for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

driver, are you learning french?

bos
No I use this good n it.

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

Cheat - but a great find

oh you sneaky bugger.

Now that PM1 is gone, perhaps you'd like to know that EVO has an unchanged target of 19p and an unchanged buy recommendation. They comment on the filter that the tobacco industry spends $4bn/year on cellulose acetate and that the seo filters can save $1.2bn a year! That should be worth a few quid? (Surely enough to pay BPRG, lol)

Also they comment that BAT has developed this 3 stage filter that still may be dangerous because of the cellulose acetate. For this reason, and the cost saving, other manufacturers may beat a path to seo. (Maybe BAT too..)

Ohh, and they also expect a pre-results statement, but think it may be as late as mid December.

On and on and on they chunter,
listen, anyone with cash to invest , of any amount over 100k, doesn`t look for rumour, doesn`t look for an " auction" for a vague "profit" from a patent (remember Sinclair).Of course Rothschild will take it up fees of 20k a day for an unlimited period?, give it me.
Show the City a profit forecast, how much, when and , oh add a 100% guarantee that no cash call is coming, to keep the directors in clover, then you might see--

1.A period where the share price increases by more than its spread
2.Half a million share sales are not sneaked in, "off LSE"
3.A lack of shorters
4.A rise in the share price which sticks

Until then its all childish hype from a couple of dozen anorak no-alls.

Biscuit - 08 Nov 2005 13:58 - 12572 of 12582
Greekman,
I wouldn't even bother replying to it, it's justthe usual suspects in their being negative while trying to appear positive mode. Strange how it's the same people each time.
Biscuit
------------
qchalmers
Biscuit, I suggest you read the question you posed to me this morning. You specifically asked which statements I felt were not ambiguous. To answer that I would need to re-read past RNS's so I think its pretty poor that you choose to mock me for trying to answer your question. Noting also that you would rather have a go at me than giving any real opinion on what I raised or what you consider the RNS to mean both now and in the future.
For the record, I would imagine that I am actually one of the longest holders in SEO on this thread having bought 9622 shares back on 4th March 2002. I have never sold any to date, have no plans to, have added significantly and want to add more.

-------------------

yep same rampers on several bb`s all the time, but some DO grow up into prescient holders

lol!!!!!!!!

cont`d
"Again, I will mention this. Some people on here were practically screeming from the rooftops when SEO issued an RNS for Frogpack claiming that it was massive. I have shown, and to date nobody has argued against the calculations that even if the US company(cant be arsed finding the RNS for the name) converted EVERY single item they sell to Frogpack it would only be worth 1.2m to SEO. But hey, if you would rather just believe that it was worth 10's of m then fine, but don't try and mock me for posting what I think is the facts.
I really don't think I will bother with this anymore as people should not have to justify themselves to people like you biscuit just because they don't happen to agree with you. I can't believe that asking whether the 'associated' patents were the fag patents or things like Starpol has brought such a reaction.
And biscuit, if you think I give one jot about my credibility in your eyes then you are very ------etc.etc.
--------------
Ah the smell of defeat.

Blinger, all you need to do is accept my bet that seo will not go to 8p before Christmas. Then you can eat instead of smelling. I'll bet you 10K are you game? Put up or shut up.

Blinger,
Please invest in a spellchecker/dictionary,if you did people might take you more seriously!!!!

NielsJensen,
what bet on a share on a FreeBB ,with a poster via a hotmail e-mail?ROTFFLMFAO!!
No wonder you are losing a fortune, get real man, I can make 10k for certain with spread bets (short or long) on this dog.
Hark SEO lovers, personally I care not if it is 0.008p or 80p by Xmas, as long as I make money at it, take a short with a stop loss, then a long, with a stop profit if it rises, if you want to kid yourself that your posting and petty punts make a difference, then so do.
As to "eating instead of smelling", presumably `eating` is the long system and `smelling ` the short, when the price rises shorters get " burned", but " longs" just average down.
Check the facts, shares fall 3X faster than they rise, ah!!! , smell the fear!!!!!!!

i can smell something....... not sure if it's fear.........

