bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bhunt1910
- 24 Oct 2005 10:35
- 12123 of 27111
A sudden flurry of activity.
Now 2: 4 @ 15 : 15.5 and 95k : 400k
predateur
- 24 Oct 2005 10:59
- 12124 of 27111
Bosley
I agree with you.
There is more speculation on this board than there is in the shares.
Predateur
greekman
- 24 Oct 2005 11:44
- 12125 of 27111
hewittalan6
My thoughts exactly, although you have put it in a slightly different way, but it's basically what I was hinting at.
Baza,
The fugure of 4 was in the report via the link. As to my comment re Starpol and the possibility of far more orders than NatureWorls PLA, as has been stated, by me it is pure speculation and is as someone else said to be taken as such, ( with that mentioned pinch of salt ). But reading between the lines ( yes it might be through rose tinted glasses ) it does look promising.
The last view posts have been varied in their contents, many with opposing views, but isn't it great to have all these views well augued ( without the sometimes previously childish comments ). We appear to be all speculating at the moment, probably down to no solid news. Time will tell who is right.
bhunt1910
- 24 Oct 2005 12:22
- 12126 of 27111
Now 4:4 @ 15 : 15.5 and 245k : 300k
Bugz
- 24 Oct 2005 12:45
- 12127 of 27111
Bosley,
I agree in part, at the end of the day nothing official has been released-however typically, with ANY company, information is seeping out and this points (obviously not the word of God!) to a Walmart deal-we all know this, and hope it!!
If people dont like the speculation, dont read internet BBs!!!!
Obviously we are all going to have to wait for news, but trying to get a jist of possible scenarios is not criminal.... :-)
KingKonggb
- 24 Oct 2005 12:53
- 12128 of 27111
Even if or should I say when, we get some sort of deal with Walmart, don't expect it to be anything major. It's gonna be just a case of dipping there toes in first. Although the ASDA trial of Starpol will surely herald the way to a full blown committment.
IMHO
Kong
Obe2konobi
- 24 Oct 2005 13:10
- 12129 of 27111
You should do the weather forcasts Kong. Covered your bases there didn`t you with the two sentences. :) Obe
KingKonggb
- 24 Oct 2005 13:16
- 12130 of 27111
It's gonna rain all day, although it will brighten up in the latter part of the day. Just a risk of thunder and lightening!!!
Kong
Obe2konobi
- 24 Oct 2005 13:20
- 12131 of 27111
I`ll wear my shorts under my rain coat then with rubber soled shoes.Ta. Obe
bhunt1910
- 24 Oct 2005 13:26
- 12132 of 27111
Must be in Florida !!
TheFrenchConnection
- 24 Oct 2005 13:34
- 12133 of 27111
Amities Bugz.........Slt . Hence the origin of the adage " Buy on rumour . Sell on fact. What a boring place the marketplace would be if everyone only bought on 100% pure fact ....... ,,, As it happens i dont particularly like this stock; l think SEO have spread themselves very thin .But i let the market be my friend and after the recent weeks RNS coming on the back of T&G reckie of 21p and subsequent sudden leap from 14.75 to 18.5 was too much to ignore ...( as such i traded it in excess of 10 times ...,,,- and again as such it has once again become a true traders stock Thats not a nice position for true investors and totally distorts the true picture of SEO,,,,,,,,,,,,,BUT ! lf this SEO is as good as many of you seem to think { and i was ONE of them up until recently } then PLEASE tell me why the big guns are not in the midst of battle. ? Why ? Thats a very SIMPLE question so please do not feed me that utter nonsense about a stock only " coming on the radar " of the big boys when a certain criteria such as its indices , m/c or s/p being attained . l know of more than 20 small minnows with an s/p of less than 8p where banks to lnvestment houses are backing them to the absolute hilt. Six of these 70% bank backed so why no instutional support for SEO ?? .Why ? @+ J ..
TheFrenchConnection
- 24 Oct 2005 13:45
- 12134 of 27111
Bhunt ...Sincerest of apologies B if i have this wrong . But you are a fervent supporter of SEO are you not ? Then why would you be applying level 2 which is strictly a tool for day/short term traders ...Merely curious ...@+ J .....
