for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2769-1869301,00.html

willib5, your link doesn't work. also, it's pretty much the same article as the ones we saw last week. taking out 3 toxins will not make a ciggie safe, nothing will. seo have to push the green issue and the litter problem caused by discarded fag ends. but maybe it will be filtronic who show interest in buying the ip. ......just a thought and nothing more.

Bosley.
I copied and pasted the link ( sorry about that), however noticed you found it anyway.
I agree with you, cigarettes almost impossible to make safe.
However as the move has been made, inevitably a marketing campaign is sure to follow.
What I was trying to show was that it wont be based on a bio degradable filter tip, If SEO product doesnt do what the Trionic product does.
Consequently SEO are going to have to push the green issue.
Time will tell

I can't recall SEO making any claim that this made for a safer cigarette (I may be wrong). All I've read from SEO say a more environmentally friendly waste from it.
If that stops Leeds City Council loitering around trying to fine outdoor smokers 50 quid for dropping a cig end, then its fine by me!!

trionic filter seems to have been around for at least 3 years:
http://www.trdrp.org/Docs/NCTOH%20New%20Products%20Handout.pdf#search='trionic%20filter%20cigarette'

http://www.trdrp.org/Docs/NCTOH%20New%20Products%20Handout.pdf#search='trionic%20filter%20cigarette'

seo did make a big deal of the toxins found in smokers lungs from the current filters and that some of these toxins arn't in the starch filturds, (rispeck ii), but i agree that trying to push a safe ciggie is daft. much better to push the environmental angle which nobody can argue with, dissovles to water in 60 days, can only be beneficial.

Cellulose acetate appears to be one of the three components within the Trionic filter, so still scope for starch based material within these filters.

Don`t hold your breath- oh and watch the SP tomorrow for the truth.

As I read the part you refer to, boz, the only point it seemed to be trying to make was that fibres of the filters find their way into your lungs and stay forever, whereas starch based ones would break down, therefore being less harmful, but I may have missed the bit about toxins.

Blinger,

Curious, and what do you predict will happen tomorrow, and what would the "truth" be?

Just to be absolutely sure we/I understand exactly what you mean.

apologies, alan. you are correct. it is just filters getting into lungs, not toxins. i misremembered it.


see you in a bit, going for a fag.

garbyle.
I think the price will crash,
perhaps you don`t- its all in the lap of the Goods (no spelling mistake)

lol!!!!!!

Crash is a strong word.
Blinger, have you shorted.
If not, why not.
Let us have a direct answer, please.

Thanks Blinger,

I certainly hope it doesn't as I added another 335k on Thursday. Well you know what they say about a fool and his money!!

OH I do garbyle , we all do,fools etc.
Can we confirm you added another 335,000 SEO???????????
What time was the trade, did I mis it?

Predateur - guess which way I am invested, whatever ---its my business -ok?

Blinger,

If you really must know: 10/11/05 @ 10:13, 335k.

Not sure what purpose it serves you though.

I had halved my holding during the slide, but decided to top up as I believe we're now due a steady climb again.

Well done ,halved your holding.
At least you listened to common sense , away from that dreadful ramping web-site, `foulyerboots`, amazing losers!!!
I have never seen such goings on where the management can admit to holding a share, and ban people who are anti it--- still there is a first for everything I guess.
SEO have to fall, its too high for the market, simple as that

Goodnight.

morning. looks like another humdinger of a day in store.

Morning, Boz.
I don't think I can stand the excitement.
Now wheres that Prozac?
Alan