overgrowth
- 09 Feb 2005 20:52
Dowgate Capital (DGT) are sitting
in the middle of a goldmine!
This company through
their sole trading arm City Financial Associates are looking to take full
advantage of the "booming" AIM market this year.
Dowgate provide NOMAD (NOMinated ADvisor) services to AIM companies
and also have full Corporate Broker status which means that they can fund
placements on behalf of the companies they represent.
|
|
On first sight, the
fact that Dowgate exist in the often veiled financial services sector
makes you think twice about investing in company such as this because
it would be impossible to understand what they were doing - however, think
again!
DGT bring new companies
to the AIM (Alternative Investment Market). For each new company "floated"
on AIM, they take arrangement fees when acting as NOMAD. After the company
is launched then for a nice steady earner DGT get another healthy chunk
of cash every year for looking after them (note that all AIM companies
must have a nominated adviser - thereby securing a ready source of recurring
income).
Because DGT also act
as a Corporate broker they can get a very healthy percentage for arranging
placement of shares with insititutions before a new company floats. In
addition, because placements come outside the sphere of yearly NOMAD work,
they can also gain healthy percentages of placements which companies may
need to make throughout the year when they need a quick injection of cash
to speed growth.
Current NOMADships:
28 companies represented (gives recurring income of approx 480,000
per year)
Current on-going Brokerage
agreements: 19 companies (income depends on placements)
For flotations, depending
on the size of a company, fees charged will be anything from 50,000
to 100,000+
For placements (the real earner), DGT get anything from 3% to around 12%
of the TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED - For example a new company raising 3M
though a placement will earn DGT anything from 90,000 to 360,000
!
These figures are indicative as actual deals all differ due to circumstances
and DGT sometimes take payment in shares - they still have a tasty chunk
of Setstone shares and when this Russian exploration company comes back
to AIM, predictions are that the share price will rocket.
Note that the amount that this little company can earn in fees is huge
and every new deal that comes through we know will contribute another
healthy chunk into the bottom line. The good news with every new floatation
means that it's another chunk of recurring revenue which could go on for
years, with DGT having to do very little.
New clients gained in 2005 are:
Mediazest
(NOMAD & broker) Elite Strategies (NOMAD) Process Handling (NOMAD) Poland Investment Fund (NOMAD) Nanotech Energy (NOMAD & broker) Archimedia Ventures (NOMAD & broker) Red Leopard Holdings (NOMAD) Alba Mineral Resources (NOMAD & broker) Intandem Films (NOMAD & broker) Motive Television (NOMAD) IncaGold (NOMAD) Sportswinbet (NOMAD & Broker) Infoscreen Networks (NOMAD & Broker) Mark Kingsley (NOMAD & Broker) Croatia Ventures (NOMAD & Broker) Pantheon Leisure (NOMAD) Firenze Ventures (Ofex Advisor) FlightStore Group (NOMAD & Broker) Euro Capital Projects (NOMAD) Pearl Street Holdings (NOMAD) Worldwide Natural Resources (Ofex Advisor) Dovedale Ventures (Ofex Advisor) Other 2005 work completed:Neptune-Calculus VCT offer for subs of up to 12 million
Advisory work for TGM on London Bus disposal for 20.4M
Advisory work for Creightons on property disposal
Advisory work for Hampton Trust on company restructuring
Advisory work for Interbulk Investments on acquisition of
Inbulk Advisory work for Fundamental-e
Investments on two disposals Advisory work for Designer
Vision re: Design Rights against Centurion Electronics
Click Here for fundamentals and profit projections.
|

ranoszek
- 28 Jul 2005 10:34
- 1226 of 2787
pth
i don't remember that one nor seeing it discussed on the boards. Significant earner and good find if not already accounted for by us here..
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2005 10:44
- 1227 of 2787
unfortuntaely, DGT are not OAK's Broker, but nonetheless, a few extra quid in the coffers.
ranoszek
- 28 Jul 2005 10:50
- 1228 of 2787
pth
but goes to show that we don't know all of DGT activities and hopefully there is more we don't know about. Have you seen DAN's sp recently?
stockdog
- 28 Jul 2005 12:36
- 1229 of 2787
pth/ranoszek - I have Oak's fund raising in April down as a 25k NOMAD fee in my model - lucky someone's watching the ball!
The Auditor
ranoszek
- 28 Jul 2005 12:52
- 1230 of 2787
well done stockdog.
markusantonius
- 28 Jul 2005 14:53
- 1231 of 2787
Spread is widening again - probably MM's attempting to stifle quick "in & outers" from selling? Personally I think PTH's "GHW comments" should not be dismissed too soon. There are other factors, of course, and I'm certain there is a lot more going on than we know.
Tempted to get back in but wary of unknown big seller(s) plus the fact that liquidating any decent volume in this stock has proven difficult in the past. Only when/if demand rockets pre-results announcements day will we all know what's been happening.......
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2005 15:36
- 1232 of 2787
That sell @ 0.60p has convinced me even further that a big Seller has been offloading on a regular basis. Same happened yesterday. Why would a PI take 0.05p less than the stated Bid when you can often deal inside the Yellow Strip? On the other hand a Seller with 19m shares to get rid of would have stated a price at which their Broker can sell and as long as they get that or a little more they will be happy. Can't be long now before they are all gone and the fact that we have had at least two sells below the Bid would perhaps lend some credence to that statement.
pth
stevieweebie
- 28 Jul 2005 15:49
- 1234 of 2787
Markus
trouble is by being over cautious 'again' you will only catch the tail end of any profit.
