for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Oblomov
Gold Contributor (snigger/guffah!)
Joined: 08-Jun-05
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 378 Posted: 11-Aug-05 at 17:46 | IP Logged
I cant see anything to change my view Notso.
It drops a little somedays, goes up a little others. Nothing unusual in that. I still see it being higher by the end of the year than it is now - hopefully 30p to 30p+.
---------------------

Yep, no hiding the facts- for "Oblomov read Oblomov",always behind Wendy and gang---

= losers by 100% on objective,

excuse the lapse but
#ROTFFLMFACB&HO, and lets hope he has a shedfull

enjoy sleepy-head!!!!!!!!!

Here we go again! Ban internet access in loony bins, I say.

No mention in the share mag as someone said there would be.

Any idea what this is about ??

"COURT 69
Before LORD JUSTICE JACOB
Thursday, 3rd November, 2005
At half-past 9
LISTED FOR DIRECTIONS
APPEALS
A3/2005/0823 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd.
A3/2005/0824 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd.
A3/2005/0819 Stanelco RF Technologies Ltd v Bioprogress Technology Ltd.

Baza

Good find, bhunt1910.

Can only think it's the long awaited appeal, a hearing because one or both sides have requested same, ie a settlement, or possibly a setting of the appeal proper. Some knowledge of criminal law but not civil law, so supposition only..

Is this that part of the civil process where each side must tell the other what its evidence and strategies are for the appeal, known as disclosure?
Alan

Regulations Pose Challenges to Food Packaging Industry

Convenient and Easy-to-Use Packages Emerge as Clear Favourites

A VERY long article with SEO mentioned near the end so link only for those who wish to wade through.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/11-02-2005/0004206133&EDATE=

Baza,

'LISTED FOR DIRECTIONS'

This a preliminery hearing in which the judge will issue 'directions'.

This indicates that an 'out of court' settlement has not been reached at this stage and so the judge will tell both parties how they are to prepare for the final hearing, what the time limit is for disclosure of documents, etc. It is basically to ensure all parties are prepared with the information the judge will require to make a judgement and that all relevant information has been disclosed to all parties.

Cheers,oblomov.

At least things are moving.

Thanks Oblo - that makes sense as it is only a 30 minute hearing

Baza

4.5m buy @ 14. 1040 gone through.

Not mine - but I did buy some at 14 immediately before those went through

baza

baza, any news come through about this mornings prelim hearing?

driver - LOL - large buys ? - LOL

big sells going through - for those challenged in the basics - its simple - large trades - price is up and blue - they were buys - price is down and red - they were sells - you have multiple large dumps going on - and have had for a very long time - notice the downtrend for many many months -

this is news driven - but there is no significant news coming - forget the Asda Starpol trials - it means nothing - wait and see - no pre close update - that is due to having nothing to say - apart from more more losses - coming your way -

All IMO - DYOR !!

from the chart some people would short to 11p - but I do not short - some people do though -

Bos - no news - but not really expecting any - I think it is simply outlining the schedule for the CC to both parties.

Baza

Must admit, the disposal does not look good. ( see RNS ).

Exercise of options and PDMR transactions in shares

Why does it not look good Greekman?

technical director disposing of half his options when exercised.....doesn't look good because it may show people that he doesn't believe that the sp will be much higher in the short to medium term......although there is always the possibility that the guy simply wanted his "cash" now......[notice the timing of the announcement.....hahaha]

(this topic is something that has always baffled me in regards to director's holdings.....to impress shareholders they must have a decent chunk of shares, but then they cannot make much of it cos if they dump any at the top or as the sp goes higher; then it will look negative towards the shareholders....yet if you were a director and had a fair-sized decent paper profit, wouldn't you prefer to say....buy yourself another house with it??)