for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

TFC

Good question. One can only assume that those that have looked at it, have decided that there is still too much risk attached to this share at the current share price.

D

tfc. a good question and one in which there is no likeable answer. one reason could be that they haven't seen enough to believe in seo. there is an alternative to everything that seo do and maybe seo don't have enough market saturation to convince the banks and investment houses that their ideas are the ones that are going to win. so far , when they have needed money , they have managed to obtain it with support from institutions with no problems, so , you could say that they are being backed. also, considering how many times the banks and instituions get it so amazingly wrong backing dogshit companies , maybe it's not too bad a thing.

agreed, interesting to debate why no big boys in SEO. equally interesting to debate the price you or I could buy at if there were. risk v. reward springs to mind. why is it that bears are always so mean-spirited with their use of language? sorry, off thread for a moment, but it's true isn't it.

sd

StockDog

Your chemical knowledge would appear to be way above mine!

Are there really two different forms of lactic Acid?

D

Hi Frenchie

Yes I am a long term supporter of SEO - and for me - in the main it is an investment stock which I tend not to trade very often - having got my fingers burnt once or twice in the past.

However, I would describe myself as a novice investor with much to learn and was was given L2 as a freebie to play with by MAM recently - which I did and found that it helped my understanding of the market. Now I pay for it on a monthly basis because I think it is an excellent tool enabling me (I think) to time my purchases and sales better than previously. I have certainly made 3 or 4 trading decisions which have each in their own right paid for the monthly rental of L2. I have also used L2 to invest in CFD's - and these I trade.

I have a much wider portfolio than SEO - and these I tend to trade on a more regular basis - forwhich I find L2 very useful.

Some have suggested that it is not worth while investing in L2 - but I seem to be making money and I think (No - I know) that L2 has helped me make better decisions.

At the end of the day - I am retired, having fun and making money

Anything else I can help you with ??

Baza

Alan - Thank you for NOT answering my question. Bos . Thank you for attempting to answer something which is quite unpalletable . l am by no stretch of the imagination a specialist in this field of plastics nor that of RF tech. l often wander how i am still messing about with this stock when there r so many attractive ones out there . All l know is the citys attitude and when i quite literally quote my boss at work who says he " wouldnt touch it with a bargepole "..Couple this with the same MM who told me at a dinner party that he didnt rate BPRG @ 60p and this was when it was about 88p { i wrote about it at the time on the BPRG thread and everyone absolutely slated me so i gave up And then what happened ? ; and of SEO the same man tells me that it is his winter cruise - a bubble that had gone higher than any of them could dream .........Now set against that environment it is inevatable l will pose questions which many of you may find unpleasant . Lest you forget i was red hot about SEO @ 4.75 .....and expressed it as i saw it at the time .... ....l wish you all well but its not a question of Tut Tut Alan . lts a question of answers,,,Not muddying the waters and having a poke at me ... Think about it ,,,@+ J

ok Frenchie - I am always looking for the next stock to invest in - so what would you suggest would be a good opportunity right now.

Cheers

Baza

Also Frenchie - I am happy to share the info with others if they find it useful - when I have the time

Now 3:1 and 15 : 15.5 and 195k v 100k

Perhaps - just perhaps - a tick up due (update - got that wrong - now u c why I am a novice)

Baza

Fair play TFC,

Views differ of course. I myself am in on seo as a close friend is a substantial holder-and to date we have called it right on most occasions. The recent bear raid though wasnt seen!!!!!

I know a few brokers like your boss, who arent fans. Great, your MM friend called BPRG right-doesnt mean he'll call this right-although its clear to see that most MMs are being tipped off just before big news is announced-prehaps his view will change overnight one day!

As I think Alan said or Greekman, only time will tell .... :-)

a good question - from TFC - but an even bigger question - when was the last - director buy - so many new directors - and directors holding ZERO shares - in SEO - why are they all not buying more - or buying their first holdings of SE0 shares - or are they waiting - for the price to drop down - to become an investment - as they feel - its overvalued at the moment - ???

All IMO - DYOR !

TheFrenchConnection,

if you have any uncertainties relating to SEO, any of the products or any questions...why not contact Howie and ask him ?

What i dislike (like it matters) is people slating the company without any facts.
So far would you not say they've made considerable progress ?

ii,

Are you suggesting that the directors hold no stock?

no Bugz - not all - but some of them - hold no stock - why are they - not buying in now - if its all going so well - and the future is so bright ???

Insider,

You de-ramper !! if your SO concerned, why don't you e-mail the chairman ..no that would be to pro-active for you, better to just de-ramper...easier hey. Tosser !

no director buys - no institution buys - even at 12p recently - they must think - its not cheap - at that price - !!

Ah ok.

I dunno ii. I dont really mind though. If it was going so wrong, why arent we seeing any director sales?

many companies - if the price drops fast - and below what directors feel is fair value - the directors jump in - to fill their boots - and assure - look at BGP for example -

SE0 - price drops - directors do not buy - what does this tell you - along with instituions not buying ???

All IMO - DYOR !!

bugz - directors cannot sell - unless the board agrees - buying is easy - selling is difficult - and with a spin machine like SE0 - there is no way - the board would agree - to any sells - at all - IMO - bad spin - not allowed -

All IMO - DYOR !!

Probably that they dont have anymore cash to put in!

No-one from seo was expecting the drop to the 12p region. I know HW is very frustrated over the price.

IMO I'm confident news is in the pipeline - your opinion is that its all hot air. No worries ;-)

PS: End of conversation. I'm not gonna clutter up the board.

Re directors and shares - Just thought you would be interested that the latest info that I have on Management with the following interest in SEO shares

Philip Lovegrove - Chairman - 4,577,083
Ian Balchin - CEO - 8,396,750
Karl Evans - Senior manager - 1,186.621
Bruce Drew - Senior Manager - 2,283,579
Robert Duggan - 842,818
Robert Boardman - 1,402,525
Howard White - 975,610
Graham Whitchurch - 8,000,000
Terry Robins - 8,000,000
Michael Feast - 1,549,999
Stephanie Morgan Fisher - 200000
Martin Wagner - 1,000,000

I guess they are also restricted from buying more shares during a closed period - or whilst negotiations are ongoing that will materially effect tyhe share proce

Baza