Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


insiderinside - 08 Nov 2005 10:58 - 12563 of 27111


i did say - why bother with Greenseal - look to them using new HIGH SPEED sealers - and also warned - look for the move into something new - and rampable - Biotec - to let people forget Greenseal - was I just trying to point you to the light ? - yes - the RNS today - is total nonsense - ultimately in the future - which century is that ultimately - the director sell tells you everything !


bhunt1910 - 08 Nov 2005 10:39 - 12558 of 12560
Anyone got any contacts to substantiate/refute this claim.

It has a certain level of credance - because that would explain the reason we have not been getting news - on the other hand - it could be old news - now fixed

"Chap on III reckons Greenseal is a dud, works fine but can't seal nearly as fast as heat. His contacts are from the Youngs and Bluecrest factories, judging by his posts he seems pretty switched on and not deramping. The factories are on tight contracts and can't see the benefit of switching."

Baza

KingKonggb - 08 Nov 2005 11:04 - 12564 of 27111

You talk some bollox II.

Kong

Tonyrelaxes - 08 Nov 2005 11:14 - 12565 of 27111

I agree with King - on both speed and bollox.

Although not in any way dismissing Greenseal let us not forget is not the only SEO product for the future. Presumably not their main one - as they chose a while ago to change the name of their headquarters address to "STARPOL TECHNOLOGY CENTRE". That must indicate their real hopes for the future.

bosley - 08 Nov 2005 11:38 - 12566 of 27111

ii, over the last few months you have posted basically every possiblity and alternative, so , of course you mentioned high speed sealers. rather than point us to the light all you ended up doing was muddying the waters. also, whenever someone posts a positive, unsubstantiated rumour you are first on the scene with your rant of hype, ramp, jam tomorrow type post. this poster claiming to know that greenseal seals slowly, do you know him? do you know if he is genuine and truthful? no, of course you don't but you are quick to use negative, unsubstantiated rumour to back up your own negative posts.
come on , cock, you can't have it both ways. either all rumours , negative and positive, are treated with sceptism until it is shown to be fact or fiction, or we believe any and every claim someone posts.

driver - 08 Nov 2005 11:48 - 12567 of 27111

This from pm1 on G/S speed.

Greenseal generally runs at comparative speeds to heatsealing except under circumstances where there is an unusually thick material or a heatsink material like foil trays where typically greenseal will run faster.

Regards,

Howard

bhunt1910 - 08 Nov 2005 11:56 - 12568 of 27111

Bos - I tend to ignore ii - no integrity - and from what I heard from others he tends to do more harm than good as it appears that people have a tendency to believe the opposite of what he says - but generally I ignore him.

However - the post from Howard was exactly what I was looking for - a comment direct from the horses mouth - so to speak - so I for one am happy for the time being.

Thanks Driver/paul

Baza

garyble - 08 Nov 2005 12:26 - 12569 of 27111

I presume that Starpol sits higher than Greenseal by virtue of the fact that not only does Greenseal create the need to switch to Starpol, but there are far wider applications. So even though Greenseal has the world-beating potential with an initial boost to revenue, its a quick win with possibly limited royalty period.

Starpol then takes over as the standard with continued revenues......

Tonyrelaxes - 08 Nov 2005 12:49 - 12570 of 27111

garyble

my thoughts too.
At the EGM Ian Balchin said they were presently concentrating on "low hanging fruits". Greenseal could well be this in terms of quicker revenue generation. It is of course an intro to Starpol. SHARES magazine suggested potential Greenseal revenues to be in terms of "mind boggling" numbers - so what could SEO income be if Greenseal is merely the carrot to get Starpol take up?

greekman - 08 Nov 2005 13:50 - 12571 of 27111

bhunt1910,

Re the greenseal info ie running slow. I have read this on several boards over last couple of days. My reply was if there was such news, SEO would have had to declare same by now, as if true the sp would be badly effected. None of the posters re this so called slow running can state where this info has come from. The running, sealing speed of the system would have been one of the easyest sections to check. I fully expect the shorters to realy press hard from now till Friday pm as if all news is good on the 30 day end they will have missed their chance. Imho scaremongering .

