bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
shamona
- 18 Oct 2005 21:58
- 11847 of 27111
Note how the sp rebounded right off the top of the trend channel, this is what caused the slide as traders sold out; i'll stay on the sidelines now till the next direction becomes clearer.
NielsJensen
- 18 Oct 2005 22:01
- 11848 of 27111
A, usually, reliably source informs me an RNS will come at 7am.
hewittalan6
- 18 Oct 2005 22:02
- 11849 of 27111
You couldn't ask them to hold off or an hour or so can you? I'll still be in bed!!!LOL
Alan
superrod
- 18 Oct 2005 22:15
- 11850 of 27111
shamona - 18 Oct 2005 21:58 - 11847 of 11849
Note how the sp rebounded right off the top of the trend channel,
right off the top? according to your gragh it never got NEAR the top.
bosley
- 18 Oct 2005 22:29
- 11851 of 27111
superrod, intraday price did. it doesn't show on the chart. bet you're pleased to have your buddy back !! niels, that "usually" reliable source isn't baza's waters , is it?
123456
- 18 Oct 2005 22:43
- 11852 of 27111
help anyone
mam last three trades showed as buys 750mm 500mm at over
asking price is this true or not ?
superrod
- 18 Oct 2005 22:44
- 11853 of 27111
bosley, i have been watching this like a hawk all day. in fact i bought at 17.5p. it sure looked like the momentum was there.
maybe i should have made myself more clear.
DONT POST GRAPHS AND MAKE STATEMENTS ABOUT SAID GRAPHS UNLESS THE TWO CONCUR
bhunt1910
- 18 Oct 2005 22:45
- 11854 of 27111
Strange - but we waters are running hot - I feel good about tomorrow - just need to pursuade the wife not to take me out tomorrow.
Baza
superrod
- 18 Oct 2005 22:57
- 11855 of 27111
123456
shown as buys, the 2 BIG trades may well be late reported sells. i cant see any other reason for the sudden change in SP direction. if they ARE sells then they are history and tomorrow should be good ( assuming peeps buy of course ).
bear in mind that the stock market is probably one of the few remaining places where you can get away with not being quite as "upfront" with what you are doing as just about anything else.
ptholden
- 18 Oct 2005 23:45
- 11857 of 27111
Ah, the return of the banned Seq under a thin disguise.
123456
- 18 Oct 2005 23:48
- 11858 of 27111
superrod
many thanks
but at that price is strang ?17 to 18 p for sales
shamona
- 19 Oct 2005 00:48
- 11859 of 27111
superod
The sp did bounce off the top of the trend channel, if you can't deduce that then may I suggest that this may not be the game for you.
Stop being abusive, perhaps you might learn something mate.
insiderinside
- 19 Oct 2005 02:16
- 11860 of 27111
charts looks set for a large fall - two large sells at the end as well -

hewittalan6
- 19 Oct 2005 07:18
- 11861 of 27111
Can't believe I'm about to type this.
May I take this opportunity to thank ii for his last posting of fact (the chart) and opinion (a big fall) and nothing more. Whether postive or negative, it is conctructive, not spun out of proportion or abusive, or deliberately misleading. This thread has suffered enough from these problems.
Alan
greekman
- 19 Oct 2005 08:25
- 11862 of 27111
I debated for a while whether to post this as I did not wish to start the patent argument going again, but I found it very interesting. I will not enter into a discussion re the pros and cons as I have no views either way, but just read the full article. My only comment is ( note the damages awarded ) and remember this was awarded by a USA court who award in most cases far higher damages than British courts. For those who will find no or little similarity with the BIO/SEO dispute, fair enough, but to me there is a slight parallel.
Small, Wisconsin-Based Packaging Company Wins $3.7 Million Verdict From Industry Giant
Federal jury says Smurfit-Stone breached contract, improperly used proprietary information regarding new packaging technology and products
http://sev.prnewswire.com/paper-forest-products-containers/20051018/CLTU53118102005-1.html
shamona
- 19 Oct 2005 08:35
- 11863 of 27111
greekman
Completely different cases i'm afraid, the one you highlighted was not in the same multi million pound catagory that the one here represents; remember Stanelco formed a whole new business unit called Ingel on the back of the stolen patent, remember too that Cardinal payed hundreds of thousands for a small stake in Ingel.
Costs alone will be worth the amount of damages outlined above.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 19 Oct 2005 08:37
- 11864 of 27111
Once again, we have had to take action on this thread to remove a poster for abusive postings against other users.
Let me re-iterate that open discussion is fine - personal abuse will not be tolerated.
Ian
oblomov
- 19 Oct 2005 08:42
- 11865 of 27111
That'll be Mr Mad/ Sequestor gone, then.
Hope the second of my predictions also comes true - sure it wil! lol
Biscuit
- 19 Oct 2005 08:43
- 11866 of 27111
Isn't this funny watching the traders selling now. It's like going to the cinema and leaving before the film starts!! and paying for the privilage to! I guess that's why brokers love traders.