Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Pursuit Dynamics Sign First Deal (PDX)     

Gausie - 03 Feb 2003 08:39

See todays RNS.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=PDX&Si

Jules - 23 Oct 2003 11:22 - 124 of 232

PW
It's a shame that they have let the rubbish go on over there:-(

KeithB - 23 Oct 2003 14:33 - 125 of 232

Jules I was lucky enough to get out at 131 just over a week ago when I got back from my hols and found where it was at. I certainly haven't shorted it though, I wasn't aware that it was large enough for cfds which are the only way I have found to short things.
I will certainly get back in again when it stops falling.
Keith

shahidali - 24 Oct 2003 14:13 - 126 of 232

hi lads

its the JABA

its looking good

Gausie - 24 Oct 2003 14:36 - 127 of 232

Hi Jaba. It's a little different here.....

Jules - 24 Oct 2003 14:58 - 128 of 232

KeithB
well traded!!!
Hi jaba nice to see you on the more moderately sane site:-)

Andy - 24 Oct 2003 15:28 - 129 of 232

Jaba,

welcome!

Where's Ashley?

little woman - 25 Oct 2003 20:07 - 130 of 232

Has anyone read the auditors report in the interim results? They mention that the company at the time had only enough money to keep them going a year. The directors believe that during that time they would obtain contracts OR WOULD (more likely) RAISE MORE FINANCE. I wonder what that'll do to the share price!

mikeran - 25 Oct 2003 22:30 - 131 of 232

The company raised some extra cash recently, and it has been no secret that they have sufficient cash throughout 2004, but the main development phase has been completed, they have already turned down Sonico for an exclusive licence, and have further manufaturers trials due for completion in November. Those that have recently visited the company have been impressed with the viability and functionality of the Pump and the extent of its possible applications. I would expect some significant news anytime between now and the date of their interim results in December, probably much earlier. Any company being that honest about its future financial position , has to be confident of their product, which they appear to be. Again this is supported by those investors who recently visited their Company Base, spoke to management and watched the demonstration.

Dil - 25 Oct 2003 23:02 - 132 of 232

Seen the header ???

These ever sign a second deal and we will never hear the end of it.

Regards

Dominic Simpson

Martini - 26 Oct 2003 00:43 - 133 of 232

PDX have a lot to answer for :)

The Sunday Times - Business
October 26, 2003

Thousands of Cadbury jobs to go
John Waples
THE British-based soft-drink and confectionery giant Cadbury Schweppes is tomorrow expected to announce a shake-up of its international operations, with several thousand job losses possible.

Regards
Dil

Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:03 - 134 of 232

Gausie has now found it necessary to start post peoples names on ADVFN.
Thats ADVFN for you, bunch of c--ts who have banned over 20 posters this last week for pointuingout the truth about PDX.

Pommy - 27 Oct 2003 08:34 - 135 of 232

Copied from the traders thread to clarify a couple of points....



Unfortunately despite ****** and ******* claims I havent been ranting.
They just got a bit upset when I pointed out Evil K had sold 100k PDX and had put his money into Corac. Contrary to their bizarre claims i have not posted heaps of things under multiple names and spent most of yesterday (******) found it necessary to start posting my real name on ADVFN) watching football with friends and not anywhere near a computer.
The sad truth is they are using all the method they can to pump up this stock, which is very much a jam tomorow story.
If they know anymore about PDX than me, they are insider trading , and I believe someone has already made a complaint to the FSA about them (no not me before ******* gets all snooty).
We've all seen ******** do this before and hardly a single promise delivered.
I am very uncomfortbale abour ******** relationship with this company and also with Ron Trenter (see first PDX RNS) who was also a director of Oasis Healthcare a company ********* tried to get all his 'mates' into.

Ive had a good load of money out of this ramp and still have a few shares left in for fre.
But I object to being attacked for pointing out something that is public domain information, but might not be in ******** or ******* interests.

I hope they dont make too many Margin buys to convince the sheep there are still big punters buyers. I have no idea where PDX are going and I care very little. As I said Ive had my money and have a free ride on a few more. Its the attacks that piss me off!!.

PS I would also like to add i hardly know Ashley James so if he has an axe to grind with ******** and ******* thats their business and nothing to do with me!!

Gianni - 27 Oct 2003 10:56 - 136 of 232

Gausie/Andy,

Refrained up to now getting involved though I did go long much earlier and also sold out earlier as I just like to go with the flow whichever way that happens to be. However I feel that with a market cap close to 50 million the time has come for some real contracts so as my knowledge in this area is zilch and I don't want to post on the muppet boards can you help me and maybe others with the following:-

- originally this pump was seen as a new marine drive opportunity. This has now to all intents been effectively dropped presumably because the drive needs a steam powered engine which will actually be more expensive to run than a standard diesel/petrol driven propellor. (Mind you I love the future potential - e.g. environment and all that). Do I have this right?