Biscuit - 08 Nov 2005 13:58 - 12572 of 27111

Greekman,
I wouldn't even bother replying to it, it's justthe usual suspects in their being negative while trying to appear positive mode. Strange how it's the same people each time.
Biscuit

TheFrenchConnection - 08 Nov 2005 15:19 - 12573 of 27111

Amities mes amies / Slt ,,,,,Second only to my passion for trading is floating riverboat poker . As such i call every hand on its merits.l have seen fortunes lost on what should have been a winning hand; and vice/versa ..People allow themselves to be psyched out by silly nuances and idiosyncrasies of their opposition . Same with shares. People sell on some inane comments made by someone they have never met ; and where they in fact to meet such people they would probably run a mile. Every day brings a new hand and as such one readjusts ones position . Out of neccassity !! For one cannot ignore market dynamics . Now to my mind - SEO @ 4.75 was a dream come true ; but at 32p had ran away with itself ,and was heavily overbought, and hence constituted an excellent "short " . And as such i shorted it down from 22p to 14p . But what with every new days trading you are dealt a different hand ;and i am of the opinion that being in todays market at the 13p/14p level renders me more potential upside than downside. The stock is learning to stand on its own two feet with support of a kind at 13p or so ..As for this utter nonsense that Greenseal runs much slower than heat sealing systems is an utter misnomer; and i would ask the poster to DISCLOSE his source . Upon failing to do this i can give no validity to his comments . None whatsoever. lf that were the case SEO would have been a complete non starter ....and considering that such information is extremely price sensitive i would have expected SEO would have been forced into alerting the market, via RNS, to this news . ,Over the past 2 years , l know i have had mixed feelings about SEO and am the first to admit such a fact . l have been long and short in equal measure ,,,, But im afraid ii @ 13p ill raise you boy ....Your not in the playground now so dont get so personal ,,Je vous previens -,,mafiez-vous des apparences. ,,,@+ J

NielsJensen - 08 Nov 2005 15:22 - 12574 of 27111

Perhaps someone could call a distributors sales department and ask?

driver - 08 Nov 2005 15:52 - 12575 of 27111

TFC
Merci de vos penss sur le sujet.

driver - 08 Nov 2005 15:53 - 12576 of 27111

Niels, I think pm1 has all ready done so.

From pm1
Greenseal generally runs at comparative speeds to heatsealing except under circumstances where there is an unusually thick material or a heatsink material like foil trays where typically greenseal will run faster.

Regards,

Howard


bosley - 08 Nov 2005 16:46 - 12577 of 27111

driver, are you learning french?

driver - 08 Nov 2005 16:58 - 12578 of 27111

bos
No I use this good n it.

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

bhunt1910 - 08 Nov 2005 17:05 - 12579 of 27111

Cheat - but a great find

bosley - 08 Nov 2005 17:07 - 12580 of 27111

oh you sneaky bugger.

NielsJensen - 08 Nov 2005 17:44 - 12581 of 27111

Now that PM1 is gone, perhaps you'd like to know that EVO has an unchanged target of 19p and an unchanged buy recommendation. They comment on the filter that the tobacco industry spends $4bn/year on cellulose acetate and that the seo filters can save $1.2bn a year! That should be worth a few quid? (Surely enough to pay BPRG, lol)

Also they comment that BAT has developed this 3 stage filter that still may be dangerous because of the cellulose acetate. For this reason, and the cost saving, other manufacturers may beat a path to seo. (Maybe BAT too..)

Ohh, and they also expect a pre-results statement, but think it may be as late as mid December.

blinger - 08 Nov 2005 18:32 - 12582 of 27111

On and on and on they chunter,
listen, anyone with cash to invest , of any amount over 100k, doesn`t look for rumour, doesn`t look for an " auction" for a vague "profit" from a patent (remember Sinclair).Of course Rothschild will take it up fees of 20k a day for an unlimited period?, give it me.
Show the City a profit forecast, how much, when and , oh add a 100% guarantee that no cash call is coming, to keep the directors in clover, then you might see--

1.A period where the share price increases by more than its spread
2.Half a million share sales are not sneaked in, "off LSE"
3.A lack of shorters
4.A rise in the share price which sticks

Until then its all childish hype from a couple of dozen anorak no-alls.
Register now or login to post to this thread.