The tiny Irish stock on the brink of landing 'the first' post-sanction oil deal in Iraq. Ref 'Fleet Street Letter' 12-04-04..

Morning all

This is my first post to this BB. Thanks to Toyko for steering me in this direction. In "another place" I am known as "Dogbawls" for those who read my posts there.

I agree that the quality of posting on this BB is certainly superior and thank Tokyo for extracting SWALF's very informative post. I hope that his very positive thoughts are realised when the announcements are made this week. They are aren't they?

One thing that I would advocate on this BB is a "recommend" button. It seems a pity that the good quality posts are not recognised by the more sensible thinkers on BB's in general.

Comments please

Oilywag

welcome to this side oilywag,
i`ve read your posts over there and find them interesting and informative. what is your thinking on how many contracts etc.?
dexter

Morning Oilywag, r u a fellow PET holder too?

A lot of commensense in the SWALF post. Looking at the details of the prrocurement conference, it certainly comes across as a trade fair and therefore about futures: thus not relevant to this particular procurement. We need to stick to the basics. The Iraqi Oil Ministry has set an end-November date. PET, hopefully as the only primary bidder, will have had a lot of work to do to finalise their tender against the Ministry specification. They will have wanted to know just how PET will deliver and that will include the contractor team and probably the risk sharing arrangements. When the tender is finalised it will no doubt need review to dot the i's, etc. That would mean another Horgan visit to Baghdad and his whereabouts do seem to leak out. One suspects that the end November date given did not leave much leaway, if any; why take the presssure off, particularly as the ensuing revenue will be so important to the incoming government? So end-November it should be, perhaps Monday, 29th. Might it slip in to December? They wouldn't want that to happen, but one can imagine the disruptive effect of the terrorism in the oil fields. The odds of success have risen in mind with the posts on this bb this month - the main thing is lack of any indications that a third party is active and might run off with the spoils. So, one and all, keep the faith!

Eric

Gra169 & dexter01 and othera who know me from "the other place" I am a PET holder, but do not hold quite as much as Tokyo Nick unfortunately.

As to the contracts? Well like other sensible people, I'm sitting on my hands (with fingers crossed) and hoping that the news will be soon and GOOD!

Oilywag

Morning all,
This thread is getting like it was earlier in the year ie. nearly slipping of the leader board !. It can`t be long now, we`ve just got to be patient a few more days, after all these months that won`t matter.
good luck to all, i`m sure there`s something at Boots to help ulcers!!,
Dexter

dexter01: I think the only thing left is for true believers to top up even more at these attractive prices! John

Theres an awful lot of conjucture on Fillyaboots at mo. All about the consultants that recieved 400k Pet shares in lieu of payment. But, i guess they are just going over old ground whilst awaiting news!!!!!!!!!! as we are!!!!

gra1969 - How are you over on Fillyaboots?

I don't think the consultants have sold their shares, not really sure if DH would have issued 400,000 shares just for them to sell them a couple of weeks later. They are perhaps in a better position than we are to understand what is going on, so anything is possible, but I would suspect they are waiting for the announcement just like us. Afraid I have no information on these consultants, so it is as much speculation as everyone else.

Tokyo

Last month John teeling released the following re AFD:

RNS Number:7760D
African Diamonds PLC
06 October 2004

6 October 2004

African Diamonds plc ("African Diamonds" or the "Company")

The Board of African Diamonds notes the recent increase in the Company's share
price. The Board is not aware of any specific reason for the recent price
movement. The Board will continue to keep the market advised of material
developments as they occur.

Contacts:

John Teeling, Chairman, African Diamonds plc +353 1 833 2833

Matthew Robinson/Jonathan Retter, Durlacher Ltd 0207 459 3600

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END

---------------------------


AFD sp had gone up by 20% -30% which prompted the above release. Now think about it: the same chairman of Pet, John Teeling, did not see fit to release a similar rns re Pet even when the sp went up over 350% (160p intraday) and is till over 250% (1 now)from its 40p.

