moneyman
- 20 Jul 2003 23:02
Yoomedia ( www.yoomedia.com) are looking for a slice of a 6 Billion pound government payout to provide the likes of interactive voting from your remote control.The market cap could explode if the company wins a slice of the pie.It has recently set up a new division to expoite the tremendous opportunity that this sector has to offer.
A must have share for the long term.Very illiquid stock which translates to relatively small purchases moving the price rapidly.If a big player takes an interest this could honestly move beyond our wildest dreams.
Scripophilist
- 01 Oct 2006 12:23
- 125 of 172
I find it remarkable that people have continued to talk up this company for some time when it has been obvious for ages that everything was headed in only one direction. Psychology is a strange thing, saying OK I was wrong or taking a loss in a desperate situation appears to be second to defending your position and hanging on until the grim death.
tvc15
- 03 Oct 2006 12:01
- 126 of 172
Yoomedia PLC
03 October 2006
YooMedia plc (the 'Company' or 'YooMedia')
Additional Listing
The Company was notified on 28 September 2006 that Platinum Partners Value
Arbitrage Fund LP ('Platinum') have served a Loan Notice for the exercise of
3,571,428 ordinary shares at 1.68p per share. This loan notice also contained a
request for a further 21,877 ordinary shares relating to currency fluctuations
relating to the exercise notice served on 8 September 2006. The service of the
Loan Notice was in accordance with the terms of the Convertible Note announced
on 11 May 2006.
In addition, Highbridge International LLC ('Highbridge') has also served a loan
notice, in accordance with the terms of the Convertible Note announced on 11 May
2006, for the exercise of 3,571,428 ordinary shares at 1.68p per share.
Application will be made for 7,164,733 ordinary shares to be admitted to AIM and
dealings are expected to commence on 9 October 2006.
ENDS
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
maestro
- 04 Oct 2006 07:13
- 127 of 172
Yoomedia PLC 04 October 2006
YooMedia plc / Index: AIM / Epic: YOO / Sector: Media
4 October 2006
YooMedia plc ("YooMedia" or "the Company")
EGM Statement
YooMedia, the AIM-traded interactive media and games group, held an Extraordinary General Meeting ('EGM') yesterday (3 October 2006) and all resolutions were duly carried. At the meeting, Chairman Michael Sinclair said:
"We are beginning to see the benefits of the recent period of reconstruction in the performance of the core business and we expect that this will translate into a strengthening in the Company's financial position in the future. The action taken was aimed at strengthening the balance sheet and re-positioning YooMedia's product offering to capitalise on growing opportunities within the interactive media market. In the current climate, I think that it is important to reiterate that the Company does not take bets from outside the UK and therefore does not have any exposure to the US gaming market."
Dil
- 04 Oct 2006 22:21
- 128 of 172
lol .... and the band played on
tvc15
- 06 Oct 2006 08:35
- 129 of 172
Article in the Evening Standard based on a letter from a former owner of Dating.
"The sound of knives being sharpened must be deafening among the shareholders of Yoomedia - judging by the emails landing in the Cityspy inbox.
One writes that she bought 100,000 of shares in 2004 and they're now worth "a paltry" 13,000. What's causing most annoyance is the bullish statement from the AIM-listed interactive media company in July this year, saying "we have also seen new business lines emerging into revenue ands profit streams for this year" and the firm was "cashflow positive" in the first quarter, and the one issued last week, disclosing widening losses and warning that full-year results would not be ahead of market expectations. It will be interesting to see if yesterday's claim from Chairman Michael Sinclair that "we are begining to see the benefits of the recent period of reconstruction" silences the critics..."
maestro
- 06 Oct 2006 08:43
- 130 of 172
sound like a bunch of lieing YOO boys
mcgrath1958
- 06 Oct 2006 11:38
- 131 of 172
Seems like the Rats are leaving a sinking ship! Nearly 4 million sold , am surprised SP hasn't dropped to 1.25.
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 16:37
- 132 of 172
Anyone listen ???
Dil - 06 Sep 2006 12:30 - 71 of 131
If you want a penny share then look at IXE ... much better than this crap.
maestro
- 06 Oct 2006 16:40
- 133 of 172
then again i think its been shorted for the next tranche of 7m shares...this is the last and its up from here..
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 16:45
- 134 of 172
always one twat :-)
Treblewide
- 06 Oct 2006 16:52
- 135 of 172
dil...the guy is a plonker....this is his claim on AFN board.....hardly backed up by his picking of POO
maestro - 18 Sep 2006 16:36 - 7 of 8
treble..i tipped Seven Arts.. 300% rise today...i only back multi baggers...thats why i'm a QXL legend...make Evil look like a novice
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 19:56
- 136 of 172
Treb .... he's a wind up merchant , takes one to spot one sometimes :-)
Dil
- 06 Oct 2006 23:53
- 138 of 172
OK ... he's a lucky tw&t :-)
WOODIE
- 11 Oct 2006 12:51
- 139 of 172
taken from todays racing post
End of the road for Channel 854
Channel 854, William Hills five nights weekly live greyhound service on the Sky digital platform, is to cease broadcasting at the end of this month. The final programme is likely to be a double-header from Brough Park and Walthamstow on Saturday, October 28.
Originally designated as a sports channel on Skys electronic programme guide and broadcast as Channel 425, the live greyhound service first aired from Sunderland on October 6, 2004 and remained on that number until reclassified as gaming channel and switched to Channel 854 in March this year.
Very much a go-alone Hills operation which other betting operators happily piggy-backed, it seems the decision to pull the plug owes more to the failure to attract sufficient revenue streams from the interactive content, virtual racing and the like, which was the overwhelming staple of the channel rather than of any lack of interest in the nightly greyhound broadcasts
Dil
- 11 Oct 2006 13:24
- 140 of 172
ooops
john50
- 12 Oct 2006 14:15
- 141 of 172
From the iii board
RESPONSE FROM AIM REGULATION! Ernest Scribbler
Heres the response, I'll be taking a private action, and keep you informed.
************
Dear XXXXXXXXX
Thank you for your email in respect of Yoomedia plc ("the Company").
Where concerns arise in relation to a company's compliance with the AIM
Rules, the Exchange will take appropriate steps to investigate any
potential breaches of those rules. Our duty of confidentiality precludes
us from commenting on individual cases, but we would like to assure you
that any issues raised that may indicate a company may have breached its
responsibilities under the AIM Rules are investigated thoroughly and
appropriate action taken. Such action may include sanctions as provided
for by the Rules and in certain circumstances referral may be made to
other regulatory bodies.
We note your concerns and assure you that we will be further
investigating whether the Company has fulfilled its obligations under
the AIM Rules, specifically by ensuring any new developments in its
financial condition or performance have been notified without delay.
However, your concerns regarding lack of communication from the Company
and the Company's strategy to raise additional funds instead of
disposing unprofitable parts of the business are not within the remit of
the AIM Rules. You may wish instead to seek legal advice to further
pursue these concerns.
Yours sincerely
Dil
- 12 Oct 2006 18:30
- 142 of 172
What exactly is the complaint John , misleading statements ?
john50
- 12 Oct 2006 20:32
- 143 of 172
what is misleading you dil?
Dil
- 12 Oct 2006 23:33
- 144 of 172
This bit :
"specifically by ensuring any new developments in its
financial condition or performance have been notified without delay"
Is he suggesting that in the past satements made regarding the company's future have been deliberately misleading or to be nice , inaccurate and should have been reported as so via an RNS when it became obvious that was the case?
Cheers