for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Also Frenchie - I am happy to share the info with others if they find it useful - when I have the time

Now 3:1 and 15 : 15.5 and 195k v 100k

Perhaps - just perhaps - a tick up due (update - got that wrong - now u c why I am a novice)

Baza

Fair play TFC,

Views differ of course. I myself am in on seo as a close friend is a substantial holder-and to date we have called it right on most occasions. The recent bear raid though wasnt seen!!!!!

I know a few brokers like your boss, who arent fans. Great, your MM friend called BPRG right-doesnt mean he'll call this right-although its clear to see that most MMs are being tipped off just before big news is announced-prehaps his view will change overnight one day!

As I think Alan said or Greekman, only time will tell .... :-)

a good question - from TFC - but an even bigger question - when was the last - director buy - so many new directors - and directors holding ZERO shares - in SEO - why are they all not buying more - or buying their first holdings of SE0 shares - or are they waiting - for the price to drop down - to become an investment - as they feel - its overvalued at the moment - ???

All IMO - DYOR !

TheFrenchConnection,

if you have any uncertainties relating to SEO, any of the products or any questions...why not contact Howie and ask him ?

What i dislike (like it matters) is people slating the company without any facts.
So far would you not say they've made considerable progress ?

ii,

Are you suggesting that the directors hold no stock?

no Bugz - not all - but some of them - hold no stock - why are they - not buying in now - if its all going so well - and the future is so bright ???

Insider,

You de-ramper !! if your SO concerned, why don't you e-mail the chairman ..no that would be to pro-active for you, better to just de-ramper...easier hey. Tosser !

no director buys - no institution buys - even at 12p recently - they must think - its not cheap - at that price - !!

Ah ok.

I dunno ii. I dont really mind though. If it was going so wrong, why arent we seeing any director sales?

many companies - if the price drops fast - and below what directors feel is fair value - the directors jump in - to fill their boots - and assure - look at BGP for example -

SE0 - price drops - directors do not buy - what does this tell you - along with instituions not buying ???

All IMO - DYOR !!

bugz - directors cannot sell - unless the board agrees - buying is easy - selling is difficult - and with a spin machine like SE0 - there is no way - the board would agree - to any sells - at all - IMO - bad spin - not allowed -

All IMO - DYOR !!

Probably that they dont have anymore cash to put in!

No-one from seo was expecting the drop to the 12p region. I know HW is very frustrated over the price.

IMO I'm confident news is in the pipeline - your opinion is that its all hot air. No worries ;-)

PS: End of conversation. I'm not gonna clutter up the board.

Re directors and shares - Just thought you would be interested that the latest info that I have on Management with the following interest in SEO shares

Philip Lovegrove - Chairman - 4,577,083
Ian Balchin - CEO - 8,396,750
Karl Evans - Senior manager - 1,186.621
Bruce Drew - Senior Manager - 2,283,579
Robert Duggan - 842,818
Robert Boardman - 1,402,525
Howard White - 975,610
Graham Whitchurch - 8,000,000
Terry Robins - 8,000,000
Michael Feast - 1,549,999
Stephanie Morgan Fisher - 200000
Martin Wagner - 1,000,000

I guess they are also restricted from buying more shares during a closed period - or whilst negotiations are ongoing that will materially effect tyhe share proce

Baza

Anyone got access to the company zone here on MAM?

Could someone find some info on largest 10 holders of seo?

Might have to find it somewhere other than MAM actually, otherwise we might get in trouble.....!

I find this topic quite interesting. Finally something worth reading. Can anyone validate what ii says is true re directors not being allowed to sell without the boards permission.

rasenberg - they cannot buy or sell without approval from the board -

bhunt - the question from me - apart from TFC and institutions - is all the developments - you feel have happened - and the moving forward - why no director buys - at SE0 - for a long time - unless they are not sure - and think its over valued ???

what price was the last time - a director purchased shares - in SEO ??? - I know the answer - btw

unless there is special circumstances - that require a sale - no director will sell while still in the company - they wait - until they leave or retire - then dump - this is why - never buy into a company - with any director sell - for any reason they state - and always be careful - when a director leaves/retires - in a stock you hold - as it normally means - they will dump their holding - as they can at will - once they leave - if they feel - the future is crap - or they need the money -

Major Shareholders
STANELCO PLC (SEO)

Ranking Shareholder Holding % Date Prev. Holding Prev. %
1 AGE OF REASON FOUNDATION 227,078,122 25.76 26/04/05 227,078,122 26.91
2 RICHARDS & APPLEBY LIMITED 53,819,166 6.10 26/04/05 55,756,666 6.61
3 FRAMLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 30,000,000 3.40 26/04/05 54,166,666 6.42
4 WATERHOUSE SECURITIES 29,718,119 3.37 26/04/05 23,099,034 2.74
5 BARCLAYS STOCKBROKERS LIMITED 27,429,948 3.11 26/04/05 25,696,826 3.04

Cheers Baza.

Dormar

Gospel! Lactic Acid is CH3CH(OH)COOH. Imagine a carbon atom at the centre of a tetrahedron (four-sided triangular-faced pyramid). At each corner are various other atoms/groups of atoms, as follows:-

top COOH (carboxylic acid group)
left base OH (hydroxy group)
right base H (hydrogen)
rear base CH3 (methyl group)

Draw this on a piece of paper, then draw its mirror image. The two cannot be superimposed on each other.

Read on:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/l1/lacticac.asp

Let me know what you discover about each isomers reaction to RF waves!

sd