What does this say to us: that JT think that even at this price 1 Pet is still undervalued. Therefore there should be so much upside even without the contracts rns!

Tokyo, just use Fillyaboots and Advfn etc for any further insights to be gained, much as else where and as you have previously posted there is a blackout on info and posters are constantly recycling info!

With he's fingers in all those pies PET, AFD ect: any views on how much he is worth.

This is crasy: You can only buy 1000 shares but sell 15000 shares. Is that 15 buyers for 1 seller! Barclaays stockbrokers! Very good omen indeed!

A damn sight more when PET follows the steps of Cairn, thats for sure!!!!!!!!!

Im afraid that this is just another post which reiterates what has been said previously - namely that we sit back and wait. I would however ask that patrons of this bb DO NOT fill their spare moments by ringing or emailing PET HQ as more than one poster on another bb has reported irritation creeping into responses to t/cs.

When there is nothing to say, all one can be is silent. :)
(Hugs) to all
- Jo

An article the surely signifies that the MOO is looking for 'neutral countries' to assist/partner on oil projects. Although not related to PET directly, thought it may be of interest to be noted.


From The Norway Post

24. November 2004

Oil & Gas: Iraq seeks cooperation with Norway

The Iraqi interim government wants cooperation with Norway on the development of its oil sector.

This initiative is now being discussed between Norwegian and Iraqi authorities, Foreign Minister Jan Petersen said in Parliament on Tuesday.

- What form this cooperation should have, with basis in the oil and gas competence we presently posess, will now be examined, Petersen said.

He also said that such cooperation may have a positive effect on Norwegian oil industry, and on trade between Norway and Iraq, and added that the Norwegian government has already allocated funds for initiatives in the business and industrial sector in Iraq.

(NRK)

Rolleiv Solholm

http://www.palladian-publications.com/Pipelines/Assets/NEAsi a.pdf

A report in English for you all gives reference to Japanese interests in the middle east through investments.

Of interest guys




Shell loses out in contest to develop Iraq's Kirkuk oil field

Terry Macalister
Thursday November 25, 2004
The Guardian

Shell has failed in a controversial attempt to win the first post-war contracts to develop oilfields in Iraq.
Hazim Sultan, Iraq's oilfield development director, said five companies had been shortlisted to evaluate the potential of the huge Kirkuk field in the north. A similar number are still in the race to study the Rumaila oilfields in the south. "I hope we will award the contracts for both projects within a month," he told Reuters.

Mr Sultan would not identify those companies still in the running for the deals. The issue is highly sensitive because of claims that the US and British invasion has been a "war for oil" that would only benefit the major energy companies.

Both Tony Blair and the energy industry itself insisted there was no economic self-interest at the heart of the decision to oust Saddam Hussein.

Both Shell and BP submitted bids for the work and the Anglo-Dutch group admitted last night that it had failed and BP said it had yet to hear.

"It's a decision for the ministry of oil. We respect that and we have no further comment to make," said a Shell spokesman. BP played down the significance of the work, arguing it was merely "reservoir engineering studies" that others believed was only worth $5m (2.7m) per contract.

Britain's biggest company denied there was any change in its former position of being wary about going into Iraq.

"This is technical work that could be done outside of Iraq. We would not be considering putting our own people into Iraq or becoming involved in a major scheme with the current air of uncertainty," BP said.


gra1969

www.ameinfo.com


Iraq shortlists major oil studies

Iraq has drawn up shortlists for its first post-war studies of its major oilfields, reported Reuters. Four to five companies will vie for the contract to evaluate the Kirkuk field, and five for the Rumaila oilfields in the south. Officials said contracts should be awarded within a month.

A lot seems to be being reported guys, this one is very interesting. A close watch on the sp today me thinks!!!!!!!!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do we have to wait another 4 weeks, and there are more companies after these contracts then i thought.