Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

Nah he's just a slow reader , took him til then to finish reading the MDX thread in the zoo :-)

--->GAUSIE

No, I don't drink that crap.

But I do think that little quote in post 115 says rather a lot about the why's and wherefores of a lot of this. I am just hungry to learn about it all from the very best sources.


--->DIL

What has this got to do with MDX or have you got a leek stuck in an inappropriate orifice at the moment driving you into a bout of momentary madness?

I noticed you made a comment on me about MDX a while back....what has that got to do with me?

Regards,

THE COUNT!

Nothing ... except you told me a few years ago to tuck a few away and I could sue you if it didn't come off , threads on here somewhere but I won't be bothering.

You wanna chill and get your sense of humour back COUNT.

Regards

--->DIL

I thought a leek in the orifice was a display of my sense of humour, in such a way that you might geddit.

Oh, and I'm pretty chilled...in fact, despite the central heating being on, I am still feeling pretty cool.

Regards,

THE COUNT!

For Pholden, Why don't you read what is written, then engage you brain and think of its content before you respond. Your position seems to me that of an unreasoning zealot. I was making an observation and have no allegiance to either party in the present Middle East conflict.

I am not alone in thinking that many of the problems in international politics is due to the patronising positions taken by the present wealthier nations in regard to the smaller and poorer nations.

These countries are often recognisable and supported by racial or religious aspects of those societies as well as geographical. The polarisation of the different groups is often around a racial or religious symbol. As an example, look at the break up of old Yugoslavia, where the genetic base of the country was similar in all areas and the majority of the population were Agnostic. Here politicians, manipulated the people of that country to group ethnically around various totem poles ie Catholic, Orthodox or Moslem. The Moslems were sometimes only recognisable by the variation of surnames, from the other groups. Large numbers each of these groups were integrated by marriage previous to this debacle. I wont go into the political power bases of the various groups. The fragmentation of old Yugoslavia as outcome of the recent war has been of little value to the majority of the people of that country.

Returning to the Middle East.
It is interesting that at the moment that is Israel, previously with the protection of America, continues to try to dictate to the Palestinians what they should do, while not respecting the mandates of the United Nations when applied to themselves. If they start negotiating as equals with mutual respect, it maybe possible to have a lasting peace, which would be beneficial to the Israeli and Palestinian people.

From their own history, the Israel should realise that you cant wipe out or subject another race by primitive violent action. The grievances and problems are there to be resolved.

The majority of the world, is condemning Israel for its disproportionate use of force.

The majority of the humanitarian aid bodies are condemning Israels actions.

If Israel faces up to accepting the United Nations mandates and carries out necessary steps to instigate them, then it is probable that there will be a peace in this area.

The chant of "Hamas" has be firing rockets into Israel for 8years has a certain truth. Perhaps, if the Israelis had negotiated positively and honestly and applied the appropriate mandates during this the 8year period, the situation may not have deteriorated to the present state of affairs.

Fred .... the first part of your post was total rubbish, but at least the last part was sensible .... unfortunately, it is radical politicians, rabble-rousers, and outsiders with vested interest in unrest and worse who always command centre stage

.

--->ALL

The problem is that Israel was created out of various acts of terror carried out against the indigenous population and too against the British forces there.

it was eventually 'legitimised' by a UN resolution, and since then, Israel has chosen to ignore virtually all UN resolutions as a result. But it is always happy to refer to the first one that actually created and 'legitimised' it as a country against the wishes of the indigenous peoples.

It has also been on the receiving end of many billions of dollars of US support/arms, and despite not being a 3rd world country, is the largest recipient of foreign aid from the USA. No other country comes close.

Israel was armed to the teeth by the USA since its creation, and so had the luxury of no longer relying on terrorist acts to get their voices heard and their will enforced.

Nowadays, its forces simply press firing buttons in Apache attack helicopters and in the most modern warplanes in the US arsenal, along with tanks and artillery pieces, and the Palestinians were simply labelled as terrorists as they tried to resist against such overwhelming odds.

They had very good teachers in learning the tactics of terror against their own people. Perhaps people should try and remember Deir Yassin as one example that immediately springs to mind.

This is not quite as simple a war against 'terrorist' Hamas as so many would like to call it.

This is all about a massive injustice perpertrated against the Palestinian people for well over half a century, and by a force so powerful and one sided that it is surprising how they have even managed to resist to this day.

