Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

Anomalous1 - 12 Aug 2005 19:04 - 1240 of 1909

More to the point - what price NML now?

The next placing must be imminent imo and the placee (the mystery seller(s) is going to want as cheap a price as possible, so they can continue their dumping into the market at a profit. What will happen to the NML shareholders if the placing is sub 3p or even below 2.5p?

Now that Ianwc has announced he's going to sell if the price hasn't risen in 3 months, how many will follow him and RBonnier when the share price is still dropping at Christmas.

As Private Frasier would say, "You're all doomed"

stockdog - 14 Aug 2005 13:51 - 1241 of 1909

Yeah, analmouse, but Private Fraser (correct spelling) was wrong, wasn't he, in the end.

lol!

sd

aldwickk - 14 Aug 2005 16:12 - 1242 of 1909

ASMITH2 - 15 Aug 2005 11:55 - 1243 of 1909

Yep Doomed without any question of a doubt if this didnt have the support of the blind mice over on the other side you would have an sp of sub 1p by now.
This will turn into an absolute nightmare because big holders like takoe aka mc wont be able to sell at a decent price which is going to cost them a fortune I just hope they are able to afford huge losses because this will end in tears and soon.

stockdog - 15 Aug 2005 12:43 - 1244 of 1909

Another excellently argued post ASMITH2 - your research is, as ever, impecable.

sd

ASMITH2 - 15 Aug 2005 12:50 - 1245 of 1909

Thats just it there isnt anything to research is there apart from broken promises a big hole in the ground and a deafening silence from a company supposed to be mining 10000 carats a month its a disgrace and a shambles and Im starting to think they may have a problem raising more cash at a decent price as the mystery seller/s is well aware that joe public are starting to wise up here.
If the mystery seller thinks theres going to be a problem selling they may only be prepared to stump up something like 2.5p or even 2p.

stockdog - 15 Aug 2005 12:51 - 1246 of 1909

Well, for a start you could research who the mystery seller is.

takahe - 15 Aug 2005 17:41 - 1247 of 1909

Been reading FYB again , Anom...Ian will be pleased that you are quoting him again. I don't think he is serious!!
RBonnier only had a small number of shares..hardly a mystery seller.
Keep trying.......

takahe - 15 Aug 2005 17:42 - 1248 of 1909

ASMITH2 ...lol! Multiple personality strikes again...

takahe - 17 Aug 2005 12:17 - 1249 of 1909

Anomalous..I have found out what your supposedly 'shocking news' is. The appropriate people have been informed. I think you might find that that little figment of your imagination has not gone down too well in certain circles. I would expect some repercussions...for you, not the company..who are very busy trying to realise shareholder value.

Anomalous1 - 17 Aug 2005 22:47 - 1250 of 1909

If you know what the two bits of news were, then publish them here on this board and I'll tell you if you are right. I think you are lying, because I doubt that the sources would pass on the information to you.

It's not a 'figment' of my imagination, because the information was verified. The company can not deny what was said, because to do so might invite an investigation by 'you know who' and they wouldn't want that. The trouble for them is that 'you know who' already knows.

I have absolutely no fear of any repercussions....so I say to you publish and be damned, because if you do, NML will be!

Andy - 17 Aug 2005 23:04 - 1251 of 1909

takahe,

Would you ike to share the "shocking news"?

Anomalous1 - 18 Aug 2005 01:21 - 1252 of 1909

Put it this way - if you don't reply with the news, we know you're a liar and the whole board will know you were deceiving them.

takahe - 18 Aug 2005 08:42 - 1253 of 1909

Anomalous...I am not a liar, but you are. I know quite a lot of people but only heard this yesterday. The information came from a very dependable source. I don't know about two bits of news but let us say that the information revolves round a certain diamond analyst. Do you not understand that clients have to pay if they are not clients of WHI?
I don't have to defend myself here. I have taken a more appropriate course of action.

takahe - 18 Aug 2005 08:48 - 1254 of 1909

Andy..I am surprised at you. I am sure Anom has shared his 'news' with you.

Anomalous1 - 18 Aug 2005 09:26 - 1255 of 1909

>Takahe
so it appears someone has informed you of the circumstances to one of the parts of news, but maybe not the context. It's all very well having to pay for a report, but they asked for something different and the person concerned was certain he knew what they were really after and it was not the standard report.

So what's the other news then? You said that you knew both bits - so tell us what the second piece was?

takahe - 18 Aug 2005 09:31 - 1256 of 1909

Anom...No.. I said 'shocking news'..it was you that said two bits....
It is possible that you have misinterpreted what was said by the 'person'. I hope so. I don't think the person will be very amused to hear what you are saying he said! It is being further investigated by the company who are also not amused.

Anomalous1 - 18 Aug 2005 10:26 - 1257 of 1909

I have not misinterpreted it one bit, because I received an email from the person concerned and there's no mistake of the context of the request. It is NML that should be worried, because the FSA have been told as well. It's one thing requesting a report, it's quite another to say what they said.

I said there was two pieces of shocking news and you said you knew 'my shocking news' and that means both - so tell us the next piece and who told me.

Andy - 18 Aug 2005 10:59 - 1258 of 1909

takahe,

That would depend upon what you are referring to, which unless you state, I can't confirm!

Bid down .5p, all buy trades this morning, bad news in the offing?, or a large sell being worked?

takahe - 18 Aug 2005 11:07 - 1259 of 1909

Anom.."'my shocking news' and that means both " ......has no one ever told you that 'news' is a plural word. This is typical of how you misinterpret things.
How very odd of JP to be telling you a company's business, even if it is true. I have copied your remark to the FD of the company.

Andy...lol..not even worth commenting on...
Register now or login to post to this thread.