Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole Evolves (TAD)     

ainsoph - 23 May 2003 13:32

A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......

Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.

Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back

Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....


ainsoph


We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140

superrod - 25 May 2003 20:58 - 116 of 729

this is a complete joke:
the following post may contain strong language: ( or maybe something a bit strongish)

i come here to rid myself of the bollocks that it spouted on advfn. and im not talking shares.
uglyboatrace says "keith" should be banned after his "performance on advfn" whatever that means.

i am here to discuss shares and in my view that means getting shot of complete tossers like uglyboatrace and reluctantly gravy ( both of whom have a different agenda ).

btw my offline chats with ainsoph have netted me over 3k in the last month.

THANKS A

the rest of you.......ignore what you dont like.....EASY REALLY.

see you at 10p :o)

Andy - 25 May 2003 20:59 - 117 of 729

Uglyboatrace,

LOL!

If "most of the id's are Keith", what's the point of a poll, or do you think he's going to vote himself off?

You really couldn't make this stuff up.


Tulletj,

Has it occurred to you that you're being ignored by all concerned?

Your polite requests won't stop this, but there are ways, and I beleive it's time to put them into action, this is ruining AM, no wonder the "straights" aren't posting!

Your intentions are excellent, but doomed to failure.

I cannot believe AM are allowing this to disrupt their BB, old Clem must be laughing his socks off! HIS problem has become YOUR problem, and you need to "think outsude the box" to clear it up.

If you can't think how to stop it, ring or email me, I'll tell you how IT CAN be done!

Regards,

Andy.

ainsoph - 25 May 2003 21:03 - 118 of 729

Hello Rod ..... glad you could make the party .... what's this with the 10p ... that could be just the starter.


I am hearing big numbers partner wise albeit nothing has been signed yet ... numbers indicating a value of $ooops been told to edit for ETI .... don't ask me who but it's not a software company



ains

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 21:15 - 119 of 729

Keith

Do you ever stop ?

PS

Why.......the..........dots.........

Fugitive - 25 May 2003 21:30 - 120 of 729

stop the multi-aliases, stop the board being turned into an ego trip for one very, very sad individual

Censor - 25 May 2003 21:55 - 121 of 729

Hear hear Andy. Well said.

I think that MAM would be far better without the personal comments made below. This isn't the first time that ainsoph has sworn and been abusive and it won't be the last, I just hope that something is done before ainsoph lapses back into her older and wholly more abusive self....

ainsoph - 25 May'03 - 20:37 - 111 of 119

is this ugly peeps for real .... a real twat on a stick ..... here are some posts from the bb picked at random lol ..... Darwin in reverse .... will he go back to the primeval mud soon

ainsoph - 25 May 2003 22:07 - 122 of 729

So far we have had less than a half days actual trading on Tads since this thread has started ..... more than half the 120 posts are just spam .... inluding this lot from NEO/Censor.




Censor - 23 May'03 - 14:20 - 3 of 120


What???

Isn't the other thread good enough??

I can't for the life of me understand why ANOTHER TAD thread has been started.

Any offers as to a reason for this new and spurious thread?




Censor - 23 May'03 - 14:33 - 6 of 120


OK Bullshare.

Thanks for the response.



Censor - 23 May'03 - 14:58 - 14 of 120


Regarding the ainsoph gender question...Does anybody know a man who might be able to comment on wool quality and the buying of wool???




Censor - 23 May'03 - 15:03 - 17 of 120


ainsoph.

A simple question. I'm male. Which gender are you?

Regards.



Censor - 23 May'03 - 15:23 - 25 of 120


LOL!....he's on fire...




Censor - 23 May'03 - 15:58 - 35 of 120


Great post moneylender....are you related to Tris? :0)....

Didn't you get yellow-carded for this sort of thing???




Censor - 23 May'03 - 16:01 - 37 of 120


gravy

IMO today is pure market manipulation..

..that GEM that went through was at a significantly higher price than the rest this week...and according to the moneyam competitor the buys/sells for today roughly match which makes me think that the MM's have done some good work today......

One day of positive movement will not re-coup ainsoph's losses anyway.

Good luck to DD & rjs....



Censor - 23 May'03 - 17:01 - 67 of 120


incredibly thick??...or just acting?






Censor - 24 May'03 - 09:17 - 78 of 120


Truth or ainsoph fantasy??




Censor - 24 May'03 - 12:16 - 80 of 120


ainsoph.


If you don't know then you're no more respectable than your misinforming and ramping past pays testimony too.




Censor - 25 May'03 - 21:55 - 120 of 120


Hear hear Andy. Well said.

I think that MAM would be far better without the personal comments made below. This isn't the first time that ainsoph has sworn and been abusive and it won't be the last, I just hope that something is done before ainsoph lapses back into her older and wholly more abusive self....


