a few e-mails and assurances that it will not happen again , as it would be a shame if Pm was banned for good .

Almost 72 hours since the ban and no effort from MoneyAM. I hear from one of the people involved that they still receive E-mails from MAM about other products despite having been banned under that username. Prepared to sell Level 2 but not let them post on here, a bit of a nose rubber?

Agree with the support for having PM1 reinstated. alot of what he posts is informative and as others have said he causes less harm with his enthusiasm (which is easily recognised) than the shorters/derampers who have told lies to attempt to rig the market in their favour. Well MAM what about reinstatement with a warning/clarification over what is permissible to post?

From PM to me:

Thanks for those :)

Can yo post my thanks on the BB to those who have shown their support, and for those who haven't but are keeping quiet :)

Cheers,
Paul

Off to the pub now, got a pub crawl/quiz for the rest of the day, so I will be in bed most of tomorrow recovering :))))

Has PM been reincarnated as Brandname?

MONEY AM

I dont think PM1 posted the note here anyway, so if he emailed a few people a copy, this is surely external from this board.


Please refer to pauls post below.



paulmasterson1 - 13 Oct 2005 12:42 - 11357 of 11591

KK Hi,

I need permission from T&G to put it there, that won't be easy to get methinks.

Maybe it will appear on the official Stanelco website, like KBC, EVO and Hardman notes have.

It's very detailed, and is 22 pages long, something to read over the weekend !

Cheers,
PM


Cheers,
PM

zscrooge
I wouldn't mind if he looks like this.

What a load of whinging children, masterson was a lying liability and the threads on the other sites he has been banned from are all much better without his one sided googled contributions.

Take your love in off thread please as it has no place on a Stanelco discussion thread.

Brandname(masterson), reported first thing Monday morning, you broke the rules many times and imo need to seek medical help for your compulsion problems when it comes to anything share related. I suspect you have a form of OCD which if not treated will only get worse.

I wonder how many posts of support Shamona or ii would get if they were banned -fairly or unfairly.....

Sham

Feel free to report me but I am not PM, MAM can check this out themselves. Nice try Sham (bles) but you are definatly barking up the wrong tree. Yes have PMs E-Mail address and yes the posts are genuine PM E-Mails.

Post 11590 was after I sent him a copy of posts 11582 to 11585. PM1 is temporarily posting on another board, if PM1 wants you to know where he is I am sure he will E-Mail you accordingly.

Sham, I a regular contributor on iii, come on over and we will be happy to give you a bashers bashing on there as well.

BN

I for one would LOVE to see shamona gone banned and ever and never to return,it won't happen even with the abusive remarks he has made against P.M,he claims he has all our interests at heart,Ye Right.would definatly like to see paul back with all his research.

Peter

.

I wouldn't be surprised if half of you are masterson, I can't possibly imagine this amount of adults could hero worship a bulletin board poster in reality.

Tony

I don't post for adulation, i'm only here to gauge sentiment on Stanelco and to pick up some snippets of news, if you're here to hear someone predicting 20 per share and posting crap about high oil prices then fair play to you; unfortuantly for you you'll have to go elsewhere now though.

Give me unbiased posters like bosley and driver any day, keep up the good work chaps; now at least I won't have to waste time skimming posts to find your good stuff.

Remember, it's an investment not a football team!

This line from Brandname makes no sense, I think you messed up already masterson! I suspect you meant "if PM1 wants you to know where HE IS"

You've never been the sharpest pencil in the box have you Paul.

Post 11590 was after I sent him a copy of posts 11582 to 11585. PM1 is temporarily posting on another board, if PM1 wants you to know where I am sure he will E-Mail you accordingly.

cheers sham, corrected my post, my mistake. So you coming over to iii then ? Lets see if Im still here Monday after you go running to MAM, oooooooooh sir sir, i think Brandname is PM1 sirrrrrrrrrr, please sir please sir.

How pathetic you are.

lol Brandname, perhaps sham is also Bullshare?

Can Ingel compete with Nrobe? I don't think so, why not give up this stupid court case Mr Balchin? You're chasing a lost cause and even with the miracle of a success(less than 1% chance I would say)it's clear to see we're miles behind the Bioprogress products.

Don't cut off your nose to spite your face, hold your hands up for stealing the patent and move on with Greenseal.

http://www.fmcmagenta.com/

Drivel like that(shamona - 15 Oct 2005 22:20) is allowed on a thread relating to Stanelco?

"Don't cut off your nose to spite your face, hold your hands up for stealing the patent and move on with Greenseal"

Bullshare, on Thursday night you wrote a paragraph on the rules of the board. One of which is below.

Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;

I consider the post by shamona that I have quoted above to be defamation of both Mr Balchin and Stanelco and would ask you to deal the same courtesy that you afforded both QC and PM when they broke your rules on Thursday.

Or will the double standards apply? Please give clarification on why QC and PM were banned for rule breaking yet others who have broken various copyright rules, defamation rules and others remain free to post on this board.