I posted earlier, the quote.....

"If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"

Rather NOT surprisingly, nobody came out to tell us who uttered those very words.

Those words came out of the mouth of David Ben Gurion. I presume most of you know who that was.

Regards,

THE COUNT!

of course DbG (sic! - Ben was not a second christian (lol!) name), great leader as he may have been, has long had his bones turn to dust ..... i also suspect that the quotation is taken out of context, for there are certainly two ways of reading, "They see but one thing ..... " - i.e. the arabs (primarily an agglomeration until very recently of small nomadic tribes) are as bigotted (as the jews) and choose to see but one thing

No I didn't geddit COUNT but you were you were spot on about me having a moment of madness ... recently.

Ask that Welsh flag burning tw*t if you bump into him (preferably whilst driving a steamroller) :-)

All the best.

And u can stuff that where the sun don't shine too Dailos :-)

I have copied this reference again, just in case some have missed. I am glad I am not as isolated in my views as suggested.

Thanks for drawing my attention to it!

Eyes in the back of your head.

http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2008/historical-amnesia-gaza-p1.php

THE COUNT

Dil has an undeclared interest in this fighting did you know he was an
arms dealer in that region?
He has been supplying weapons to Hamas for years according to Martini,
who sent me this evidence and asked me to show everybody....

--->DAILOS

:-)

If only they had something quite as sophisticated.

Regards,

THE COUNT!

Don't believe I have been called a Zealot before Fred, although I'm sure worse. I would like to think I have a pragmatic view of most topics rather than the one-sided stance you prefer to adopt. Actually you reminded me of a trip I enjoyed immensely a few years ago when I was lucky enough to visit the Masada and indeed some other rather special historical sites in Israel.

I love the sheep Dailos,....!, where did you get the army kit from ?.

rawdm999,

Raw, yes it was flippancy. Like many pseudonyms I thought there was a layer of humour in its choice. (A bit like my own choice.) But with humour there is generally a point.
I thought in the first posting there were some interesting remarks and did not notice any personal attack. The second posting was of a slightly different nature. My answer to the whether Hamas was elected democratically, is that you read the information in the media around that period. It appeared that the World Press seem to think that it was a relatively free election. The result of that election was seen, as less questionable than the Bush elections in America.

I disagree with the views you appear to voice in; Ruth mentioned the key words in post 107 she mentioned the dark ages. That part of the world (with the exception of Israel) is still in the dark ages. They are all for destruction and do not create anything but problems.

I think many of the surrounding countries are advancing rapidly, with their social improvements, education and economies. (Based on to some degree on their oil wealth. Britain's industrial revolution and period of Wealth was based on Coal, Iron and Steel.)
I wonder where Israel would be without its colossal financial support of America. But maybe the future financial support for Israel, may be seen as a drain on the American economy, especially as Obama seems to have found a new method of political fund raising. Interesting to watch.

I feel at the moment the logic and action of Israels government, is similar to "Hitlers Final Solution". It will fail.

I think Fred may have some sort of a point, albeit that his defence of Hamas is somewhat clumsy.

This being that Israel's response to Hamas' rockets is now being regarded as somewhat 'disproportionate'.

Another side effect is that Muslim young men are beginning to feel somewhat aggrieved and supportive towards the Palestinian underdog and this feeling is predominating on an international basis. Thus Israels' actions, although one might feel they are 'entitled' to have some defence against an aggressor's persistent rocket attacks, are not being totally viewed as being conducive towards peacekeeping in the medium or long term.

Sooner or later, both sides are going to have to sit down and negotiate a peaceful way forward. It is my belief that Israel wish to dramatically reduce Palestine's defences (eg, tunnels, etc, etc) before even considering doing so. And the reason for this is the utter and complete distrust that Israel has towards any and all political factions in Palestine. Israel and its Jews have a massive history of being persecuted and are utterly determined it will never happen again.

The sooner the world can collapse any and all religions then the better as far as I am concerned. They are all an abomination.

Of course, without religion, then the guidelines on morality for the masses completely goes out of the window. We would need an alternative international set of morality guidelines and rules.

Let's start with

Rule No 1. Do unto others as you would wish them to do unto you.

Rule No 763. All services to homes should be installed in easily accessible conduits and under paved pathways.