Phart68
- 24 Oct 2005 13:48
- 12135 of 27111
From another board:
jwoolley - 24 Oct'05 - 13:30 - 53330 of 53331
Just had this reply from Neville Harris at Stanelco...all reads good to me. I am sure he won't mind me posting it on here:
James, apologies for the delay in replying ...Monday was my first day back
from hols and I had to be out again all day yesterday.
We will certainly update the market more fully when we issue a pre-close
update, sometime around the end of this month (the year end is October)and
if there is anything material before then, of course we will let folk know.
We all feel generally that there is quite a lot of "shorting" going on in
the market, particularly over the last week and in the short-term there is
not a great deal we can do. In the meantime, the company is working out the
best way to proceed with the starch filters project and is pressing on with
both Greenseal and the other products out of the Biotec portfolio.
Everyone at the company is just as frustrated as you about the share price,
but until the profits start to flow through, we must accept that valuing
Stanelco is more art than science and this provides hedge funds etc with an
opportunity.
We are all trying to be patient, but some days it's not easy!!
stockdog
- 24 Oct 2005 13:50
- 12136 of 27111
Dormar - thanks for reminding me of my chemistry. But is it laevo- or dextro- lactic acid? As you know, I am sure, this comes in two chemically similar but physically differently conformed optical isomers. One form or other could well be favoured by GM methods. One form or other could well behave differently under RF treatment.
Don't want to play the boffin, but you have got me started on something that might be interesting to others.
boff dog
hewittalan6
- 24 Oct 2005 13:52
- 12137 of 27111
Tut, tut, TFC.
There are nos uch things as supporters of a stock in the pi game. We all just take a position, long or short, depending on our views. Are you trying to bait people?
Level 2 is not strictly a tool for anyone. in particular. It is a tool for anyone who wishes to pay for it, to use just as they wish.
I would have thought that such an esteemed trader / investor as yourself would realise that the quality of ones trading / investing is heavily dependant on the quality and quantity of tools at your disposal, and it would be a fool indeed, who didn't use a tool that was available to them, regardless of their own feelings about a stocks quality.
Alan
Dormar
- 24 Oct 2005 13:53
- 12138 of 27111
TFC
Good question. One can only assume that those that have looked at it, have decided that there is still too much risk attached to this share at the current share price.
D
bosley
- 24 Oct 2005 13:54
- 12139 of 27111
tfc. a good question and one in which there is no likeable answer. one reason could be that they haven't seen enough to believe in seo. there is an alternative to everything that seo do and maybe seo don't have enough market saturation to convince the banks and investment houses that their ideas are the ones that are going to win. so far , when they have needed money , they have managed to obtain it with support from institutions with no problems, so , you could say that they are being backed. also, considering how many times the banks and instituions get it so amazingly wrong backing dogshit companies , maybe it's not too bad a thing.
stockdog
- 24 Oct 2005 13:57
- 12140 of 27111
agreed, interesting to debate why no big boys in SEO. equally interesting to debate the price you or I could buy at if there were. risk v. reward springs to mind. why is it that bears are always so mean-spirited with their use of language? sorry, off thread for a moment, but it's true isn't it.
sd
Dormar
- 24 Oct 2005 14:02
- 12141 of 27111
StockDog
Your chemical knowledge would appear to be way above mine!
Are there really two different forms of lactic Acid?
D
bhunt1910
- 24 Oct 2005 14:22
- 12142 of 27111
Hi Frenchie
Yes I am a long term supporter of SEO - and for me - in the main it is an investment stock which I tend not to trade very often - having got my fingers burnt once or twice in the past.
However, I would describe myself as a novice investor with much to learn and was was given L2 as a freebie to play with by MAM recently - which I did and found that it helped my understanding of the market. Now I pay for it on a monthly basis because I think it is an excellent tool enabling me (I think) to time my purchases and sales better than previously. I have certainly made 3 or 4 trading decisions which have each in their own right paid for the monthly rental of L2. I have also used L2 to invest in CFD's - and these I trade.
I have a much wider portfolio than SEO - and these I tend to trade on a more regular basis - forwhich I find L2 very useful.
Some have suggested that it is not worth while investing in L2 - but I seem to be making money and I think (No - I know) that L2 has helped me make better decisions.
At the end of the day - I am retired, having fun and making money
Anything else I can help you with ??
Baza