Blinger : i beg to differ .lf you did bother looking back you would see i got slated when i stated i believed the RNS reg. Frogpack to being an utter smokescreen; which to all intents and purposes was exactly what it was. . lts intention was never to deceive -as such-,,lol but rather like adrenalin pumped into you bolster or maintain a jittery s/p until the REAL news they KNEW was forecoming was available , That RNS was merely buying time for the a number of deals going through and far better negotiating with an m/c of 120 million than 80 million. 12 !! l called it the" Blue Peter scam " Now with the greatest of respect but lets not loose sight of the fact that many people rush out and buy stock after what they may construe a positive RNS and only realise upon full digestion that by pure definition it is absolute crap. Pure crap. And that Frogpack was i agree Blinger a load of pure crap ....................... But that was then.,,, And now is now . And "now" is all that matters in the city . ,,,,The dust has settled a little now. So much has changed since then . SEO is NOT a one product company. ln fact it is far from that. Chillingly as it turns out . lt is making aquisitions and allying itself to a number of operations culminating hopefully with developments turning into contracts reg.Asda/Wal Mart,,,,,blah blah ,,,,, a deal with Rotheschild too ofload various patents. ,,NOW lets get one thing straight here !! Merchant bankers like Lord R work for big beeeeeg mega $ . Clients like Governments , ministries, big banking conglomerates seek their advice. They have in thier employ an army of analysts whose wages dwarf even chelsea football players . They have Qc s on 3k an HOUR !! Thier fees probably exceed your 20k a day estimation . And by a fair mark. l have too many friends who work there not to know at least that much . The very notion of them " flogging off" various obscure patents on the cheap without absolute assurance that thier effort was going to be most handsomely rewarded is utterly ABSURD ! and i laughed my bollocks off at the very thought ,, . AND i mean ASSURANCES from the very start !!. No waffle/ Juste hard cash . . l am not trying to be clever nor sinister nor seek attention and for as long as this board has been going i have never mentioned it to anyone except one man on this board. , l have always wondered at the amazing physics this RF Tec is... But open your minds !!!! Among those patents exists many whose previos owner was a well known arms dealer who was ,err shall we say " discreetly discouraged " from selling them on any 3rd party any party whose means of use was loosely deemed "unsuitable " Basically the middle east ,,,,l know that to be fact and will be quoted on that. ln fact there is not much i dont know about Mr. K ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and then think about the actual principle of RF technology . The physics, or rather , the avenue of physics RF Tec takes one down. lt is quite chilling. lt is not unlike the nucleur question is it ?. Something of a double edged sword . lt can be used for both productive yet most devastating destructive effect. And now apply the whole package to the millitary,,,,....This is called sailing into bigtime on a side wind ..........Lm off to take my medication now ,,,,errr hold on ,,,,,,,while i answer the door from these aghhhhhhh ,,, @+ J

Blinger,

Well, another mad dog (did not mean TFC,but blinger). What can I say?

It's possible to set up a blind bet; we each pay the 10K into a trusted third party account. They then pay the winning party.

Well anyway, I guess you don't even have 10K to bet, so you'll be squelched on Friday unless you agree to my proposal. I urge other members to squelch him too and publish the action on this board.

Good night.

Hey Testex (paul ) what would old Brownie have made of this,,? LOL

or worse still Mikhail lol

tfc, what the bloody hell have you been drinking/smoking?

And you would win your bet Neils , l tried shorting below 12p when things looked much bleaker for SEO ,,and the support level appeared from nowhere . A veritable army . So i closed immediately . For although the cunning red fox crosses the great river he smarts at getting his tail wet. @+ J

i thought it was a different kashoggi to the armsdealer kashoggi. also, rf is seo's technology , not biotec's.

BOS. l do not drink my friend. ,,That decision was made for me ; not by me . There is a subtle difference ,,lol Dont you think ? Believe me ..lf i could i WOULD !!!...But ya all know what happens when you have too much fun ,,..?,,,,,,,plus i wasnt always in this game And you know what its like. You travel extensively .You encounter many new things ..and some bad habits ,,,,,,,,,Why do you ask ? Do you think i am mad ? lol ,,,,,,,lol oh you funny man ,,,Your only mad if your poor. lts a crime in this country. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,oh lol ..lncidentally i had a go on that babel translator and when i typed in the words " l Miss you " it came back as" i am bored of you" lol