for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

shamona - 18 Oct 2005 21:58 - 11847 of 11849
Note how the sp rebounded right off the top of the trend channel,

right off the top? according to your gragh it never got NEAR the top.

superrod, intraday price did. it doesn't show on the chart. bet you're pleased to have your buddy back !! niels, that "usually" reliable source isn't baza's waters , is it?

help anyone
mam last three trades showed as buys 750mm 500mm at over
asking price is this true or not ?

bosley, i have been watching this like a hawk all day. in fact i bought at 17.5p. it sure looked like the momentum was there.

maybe i should have made myself more clear.

DONT POST GRAPHS AND MAKE STATEMENTS ABOUT SAID GRAPHS UNLESS THE TWO CONCUR

Strange - but we waters are running hot - I feel good about tomorrow - just need to pursuade the wife not to take me out tomorrow.

Baza

123456
shown as buys, the 2 BIG trades may well be late reported sells. i cant see any other reason for the sudden change in SP direction. if they ARE sells then they are history and tomorrow should be good ( assuming peeps buy of course ).
bear in mind that the stock market is probably one of the few remaining places where you can get away with not being quite as "upfront" with what you are doing as just about anything else.

Mr Mad
Seq, bienvenue

Ah, the return of the banned Seq under a thin disguise.

superrod
many thanks
but at that price is strang ?17 to 18 p for sales

superod

The sp did bounce off the top of the trend channel, if you can't deduce that then may I suggest that this may not be the game for you.

Stop being abusive, perhaps you might learn something mate.

charts looks set for a large fall - two large sells at the end as well -

Can't believe I'm about to type this.
May I take this opportunity to thank ii for his last posting of fact (the chart) and opinion (a big fall) and nothing more. Whether postive or negative, it is conctructive, not spun out of proportion or abusive, or deliberately misleading. This thread has suffered enough from these problems.
Alan

I debated for a while whether to post this as I did not wish to start the patent argument going again, but I found it very interesting. I will not enter into a discussion re the pros and cons as I have no views either way, but just read the full article. My only comment is ( note the damages awarded ) and remember this was awarded by a USA court who award in most cases far higher damages than British courts. For those who will find no or little similarity with the BIO/SEO dispute, fair enough, but to me there is a slight parallel.

Small, Wisconsin-Based Packaging Company Wins $3.7 Million Verdict From Industry Giant
Federal jury says Smurfit-Stone breached contract, improperly used proprietary information regarding new packaging technology and products

http://sev.prnewswire.com/paper-forest-products-containers/20051018/CLTU53118102005-1.html

greekman

Completely different cases i'm afraid, the one you highlighted was not in the same multi million pound catagory that the one here represents; remember Stanelco formed a whole new business unit called Ingel on the back of the stolen patent, remember too that Cardinal payed hundreds of thousands for a small stake in Ingel.

Costs alone will be worth the amount of damages outlined above.

Once again, we have had to take action on this thread to remove a poster for abusive postings against other users.

Let me re-iterate that open discussion is fine - personal abuse will not be tolerated.

Ian

That'll be Mr Mad/ Sequestor gone, then.

Hope the second of my predictions also comes true - sure it wil! lol

Isn't this funny watching the traders selling now. It's like going to the cinema and leaving before the film starts!! and paying for the privilage to! I guess that's why brokers love traders.

I find it more fascinating by the number expecting news this morning only to then sell. Then again they can't afford not to be in "just in case"...

B

It may be funny to you but others call it making money, I sold out at 18p yesterday; bet you'd take that price right now!

It's a shame that seq ,or Mr Mad has to be so abusive, because where the stock market is concerned he is quite clever, he usually calls it right.