Censor - 25 May 2003 22:11 - 123 of 729

[ ainsoph You missed the bottom bit off of the last one - Please control yourself ]

Hear hear Andy. Well said.

I think that MAM would be far better without the personal comments made below. This isn't the first time that ainsoph has sworn and been abusive and it won't be the last, I just hope that something is done before ainsoph lapses back into her older and wholly more abusive self....

ainsoph - 25 May'03 - 20:37 - 111 of 119

is this ugly peeps for real .... a real twat on a stick ..... here are some posts from the bb picked at random lol ..... Darwin in reverse .... will he go back to the primeval mud soon

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 22:13 - 124 of 729

Keith

I think the best solution would be to have your own BB .

This would cater for you and your aliases , you could agree with yourself and tell yourself how much money you have made .

A good idea ?

Fugitive - 25 May 2003 22:17 - 125 of 729

I repeat:

stop the multi-aliases, stop the board being turned into an ego trip for one very, very sad individual

UGLYBOATRACE - 25 May 2003 22:19 - 126 of 729

Keith

The court case against ADVFN ?

How is it going ?

gravy - 26 May 2003 00:08 - 127 of 729

Always knew that ainsoph and guru were one and the same person.

Ainsoph ;

Nice to see you show your true colours from time to time, that
language you use is disgraceful and should not be tolerated !!!

I hope the webmaster takes action over this.

Gravy

gravy - 26 May 2003 00:45 - 128 of 729

Note that the ainsoph post on iii was recommended by guru
in less than a minute !!!

What a coincedence :-))

Gravy

guru 1 1/4 - 26 May 2003 08:20 - 129 of 729

Gravy
You are a laugh a minute, so you have never gone into a bb at virtually the same time a post has been made?
No actually you have, the one I have recommended on iii, you must have read it at the same time.
Heavens behold that 2 different people have actually entered a bb at the same time and there was me thinking that the internet was the world wide web but in your warped head the majority of the internet is the ainsoph wide web.
Ains must take up so much bandwidth that it makes it virtually impossible for anyone else to post.
Does this actually make you feel better by pretending to yourself that anyone who has the same view on Tad as ainsoph is actually ainsoph.

Guru 1 1/4 ( living in the real world not the demented gravy world)

Censor - 26 May 2003 09:06 - 130 of 729

Liar Guru..

..this isn't a matter of coincidence....you read and recommended ainsoph less than a minute after the post was made......that's the sign of a weak mind needing visual reassurance from itself...you aren't strong enough to be honest...

Your problem is that you think everyone's as thick as you, you don't realise how transparent these insipid limp-wristed moves are....they make me laugh though...you tell such whoppers that you should be a comedy act on a stage...it's certain that in the investment world nobody takes you seriously.....

Regards.

guru 1 1/4 - 26 May 2003 09:32 - 131 of 729

Censor
I am not the one who is completely off base here.
You could not tbe further from the truth, implication you are the liar.
Regards
Guru

ainsoph - 26 May 2003 09:33 - 132 of 729

MAM


please note there are 59 obvious spamming posts. on this thread, from the gravy/ollie/neo gang out of 129 so far.

I thought the idea of a new thread was to cut some of the rubbish posts. Can you please issue some red cards to the gravy/neo/ollie gang and bring the situation under control (their current aliases include Censor/gravy)



ainsoph

Censor - 26 May 2003 09:49 - 133 of 729

ainsoph

Aren't your stats on so called 'spamming' more demonstrative of the general concensus of opinion about you as opposed to TAD bashing?

All you have done is to demonstrate how unpopular you are.

ainsoph - 26 May 2003 10:08 - 134 of 729

To be frank NEO I cannot ever see you and your sad gang as a concensus and you have just clearly demonstrated why MAM needs to give you the red card today.

I am sure everyone outside your gang will agree and we can then talk investments instead of this playground stuff from advfn

guru 1 1/4 - 26 May 2003 10:10 - 135 of 729

censor
Your post states your point of view from a completely biased opinion ie you think there is only one poster attacking you, ainsoph on which you base your judgements.
In fact there are probably more pro tad posters totally cheesed off with you and ollies and gravy's spam so really the opposite applies to your post from my point of view and several other people who post on the pro side.
I suppose from your point of view it vindicates your argument, thats fine if you want to put your head in the clouds.
The simple reason MAM don't ban ainsoph for using multiple aliases is because he doesn't use them, they have banned you and Ollie but it's quite convenient to forget that.
Back to Tad nice 25% rise on Friday, Yahoo finance think there is further to run.

Guru 1 1/4
Register now or login to post to this thread.