I know someone who thought Eric to be insane when he pitched in for two mill at about .35, bet that same person is now green with envy.
This will come good very soon and the patient and stiff resolved will be sufficiently rewarded.
Stevie
markusantonius
- 28 Jul 2005 16:13
- 1235 of 2787
Stevie - FYI King Eric is my Guru!
white westie
- 28 Jul 2005 17:20
- 1236 of 2787
pth,
replied to you on the other bb,
Incidentially i joind Eric's millionaires club 16months ago.
ww
EWRobson
- 28 Jul 2005 17:24
- 1237 of 2787
I don't know whether the link with royalty is a good thing. poor old Charlie is being treated as a right old charlie. Not back up to the 2 million yet, having taken profits along the way to feed my family's spending habits, but a couple of decent buys today at 0.76p and then 0.74p. Interested in pth's theory (but have missed the GHW reference?) which seems to make sense. An excellent time to accumulate. markus should stack them up now rather than wait as the fundamentals say the sp is far too low. Am going for a double whammy on SEO and DGT. Never have I seen better portents. (sd - a portent has nothing to do with portion control so you don't need to worry; another word could be a 'woofer').
Eric
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2005 17:56
- 1238 of 2787
Eric
GHW held 42M shares following Barclays departure. They released a RNS recently stating that they no longer hold a notifiable interest. What they didn't say was if they held any interest at all. Personally I took that to read that they had disposed of 23M shares thus far and still held 19M. The selling over the last few weeks seems too coincidental to be just PIs getting bored or fed up and seems to have the hallmark of a big seller. The easy assumption is that it is GHW. Why would they sell approx half and not the other? Particularly as they are now getting a much better price than the 0.45p they got for the first batch. The good news is that PIs are aware of the fundamentals and potential and have been hoovering up any loose stock. If it is GHW then I think they must nearly be finished. I would even hazard a guess that they have finished today.
Why?
Treeshake today disguised by the selling activity. In actual fact, buys outnumbered sells, even assuming that the 500k unknown was a sell. I was expecting late reported trades in the region of 1m+. So far nothing so why drop the bid/offer? Might be something tomorrow morning, we shall see.
Although the 250k sell at 0.60p may be a PI who got it all wrong, I think it unlikely that any PI would accept an offer outside the yellow strip, especially as you can nearly always deal inisde the strip with DGT unless you are selling a substantial amount. No, I think todays and yesterdays below par sells are part of that bigger sell order and 0.60p was the best price the MMs were willing to pay for the last dregs of that order.
If I am right, the MMs now have hopefully played their last card and the rest is down to market forces. I fully expect this make us all very happy investors in the coming weeks.
Could be a complete load of ******* though, so don't believe everything you read! LoL :-))))))
pth
markusantonius
- 28 Jul 2005 20:16
- 1239 of 2787
Maybe we should all ask DGT to declare GHW's interests (and control)........?
ptholden
- 28 Jul 2005 20:19
- 1240 of 2787
Hmm, crypic post Mark, perhaps you would like to explain?
arawli
- 28 Jul 2005 20:40
- 1241 of 2787
Good Evening All
I see the MMs are still trying to get people to sell out. I can't beleive they won't just let it run. When GWH were selling before we used to get T Trades posted every night for amounts that we thought were buys. I don't think we have been getting regular T Trades recently. Then again we have not been seeing any balancing sells being posted.
A senario noone has looked at is that the MMs might be going short on the stock because they have not realised the figures that DGT are about to publish and could get caught short big time when the Interims are published if the Buying comes in big time! I have seen this senario once before when I owned SEG shares it happened about 12 months ago and the price tripled in about a month.
I would buy some more myself I have funds available but I am a bit worried as I already own over 1% of the company and I will struggle to sell my stake in a few years if I buy many more. I wouldn't hesitate to spreadbet on DGT but the company's Market Cap is just too small at present.
Then again I could change my mind tomorrow!
All the best
Andy
markusantonius
- 28 Jul 2005 21:00
- 1242 of 2787
So, Mr. Arawli, you are under the 3% critical barrier. But prey tell - what can you state here about GHW? What do you know of their influence on DGT? What leverage do they hold? Was having a GHW bod on their Board part of the original deal? What can they do/cannot do without seeking GHW approval first? Etc.????????
Prey, tell us more.................???????
arawli
- 28 Jul 2005 21:13
- 1243 of 2787
Mark
I don't know GWH's motives and IMO they only held DGT as an Investment. I think the other company who owned the shares before them and sold at a loss (Griffin) might have been trying to get a deal with DGT as we seemed to get alot of work from their companies in the early part of the year.
If GHW are the seller then I think they are just taking a profit which can be said for any seller at the current price. The wierd bit for me is that the sells are not being declared to the market like they were the last time GHW were selling.
Andy
EWRobson
- 28 Jul 2005 21:23
- 1244 of 2787
Thanks, Peter; makes sense. I had missed the RNS whilst on holiday. The balance would be just about the shares sold in the interim. If so, the drag on the sp will have been removed. Makes the timing of my purchases semi-inspired! Still planning to add more so not too keen on the price roaring away just yet. Suspect we may have another week or so before the interims get too close.
Come on, markus, no more prevarication. Remember the faint heart lesson; you won't be able to sneak up on the ropes as you normally do with pth on the golf-course!
Eric
markusantonius
- 28 Jul 2005 21:33
- 1245 of 2787
"Faint heart lesson...", Eric? I take offense, sir. The Shark is without fear, as you know! The only time PTH has ever beaten me on the golf course was the first time we played (that's 1/7) on his home soil. If we play another 100 times, it's unlikely he would win more than twice!!