for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Well an unexpected RNS this week from SEO - revenue enhancing - but probably not until well into 2006.

I still do not expect to hear anything else from SEO until after the trial has finished - probably not until middle of next week earliest - the assumption being that the trial started when the last RNS was announced - so the trial wont finish until Friday earliest.

Still all positive news flow from SEO

Baza

Morning all.
Agree with you Baza. Contrary to ii's opinion, I think it was a very positive RNS. The de-rampers opinion was that the auction wouldn't happen. It clearly will. HW could hardly have given a time scale or a value at this stage so I think we can safely ignore ii's comments (again).
Alan

OMG - IMO - I have not seen - such a camp post- on a bb before -

Nice one bosley.

ii - who's he ??

Expect to see the usual hike this morning and fall back this afternoon - although I suspect we will end the day a tad up

Baza

Rothschilds are not type of merchant bankers that will take on a mickey mouse job.

I think that there might be a half decent or better chance of SEO getting a useful some of money out of this deal if/when done both in an up front payment and with a royalty flow thereafter.

It is however, likely to take at least a year before a deal is concluded. So I wouldn't bank on the share price holding onto much of this morning's initial gains.

The oily one

oilywag, that was my reading of the rns. i think seo were being smart and saying that they are in no rush to sell as they feel this ip could be worth something. we shall have to wait and see if they are right.

Anyone got any contacts to substantiate/refute this claim.

It has a certain level of credance - because that would explain the reason we have not been getting news - on the other hand - it could be old news - now fixed

"Chap on III reckons Greenseal is a dud, works fine but can't seal nearly as fast as heat. His contacts are from the Youngs and Bluecrest factories, judging by his posts he seems pretty switched on and not deramping. The factories are on tight contracts and can't see the benefit of switching."

Baza

baza, he might be right and he might be talking out of his arse. i would have thought that something as basic as speed of seal would have been analysed in the tests earlier this year.

Morning all.

Interesting RNS.

Just to add, had a chat a few days ago to a friend who is well informed that SEO have changed 'policy' in updating the market. Apparently HW has finally realised that having a constant RNS flow all the time doesnt help the sp in the long run-taken him a while! Although in todays release he couldnt resit wacking in a sentence like the one ii picked up!

There are mummerings that talks are happening with a massive fast food chain who got interested at the conference in the States-very preliminary though.

Other than that, not much to add!

Bos - I would tend to agree - and I know it is a de rampers ruse to cast doubt - but I always take the attitude that there is never smoke without fire - so I am looking for a bucket of water to pour on it - or a wind to fan the flames. Either way I am loooking for some facts - hoped that someone in the industry might have pcked up a whisper - or not - or know who to contact ?

Either way - I would hope it is either old news or a teething problem to be overcome - and there will be teething problems regardless of how much testing you do - ask BMW/Mercedes/Ferrari

Baza.

baza

Bos,

Have to agree with you on the subject with the tests. The whole idea of trialling the new Greenseal technology would have covered all aspects, including speed etc. Just the deramp crowd finding usual bollox info.

Kong

i did say - why bother with Greenseal - look to them using new HIGH SPEED sealers - and also warned - look for the move into something new - and rampable - Biotec - to let people forget Greenseal - was I just trying to point you to the light ? - yes - the RNS today - is total nonsense - ultimately in the future - which century is that ultimately - the director sell tells you everything !


bhunt1910 - 08 Nov 2005 10:39 - 12558 of 12560
Anyone got any contacts to substantiate/refute this claim.

It has a certain level of credance - because that would explain the reason we have not been getting news - on the other hand - it could be old news - now fixed

"Chap on III reckons Greenseal is a dud, works fine but can't seal nearly as fast as heat. His contacts are from the Youngs and Bluecrest factories, judging by his posts he seems pretty switched on and not deramping. The factories are on tight contracts and can't see the benefit of switching."

Baza

You talk some bollox II.

Kong

I agree with King - on both speed and bollox.

Although not in any way dismissing Greenseal let us not forget is not the only SEO product for the future. Presumably not their main one - as they chose a while ago to change the name of their headquarters address to "STARPOL TECHNOLOGY CENTRE". That must indicate their real hopes for the future.

ii, over the last few months you have posted basically every possiblity and alternative, so , of course you mentioned high speed sealers. rather than point us to the light all you ended up doing was muddying the waters. also, whenever someone posts a positive, unsubstantiated rumour you are first on the scene with your rant of hype, ramp, jam tomorrow type post. this poster claiming to know that greenseal seals slowly, do you know him? do you know if he is genuine and truthful? no, of course you don't but you are quick to use negative, unsubstantiated rumour to back up your own negative posts.
come on , cock, you can't have it both ways. either all rumours , negative and positive, are treated with sceptism until it is shown to be fact or fiction, or we believe any and every claim someone posts.

This from pm1 on G/S speed.

Greenseal generally runs at comparative speeds to heatsealing except under circumstances where there is an unusually thick material or a heatsink material like foil trays where typically greenseal will run faster.

Regards,

Howard

Bos - I tend to ignore ii - no integrity - and from what I heard from others he tends to do more harm than good as it appears that people have a tendency to believe the opposite of what he says - but generally I ignore him.

However - the post from Howard was exactly what I was looking for - a comment direct from the horses mouth - so to speak - so I for one am happy for the time being.

Thanks Driver/paul

Baza

I presume that Starpol sits higher than Greenseal by virtue of the fact that not only does Greenseal create the need to switch to Starpol, but there are far wider applications. So even though Greenseal has the world-beating potential with an initial boost to revenue, its a quick win with possibly limited royalty period.

Starpol then takes over as the standard with continued revenues......