superrod
- 26 Sep 2003 21:01
i hate to add yet another thread ( which may never get a single post ), but is this how a financial site evolves? there seem to be plenty of posters but not many who are interested in the same stocks. therefore dozens of threads with no comment
any views?
superrod
- 27 Sep 2003 16:49
- 12 of 55
crocodile
a fair point, but im only into half a dozen stocks at the moment. i was merely trying to stimulate a bit of interest here as no-one seems to be interested in the stocks i hold.
not even tad where i am 85% , a penny share favourite, invested ( much to the annoyance of my accountant ).
surely any thread that generates a few posts is worth a go?
took the freebie on the premium service but still not convinced. i agree that quality not quantity is what is needed. have cancelled my sub to advfn and will probably join traders room soon. at least this site seems more able to bar miscreants
skinny
- 27 Sep 2003 17:20
- 13 of 55
superrod - re Tad I'm sure Martini, Dil or the erstwhile ainsoph will appear shortly :-)
Martini
- 27 Sep 2003 18:59
- 14 of 55
JC you called?
M:)
GRAEME.ALEXANDER
- 27 Sep 2003 21:31
- 15 of 55
As a new boy to this whole thing I am really grateful that I found moneyam site and the Investors room. Initially I only bought 1 Stock because a friend had some.That was 5 weeks ago.From here I have learnt a hell of a lot from you guys and reading the posts and am now hooked.(I now have a reason to get out of bed each morning).New people dont get shut out and there are always people willing to help.I think its great and am sure I would still be in bed with just one stock without it. Thanks to everyone........
Graeme.
Kayak
- 27 Sep 2003 21:59
- 16 of 55
Some days I wish I was in bed with just one stock :-)
JC, carry on, there is room for every opinion here :-)
Andy
- 28 Sep 2003 11:06
- 18 of 55
Tulletj,
That's just what I thought too!!!!
Caravaggio
- 28 Sep 2003 12:16
- 19 of 55
As someone who joined this site after"lurking" around in the background...I
agree it is a breath of fresh air and I can see lots moving over from ADVFN which is at best an informative site by it's debate...but is decending into the depths by its un-monitored abuse and an unacceptable amount of sickening postings...many of which have nothing to do with stocks.
Add to that the well known rampers(who use different names and making visits to this one!)and who resort to personal abuse and I can see many comming over,as a refuge from the gutter standards which ADVFN seemingly tolerates or condones..
Ample iii is an example of how a site can/should be run as regards acceptable posting standards,inspite of remarks about "web nanny",and for this reason I can see the appeal of ADVFN.With the uncertainty surrounding ample it would be a welcoming place for those who seek to post sensibly and a potentially better place than the ADVFN uncensored sewer threads.
Great idea to have self regulated postings but there is a need for monitoring and removal, or it will sink to the gutter/childish ( and in a good few cases the sickening obsentities) that are posted on ADVFN.
With the same format as ADVFN and monitoring,this site can become what ADVFN WAS....
Regards
C
Andy
- 28 Sep 2003 13:20
- 20 of 55
Carvaggio,
I agree with you, although ADVFN have sharpened their act up a bit, and they will delete a post of you request them to. (The problem there is hundreds of people have already read it before it can be deleted, which is a huge reason not to use your surname, IMHO)
iii, Financebb, and sardinesplaice all moderate very effectively, and don't hesitate to ban abusers, which is the way a BB should be run, IMHO.
The problem is that the busier the BB, the more posts there are to read, and moderate.
I think the solution in ADVFN's case is to appoint some moderators, and allow them to "hide" posts that are doubtful, until a member of staff can actually determine whether it should stand or not. Three bad posts,. and you're out!
superrod
- 28 Sep 2003 16:33
- 22 of 55
this is my preferred site now, they know how to deal with abusive posters and spam. plus the monotor data i find more accurate
Crocodile
- 28 Sep 2003 17:31
- 23 of 55
Superrod
You said "i hate to add yet another thread ( which may never get a single post )"
Just shows you never know :-)
dalrymp
- 28 Sep 2003 17:55
- 24 of 55
zscrooge
- 28 Sep 2003 19:03
- 25 of 55
I find this site informative, helpful and useful. And free of the tedious drivel that people with too much time on their hands can post on internet messageboards.
Caravaggio
- 28 Sep 2003 22:07
- 26 of 55
Give it time and serious posters will come over..
ADVFN for all it's threads is decending into the mire..
The Monitor data is 1st class...
C
gardyne
- 29 Sep 2003 20:20
- 27 of 55
My opinion for what it counts is that this site has some very good posters compared to other messageboards.Long may it continue but hopefully not too big to attract some of the idiots from elsewhere.
superrod
- 29 Sep 2003 21:48
- 28 of 55
WOW.........at this rate it will be the most popular thread here.
to all who have posted thus far, thanks, nice to see. i agree with gardynes last post, but dont see size as a barrier to quality. MAM seems to keep a tight reign. none of this three strikes and you are out garbage.
i will admit to being goaded on other sites but really cant see it happening here.
my only regret is that my free Traders Room ticket expired before i could see the streaming of Ruthies parachute jump :o((
Andy
- 29 Sep 2003 22:21
- 29 of 55
Supperrod,
Why not subscribe to Shares Mag for 1 year, and you receive a 12 month ticket to the Trader's Room?
That's what I intend to do when my trial expires in December.
I think shares has improved and become a decent read, and they always have a few good ideas for shares to follow, chart sections are good, so, IMHO, 99 for an annual subscription to the two is very worthwhile.
Andy.
superrod
- 29 Sep 2003 22:31
- 30 of 55
Andy
last week i cancelled my sub at the newsagent for shares mag for that very reason
brianboru
- 29 Sep 2003 23:24
- 31 of 55
Far less interesting and vibrant than ADVFN - Down to too much control freakism by the editorial staff in my view. Seems they only want to hear views similar to their own or the poster is banished. Maybe they should join New 'Labour'.