- the main thrusts for this pump are now in a whole range of applications where this pump will replace the standard ones e.g. waste water and food manufacture (e.g. masceration). I can see how this unit can utilise excess/waste steam from manufacturing plants to run this new pump but....

- What if the steam generator packs up - what is the back-up system? If that breaks down not easy to switch I would guess. Can someone clarify. In most production lines the pumps may fail and therefore the line stops/switches and if the electricity fails a generator can kick in if critical. But what if the actual steam generation fails - e.g. pressure valves? If the back-up is the old type pumps then the benefit is limited.

- most standard applications I've heard mentioned (e.g. waste water pumping stations) will require steam generators installed and presumably a back-up should the electricity fail. Is this correct? If so how do the costs of installation compare to maintaining the existing system - iow the new pump may be brilliant if installed in new plants from scratch as part of the plant design but may not be cost effective if tried in the existing manufacturing/treatment process.

So answers would be appreciated as from my very limited understanding this pump would seem to have tremendous potential but in a much longer time scale than is currently envisaged as royalty income on new plant will take much longer to materialise than a new "mousetrap" which would be an instant success.

TIA

Martini - 27 Oct 2003 11:18 - 137 of 232

Gianni
Someone has set up a site that covers a number of the FAQs on PDX,
May answer some of your questions but remember it is promoting the Bull case for PDX so should be read in that light.
http://www.debauched.homechoice.co.uk/pdx/index.html
Regards
M

Gianni - 27 Oct 2003 11:51 - 138 of 232

Martini - thanks just read thru it and though my specifics weren't answered fully there I thought the site was very fair though the financials were slightly bullish =:0

I actually noticed there were a couple of sensible negatives posted by some experts in waste water and steam generation so consider the site to be a good one for PDX investors/potential investors to look at. I think of particular interest was PDX's own technical officer who states:-

"Commercially available methods employed for the generation of steam have not significantly changed in over 50 years. Conventionally, steam is used to produce rotational power via either turbines or reciprocating engines, which utilise the expansion energy available as steam pressure reduces. They also require high quality steam to avoid damage to turbines or piston seals from condensation or solid particle entrained in the flow.

The PDX system utilises both the expansion energy available and the 'implosion' energy as the steam condenses to a fraction of its volume in the fluid being pumped. The steam is introduced into the fluid flow through a jet arrangement that is tolerant to variable steam quality and any fine detritus carried with the steam (such as un-dissolved solids, rust particles etc.)

Conventional steam generators follow two routes: A boiler system; or an OTSG (Once Through Steam Generator).

1. The boiler principle: a heated tank of water with steam drawn off the top. These are slow to raise steam as a large quantity of water has to be heated, and salts and minerals contained in the water drop out or adhere to the sides or heating source deteriorating performance.

2. OTSG use a continuous single coil that water flows through, picking up heat and turning into steam. These are smaller, significantly faster at producing steam, but still need good water preparation to prevent corrosion or undissolved solids from being passed that would damage conventional equipment.

By incorporating modern materials and eliminating the need for water preparation in a development of the OTSG principle, a fast acting, very compact, Outboard-equivalent configuration for small vessel applications can be produced."

Unfortunately this raised another query for me - Doesn't the above mean that for the pump to be successful it needs to also form part of the steam generation process itself i.e. the pump is part of the entire system and not independent of it?

mikeran - 27 Oct 2003 12:45 - 139 of 232

Gianni - not sure if you picked this up on your browse through any PDX material, but the steam pressure required is very low about 2bar, I am not a tech expertise but some domestic Cappucino makers generate about 16 bar + just to froth the milk.

mikeran - 28 Oct 2003 20:59 - 140 of 232

Gentlemen and of Course Lady investors, -- What a lot of steam on all these PDX threads, but to what avail ? whatever view you have and whichever position you hold Long or short, the overall winner has been the MM. He will run you ragged at will -- Long or short in the absence of any news and at will. I would hope that on so little volume and the relatively small number of trades, this would not be possible. But it is at the moment, maybe the increase in SETS trading in NOV. May make transctions more transparent for those equities.

Please dont lets debate that as well.

BUT why not whichever side you are on stop posting until this weekend on all the PDX threads on Moneyam and the other side. Let the markets and the mm's take their course--- otherwise whether LOng or Short you are playing to their Gallery. They love it and will walk all of you up and down at will.
You at the moment are the total losers.

shahidali - 01 Nov 2003 10:43 - 141 of 232

looks like a good week coming up for pdx

Seymour Clearly - 01 Nov 2003 23:21 - 142 of 232

Why?

(I am long)

Andy - 01 Nov 2003 23:52 - 143 of 232

Shahidali,

Likewise, i'm long too!
Register now or login to post to this thread.